3,624 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Assess one bounded Proto UI Adapter question without changing repository or external state. Use for new-Adapter research, target compatibility, catalog readiness, reviewed Module support or omission evidence, Host Capability fidelity, lifecycle translation, dependency risk, or implementation readiness. Do not catalog, implement, repair, or approve the Adapter slice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sync Odylith registry component specs with implementation and governance evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refine an existing implementation plan with a second iteration. Re-analyzes the codebase for gaps, missing tasks, and wrong dependencies. Use after $aif-plan or to improve an $aif-fix plan. Optional +check flag validates refinements via a fresh-context subagent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
QA workflow for testing a feature or task implementation. Analyzes changes, produces test plans, and describes concrete test scenarios. Use when user says "test this", "write test plan", "what should I test", or "QA this branch".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan a feature or task in fast, full, or ultra mode. Ultra creates an indexed multi-file bundle with deeply specified phases for execution by a smaller model. Use for "plan", "new feature", "start feature", "create tasks", or exhaustive implementation planning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify completed implementation against the plan. Checks that all tasks were implemented, nothing was forgotten, code compiles, tests pass, and quality standards are met. Use after "$aif-implement" completes, or when user says "verify", "check work", "did we miss anything".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decide what to PERSIST in your data structures (graph nodes, DB tables, cache layouts) based on the QUERIES you must answer, not the DEFINITIONS that justify the data. Definitions tell you logical identity; storage strategy is independent. Materializing every definitional component leads to O(N×M) blow-ups that masquerade as memory leaks. Use when: (1) designing a new graph-node type, edge type, DB table, or cache layout; (2) about to name a `subgraph` / `comprises` / `members` / `contains` collection on a parent entity; (3) memory growth proportional to (entities × per-entity-elements); (4) "memory leak" debugging that survives multiple targeted patches — the leak may be storage shape, not retention; (5) pre-implementation sketch includes "for each X, store all reached nodes"; (6) research/spec doc says "X = ⟨A, B, C⟩" and you're tempted to make it three storage edges per X.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user needs to search or navigate code with Sourcegraph MCP tools. Provides disciplined search workflows for finding implementations, understanding systems, debugging issues, fixing bugs, and reviewing code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify completed implementation against the plan. Checks that all tasks were fully implemented, nothing was forgotten, code compiles, tests pass, and quality standards are met. Use after "$aif-implement" completes, or when user says "verify", "check work", "did we miss anything".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify completed implementation against the plan. Checks that all tasks were fully implemented, nothing was forgotten, code compiles, tests pass, and quality standards are met. Use after "/aif-implement" completes, or when user says "verify", "check work", "did we miss anything".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refine an existing implementation plan with a second iteration. Re-analyzes the codebase for gaps, missing tasks, and wrong dependencies. Use after $aif-plan or to improve an $aif-fix plan. Optional +check flag validates refinements via a fresh-context subagent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan implementation for a feature or task. Two modes — fast (single quick plan) or full (richer plan with optional git branch/worktree flow). Use when user says "plan", "new feature", "start feature", "create tasks".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
QA workflow for testing a feature or task implementation. Analyzes changes, produces test plans, and describes concrete test scenarios. Use when user says "test this", "write test plan", "what should I test", or "QA this branch".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refine an existing implementation plan with a second iteration. Re-analyzes the codebase for gaps, missing tasks, and wrong dependencies. Use after /aif-plan or to improve an /aif-fix plan. Optional +check flag validates refinements via a fresh-context subagent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintain governance artifacts without implementation work. Use when: (1) Accepting or refining ADRs, (2) Clarifying or amending RFCs without code changes, (3) Governance-only docs/check/render updates
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when running the full team/breezing flow end-to-end — all tasks with parallel workers. Do NOT load for: single-task implementation, planning, review, release, or setup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Choose the authorized worker channel and hand over complete engineering responsibilities, including in-scope self-check, repair and delivery. Use for substantial investigation, implementation, continuation and recovery — an ordinary substantial goal is enough, no special phrasing required; use swarm for approved independent batches. Respect the operator's standing ACP/native choice, explicit solo, and tiny or nearly finished work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designer's eye QA: finds visual inconsistency, spacing issues, hierarchy problems, AI slop patterns, and slow interactions — then fixes them. Iteratively fixes issues in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying with before/after screenshots. For plan-mode design review (before implementation), use /plan-design-review. Use when asked to "audit the design", "visual QA", "check if it looks good", or "design polish".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Spec-driven development workflow. Interactive phase-by-phase confirmation from proposal to implementation. Trigger: 'spec-flow', 'spec mode', 'need a plan', 'structured development', 'write a spec', 'feature spec', 'technical spec', '需求文档', '技术方案', '任务拆解', '规格驱动', '写个方案', '做个规划', '结构化开发', 'plan this feature', 'break this down', 'design doc'. Creates .spec-flow/ directory with proposal, requirements, design, and tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write an actionable markdown implementation plan, without executing it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When making code changes or reviewing existing code, check if architecture diagram matches implementation, and keep the diagram in sync.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coordinate the custom Elementor Widget site workflow for kickoff, lightweight company intake, conditional reference research, new-versus-existing site style routing, uncertain next steps, project resumption, or continuous work across content, Design Systems, UI, HTML, and Widget implementation. Do not use for release, old-Widget troubleshooting, theme development, or remote WordPress management.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or audit a complete, concise, UI-ready website page content framework from verified business facts before visual design. Use to define page goals, customer decision flow, section order, realistic draft copy, content and evidence needs, CTAs, or page-family rules; do not use for visual design, HTML, SEO implementation, or platform code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or evolve an implementation-agnostic website design system from existing-site evidence, verified brand inputs, and an optional Visual Reference Brief. Use to establish visual and restrained-motion baselines, extract an existing site's rendered system for style-preserving extensions, validate one selected baseline with a compact Design Board, or update shared rules before page/module design. Do not conduct cross-industry reference research, map Elementor settings, create page layouts, design modules, or implement production code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。