2,451 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Search an index of public repositories, GitHub issues, merged pull requests, repository READMEs, and curated documentation sites. Use when a programming question needs external documentation or upstream evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find the papers that answer a research query in Firecrawl's research paper index — a corpus of paper abstracts whose largest share is biomedical and life-science literature (PubMed, bioRxiv, medRxiv), alongside arXiv preprints in CS, physics, and math — using semantic search, semantic and structural expansion, and in-body verification. Use this skill for literature-finding and paper-retrieval tasks of any kind, including clinical, biomedical, drug, gene, disease, and other life-science questions, whether the answer is a single paper or a full multi-paper set. The index is reached only through the `firecrawl_research_*` MCP tools or the `firecrawl research` CLI subcommands. Calling `firecrawl_search` with its `categories` option set to `["research"]` is a different feature — it filters ordinary web search to research-affiliated websites (the list includes PubMed, bioRxiv, medRxiv, arXiv, and publisher sites) and returns page results from them, without querying the paper records in this index.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
An infographic skill for AI agents — works inside Claude Code, Codex, Hermes, OpenClaw, Cursor, and any agent host that loads skills. Create professional infographics as self-contained HTML files with PNG exports. Use when the user asks to create, design, generate, build, or make an infographic, data visualization, visual explainer, chart poster, cheatsheet, or pocket guide. Trigger phrases include "make this visual", "turn this into a graphic", "visualize this data", "infographic for X", "cheatsheet for X", or when the user provides structured data (tokenomics allocations, ecosystem/partner lists, timelines, comparisons, step-by-step processes) AND asks for a visual output. Covers tokenomics, ecosystem overviews, game overviews, cheatsheets, airdrop guides, comparisons, and process flows. Do NOT trigger for plain text answers, markdown tables, bulleted summaries, questions asking for advice or explanations about a topic (even when the topic is tokenomics, ecosystem, vesting, etc.), inline chat diagrams, or data processing with no visual output requested. The signal is "asks for a visual", not "mentions a keyword".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Clarify requirements before implementing. Use when serious doubts arise.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Every product will be AI-powered. The question is whether you'll build it right or ship a demo that falls apart in production.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
/cs:aims-audit <scope> — ISO/IEC 42001 AIMS internal-audit 6-question forcing interrogation. Use before certification stage 1, before annual internal audit cycles, or when onboarding a new AI system into an existing AIMS.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
/cs:ai-act-readiness <system> — EU AI Act 6-question forcing interrogation. Use during AI-system intake, before EU deployment, or during annual compliance refresh as Article 113 obligations phase in (2025-02-02 / 2025-08-02 / 2026-08-02 / 2027-08-02).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transform rough ideas into solid designs through structured questioning
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review proposed abstractions, dependencies, and configuration for concrete consumers and maintenance cost when simplifying a design or checking overengineering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Keep a small requested change focused when optional refactors, architectural redesign, or unrelated cleanup threaten to expand its scope.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify that a requested bug fix changes observable behavior with a failing-before, passing-after reproduction and honest execution evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a planned deployment or release diff for rollback feasibility, mixed-version compatibility, migrations, and configuration readiness without deploying it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit whether tests detect broken behavior by tracing assertions and running narrow controlled mutations in an isolated workspace; use for test-quality reviews, not routine test execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test a changed user interaction for realistic sequence failures such as double submission, stale responses, navigation, and recovery; use for interaction QA rather than general code review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Trace the purpose of suspicious legacy code using current callers, tests, and Git history when deciding whether it can be changed or removed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose an uncertain bug by designing experiments that distinguish competing causes, especially speculative cache, timing, environment, or concurrency explanations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for analytical thinking, or when a question needs breaking down and evidence: "why did metric X drop?", "what drives this?", "break this down", "what data do we need?". Builds a tree, hypotheses and evidence, ends with an answer and key uncertainty. Skip for quick verdicts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for first principles thinking, or when the user questions an inherited default: "why do we do it this way?", "is this cost really necessary?", "should we copy what competitors do?". Strips analogies and rebuilds from fundamentals. Skip for convention-following checklists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for Six Thinking Hats or de Bono's parallel thinking, or when a decision or idea needs facts, gut feel, risks, benefits and new options kept apart: "look at this from all sides", "full perspective check". Skip for plain factual questions or single-angle hot takes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a throwaway prototype to flush out a design before committing to it. Routes between two branches — a runnable terminal app for state/business-logic questions, or several radically different UI variations toggleable from one route. Use when the user wants to prototype, sanity-check a data model or state machine, mock up a UI, explore design options, or says "prototype this", "let me play with it", "try a few designs".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pressure-test an existing plan or design artifact until it is coherent enough for the next workflow step or plainly blocked. Use when the user wants to be grilled on a plan, design doc, PRD, ADR, rollout plan, migration runbook, rolling-wave project shape, or slice contract; when they say "grill me"; or when Codex should interrogate a source-of-truth artifact, inspect code and adjacent docs before asking, auto-answer evidence-backed questions, ask only about conflicts or low-confidence recommendations, edit the original file in place, preserve the artifact's existing format, and keep conclusions, blockers, readiness, and deferred work synchronized in the document.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research the codebase to answer a question without making any changes. Use when exploring code, understanding architecture, or investigating how something works.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。