「raft」の検索結果

Transition from static LLM chats to autonomous agents that execute multi-step tasks. Use this when you need to automate cross-platform reports (e.g., Snowflake to Google Docs), build self-service tools for non-technical teams, or create "anticipatory" engineering workflows that draft PRs based on Slack discussions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create/update .agent/constitution.md. Use when commands/boundaries/constraints must be confirmed before baseline or code changes. Draft v0 from repo evidence, then interview user.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert legal advisor specializing in technology law, compliance, and risk mitigation. Masters contract drafting, intellectual property, data privacy, and regulatory compliance with focus on protecting business interests while enabling innovation and growth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a high-thoroughness end-to-end implementation loop using clean worker worktrees, per-slice planning, implementation, explicit review/fix iteration, orchestrator integration, and final commit/PR drafting. Use when the user explicitly wants a Ralph/Wiggum-style loop, autonomous multi-agent execution, a delegated feature/bugfix carried from confirmed scope through review-ready completion, or RFC-driven implementation that should be reviewed, bumped to In Progress, decomposed into phases, and executed through nested sub-loops. Supports Codex subagents by default and external CLI workers such as OpenCode when explicitly requested and available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts implementation plans with TDD, documentation updates, and repository verification commands before coding. Use when the user asks for an implementation plan, /create-plan, or structured pre-implementation design for work in encero workspaces (e.g. Incan, IncQL).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft commit titles and optional commit bodies using the workspace commit naming convention. Use when the user asks for a commit message, commit text, commit title, or wants commit wording in the format `chore|bugfix|feature - <issue_id(s)> <short description>`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a PR description following the repository's pull request template. Use when the user asks to create, draft, or generate a PR description for a pull request. The skill automatically locates the PR template in the target repository and fills it in based on the git diff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Publish local Incan or Encero repository changes to GitHub using project standards. Use when the user asks to yeet, publish, commit and PR, push a branch and open a review-ready or draft PR from local changes while requiring the repo-local commit-message and PR-description conventions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transition an Incan RFC from one status to the next. Use when the user asks to promote, advance, or finalize an RFC, or says /bump-rfc. Handles Draft → Planned, Planned → In Progress, and In Progress → Implemented transitions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write the postmortem for an incident, in its incident channel, once it is mitigated or resolved. Use on "write up this incident", "postmortem", "incident summary", "what happened here for people who weren't around", "draft the retro", or when the oncall memory says incidents of this severity get one. Reads the incident channel (and the alert thread it came from), the investigation findings and the data behind them, and writes a one-screen, zero-context write-up: what happened, impact with numbers, detection, timeline with durations, why it happened, what fixed it, follow-ups with proposed owners, and one before/during/after chart. Posted and pinned in the incident channel as its final pinned post, with edit requests updating that one pinned post in place — unless the person or the team's conventions say write-ups live elsewhere, in which case it is written there and only a link is posted, nothing pinned. A person edits and publishes it; never assigns blame.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Лёгкий советник «раздвигающий шторки» — premortem-сессия которая находит дыры в плане с разных углов, предлагает варианты решений по каждой и помогает юзеру быстро принять осознанные решения. История запусков сохраняется в ./docs/premortem/. Use when user types «премортем», «premortem», «найди дыры в плане», «посмотри со стороны на план», «what could kill this plan». Do NOT use for: vague ideas without a concrete plan; one-right-answer questions; creative editing of a draft; already-irreversible decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iteratively edit and refine a named plan for a task through a conversational loop. Each round, the current plan is shown and the user is asked whether to keep refining, mark the plan as done, or proceed to the implementation or draft. Use when the user wants to plan a task purely through chat-driven refinement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Edit Source Code: Use when the user wants to "edit" the code base in one shot from a query or a bare analyzer issue id like "P1", fusing crafting, refactoring, and resolving with optional grilling, verification, looping, and Git worktree isolation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing, expanding, rewriting, or drafting any chapter (.mdx) or Go exercise for this book. Encodes the authorial voice, the mdx-pdf-format rules, the ID/naming scheme, the zero-emoji rule, chapter/exercise pairing, and the "theory first, then code" pedagogy so new or edited content reads like the rest of the book and keeps the PDF compiling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating outreach sequences, writing cold email campaigns, building multi-channel cadences, designing follow-up flows, or crafting signal-triggered messages. Triggers: 'build an outreach sequence', 'write a cold email sequence', 'create a cadence', 'outreach for [signal]', 'email sequence', 'follow-up sequence', 'multi-channel outreach'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate and improve GitHub Well-Architected Framework (WAF) documentation under the content/ folder for architectural correctness, decision quality, explicit trade-offs, and actionable guidance. Use this when reviewing pull requests, markdown files, or draft content in content/ to ensure recommendations are technically sound, context-aware, and guide readers toward correct architecture and design decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review and refine GitHub Well-Architected Framework (WAF) documentation under the content/ folder for clarity, precision, consistency, and publication readiness. Use this when reviewing pull requests, markdown files, or draft content in content/ to ensure guidance is unambiguous, readable, and aligned with editorial standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and operate a complete, brand-neutral Reddit intelligence system with approved read-only monitoring, grouped keyword rules, evidence-backed AI scoring, a persistent opportunity bank, dashboard review, urgent-alert and weekly-digest previews, content briefs, and human-only response drafts. Use for "reddit intelligence", "reddit monitor", "reddit listener", "watch subreddits", "find reddit opportunities", "content ideas from reddit", "community listening", or setting up this workflow for a client or brand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a single piece of marketing content using the marketing harness frameworks and quality gates. Supports blog posts, LinkedIn articles, emails, cold outreach, press releases, ad copy, and TikTok scripts. Automatically loads the right framework, skill contract, and persona. Use when "write a blog post", "draft an email", "LinkedIn article", "cold outreach", "write ad copy", "press release", "TikTok script", or any single content creation request. For building a complete email system, use /kai-email-system instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Line-editor pass on any content draft against a client voice guide. Flags cadence issues, signature-move overuse, voice-guide violations, receipt gaps — things a rule-based gate can't catch. Use after /content-gate and before human review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when 高教社杯/CUMCM/电工杯 mathematical modeling abstracts, keywords, highlights, first-page claims, or high-density summaries need drafting, revision, audit, or style diagnosis, especially when feedback mentions too many numbers, weak focus, process-listing, empty official prose, buzzwords, missing structure, weak keywords, unsupported values, or first-page claim verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write or rewrite prose so it sounds like a human wrote it — not a frontier model. Named in homage to Rabindranath Tagore, whose prose carried what frontier models reach for and miss: a point of view, specificity over abstraction, and restraint over puffery. Merges two complementary approaches: a 29-pattern catalog of AI tells (from humanizer) plus an 8-rule operating system with an 8-dimension scoring gate (extending stop-slop). Use when drafting, editing, or reviewing any prose: essays, posts, docs, reports, emails. Detects and removes inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary, passive voice, negative parallelisms, filler phrases, inanimate-verb constructions, narrator-from-a-distance voice, and metronomic rhythm. Adds back the things AI writing usually lacks: point of view, stakes, specificity, restraint, varied rhythm, and trust in the reader.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate the repo workflow from brief through draft PR using skills and thin role wrappers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Avoid AI Writing when an agent needs a repeatable audit, rewrite, or in-place edit workflow for removing AI writing patterns from draft prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。