3,348 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Run CodeQL static analysis for security vulnerability detection, taint tracking, and data flow analysis. Use when asked to analyze code with CodeQL, create CodeQL databases, write custom QL queries, perform security audits, or set up CodeQL in CI/CD pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze code changes for security vulnerabilities using LLM reasoning and threat model patterns. Use for PR reviews, pre-commit checks, or branch comparisons.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic code maturity assessment using Trail of Bits' 9-category framework. Analyzes codebase for arithmetic safety, auditing practices, access controls, complexity, decentralization, documentation, MEV risks, low-level code, and testing. Produces professional scorecard with evidence-based ratings and actionable recommendations. (project, gitignored)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extracts and analyzes competitors' ads from ad libraries (Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) to understand what messaging, problems, and creative approaches are working. Helps inspire and improve your own ad campaigns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Unified messaging via three access tiers — MCP (live API), beeper-cli (authenticated CLI), and direct SQLite→DuckDB (full archive). Search, analyze, and act across all networks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Purpose: Standardize how stakpak designs and optimizes AWS architectures. Scope: Greenfield: design new infrastructure. Brownfield: analyze existing architectures and propose improvements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs initial binary triage by surveying memory layout, strings, imports/exports, and functions to quickly understand what a binary does and identify suspicious behavior. Use when first examining a binary, when user asks to triage/survey/analyze a program, or wants an overview before deeper reverse engineering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Access AlphaFold's 200M+ AI-predicted protein structures. Retrieve structures by UniProt ID, download PDB/mmCIF files, analyze confidence metrics (pLDDT, PAE), for drug discovery and structural biology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search academic papers across arXiv, PubMed, Semantic Scholar, bioRxiv, medRxiv, Google Scholar, and more. Get BibTeX citations, download PDFs, analyze citation networks. Use for literature reviews, finding papers, and academic research.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze, improve, or represent processes across a file or directory by delegating to process-siren. Uses the same semantic model and validation loop as single-process work; Mermaid is produced when it is the useful concise representation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs the description-drift experiment — spawns all Claude Code agents simultaneously to collect self-reported capabilities, then compares them against static frontmatter descriptions to reveal how reliable orchestrator routing based on descriptions actually is. Use when measuring description drift across the agent fleet, re-running the capability collection experiment, analyzing a specific agent's self-reported capabilities, or auditing whether frontmatter descriptions accurately reflect agent behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Start a complete plugin refactoring workflow that analyzes plugin structure, creates a refactoring plan with tasks, and guides through execution. Use when you need to refactor an entire plugin — triggers assessment, design, planning, and parallel agent execution phases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze and improve processes or systems using an explicit semantic model, adaptive instruction resolution, evidence-driven change, and claim-level validation. Use when reviewing process quality, resolving ambiguity or gaps, deciding how much procedural detail is necessary, or validating consequential process behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Claude Code session log schema — JSONL record types, message structure, tool call/result pairing, subagent file locations, team session layout, task/plan/team configuration paths. Use when parsing ~/.claude/projects/**/*.jsonl files, writing PostToolUse hooks that measure response sizes, building session analyzers, or any agent that reads or queries Claude session transcripts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Grooms a GitHub milestone for parallel execution — batch-grooms ungroomed items, assesses scope gaps, analyzes cross-item dependencies via Impact Radius overlap, builds conflict groups, assigns items to execution waves, and persists the dispatch plan via dispatch_create_plan MCP tool. Calls dispatch_wave_start per wave to register state. Use when preparing a milestone for /work-milestone execution. Pass the milestone number as the first argument. Requires milestone items assigned via /group-items-to-milestone.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze git repository history to produce a codebase risk profile before code review. Probes repo size, runs 7 parallel git analysis pipelines (hotspots, bug magnets, bus factor, contributor momentum, firefighting frequency, newly added files), cross-references hotspots with bug magnets to identify high-risk files with primary owner annotation, and writes walkthrough/recon-report.md. Use before code review to prioritize reviewer attention, at the start of linear-walkthrough Phase 1 Discovery to weight file coverage, or when onboarding to an unfamiliar codebase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze git branches and generate structured MR/PR descriptions with domain-based change categorization — bug fixes, enhancements, technical debt, documentation, testing, build/CI, and non-functional changes. Use when preparing merge request descriptions, pull request bodies, writing changelogs from git diffs, documenting branch changes, or generating release notes. Works with GitHub and GitLab without requiring JIRA or issue tracker integration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when answering business analytics, RevOps, GTM metric, pipeline, revenue, funnel, customer, or warehouse questions with Deepline. Triggers on phrases like 'query Snowflake', 'analyze pipeline', 'total ACV', 'break down by quarter', 'use the semantic layer', 'run a semantic query', or any use of snowflake_get_semantic_layer / snowflake_run_semantic_query. Skip prospecting, enrichment, contact finding, outbound, or personalization workflows; use deepline-gtm for those.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze upstream specs (agentskills.io, Claude Code plugin/marketplace format, OpenAI Codex plugins/marketplace, OpenClaw, MCP and MCP Registry, CodeRabbit, APM) for changes, identify gaps in skillsaw's rule coverage, and create or update PRs to close those gaps. Use when performing periodic maintenance on the skillsaw linter.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits fielded survey-response data for registered elements, data quality, bot and AI-automation screening, and sample integrity, and produces an appendix-ready quality report. Use at soft launch before full field, after fielding before outcomes are analyzed, or when asked what a study did about bots and AI respondents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit fielded survey response data for registered elements, data quality, bot and AI-automation screening, and sample integrity, and emit an appendix-ready quality report. Use at soft launch or after fielding, before outcomes are analyzed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deterministic Software Graph analysis via Ontoly CLI and MCP. Use when: (1) Codebase architecture, dependency, route, service, module, configuration, or impact questions need graph evidence, (2) A repository should be analyzed before source search, (3) You need a persistent SoftwareGraph.json for validation, MCP, or agent workflows. Triggers: "build software graph", "trace route", "impact analysis", "architecture summary", "dependency graph", "what uses this", "Ontoly".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-step reasoning engine for complex analysis and systematic problem solving. Use when: (1) Complex debugging scenarios with multiple layers, (2) Architectural analysis and system design, (3) Problems requiring hypothesis testing and validation, (4) Multi-component failure investigation, (5) Performance bottleneck identification. Triggers: "--think", "--think-hard", "--ultrathink", "analyze step by step", "break down this problem", "systematic analysis". IMPORTANT: Do NOT use for simple single-step tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。