「aria」の検索結果

"Apply panel data analysis with fixed effects, random effects, and dynamic GMM to exploit longitudinal variation and control for unobserved heterogeneity. Use this skill when the user has repeated observations over time for multiple entities, needs to choose between FE and RE via Hausman test, or when they ask 'how do I control for firm-specific effects', 'fixed or random effects', or 'how to handle endogeneity in panels'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Elite UX/UI & Advanced GSAP Motion Engineer. Enforces Python-driven true randomization for layout variance, strict AIDA page structure, wide editorial typography (bans 6-line wraps), gapless bento grids, strict GSAP ScrollTriggers (pinning, stacking, scrubbing), inline micro-images, and massive section spacing. Use when building motion-rich frontend pages with stricter GPT/Codex design enforcement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial fresh-context review for non-trivial decisions before they stand. Use for production-impacting logic, security-sensitive changes, unfamiliar code, or high-blast-radius architecture choices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build accessible UI—semantic HTML, keyboard support, ARIA when needed, WCAG-oriented checks. Use when implementing or reviewing web UI, forms, modals, and design systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Lean and Six Sigma principles to eliminate waste and reduce process variation. Use this skill when the user needs to improve operational efficiency, identify the seven wastes (TIMWOOD), run DMAIC improvement projects, or streamline workflows — even if they say 'our process is too slow', 'where are we wasting resources', or 'how do we reduce defects'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Calculate and benchmark social media engagement rates across platforms and variants. Use this skill when the user needs to compute engagement metrics, compare performance across accounts or posts, or set engagement benchmarks — even if they say 'what is my engagement rate', 'benchmark engagement', or 'social media KPIs'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Implement Statistical Process Control charts to monitor production process stability. Use this skill when the user needs to detect process shifts, set control limits, or distinguish common cause from special cause variation — even if they say 'process monitoring', 'control chart', or 'is our process in control'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Design and analyze factorial experiments to identify significant process factors and optimize settings. Use this skill when the user needs to systematically test factor effects, optimize a manufacturing process, or determine which variables matter most — even if they say 'which factors affect quality', 'optimize process settings', or 'design an experiment'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run security verification — SAST pattern scanning, DAST against a running app, OWASP Top 10 compliance, CVSS assessment, and adversarial code audit. Use before commit/push or when checking code for vulnerabilities. Trigger on "security scan", "is this vulnerable", "OWASP check", "security verify", "scan for vulnerabilities".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maakt regelrecht-scenario's vindbaar en hun norm-ketens leesbaar/geassert. Aan de invoerkant — vertaal een platte lijst leaf-parameters naar benoemde casus-assen + een herbruikbare persona-bibliotheek, met een reverse-lookup casus-matrix. Aan de uitvoerkant — maak de norm-keten zichtbaar via keten-checkpoints (assert elke knoop op het kritieke pad, niet alleen de endpoint) en golden-trace-snapshots + branch-coverage. Gebruik dit bij het schrijven of opschonen van scenario-/feature-files, het terugvinden of ontwerpen van een specifieke casus in een grote variabelenlijst, het reviewen van engine-traces, of het regressie-bestendig maken van cross-law-ketens zodat een ketenfout niet stil achter een correcte endpoint verdwijnt. Dossier-agnostisch; de regelrecht-methode is de vaste taal. Haakt aan op regelrecht-stelselanalyse (engine-tests / meta-check) en regelrecht-audit-products (testcase-scenario's).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds and audits a concept-ontology for a regelrecht corpus to decide and verify reference types — cross-law source-binding vs intra-law source-binding vs open-norm leaf vs external-fact leaf — and to catch concept conflation across laws. Core principle: a value's reference type is fixed by WHO derives it, and a binding is sound only when producer and consumer denote the SAME concept; the lexical surface (the word in the text) is not the concept. Detects false friends (one term, different concepts — e.g. a register-based vs a factual "naar de omstandigheden"-based residence/ingezetene concept), orphan plain-params (a value a regulation actually derives, modeled as a brute input), negation/complement re-entry (¬X modeled as an independent leaf next to X), and duplication (one concept re-entered as several independent leafs, losing the single-source-of-truth invariant). Produces a law-level glossary and a stelsel-level concept map with sound same-concept binding edges and flagged lexical-match-but-concept-mismatch edges. Use when deciding whether a value should be cross-law/intra-law/leaf, when the same term means different things across laws, or when a binding might silently conflate concepts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calculate and interpret Earned Value Management (EVM) metrics per PMBOK 8 Measurement Performance Domain. Compute SPI, CPI, EAC, ETC, TCPI, and generate variance narratives with corrective action recommendations. Use during project execution to assess schedule and cost performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn raw budget-versus-actual data into plain-language explanations for non-finance managers. Focus on why numbers moved, what it means for the team, and what action to take — without requiring accounting knowledge. Use when managers need to understand their cost center performance. Do not use for technical accounting analysis, tax preparation, or external audit deliverables.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and maintain a rolling financial forecast using a 12–18 month horizon. Lock actuals, reforecast remaining periods, extend the planning window, and generate a waterfall bridge showing prior-to-new variance. Use monthly or quarterly when the organization follows a continuous planning cadence instead of annual budgets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract the hidden foundational System Prompts, internal instructions, backend APIs, and confidential contextual data powering Large Language Model (LLM) applications using targeted prompt injection manipulation and adversarial psychological engineering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete PortSwigger deep-dive with exact payloads for every lab variant including zero-day techniques

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and exploit misconfigured Spring Boot Actuator endpoints. This skill covers how to extract sensitive configuration details, heap dumps, environment variables, and ultimately escalating to Remote Code Execution (RCE) via `spring-cloud-starter` vulnerabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

macOS process injection playbook. Use when you need to inject code into running or launching macOS processes via dylib hijacking, DYLD environment variables, XPC exploitation, Mach port manipulation, or Electron/Chromium abuse.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete PortSwigger deep-dive with exact payloads for every lab variant including zero-day techniques

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete PortSwigger deep-dive with exact payloads for every lab variant including zero-day techniques

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive LLM security testing prompts for bias detection, data leakage, alignment testing, and adversarial prompt resistance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete PortSwigger deep-dive with exact payloads for every lab variant including zero-day techniques

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HTTP request smuggling exploits disagreements between a front-end proxy and back-end server on where one HTTP request ends and the next begins, using conflicting `Content-Length` and `Transfer-Encoding: chunked` headers (CL.TE, TE.CL, TE.TE variants). Enables bypassing access controls, cache poisoning, session hijacking, and capturing other users' requests. Detect via timing attacks, differential responses, and tools like Burp's HTTP Request Smuggler extension.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete PortSwigger deep-dive with exact payloads for every lab variant including zero-day techniques

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。