「hn」の検索結果

Institutional-grade equity research skills for AI agents. 80 Claude-type skills across 14 verticals (equity-research-core, models-and-pitches, bio-pharm, scenarios, quantitative-analysis, idea-generation, options-derivatives, business-intelligence, industry-analysis, macro-strategy, portfolio-strategy, technical-analysis, risk-and-psychology, trading-as-business) powered by agentii.ai's agent-use-ready SEC filing data plane — SEC filings and 15K+ earnings call transcripts, 15.99M XBRL facts, and company profiles for 1,146+ US-public-equity tickers. Features the three-layer retrieval protocol (Document Discovery → Page Map → Deep Read, with deep-outline escalation) — measured, not asserted: 97.5% saved against a sequential read, and the page map itself is 10.0% of one (spec 062 T030, 2026-09-23) — server-side parallel multi-period search via search_cross_period, a full Excel/PPT generation pipeline with 3-tier office backend support, and the spec-046 governance layer (constitution, thesis and single-skill modes, mechanical gates, and a template-owned disclaimer on generated reports).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Risk analysis, regulatory risk assessment, competitive risk, macro risk, technology risk, litigation risk, financial risk assessment, enterprise risk, operational risk, geopolitical risk exposure

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provider-independent media quality control and delivery direction for generated images, video, audio, ads, product content, social clips, broadcast and streaming assets, localization packages, and mixed-source edits. Use when an agent must define final export specs, inspect technical and perceptual quality, check captions/audio/color/accessibility/provenance/rights, create delivery sheets, version filenames, checksums, manifests, package deliverables, set acceptance or rejection criteria, and perform final delivery QA before handoff to a platform, broadcaster, streamer, client, or ad trafficker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce full-length audiobooks and long-form narration with generative voice tools. Use when the task is to turn a manuscript or long text into hours of spoken audio: preparing the manuscript for narration (front/back matter, footnotes, tables, dialogue), casting a single narrator or full cast, controlling pronunciation and voice consistency across a whole book, running a proofing/QC listen, meeting a retailer's technical delivery specs (RMS, peak, noise floor, room tone, chapterized files, metadata), and choosing a distribution route under each platform's current AI-narration policy. Not for short TTS clips, single-line voiceover, podcast production, or captioning existing video.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage per-feature living documents that capture decisions, constraints, and reasoning across AI sessions during active development. Scoped to feature-level work — design, implementation, bugfix, refactor — not for codebase-wide assessments or product-wide specifications (those define their own document lifecycles). Handles creating new context documents, loading existing ones, and enriching them with new decisions. Use when starting a new feature, resuming work, making technical decisions, resolving questions, or when context needs to persist across sessions. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'load context', 'update context', 'context doc', 'decisions', 'continue where we left off', 'what did we decide', or 'capture this decision'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply requirement quality principles when generating or validating feature specifications. Enforces feature completeness, scenario structure, AC verifiability, feature independence, and implementation slice quality. Use when writing feature specs, validating existing requirements, or when the user mentions 'validate this spec', 'check this feature', 'requirement quality', 'is this spec complete', or 'requirement-quality'. This skill governs the craft of writing individual feature specifications — not technical design (see design-blueprint), not implementation (see code-forge).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quantifies CRISPR editing outcomes with CRISPResso2 (Clement 2019 Nat Biotechnol) across Cas9-nuclease (indels, HDR), CBE and ABE base editors (target conversion + bystander), and prime editor (pegRNA-templated) modes. Covers single-amplicon (CRISPResso), multi-sample batch (CRISPRessoBatch), pooled-amplicon (CRISPRessoPooled), WGS off-target (CRISPRessoWGS), and sample-comparison (CRISPRessoCompare) workflows; quantification-window math that controls what is called edited; substitution-vs-indel diagnostic to distinguish BE from Cas9 contamination; MMEJ deletion pattern interpretation; allele-frequency tables; and failure modes from amplicon misalignment or contamination. Use when quantifying editing from amplicon sequencing, choosing CRISPResso mode by design, distinguishing intended edits from bystanders and indel byproducts, debugging low-alignment runs, or generating publication-grade editing reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Alpha and beta diversity analysis for microbiome data. Calculate within-sample richness, evenness, and between-sample dissimilarity with phyloseq and vegan. Use when comparing community composition across samples or testing for group differences in microbiome structure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify differentially bound regions across CLIP-seq conditions (knockdown vs control, treatment vs vehicle, disease vs healthy) using DEWSeq (sliding-window DESeq2), Flipper (Skipper-downstream), ASpeak, edgeR, or limma-voom. Use when computing condition-level changes in RBP binding intensity, choosing peak-level vs window-level vs crosslink-level testing, designing replicate experiments, or distinguishing biological binding shifts from technical confounders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs experiments to minimize and account for batch effects using balanced layouts and blocking strategies. Use when planning multi-batch experiments, assigning samples to sequencing lanes, or designing studies where technical variation could confound biological signals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Integrate multiple scRNA-seq samples/batches using Harmony, scVI, Seurat anchors, and fastMNN. Remove technical variation while preserving biological differences. Use when integrating multiple scRNA-seq batches or datasets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calculates species richness, diversity, and turnover using the Hill number framework with iNEXT coverage-based rarefaction/extrapolation, asymptotic diversity estimation, and beta diversity partitioning (betapart turnover vs nestedness). Compares assemblages using coverage-standardized rather than size-standardized rarefaction. Use when quantifying biodiversity from species abundance or incidence data, comparing diversity across sites, or constructing rarefaction curves. Not for clinical 16S microbiome alpha/beta diversity (see microbiome/diversity-analysis).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Source technical and professional talent by combining LinkedIn profiles, GitHub contributions, and company intelligence. Identifies candidates with specific skills, assesses expertise depth, and provides outreach context for recruiting teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research npm packages — download stats, dependencies, maintainers, version history, and security advisories. Useful for technology due diligence, dependency auditing, and evaluating package reliability before adoption.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research GitHub user profiles including repositories, contributions, languages, stars, and activity patterns. Useful for developer talent sourcing, open-source community research, and technical due diligence on engineering teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate high-quality Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) for software systems and AI-powered features. Includes executive summaries, user stories, technical specifications, and risk analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply systematic problem-solving methodologies to complex challenges. Use when the user says "guide me through structured problem solving" or "I want to crack this challenge with guided problem solving techniques"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce an intensive, cited analytical report: executive summary, multi-angle findings, contrarian views, open questions, and full sources. Use only when the user needs rigorous synthesis of a complex topic (scientific, technical, policy, or market-analytical) that cannot be answered with a short search, and wants a formal written report, not a recommendation list. Do not use for product picks, top-N lists, quick lookups, or routine "find out about X" tasks. If the request does not clearly need this kind of report, do not use this skill. Do not use for a literature review over published papers. This skill collects evidence from the open web. A request for the literature on a biomedical, clinical, life-science, or other scientific topic — papers, studies, trials, preprints — belongs to firecrawl-research-papers, which queries Firecrawl's paper index (PubMed, bioRxiv, medRxiv, arXiv) instead of searching websites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and synthesize research papers, whitepapers, PDFs, technical reports, and academic sources with Firecrawl Research, using semantic paper search, related-paper expansion, and in-body verification over Firecrawl's paper index — largely biomedical and life-science literature from PubMed, bioRxiv, and medRxiv, plus arXiv preprints in CS, physics, and math. Use when the user wants a literature review, systematic review, survey of studies, paper summary, research landscape, or sourced synthesis from scholarly and industry publications, including clinical, drug, gene, disease, epidemiology, and public-health topics. Prefer this over a general web-research workflow whenever the evidence base is published papers rather than web pages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate structured lead lists from prospect databases and web directories with Firecrawl browser. Use for finding prospects by role, company type, industry, stage, location, technologies, or other criteria and exporting CRM-ready JSON or CSV.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs comprehensive, multi-layered research on any topic with structured analysis and synthesis of information from multiple sources. Use when the user needs thorough investigation, market research, technical deep-dives, due diligence, or comprehensive analysis on any subject.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use production telemetry as INPUT to design new tests. Covers OpenTelemetry integration with tests, trace-based assertions, log-informed test creation, production-error analysis for coverage gaps, and telemetry-driven test prioritization. Use when: "trace-based testing," "design tests from logs," "OpenTelemetry assertions," "production errors point to test gaps," "telemetry-driven testing." Not for: safe rollout techniques (flags, canary) during release — use testing-in-production. Not for: scheduled post-deploy probes — use synthetic-monitoring. Not for: triaging CI failures — use ai-bug-triage. Related: testing-in-production, synthetic-monitoring, qa-metrics, ai-bug-triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Safe-release techniques DURING rollout: feature flags, progressive rollouts, canary analysis, guardrail metrics, production smoke tests, and synthetic users. Bridges QA and SRE practices. Use when: "feature flag testing," "canary deploy," "progressive rollout," "guardrail metrics," "dark launch," "safe rollout." Not for: scheduled probes that run continuously after release — use `synthetic-monitoring`. Not for: designing tests from prod telemetry — use `observability-driven-testing`. Related: release-readiness, synthetic-monitoring, observability-driven-testing, qa-metrics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scheduled probes that run CONTINUOUSLY after release. Covers probe design for critical user journeys, alerting integration, SLA validation, multi-region monitoring, and the boundary between QA and SRE. Use when: "synthetic monitoring," "uptime testing," "scheduled probes," "SLA validation," "availability monitoring," "post-deploy checks." Not for: safe-release techniques during rollout — use testing-in-production. Not for: designing tests from prod telemetry — use observability-driven-testing. Not for: a one-shot post-deploy smoke gate tied to a release — use release-readiness. Related: testing-in-production, release-readiness, performance-testing, qa-metrics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。