3,033 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Review pytest test effectiveness against authoritative contracts, relevant faults, behavior-preserving refactors, realistic boundaries, isolation, and diagnostics. Use for test-quality audits, coverage-gap reviews, regression-test changes, or mocking reviews; preserve existing project gates rather than inventing coverage targets.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Auto-selects and enforces the strongest valid Python typing lane for the detected Python version and dependencies — no user input required. Use when adding or tightening type annotations, eliminating Any usage in internal code, designing boundary validators or parsers, choosing between stdlib typing (TypedDict, Protocol, dataclasses), Pydantic models, or Hypothesis property tests, addressing ty or mypy failures, or applying version-specific features (TypeIs, ReadOnly, PEP 695 generics, PEP 649 deferred evaluation). Enforces boundary isolation — raw payloads validated immediately at ingress and returned as typed internal objects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Executes a groomed milestone with parallel kage-bunshin sessions in isolated worktrees. Use when a milestone has been groomed and /groom-milestone has produced a dispatch plan. Reads the dispatch plan, creates an integration branch, spawns one kage-bunshin (independent claude -p process) per wave item in its own worktree — each session is a full orchestrator with the Agent tool. Sequentially merges worktree branches, relays wave discoveries to subsequent waves, then lands the integration branch to main. Takes a milestone number as argument.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Register a plan artifact via the MCP backlog server. Use when you produce a document or report that downstream agents or worktree-isolated environments need to retrieve — feature-context, codebase-analysis, architect, T0-baseline, TN-verification, or research artifacts. Triggers include "store an artifact", "register a plan artifact", "write a report to the backlog", "upload artifact content".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute structured acceptance checks and record their observed results for later comparison. Use to capture a pre-change baseline or a post-change verification state without treating expected nonzero baseline results as execution failure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review test effectiveness against authoritative contracts, relevant fault detection, refactor tolerance, boundary fidelity, isolation, and diagnostic value. Use when auditing test quality, reviewing coverage gaps, improving regression protection, or assessing tests after a change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GTM prospecting, enrichment, outreach, and Deepline Play work/audits. Providers: adyntel,affinity,ai_ark,akta,allegrow,amplemarket,apify,attention,attio,aviato,bettercontact,bigquery,bluesky,bounceban,brave,browserbase,builtwith,cbinsights,clay,clickhouse,cloudflare,contactout,contextdev,crunchbase,crustdata-v3,customer_db,databricks,dataforseo,datagma,dealroom,deepline_ip_to_company,deepline_native,deeplineagent,discolike,dropleads,edges,emailbison,emailguard,enformion,enigma,exa,findymail,firecrawl,fireflies,firmable,forager,fullenrich,fundable,generic_http,getleads,gong,google_ads_audiences,google_workspace,govfiles,grain,hackernews,harvestapi,heyreach,hubspot,hunter,icypeas,instantly,intercom,ipqs,kaspr,kernel,leadmagic,lemlist,limadata,linkedin_ads_audiences,luma,lusha,meta_audiences,millionverifier,nooks,notion,openmart,opensosdata,openwebninja,outreach,parallel,peopledatalabs,pitchbook,podscan,polymarket,postgres,predictleads,prospeo,quickenrich,rapidapi,redshift,rocketreach,salesforce,salesforge,….
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when a human needs to review a Deepline Play result and hand feedback, labels, or approval back to the agent for revision, evaluation, comparison, or bounded iteration. Triggers on “put this run in a Sheet,” “review these results,” “read my feedback,” “make this a standing rule,” “never regress on this case,” “compare these runs,” “keep improving,” or “add the revised run to the same spreadsheet.” Skip ordinary Play authoring or execution with no human review loop, generic spreadsheet work, and one-off CSV export.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Track and analyze US government shutdown liquidity impacts by monitoring TGA (Treasury General Account), bank reserves, EFFR, and SOFR data from FRED API. Use when user wants to (1) analyze current or past government shutdown effects on financial markets, (2) track liquidity conditions during fiscal policy disruptions, (3) assess "stealth tightening" effects, (4) compare shutdown episodes across different monetary policy regimes (QE vs QT), or (5) generate liquidity stress reports with historical context. Recommended usage frequency is weekly on Wednesdays after TGA/reserve data releases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to create SEO-driven pages at scale using templates and data. Also use when the user mentions "programmatic SEO," "template pages," "pages at scale," "directory pages," "location pages," "[keyword] + [city] pages," "comparison pages," "integration pages," or "building many pages for SEO." For auditing existing SEO issues, see seo-audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Swift 6.2 Approachable Concurrency — single-threaded by default, @concurrent for explicit background offloading, isolated conformances for main actor types.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze raw prompts, identify intent and gaps, match ECC components (skills/commands/agents/hooks), and output a ready-to-paste optimized prompt. Advisory role only — never executes the task itself. TRIGGER when: user says "optimize prompt", "improve my prompt", "how to write a prompt for", "help me prompt", "rewrite this prompt", or explicitly asks to enhance prompt quality. Also triggers on Chinese equivalents: "优化prompt", "改进prompt", "怎么写prompt", "帮我优化这个指令". DO NOT TRIGGER when: user wants the task executed directly, or says "just do it" / "直接做". DO NOT TRIGGER when user says "优化代码", "优化性能", "optimize performance", "optimize this code" — those are refactoring/performance tasks, not prompt optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct market research, competitive analysis, investor due diligence, and industry intelligence with source attribution and decision-oriented summaries. Use when the user wants market sizing, competitor comparisons, fund research, technology scans, or research that informs business decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
C++ coding standards based on the C++ Core Guidelines (isocpp.github.io). Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring C++ code to enforce modern, safe, and idiomatic practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Head-to-head comparison of coding agents (Claude Code, Aider, Codex, etc.) on custom tasks with pass rate, cost, time, and consistency metrics
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates a git worktree for parallel feature development. Use after planning to prepare an isolated development environment with all necessary environment files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Develops B2B SaaS positioning from your ICP, competitor and win-loss evidence. Maps what buyers compare you to, chooses between leading with a category or a problem, picks a primary and secondary anchor and up to three defensible differentiators, lays out 2 to 4 worked positioning options with a comparison canvas so you can decide, then locks the chosen one and tests it (clarity ladder, guarantee test). Triggers: "positioning", "how do we position", "what category are we in", "how do we differentiate from", "our homepage is confusing", "positioning options". Run before /messaging. Not for taglines or a messaging library (use /messaging).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Верификация артефакта по эталону из Pack. Загружает роль VR.R.001 (Верификатор) с context isolation — проверяет результат, а не процесс создания.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Аудит пользовательской инсталляции IWE. Запускает scripts/iwe-audit.sh + MCP healthcheck + smoke-test ритуала через sentinel-механику (контракт dry-run-contract.md), передаёт отчёт subagent'у в роли VR.R.002 Аудитор (context isolation) → verdict ✅/⚠️/❌ по 6 компонентам (Inventory, L1 drift, {{GOVERNANCE_REPO}}, L3 customizations, MCP, ритуал). Используй после restore из бэкапа, после update.sh, или при еженедельной сверке.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Track and optimize agent specialization during methodology development. Use when agent specialization emerges (generic agents show >5x performance gap), multi-experiment comparison needed, or methodology transferability analysis required. Captures agent set evolution (Aₙ tracking), meta-agent evolution (Mₙ tracking), specialization decisions (when/why to create specialized agents), and reusability assessment (universal vs domain-specific vs task-specific). Enables systematic cross-experiment learning and optimized M₀ evolution. 2-3 hours overhead per experiment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add a new property to the AI agents database. Use when the user wants to add, create, or introduce a new column, property, field, or feature to track across all agents in the comparison matrix. Handles all four required steps - database updates, groups.json, table display, and GitHub issue templates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create and manage Databricks Agent Bricks: Knowledge Assistants (KA) for document Q&A, Genie Spaces for SQL exploration, and Multi-Agent Supervisors (MAS) for multi-agent orchestration. Use when building conversational AI applications on Databricks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add a new AI provider to agentconfig.org's comparison system. Use when integrating a new coding assistant (e.g., Cursor, Claude Desktop, GitHub Copilot alternative) with proper type system updates, implementation data, UI components, tests, and documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate one Anabasis v2 campaign from its log and turn what it shows into findings with one owner each. Answers whether a comparison's reading (step, no-step, not-scored) may be believed, whether a fail was the solver's or the exam's, whether the harness could know the exam, whether the tasks bracket the solver, whether the campaign is climbing, and where the hours and dollars went. Reads evidence; starts no solve, session or round, and changes no verdict.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。