2,245 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Design patterns for building autonomous coding agents. Covers tool integration, permission systems, browser automation, and human-in-the-loop workflows. Use when building AI agents, designing tool APIs, implementing permission systems, or creating autonomous coding assistants.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous agents are AI systems that can independently decompose goals, plan actions, execute tools, and self-correct without constant human guidance. The challenge isn't making them capable - it's making them reliable. Every extra decision multiplies failure probability. This skill covers agent loops (ReAct, Plan-Execute), goal decomposition, reflection patterns, and production reliability. Key insight: compounding error rates kill autonomous agents. A 95% success rate per step drops to 60% b
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You are an expert in the interface between LLMs and the outside world. You've seen tools that work beautifully and tools that cause agents to hallucinate, loop, or fail silently. The difference is almost always in the design, not the implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read and drive Agentic Table (magic table / due-diligence) sheets through the unique-cli agentic-table command. Use when the user or task involves an Agentic Table: inspecting a sheet's state, a cell's value or lock state, a cell's edit history or its export artifacts; writing text into a specific cell; or running the full loop — creating a sheet, importing a questionnaire and sources, waiting for the agent to answer, and exporting the result. Access is enforced per sheet by the platform and varies from sheet to sheet; a denial is reported as `agentic-table: permission denied`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Disciplined diagnosis workflow for hard, intermittent, or multi-component bugs and performance regressions: inspect logs and existing evidence, build a feedback loop, test falsifiable hypotheses, instrument gaps, and verify the outcome. Use when the root cause is unclear, reproduction is unreliable, several causes or components are plausible, or performance has regressed. Do NOT use for obvious single-cause errors, straightforward configuration or syntax fixes, planned feature work, or broad architecture review. Diagnosis-only requests stop after reporting the root cause and evidence; apply a fix only when the user requested one.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the full design-doc-writer and design-doc-reviewer loop until consensus. Produces a polished design document with a PR plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create PostHog error tracking suppression rules to drop high-volume, low-value errors at ingestion. Use when the user asks "stop capturing this error", "drop browser extension errors", "ignore ResizeObserver loops", "suppress bot-driven errors", or wants to reduce ingestion cost from noisy unactionable errors. Identifies suppression candidates, scopes the filter tightly, decides between full suppression and sampling, and confirms the rule before creating it. Suppressed errors are dropped permanently — this skill defaults to caution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Focused Signals scout for PostHog projects using error tracking. Watches `$exception` bursts, stuck loops, multi-fingerprint clusters, status regressions, and stack-trace activity-name patterns. Emits findings only when they clear the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet — no dependencies on other skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Keep iterating on code changes until the tests pass, the build succeeds, or linting is clean. Runs in a tight loop of fix → run → check → repeat. Use when you want the agent to autonomously grind through test failures or build errors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iterate on a PR until actionable CI passes and high/medium review feedback is addressed. Use for PR CI failures, review feedback, or green-check loops; do not wait for human approval, draft status, or merge gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How to author, edit, and adapt PostHog Signals scouts — the scheduled agents that scan a project and emit findings into the Signals inbox. Use when a user wants to customize a canonical scout for their own setup (narrow its scope, retune its thresholds, add disqualifiers), tweak a scout's schedule or dry-run posture, or write a brand-new scout from scratch for a specific use case (a custom event, a product surface no canonical scout covers). Covers the scout SKILL.md anatomy, the emit contract, the dedupe + scratchpad-memory conventions, the per-team skills-store path vs the canonical in-repo path, and the emit-and-inspect test loop (with dry-run as an optional safety net). Trigger on "write/edit/customize a signals scout", "new scout for X", "tune my scout schedule", "make a scout that watches <event>".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
High-level PyTorch framework with Trainer class, automatic distributed training (DDP/FSDP/DeepSpeed), callbacks system, and minimal boilerplate. Scales from laptop to supercomputer with same code. Use when you want clean training loops with built-in best practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate the full ToolUniverse self-improvement cycle: discover APIs, create tools, test with researcher personas, fix issues, optimize skills, and push via git. References and dispatches to all other devtu skills. Use when asked to: run the self-improvement loop, do a debug/test round, expand tool coverage, improve tool quality, or evolve ToolUniverse.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iterative lead optimization with analyze-reason-generate-verify-evaluate loop. Paper-backed (MT-Mol, DrugR, MultiMol).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs PROTACs, molecular glues, and bivalent degraders with explicit handling of E3 ligase choice (VHL, CRBN, IAP, MDM2, KEAP1), linker design (length, composition, rigidity), ternary complex prediction (PRosettaC, DeepTernary, AlphaFold3 with constraints), cooperativity (alpha), DC50 / Dmax characterization, hook effect, and prediction-experiment reconciliation. Use when designing targeted protein degraders, planning linker SAR, predicting ternary complex stability, or building generative degrader workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Surface current and recent Stellar Community Fund (SCF) round activity. Use when a user says "current SCF round", "what's happening with SCF", "active SCF submissions", "should I apply to SCF this round", "SCF deadline", "who is applying to SCF right now", "SCF round status", or "show me this round's submissions". Fetches live data from communityfund.stellar.org and cross-references with the LumenLoop ecosystem DB to flag repeat builders and category trends.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map the competitive landscape for a Stellar project idea. Use when a user says "who are my competitors on Stellar", "competitive analysis Stellar", "what already exists in this space on Stellar", "show me similar Stellar projects", "is anyone else building this on Stellar", or "map the Stellar landscape for X". Queries the 728-project LumenLoop ecosystem database and Electric Capital developer activity to rank competitors by SCF funding history and repo activity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Benchmark stellar-build skills to measure quality and the lift from optimization. Use when the user says "bench my skills", "bench-skills", "benchmark skills", "did optimization help", "measure my skills", "stellar-loop bench", or wants to quantify whether /optimize-skills actually improved things. Held-out eval prompts scored by an LLM judge, reproducible with fixed seeds. Fully local.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Help users discover what to build on Stellar. Use when a user says "what should I build on Stellar", "Stellar app ideas", "I want to build on Stellar but don't know what", "Stellar startup ideas", "find me a Stellar project idea", "I'm new to Stellar and want to build something", or "what's hot on Stellar right now". Interviews user sharply, then proposes ranked ideas grounded in real ecosystem gaps from the LumenLoop 728-project database and current SCF funding patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to create, optimize, or analyze a referral program, affiliate program, or word-of-mouth strategy. Also use when the user mentions 'referral,' 'affiliate,' 'ambassador,' 'word of mouth,' 'viral loop,' 'refer a friend,' or 'partner program.' This skill covers program design, incentive structure, and growth optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ralph - persistent self-referential execution loop wrapping ultrawork with independent verifier verification
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full adversarial quality loop — implement, self-attack, parallel verification, quality gates, final validation. 全品質循環：實現、自攻、並行驗證、質量關卡、最終確認. Use when: implement task with quality, run adversarial review, verify code quality, run quality gates, complete workflow task
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze changes and create a meaningful commit with agent authorship. Internal skill for evolve_loop.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。