「agent」の検索結果

Orchestrator for the pre-decision business-idea lifecycle — generate ideas, model them, evaluate them, validate them with customers, and only then hand off to product-soul / brainstorming. Routes through `idea-generation`, `business-modeling`, `idea-evaluation`, and `customer-discovery`. Load when the user asks to explore business ideas, find a startup idea, evaluate a venture, validate an idea, says "what business should I start", "should I build this", "is this a good business", "I have a startup idea", "evaluate this venture", "model this business", "validate this idea", "Mom Test this", "Lean Canvas this", "Business Model Canvas", "Value Proposition Canvas", "go/no-go on this idea". Pre-decision suite — once one idea is committed, hands off to `product-soul`. Does NOT design features (use `brainstorming`) or audit built products (use `reality-check`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decompose multi-step work into a revisable subgoal plan with stable step IDs, checkpointing, and plan-ahead execution. Load when a task needs explicit planning before action, subgoal decomposition, plan checkpointing, or ReCAP-style plan-ahead execution. Also triggers on "structured plan", "plan with steps", "subgoal graph", "revise the plan", "checkpoint plan", or multi-step tasks where naive one-shot execution would be fragile. Skips trivial single-step tasks. Pairs with dynamic-routing on failure. Distinct from process-decomposer (registry/triage) and problem-to-plan (doc deliverables).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit the project's technical health and identify "high-interest" debt. Load when the user asks to check code quality, find TODOs, assess project health, or prepare for a refactoring sprint. Also triggers on "technical debt audit", "where is the code messy", "assess project health", "find my hacks", or "identify tech debt". Essential for maintaining velocity in growing projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pick a product archetype from a curated catalog before any UI gets built — the single biggest lever for not looking vibecoded. Routes the request to one of B2B-productivity, enterprise-trust, premium-consumer, playful-consumer, editorial, brutalist-distinctive, dev-tool, or marketing-landing, and returns a complete design philosophy: typography pair, color logic, motion curve, density, icon stance, reference sites, and a "feels like X" claim. Load when the user asks to pick an aesthetic, choose a design direction, decide what a UI should feel like, classify a product visually, says "what should this look like", "make this feel like [Linear/Stripe/Apple/Duolingo/...]", "give me a design direction", "what's the right aesthetic for this", or when frontend-design routes here during archetype selection. Sub-skill of frontend-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pick an icon strategy and produce a coherent icon set that doesn't look mass-produced. Solves the "Lucide everywhere" problem — every AI-generated UI uses the same 24px stroke-1.5 outline icons, which is the second-biggest vibecoded tell after Inter-on-purple-gradient. Generates custom SVG sets, tunes existing icon libraries to match archetype + typography, defines stroke weight, optical sizing, and corner-radius rules. Load when the user asks to pick icons, design an icon set, customize Lucide / Phosphor / Heroicons, generate SVG icons, make icons feel custom, says "the icons look generic", "design a custom icon system", "icons for this product", or when frontend-design routes here during icon craft. Sub-skill of frontend-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reduce an oversized SKILL.md by checking whether an existing skill already covers the excess sub-workflow before creating a new child skill only when none fits. Load when a skill exceeds 200 lines and compress-skill determines excess content is genuinely CORE, when the same sub-workflow appears in multiple skills, or when universal-skill-creator or improve-skills identifies a coherent sub-capability. Also triggers on "split this skill", "extract a sub-skill", "this skill is doing too much", or "make this skill reusable". Always checks for an existing home before creating a new skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think through the consequences of consequences — not just what happens immediately, but what happens next, and next after that, across time. Load when a decision looks obviously good or obviously bad on initial read, when the user is optimising for a short-term outcome that might create a long-term problem, when unintended consequences are a concern, or when deep-thinking diagnoses a second-order frame. Triggers on "what are the downstream effects", "what happens after that", "unintended consequences", "think ahead on this", "long-term vs short-term", or "what comes after that". Based on Howard Marks second-level thinking and Farnam Street mental models. Most powerful for decisions with delayed consequences or systemic effects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a fast, read-only health check across all skills in the library and produce a structured quality report — without modifying anything. Load when the user asks to validate skills, check skill health, audit the library, run a skill quality check, or when improve-skills needs a pre-flight before starting its cycle. Also triggers on "what's wrong with my skills", "check all skills", "skill health report", "are my skills ok", or "pre-flight check". Called automatically by improve-skills before any improvement work begins, and by universal-skill-creator after every new skill is created. Never modifies any file — only reads and reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hard readiness gate before implementation begins — cross-checks the constitution, feature spec, plan, and tasks for consistency, traceability, and unresolved ambiguity. Returns PASS or FAIL with specific findings. Load when the spec-driven-development orchestrator routes /analyze, when the user asks to cross-check spec vs plan, audit traceability, verify spec readiness, gate-check before implementation, or says "is this spec implementation-ready", "trace requirements to tasks", "/analyze", "spec sanity check", "spec readiness gate", "spec consistency check". Output: docs/reviews/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>-spec-crosscheck.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect and resolve naming collisions, overlapping intent triggers, and insufficient intent diversity across the skill library. Load when a new skill is created (called by universal-skill-creator), during improvement passes (called by improve-skills), or when the user asks to deconflict skills, check for naming collisions, audit trigger overlap, review intent coverage, find duplicate triggers, check skill names, or says "are any skills too similar", "which skills overlap", "deconflict the library", "check for confusing skill names", "intent audit".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare safe production launches — pre-launch checklist, monitoring, staged rollout, and rollback. Load when deploying to production, releasing a major change, opening beta access, or the user asks for a launch checklist, go-live plan, rollout strategy, or rollback plan. Not for local-only prototypes. Pairs with ci-cd-and-automation and app-security-hardening.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deliver multi-file changes in thin vertical slices — implement, test, verify, commit, repeat. Load when implementing a feature from a plan, building across more than one file, refactoring, or when tempted to land a large change in one pass. Also triggers on "incremental implementation", "vertical slice", "thin slice", "one slice at a time", "don't do it all at once". Routes single-file fixes to direct execution. Pairs with test-driven-development and git-workflow-and-versioning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a detailed, step-by-step implementation plan for a feature or project. Load when the user asks to plan a feature, create a technical roadmap, break down a PRD into tasks, design an implementation strategy, or sequence engineering work. Also triggers on "how should we build this", "implementation plan for", "technical breakdown", "task list for", or any request to turn a high-level requirement into a concrete execution plan. Supports phased rollouts, architecture-first, and MVP-focused planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract actionable insights from blog posts, web articles, and practitioner content - assess credibility, run security checks, and either improve existing skills or apply to the current project. Load when the user asks to learn from an article, extract insights from a blog post, apply a practitioner's findings, or process engineering blog content. Also triggers on "learn from this article", "learn from this blog post", "extract insights from this post", "what can we learn from this article", "apply this article", or when the user links to a blog, Medium, Substack, dev.to, or engineering blog post.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mirror issues and status across issue trackers with stable external-ID mapping to avoid duplicates. Load when syncing GitHub and Linear issues, mirroring ticket status, or keeping two trackers in sync. Also triggers on "issue sync", "sync issues", "mirror issues to", "keep Linear and GitHub in sync", or bidirectional issue tracker updates. Requires API access on both sides — stops if credentials missing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrator for the learn-from suite - auto-detects source type (academic paper, GitHub repo, blog/web article, or in-conversation learnings) and routes to the correct sub-skill for credibility check, security scan, insight extraction, and application. Load when the user says "learn from", "learn from this", "extract insights from", "apply learnings from", "what can we learn from", or provides a URL, file path, or pasted content that should be ingested as knowledge. Single entry point for all learning workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract actionable patterns, architecture decisions, code conventions, and skill-relevant insights from GitHub/GitLab repositories. Assess repo credibility, run the full security scan pipeline, and apply findings to existing skills, new skills, or the current project. Load when the user asks to learn from a repo, extract patterns from a codebase, study a repository, or analyze a repo for reusable techniques. Also triggers on "learn from this repo", "learn from this repository", "what can we learn from this codebase", "extract patterns from this repo", "study this repo".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Record durable project decisions with rationale, alternatives, assumptions, status, and revisit triggers. Load when the user says record this decision, we decided, decision log, why did we choose, revisit this later, or capture architectural/process rationale.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delete, redact, or archive project and global memories when the user says forget this, delete memory, remove that preference, do not remember, redact sensitive information, or retire stale memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compress bloated project or global memory while preserving decisions, rationale, revisit triggers, provenance, and active user preferences. Load when memory exceeds budget, global memory is too large, session logs are repetitive, or before appending to an over-budget memory file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build GSAP JavaScript animations for web apps — timelines, scroll-driven motion, SVG draw/morph/path effects, and React integration with useGSAP. Load when the user asks to animate with GSAP, add ScrollTrigger, draw SVG paths with GSAP, morph SVG shapes, sequence page animations, or wire GSAP in React/Next/Vue. Also triggers on "GSAP timeline", "DrawSVG", "MotionPath", "gsap.context", or "scroll animation library". Not for self-contained README/GitHub SVG files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Promote project-specific memories into strict, small global memory only when they are cross-project, stable, useful, safe, and worth the global context cost. Load when the user says make this global, remember across projects, save this globally, or promote this learning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retrieve task-relevant project and global memory without loading everything. Load when the user asks what we decided, recall prior context, find memory about a feature, explain past rationale, resume a task, or check deferred ideas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Flip a problem, goal, or decision 180 degrees to find what forward thinking misses. Asks what would guarantee failure, then works backward to what must be avoided or changed. Load when the user says "invert this", "flip this problem", "what would guarantee failure", "think backward", "reverse engineer the goal", "think about it backwards", or when deep-thinking diagnoses an inversion frame. Also triggers on "what's the opposite of success here", "how would we sabotage this". Two methods: Failure Inversion and Opposite Goal. Max 2 clarifying questions before inverting. Always returns forward actions. For broader analysis, deep-thinking calls this.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。