「eval」の検索結果

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints. Output: optimized detailed outline ready for systematic writing (use with academic-paper-composer skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to create, write, update, amend, supersede, or evaluate an ADR, architecture decision record, durable architecture decision, decision log, or baseline sync after architecture-changing work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operate as an agentic engineer using eval-first execution, decomposition, and cost-aware model routing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measure whether a skill helps by comparing runs with and without it. Use when: reading skill A/B results or deciding to keep, revise or remove one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only after explicit Codex `$superloopy:superloopy-research` or Claude Code `/superloopy:superloopy-research` invocation, a research task started with a leading `loopy` or `루피` (such as `loopy research`), or an active Superloopy loop explicitly routing a research deliverable here. Evidence-backed Superloopy research orchestration with automatic advisory usage targets, parallel read-only lanes, per-retrieval verdicts, graded and dated sources, empirical verification, a priced claim ledger, cited synthesis, and optional reports. Do not activate from research, investigate, look-up, summarize, deep-dive, report, or similar vocabulary alone, in any language; ordinary questions, debugging, and implementation context-gathering stay with their primary workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when deciding how to correctly download/install a Bethesda mod per the author's instructions — triggers "how do I install", "FOMOD choices", "which file to download", "author说明", "install instructions", "which variant", "按作者说明安装", "这个mod怎么装". NOT for deciding whether to include the mod (use evaluating-bgs-mods), load order editing (writing-bgs-load-order), record conflicts (xedit-conflict-audit), archive operations (using-bgs-archive), Papyrus work (using-bgs-papyrus), or translation/export tasks (using-bgs-translator).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning or building the whole Bethesda modpack incrementally — batch strategy, rollback point, naming convention, separator discipline, attribution, and declaring 风格 before adding mods. Triggers - "build a modpack", "plan the pack", "batch strategy", "rollback point", "naming convention", "declare 风格", "策展整合包", "整合包规划". NOT for deciding whether one mod belongs (evaluating-bgs-mods), installing one mod from author instructions (interpreting-mod-author-instructions), load order mechanics (writing-bgs-load-order), or record conflicts (xedit-conflict-audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when deciding whether a mod belongs in a modpack — judging mod quality, fit, risk, and pack-value BEFORE download/install. Triggers - "should I add this mod", "is this mod good", "评估这个mod", "这个mod值得装吗", "is this mod worth it", "this mod looks too good to be true", "compare these mods", "does this mod fit my pack". NOT for how to install a mod (use interpreting-mod-author-instructions), load order (writing-bgs-load-order), or conflict resolution (xedit-conflict-audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze KiCad projects and PDF schematics: schematics, PCB layouts, Gerbers, footprints, symbols, netlists, and design rules. Reviews designs for bugs, traces nets, cross-references schematic to PCB, extracts BOM data, checks DRC/ERC, DFM, power trees, and regulator circuits. Every finding carries a confidence label and evidence source with trust_summary rollup. Analyzes PDF schematics from dev boards, reference designs, eval kits, and datasheets. Supports KiCad 5–10. Use whenever the user mentions .kicad_sch, .kicad_pcb, .kicad_pro, PCB design review, schematic analysis, PDF schematics, reference designs, Gerber files, DRC/ERC, netlist issues, BOM extraction, signal tracing, power budget, DFM, or wants to understand, debug, compare, or review any hardware design. Also for "check my board", "review before fab", "what's wrong with my schematic", "is this ready to order", "check my power supply", "verify this circuit", OSHWA certification readiness, or any electronics/PCB design question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

可审计的 agent 团队：BMAD 全自动研发流水线编排器。编排 9 个专业 Agent（PM、架构师、UI Designer、Tech Lead、Scrum Master、Frontend、Backend、QA、DevOps）从需求到部署，每一步都有事件溯源 + 不可绕过门禁 + 确定性 eval——可验证测试真跑、门禁真过。支持单环节切片命令（/boss:plan /review /qa /ship）与无 CLI 纯 Markdown 降级。 Triggers（全流水线）: 'boss mode', '/boss', '全自动开发', '从需求到部署', '帮我做一个', 'build this', 'ship it', '全流程', '自动化开发', '一键开发', 'start a project', 'new feature' Triggers（单环节切片，对存量项目最常用）: - /boss:review — '帮我评审', '代码评审', '技术评审', '看看这段代码有什么问题', '风险评估', 'review this', 'review my PR', 'code review' - /boss:qa — '跑一下测试', '补测试', '检查质量', '测试覆盖够不够', '门禁过了吗', 'run the tests', 'check quality', 'add tests' - /boss:plan — '先出个方案', '写个 PRD', '设计一下架构', 'write a spec', 'plan this feature' - /boss:ship — '可以发布了吗', '部署检查', 'ready to ship', 'deploy checks' Does NOT trigger: - 单文件修改或简单 bug 修复（直接编辑即可） - 纯代码阅读或解释（使用 read 工具） - 已有 pipeline 正在运行时的重复启动 - 极小事（预计 <30 分钟人工可完成、不需要 PRD/架构/门禁记录） Output: 完整项目代码 + PRD/架构/UI/测试/部署文档，写入 .boss/<feature>/ 目录

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Codified expertise for managing carrier portfolios, negotiating freight rates, tracking carrier performance, allocating freight, and maintaining strategic carrier relationships. Informed by transportation managers with 15+ years experience. Includes scorecarding frameworks, RFP processes, market intelligence, and compliance vetting. Use when managing carriers, negotiating rates, evaluating carrier performance, or building freight strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Patterns for continuous autonomous agent loops with quality gates, evals, and recovery controls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate system boundaries and architectural tradeoffs. Use for architecture decisions, design reviews, and ADRs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design schemas and migrations, tune queries, or plan vector retrieval and database operations. Application API implementation uses oma-backend.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Database specialist for SQL, NoSQL, and vector database modeling, schema design, normalization, indexing, transactions, integrity, concurrency control, backup, capacity planning, data standards, anti-pattern review, and compliance-aware database design. Use for database, schema, ERD, table design, document model, vector index design, RAG retrieval architecture, migration, query tuning, glossary, capacity estimation, backup strategy, database anti-pattern remediation work, and ISO 27001, ISO 27002, or ISO 22301-aware database recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design-first ideation that explores user intent, constraints, and approaches before any planning or implementation. Use for brainstorming, ideation, exploring concepts, and evaluating approaches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (find dangerous execution sinks), batched verify (trace user input to sinks in parallel subagents, 3 sinks each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Covers OS command injection, eval-like sinks, and unsafe deserialization. Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/rce-results.md. Use when asked to find RCE, command injection, or unsafe deserialization bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits a live website for AI-engine discoverability (AEO/GEO). Crawls the site, runs 16 deterministic checks plus a 6-dimension content evaluation, and produces a scored report (A-F) with prioritized fixes. Use to get a baseline before improve-aeo-geo, or to measure progress after changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add a new deterministic scoring check in src/scoring/checks/ that evaluates config quality. Follows the Check[] return pattern, uses point constants from src/scoring/constants.ts, and integrates via filterChecksForTarget() in src/scoring/index.ts. Use when user says 'add scoring check', 'new check', 'modify scoring criteria', or works in src/scoring/checks/. Do NOT use for display changes or refactoring scoring logic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate URLs and tools — check vault coverage, assess relevance, recommend save or skip

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

INVOKE THIS SKILL when building, testing, or deploying Managed Deep Agents in LangSmith. Walks a user through their first agent end to end — interviewing them about what they want to build, mapping it onto what MDA can actually do, then scaffolding and deploying it. Covers the file-based project layout; define_deep_agent / defineDeepAgent; instructions, skills, memory, identity, tools, MCP servers, connections, middleware, sandboxes, schedules, channels, and evals; the mda CLI; GitHub deployments; and Context Hub.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

INVOKE THIS SKILL when building ANY retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) system. Covers document loaders, RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter, embeddings (OpenAI), and vector stores (Chroma, FAISS, Pinecone).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a repo's agent context — CLAUDE.md files, codebase docs, skills, and tool/MCP designs — against Anthropic's Claude 5 context-engineering guidance ("unhobbling": Anthropic cut ~80% of Claude Code's system prompt with no eval loss). Finds overconstraint, conflicting instructions, redundancy, stale facts, and missing "unknown knowns"; produces a scored findings report with concrete rewrites, then applies approved fixes. Use when someone says "audit my CLAUDE.md", "context audit", "unhobble this repo", "review our agent docs/skills/tools", or after upgrading to Claude 5-generation models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when packaging AISTATS code, data, proofs, simulation scripts, notebooks, random seeds, and logs as anonymous supplementary evidence or public post-acceptance artifacts, even when there is no separate artifact badge. Covers what statistically minded AISTATS reviewers inspect first and how to make Monte Carlo studies turnkey.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。