「ship」の検索結果

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Clinical Nurse Specialist — diagnosing why a unit-level outcome metric (CLABSI, falls, pressure injury) is off benchmark, designing and scaling a practice-change pilot, appraising whether a new clinical guideline actually fits the local population, writing a quarterly outcomes report to nursing leadership, or coaching staff nurses through a new protocol without formal authority over them. US hospital/health-system default; state nurse practice acts vary. A reasoning aid, not clinical or legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a courier or messenger — sequencing a multi-stop route against hard delivery windows, deciding what proof-of-delivery a shipment requires, handling a chain-of-custody transfer for a legal or medical item, or resolving a refused-delivery/no-answer exception against the sender's fallback instructions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Cooling/Freezing Equipment Operator — calculating freezing time for a new product thickness via the thickness-squared relationship rather than assuming linear scaling, verifying freezing completion by actual core/thermal-center temperature rather than surface temperature or elapsed time, recognizing a temperature plateau as expected latent-heat removal rather than a malfunction, or matching belt speed/residence time to the calculated freezing time requirement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a cargo/freight agent — quoting a shipment across air/ocean/ground modes, calculating dimensional weight vs actual weight for billing, classifying freight by NMFC density class, preparing bill-of-lading/customs documentation, or processing a cargo-damage claim.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Chief Data Officer — resolving conflicting metric definitions across dashboards, deciding whether a dataset should be retained or purged, assigning data ownership for a system feeding regulatory or board reporting, sizing a privacy/breach risk against a proposed data collection, or auditing data readiness before an AI/ML initiative kicks off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Biology Professor at a research university — writing or defending an NIH/NSF grant budget, deciding authorship order on a paper, navigating an IACUC or biosafety protocol, mentoring a PhD student through a stalled project, or converting a course when active-learning data doesn't match student pushback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Area, Ethnic, or Cultural Studies Professor — designing a joint-appointment course load across two departments, prepping a tenure or mid-tenure review file for interdisciplinary scholarship, deciding whether a course survives an enrollment or political-pressure threat, evaluating community-engaged research for a merit case, or writing a Title VI/FLAS-adjacent grant narrative.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Aerospace Engineering and Operations Technologist/Technician — verifying an installed fastener's preload against a drawing's torque callout via the T=K·D·F relationship, reducing strain-gauge data from a structural proof-load test into stress and checking it against an FEA-predicted margin, selecting and executing an NDI method against a defect type and material, reducing a wind-tunnel test point's dynamic-pressure and Reynolds-number data, or ballooning and dispositioning an AS9102 first article inspection. Distinct from an aerospace-engineer (owns the design, structural analysis, and certification basis) — this role builds, instruments, tests, and inspects the hardware the engineer specified, closing the loop with measurement rather than deriving a new analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Administrative Services Manager — evaluating a vendor contract on total cost of ownership rather than price, right-sizing a facilities/admin budget against actual utilization, anticipating where an operational process breaks at the org's next size milestone, or diagnosing why internal operational support is failing a growing organization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Application Security Engineer — checking whether an endpoint verifies object-level authorization (not just authentication), running threat modeling at design time rather than deferring security review to the end, triaging a dependency vulnerability by actual reachability rather than CVSS score alone, combining SAST/DAST/SCA tooling to cover their distinct blind spots, or applying context-specific output encoding to untrusted input. Distinct from an information security analyst — this role works inside the SDLC to prevent vulnerabilities before they ship, not detect and respond to intrusions in production.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Flagship comprehensive SEO audit combining Ahrefs and GSC data in sequential waves with checkpoint saves. Use when user says "site audit pro", "full audit", "comprehensive audit", "audit with live data", "deep audit", "pro audit", "complete SEO audit", "run a full site audit", or "audit everything for this domain". Requires domain param. Optional: site param for GSC overlay.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this whenever the user asks to "open a PR", "ship this", "create the pull request", "make a PR", or once a Vue feature/fix is verified and ready to push. Full lifecycle: branch → commit (commitizen) → issue → draft PR → CI → ready → autonomous monitor loop (fix comments, resolve threads, iterate until CI green + zero unresolved threads). `--perfect` adds a CodeRabbit convergence loop on top. Never works on `main`/`master`, never uses `--no-verify`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Do a task end-to-end — implement, PR, CI loop, ship. ONLY invoke when the user explicitly types `/do` or `$do`; never auto-select from a natural-language request, even one that sounds like an end-to-end task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for writing idiomatic Rust code based on Apollo GraphQL's best practices handbook. Use this skill when: (1) writing new Rust code or functions, (2) reviewing or refactoring existing Rust code, (3) deciding between borrowing vs cloning or ownership patterns, (4) implementing error handling with Result types, (5) optimizing Rust code for performance, (6) writing tests or documentation for Rust projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and verify professional multi-sheet KiCad hierarchies generated from Circuit Weaver functional sections. Use when adding, splitting, renaming, or reviewing schematic sheets, cross-sheet interfaces, root symbols, sheet ownership, or final hierarchy ERC.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove a personal fact, preference, relationship detail, topic, or prior event from Muse's active memory and stop existing copies or automations from bringing it back. Use for explicit requests such as 'forget that', 'don't remember this about me', or 'remove that from your memory'. Do not use when 'forget it' merely means cancel the current task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, write, or manage Meta ads and assets: ad copy, campaigns, spend, reports, audiences, catalogs, product feeds, feed refresh schedules, experiments, and policy. Always load for any request to create or write an ad, or to advertise a product or service, even when no platform is named; this includes sensitive or restricted categories. Always load for any question asking what a Meta, Facebook, or Instagram advertising policy means, allows, prohibits, or requires, including a standalone policy-definition question with no account context. Those questions must use ads_policy_tool, never browser search or memory. Load for a specifically named catalog or feed with an upload or refresh-schedule request; use Ads reads to resolve ownership before writing. Generic unnamed feeds need context. Whether an image, claim or piece of copy may be used in an ad is ALWAYS a Meta Ads task — 'can I use this in an ad', 'is it allowed', 'is this against policy', and any rights, likeness, celebrity, logo or trademark question about advertising with an image, including a follow-up about one just generated. Those are ads-policy questions, not general legal ones. An ad request uses the campaign workflow unless explicitly only an image or organic post.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a full pre-launch quality gate before shipping — chains product review, growth audit, UX audit, security scan, and deployment preflight into a go/no-go launch decision. Stops on critical blockers. Use before v1 launch, beta release, major version rollout, or feature launch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Emergency fix-and-deploy pipeline — diagnose a bug, apply a minimal fix, verify safety, deploy to production, and confirm the service is healthy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ship an app from code to production-ready infrastructure: containerize with Docker and multi-stage builds, set up GitHub Actions CI/CD with automated testing and deployment, add monitoring with health checks and alerting, then run preflight verification..

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full autonomous design pipeline — builds fast, then the safety net polishes it. Chains: design-setup → design-build → (design-audit ∥ design-optimize) → design-polish → design-animate. Ships production-grade interfaces end to end.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit pharmaceutical yield prediction systems and process analytical technology -- evaluate critical process parameter (CPP) to critical quality attribute (CQA) relationships, design space characterization per ICH Q8(R2) Quality by Design, PAT sensor readiness (NIR, Raman.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze vendor management systems for performance scorecards, third-party risk assessment, SLA enforcement, vendor rationalization, and relationship governance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full nonprofit operational health analysis: validate impact measurement methodology and theory of change, optimize fundraising channels and campaign ROI, audit grant management for compliance and proposal quality, and assess donor retention with churn prediction and stewardship workflows..

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。