「wan」の検索結果

Write publication-ready ML/AI/Systems papers for NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM, OSDI, NSDI, ASPLOS, SOSP. Use when drafting papers from research repos, structuring arguments, verifying citations, or preparing camera-ready submissions. Includes LaTeX templates, reviewer guidelines, and citation verification workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates end-to-end autonomous AI research projects using a two-loop architecture. The inner loop runs rapid experiment iterations with clear optimization targets. The outer loop synthesizes results, identifies patterns, and steers research direction. Routes to domain-specific skills for execution, supports continuous agent operation via Claude Code /loop and OpenClaw heartbeat, and produces research presentations and papers. Use when starting a research project, running autonomous experiments, or managing a multi-hypothesis research effort.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to create, author, write, or design a new Agent Skill (a SKILL.md) — for OpenKnowledge or for their editors — including requests like 'help me write a skill', 'make a skill that…', 'turn this workflow into a skill', or improving an existing skill's triggering and discipline. Also use when capturing reusable agent guidance that should live as an installable skill rather than a one-off prompt. Covers choosing scope (project vs global), authoring inside a plugin or skills-distribution repo (write in the repo's own layout, never install), the SKILL.md frontmatter contract, progressive-disclosure structure, evaluating the skill, and installing it into the user's editors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to work in a Plain Notes project (the `plain-notes` starter pack): a flat notes/ folder plus a daily/ journal. The 'I just want to write' layout. Read when the project has these folders, OR when asked to jot a note, capture a quick thought, or write today's journal entry. Carries the linking habit and daily-entry behavior so templates and folder descriptions stay minimal. Complements the platform `open-knowledge` skill; does not replace it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews whether a design is SOUND — solving the right problem, derived from its stated goals and constraints — and emits ranked, evidence-backed findings, not edits. Read when asked to 'review this design', 'is this design sound', 'pressure-test this proposal', 'do a design review', 'does this solve the right problem', 'poke holes in this spec', 'should we build this', or to critique a proposal / spec / ADR / architecture or product decision. Do NOT read when the user wants to AUTHOR one of these — routing a new proposal is frame-a-proposal, a spec is write-a-spec, a decision record is record-a-decision, a postmortem is write-a-postmortem. Do NOT read for code review of a diff, or to fact-check individual claims (that is a correctness pass, a different job).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a blameless incident postmortem under postmortems/ following the Google SRE shape — evidence-based timeline, trigger vs root cause vs symptom, contributing factors, what went well, and owned+dated+verifiable action items. Read when asked to write a postmortem, do an incident review, run a root cause analysis, write up the outage, retro on the outage, or when the user says we had an incident and wants it documented. Do NOT read to frame a proposal (use frame-a-proposal), write a spec (use write-a-spec), record a decision (use record-a-decision), or review a design (use review-a-design) — a postmortem documents an incident that already happened, it does not propose, specify, decide, or critique future work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Promote existing research into a stable-status canonical article under `articles/` in a Knowledge Base project (the `knowledge-base` starter pack). Read when a decision has actually been made and the team wants the source-of-truth written down, or when asked to consolidate, canonicalize, promote research, or supersede an older article. Carries the decision-confirmation gate, the `supersedes:` chain that keeps the evidence trail intact, and the canonical voice. Does not conduct new research — that is the sibling `research-with-sources` skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when running Claude Fable on codebase-heavy or token-heavy work and the user wants Fable to orchestrate research, coding, and testing while cheaper subagents do bounded heavy lifting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user explicitly wants autonomous progress without routine clarification stops: "plow ahead", "do not stop", "use your best judgment", "keep going until done", "finish while I am away", "do not ask questions unless truly blocked", or similar. Convert ordinary ambiguity into stated assumptions, proceed through implementation and validation, stop only for true blockers, and end with a clear recap of decisions, changes, verification, and residual risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to compare, cross-review, merge, judge, choose, or arbitrate competing plans from multiple agents such as Codex and Claude Code; when given two or more proposed plans, session IDs, transcripts, plan documents, PR descriptions, or pasted strategies; or when the user wants one recommended execution plan after agents review each other's proposals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates, forks, authors, validates, publishes, updates, versions, pulls, archives, restores, transfers, and manages co-authors for Observal Agents. Use when the user wants to build or install an Agent, change an Agent definition, publish a draft, release a version, or manage Agent ownership.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Searches, recommends, bulk-submits, installs, forks, edits, versions, archives, restores, transfers, and manages co-authors for Observal MCP servers, skills, hooks, prompts, sandboxes, and registered remote A2A agents. Use when the user wants to find components, publish one or many they control, install them into a harness, or manage their lifecycle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting any task the organization may already have an approved skill, prompt, MCP server, or Agent for: reviewing code, a commit, a diff, or a pull request; writing tests or documentation; querying a database, API, or service; automating a browser or web page; running untrusted code; connecting to a SaaS tool; drafting, researching, or any other substantive work. The user will not mention Observal: the task type is the trigger. Check what is already installed, then run observal discover search as the first action, before reading the repository or working from scratch. Also use when the user wants to log in, configure Observal, inspect local harness setup, share or open a repository Agent share, manage a teamspace or invitation, process inbox items, check installed registry items, or call an endpoint without a dedicated command.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspects Observal traces, sessions, rankings, feedback, telemetry health, logs, and Agent insight reports. Use when the user wants operational evidence, current activity, telemetry diagnosis, ratings, report generation, regression analysis, or recommendations grounded in Agent usage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert a GraphQL endpoint, OpenAPI spec, or MCP server into bash CLI commands and a `tools.*` JS API runnable inside `just-bash`'s `js-exec` sandbox. Use when the user wants to expose a remote API to a sandboxed bash agent, build a tool-calling agent on top of just-bash, or generate CLI commands from an existing API spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, install, and debug bb plugins. Use when the user wants a bb plugin, a sidebar panel, a bb CLI subcommand, an agent tool, a theme, a provider, or to extend bb itself. For running threads and the core bb CLI, use bb-cli instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Direct browser control via CDP. Use when the user wants to automate, scrape, test, or interact with web pages. Connects to the user's already-running Chrome.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Cua Driver for desktop or browser tasks that are awkward or unavailable through Bash/APIs, or when the user explicitly wants GUI interaction: app testing, visual bug reproduction, form filling, calendar entry, screenshots, and demo recording. Also covers Cua setup; not OpenAI Codex Computer Use or web research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn almost any file into Markdown plus metadata — PDF, Office, HTML, email, archives, images, audio/video, 1000+ formats — powered by Apache Tika, either via the tika-app CLI (zero setup, one file) or a running tika-server (curl, warm process, many calls). Leads with rmeta (structured, embedded-item-aware output) as the default operation rather than flat concatenated text, since you can't tell whether a file has embedded content from its extension. Covers metadata-only triage, type and language detection, OCR, and output-size discipline for agent context. Use whenever a task involves reading the content of a file whose format you don't want to hand-parse.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Apache Tika as a Docker container when you need guaranteed OCR (scanned PDFs, images) or geospatial raster support with zero local install — `apache/tika:<version>-full` bundles Tesseract, GDAL, ImageMagick, and fonts. Also covers the minimal image, port/volume/memory conventions, the path-identity mount gotcha, and how to confirm OCR actually ran rather than silently returning no text. Powered by Apache Tika. Use when a local `tika-app`/`tika-server` doesn't have Tesseract installed, or you want a disposable, self-contained parsing environment. Companion to the `file-to-markdown` skill, which covers the parsing calls themselves once a server is up.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to analyze active ads from Meta/Facebook, Google, or LinkedIn ad libraries; tear down a competitor's messaging; extract hooks, offers, CTAs, video transcripts, landing page claims, and test ideas from public ads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to discover trending social topics, hashtags, sounds, posts, reels, shorts, creators, or formats in a niche. Searches public trend and discovery endpoints, ranks evidence, and turns trends into practical content angles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to turn public social videos, transcripts, posts, or creator research into reusable content assets such as LinkedIn posts, X threads, short-form scripts, newsletters, blog outlines, carousels, or content calendars.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to validate a product idea, find pain points, mine demand signals, discover objections, or gather voice-of-customer language from Reddit, social posts, video transcripts, and comments. Produces evidence-backed product research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。