「accuracy」の検索結果

Verifies factual claims in documents using web search and official sources, then proposes corrections with user confirmation. Use when the user asks to fact-check, verify information, validate claims, check accuracy, or update outdated information in documents. Supports AI model specs, technical documentation, statistics, and general factual statements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

QA an analysis before sharing with stakeholders — methodology checks, accuracy verification, and bias detection. Use when reviewing an analysis for errors, checking for survivorship bias, validating aggregation logic, or preparing documentation for reproducibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verification guide for citations added during rebuttal writing. Use when Stage 2 responses introduce new references, when the Area Chair asks about a cited paper, or when any citation in the rebuttal might have been AI-generated. Prevents the serious credibility damage of fabricated references in reviewer-facing documents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic quality check for a completed rebuttal document before submission. Use after Stage 3 document compilation or after Stage 5 final remarks writing to verify completeness, tone, factual accuracy, and structural integrity. Catches common rebuttal errors before they reach reviewers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify the accuracy of claims and statements by extracting individual assertions, identifying authoritative sources, cross-referencing evidence, and assigning confidence-scored verdicts. Use when the user requests fact checking or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Earnings sentiment analysis, analyst estimates vs guidance, earnings surprise history, consensus sentiment, earnings revision trends, analyst rating changes, earnings beat miss track record, guidance accuracy, whisper numbers, pre-announcement sentiment

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Medical Physicist. Use when a task calls for Medical Physicist judgment. Reasons from CTDIvol/SSDE, HU accuracy, ACR/MQSA QA, TG-126 PET/CT, TG-18/TG-270 displays, and NCRP 147 shielding across CT, MRI, mammography, NM/PET, and therapy QA while treating phantom-mismatch dose claims, SUV normalization drift, display washout, and post-upgrade MEE gaps as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Mass Spectrometrist. Use when a task calls for Mass Spectrometrist judgment. Reasons from ion formation, m/z resolution and mass accuracy, fragmentation, and calibrated ion statistics through ESI/APCI/MALDI tuning, CID/HCD/ETD MS/MS, isotope-pattern formula assignment, and spectral libraries (NIST, mzCloud, GNPS) under FDA/ICH M10/MSI tiers, while treating matrix suppression, PEG/siloxane/keratin contamination, decoy-driven FDR inflation, and unassigned adducts as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Animal Geneticist & Breeder. Use when a task calls for Animal Geneticist & Breeder judgment. Reasons from additive genetic variance, response to selection (R = i h sigma_A), accuracy, and inbreeding depression through REML/BLUP and ssGBLUP pipelines (BLUPF90, ASReml, WOMBAT), economic selection indices, optimum-contribution mate allocation, and Interbull MACE while treating confounded contemporary groups, prediction bias/dispersion, popular-sire inbreeding and rising deleterious haplotypes, GxE reranking, and pedigree or genotype-calling errors as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an agent must make TwelveLabs do real video-understanding work: indexing footage, semantic/visual search across an archive, generating descriptions, summaries, chapters, highlights, and tags from video, producing multimodal embeddings, or wiring TwelveLabs into a media-production pipeline (NLE panels, logging, compliance review, metadata). Covers the current model families (Marengo for search/embeddings, Pegasus for video-to-text analysis), the v1.3 Video Understanding API (indexes, assets, tasks, search, analyze, embed), prompt construction for analysis, capability and format limits, pricing/quota math, output quality review (hallucination and timestamp accuracy), and privacy/rights obligations when footage shows real people. Not for generating or editing video pixels — this is analysis and retrieval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate AI lip sync and visual dubbing with Sync Labs (sync.so) — choose the right model (sync-3, lipsync-2, lipsync-2-pro, lipsync-1.9.0-beta, react-1), build the POST /v2/generate request, host inputs, handle async jobs via polling or webhooks, run batch dubbing/localization, and review output for sync accuracy and identity preservation. Use when an agent must re-voice, dub, translate, personalize, or re-time the mouth of a talking-head video (or animate a still face from audio), or must debug a failed/rejected Sync generation. Also covers consent, likeness, and rights obligations for editing a real person's face.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs alchemical free-energy calculations including relative binding free energy (RBFE / FEP+) and absolute binding free energy (ABFE) via OpenFE, FEP+, GROMACS, AMBER pmemd, and OpenMM with explicit lambda window scheduling, soft-core potentials, REST2 enhanced sampling, MBAR/BAR analysis, and cycle closure validation. Compares ML alternatives (Boltz-2 affinity, DeepDock). Use when ranking analogs by binding affinity beyond docking accuracy, performing prospective lead optimization, or validating SAR predictions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep learning-based variant calling from long reads using Clair3 for SNPs and small indels. Use when calling germline variants from ONT or PacBio alignments, particularly when high accuracy is needed for clinical or research applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create QA checklists for verifying design implementation accuracy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, auditing, scoring, or improving a real or synthetic MATLAB AI tutor transcript, tutoring prompt, generated lesson, exercise, feedback sequence, or skill behavior for MATLAB accuracy, active learning, assignment guardrails, feedback quality, debugging support, transfer prompts, and instructor-facing quality recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trim large MetaX model directories for dummy smoke tests or real-checkpoint loading on limited GPUs. Preserve target execution paths while reducing depth; use the real-weight workflow when a loadable checkpoint is requested. Not for accuracy evaluation or model compatibility upgrades.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract text from complex documents using Chandra OCR — handles tables, forms, handwriting, and full page layouts with high accuracy. Use when: extracting data from scanned documents, reading complex tables from PDFs/images, processing handwritten forms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The craft of communicating technical concepts clearly to developers. Developer communications isn't marketing—it's about building trust through transparency, accuracy, and genuine utility. The best devrel content helps developers solve real problems. This skill covers technical documentation, developer tutorials, API references, changelog writing, developer blog posts, and developer community engagement. Great developer communications treats developers as peers, not leads to convert. Use when "documentation, docs, tutorial, getting started, API reference, changelog, release notes, developer guide, devrel, developer relations, code examples, SDK docs, README, documentation, devrel, tutorials, api-docs, developer-experience, technical-writing, getting-started, changelogs" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The systematic discipline of reviewing AI-generated and human-written marketing content for quality, accuracy, consistency, and effectiveness. This isn't proofreading—it's strategic quality control that catches issues before they damage brand, waste spend, or miss opportunities. In an era where AI can generate content at scale, QA becomes the bottleneck— and the moat. Speed without quality is just fast failure. Every piece of content is a brand promise, and QA ensures that promise is kept. Content QA operates at multiple levels: tactical (spelling, grammar), strategic (message alignment), technical (platform compliance), and brand (voice, tone). The best QA catches what the creator couldn't see because they were too close. Use when "review content, QA, quality check, proofread, check copy, content review, brand compliance, verify content, fact check, review before publish, content approval, final review, qa, content-review, quality-assurance, brand-compliance, proofreading, content-quality, review" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts token usage ~75% by speaking like caveman while keeping full technical accuracy. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra, wenyan-lite, wenyan-full, wenyan-ultra. Use when user says "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman", "less tokens", "be brief", or invokes /caveman. Also auto-triggers when token efficiency is requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check that a document's claims about code are actually true by reading the prose, the code, and the tests and reporting (or fixing) where they disagree. Use whenever the user wants to verify a README, guide, spec, or docstring still matches the code; whenever they mention documentation drift, doc-code sync, "is this still accurate", stale docs, or keeping docs/tests/code consistent; before publishing or merging a docs change; or as a periodic doc-accuracy sweep. The agent reads the prose's meaning directly — there is no claim-comment DSL to maintain. Pairs with TDD — the test suite is the deterministic behavioral gate, this skill is the semantic prose-vs-reality review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-context adversarial review for deliverables before shipping. Use when producing blog posts, technical recommendations, analysis briefs, code, or any artifact where accuracy matters more than speed. Triggers on "challenge this", "review before shipping", "adversarial pass", "stress test this".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。