「advisor」の検索結果

Decode an incoming message into a structured breakdown separating the literal ask from the job-to-be-done. Use when a loaded Slack ping, email, mandate, or escalation needs a reply.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break down epics into user stories with Humanizing Work split patterns. Use when a backlog item is too large to estimate, sequence, or deliver safely.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose context stuffing vs. context engineering. Use when an AI workflow feels bloated, brittle, or hard to steer reliably.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a go/no-go assessment for retiring a product or feature, then right-size the effort. Use when someone says "we should probably kill this" and nobody has made the call.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess whether your product work is AI-first or AI-shaped. Use when evaluating AI maturity and choosing the next team capability to build.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive Apache Hudi table design advisor. Turns workload requirements into architecture guidance and an Architecture Decision Record through a tiered conversational flow, with configuration bundles on implemented executable routes. Invoke when a user wants help designing a new Hudi table or evaluating an existing design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes your codebase and asks 3 targeted questions to recommend the right AI-assisted development methodology stack

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes your codebase and asks 3 targeted questions to recommend the right AI-assisted development methodology stack

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Update the guide's threat intelligence through AgentSec Triage, research new coding-agent and MCP security advisories, and synchronize the security feed. Use for threat database refreshes or mise a jour de la base de menaces, not repository security scans or Claude Code release tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only for MSBuild failure investigation, build-performance analysis, or review of existing build XML/extension contracts. A plan to convert a working legacy/non-SDK project to SDK style or migrate packages.config is a project-system migration, NOT a build-file review: do not activate, even to check scope. Framework/API upgrades are also excluded. Activate for advisory Import/Exists hook and NuGet packed-import questions even without a checkout or failed build; .csproj/.fsproj/.vbproj/.props/.targets conditions; custom-target inputs/outputs; .binlog capture/replay; failing dotnet build/restore/pack/publish or MSBuild-based test builds; slow evaluation, compilation, copying, or no-change builds; and controlled timing comparisons. Exclude SDK installation alone, C# refactoring, runtime profiling, assertions after successful builds, and non-MSBuild builds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shape pitches, brand stories, presentations, and creative writing with narrative frameworks such as the Hero's Journey, Story Spine, and Freytag's Pyramid. Use when a user wants to structure, critique, or strengthen a story.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create (generate) any TRES Finance report end-to-end via the tres-mcp MCP server and GraphQL — trigger the export, verify a report row was actually created (guarding against silent failures), poll until done, and return the download link. Trigger this skill on ANY report creation request, including phrases like "create a report", "generate a report", "export", "run a report", "I need a Transaction Ledger / Balances / Reconciliation / Cost Basis / Roll Forward / Staking / Audit report", "pull the data for", "download a report for", "give me a CSV/XLSX of", or whenever the user wants TRES to produce a report file. Use together with tres-report-advisor when the user is unsure which report they need.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recommend the right TRES Finance report for any user question. Trigger this skill whenever a user asks which report to use, what report contains certain data, how to get specific information out of TRES, or compares two reports. Also trigger when the user describes a goal (e.g. "month-end close", "auditor needs proof", "tax filing", "reconciliation") without naming a specific report. Trigger phrases include "which report", "what report", "how do I export", "where can I find", "I need a report for", "what's the difference between", "best report for", "auditor asked for", or any question about getting data out of TRES Finance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

VS-Enhanced Quantitative Design Consultant with Materials & Sampling Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Avoids obvious experimental designs, proposes context-optimal quantitative strategies Absorbed C4 (Experimental Materials Developer) and D1 (Sampling Strategy Advisor) capabilities Use when: selecting quantitative research design, planning experimental/survey methodology, power analysis, developing materials, sampling Triggers: RCT, quasi-experimental, experimental design, survey design, power analysis, sample size, factorial design, materials, stimuli, sampling strategy

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

VS-Enhanced Qualitative Design Consultant with Ethnography & Action Research Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Avoids overused phenomenology, proposes context-optimal qualitative strategies Absorbed H1 (Ethnographic Research Advisor) and H2 (Action Research Facilitator) capabilities Use when: selecting qualitative research design, planning phenomenology/grounded theory/case study/ethnography/action research Triggers: phenomenology, 현상학, grounded theory, 근거이론, case study, 사례연구, narrative inquiry, ethnography, 민족지, action research, 실행연구, qualitative design

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent A5 - Paradigm & Worldview Advisor - Philosophical foundations for research design. Covers ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology alignment. Use when: establishing philosophical foundations, justifying methodological choices, writing positionality statements Triggers: paradigm, 패러다임, ontology, epistemology, worldview, 세계관, philosophical foundations, 철학적 기초

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research Guardian - Ethics Advisory & Bias Detection across all research stages Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Surface-level screening, deep contextual analysis, constructive recommendations Use when: reviewing research ethics, checking for bias, assessing trustworthiness, QRP screening Triggers: ethics review, IRB, bias detection, QRP, trustworthiness, research integrity, p-hacking, HARKing

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured multi-provider AI debates between Claude and available advisors — use for critical decisions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to verify CLAIM-LEVEL grounding of a documentation page (or set of pages) against the source code. Activate when you have specific pages to check for factual accuracy -- not when sweeping a whole corpus (use docs-corpus-audit for that) and not when triaging a PR diff (use docs-sync for that). Trigger nouns: "is this doc accurate", "verify the page against the code", "fact-check this section", "any claims that drifted from source", "fact-checking", "grounding audit", "drift hunt", "claim verification". Returns per-claim verdicts (GROUNDED | PARTIAL | CONTRADICTED | UNSUPPORTED) with file:line evidence citations. Catches paragraph-level inaccuracies that page-level audit averages over -- e.g. a paragraph with 5 claims where 4 are grounded and 1 is fabricated. Does NOT modify files (returns advisory only); does NOT re-architect the docs; does NOT triage PRs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Queue microsoft/apm pull requests labelled `panel-review` (or an explicit named list) and fan them out through an isolated pool (default 2) of autopilot-pr-review-worker sessions. Advisory only. Never implements. Never composes autopilot-pr-merge-worker. Never review every open PR. Works in a local session, Copilot App automation, Cloud Agent, Remote Agent, or Agentic Workflow. Does not triage issues or open greenfield PRs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever a pull request is opened, reopened, or synchronized in microsoft/apm to assess whether and how the documentation corpus must change to stay truthful with the proposed code change. Activate even when the PR title or body says nothing about docs -- the skill must run on every PR to detect silent drift between code and docs. Classifies impact as no-change, in-place edit (one to a few paragraphs), or structural change (new page or TOC reshape), then orchestrates a CDO + doc-writer + python-architect + editorial-owner + growth-hacker loop to produce a patch-ready advisory. Does NOT review code quality, security, or test coverage. Does NOT auto-merge or auto-push doc edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to triage ONE microsoft/apm issue already selected by autopilot-issue-triage-scheduler. Return one advisory recommendation and a proposed scope brief, never human approval. Do not implement the issue, manage the backlog, or list the queue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Queue open microsoft/apm pull requests (community fixes, PRs without an issue, or PRs that close an issue) and fan them out through an isolated pool (default 2) of autopilot-pr-triage-worker sessions. Advisory only. Never merges, never assigns, never requests reviewers, never runs autopilot-pr-review-worker. Activate on a mixed PR list or queue-open when the job is PR triage. Works in a local session, Copilot App automation, Cloud Agent, Remote Agent, or Agentic Workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Queue open microsoft/apm issues and fan them out through an isolated pool (default 2) of autopilot-issue-triage-worker sessions. Advisory only. Never implements, never assigns, never requests reviewers. Activate on a mixed issue list or queue-all when the job is triage. Works in a local session, Copilot App automation, Cloud Agent, Remote Agent, or Agentic Workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。