「agreement」の検索結果

Guides implementation of UK international data transfer mechanisms post-Brexit including the International Data Transfer Agreement (IDTA), UK Addendum to EU SCCs, UK adequacy assessments, and ICO transfer risk assessment tool. Keywords: UK IDTA, UK addendum, ICO TRA, post-Brexit transfers, UK GDPR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts Privacy Impact Assessment for vendor and third-party data processing arrangements. Covers processor due diligence, Data Processing Agreement (DPA) requirements under GDPR Article 28, sub-processor management, cross-border vendor transfers, cloud service provider assessments, and ongoing vendor monitoring. Keywords: vendor PIA, processor assessment, DPA, Article 28, sub-processor, cloud privacy, third-party risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements HIPAA Privacy Rule requirements for research uses of protected health information under 45 CFR §164.512(i). Covers IRB and Privacy Board waivers of authorization, individual authorization for research, limited data set and data use agreements, preparatory to research provisions, and decedent research provisions. Keywords: HIPAA research, IRB waiver, Privacy Board, authorization, limited data set, preparatory research, de-identification, Common Rule.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages HIPAA Business Associate Agreements under 45 CFR §164.502(e) and §164.504(e). Covers required BAA provisions, business associate vs subcontractor obligations, breach notification chain, downstream BA requirements, and termination remedies. Keywords: BAA, business associate, subcontractor, HIPAA compliance, PHI disclosure, termination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements HIPAA de-identification methods under 45 CFR §164.514(a)-(b). Covers expert determination method and safe harbor method with 18 identifiers removal, re-identification risk assessment, limited dataset requirements, and data use agreements. Keywords: HIPAA de-identification, safe harbor, expert determination, 18 identifiers, limited dataset, PHI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements 42 CFR Part 2 protections for substance use disorder patient records. Covers written consent requirements stricter than HIPAA, re-disclosure prohibition, court order procedures, qualified service organization agreements, and 2024 amendments aligning Part 2 with HIPAA. Keywords: 42 CFR Part 2, substance use disorder, SUD records, re-disclosure, consent, Part 2 amendments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adobe Acrobat Sign integration. Manage Users, Agreements, Widgets. Use when the user wants to interact with Adobe Acrobat Sign data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Navigate privacy regulations (GDPR, CCPA), review DPAs, and handle data subject requests. Use when reviewing data processing agreements, responding to data subject access or deletion requests, assessing cross-border data transfer requirements, or evaluating privacy compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies differentially bound ChIP-seq regions between conditions using DiffBind, csaw (sliding windows), DESeq2/edgeR/PyDESeq2 on count matrices, NormR (control-aware), or MAnorm2. Distinguishes three distinct normalization problems (composition bias, trended bias, global shifts) and matches each to its appropriate fix including spike-in scaling. Use when comparing ChIP-seq binding between experimental conditions, choosing normalization for global vs local changes, integrating spike-in data, or reconciling DiffBind/DESeq2 disagreement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover RBP binding motifs from CLIP-seq peaks or single-nucleotide crosslink sites using HOMER, MEME/STREME, kpLogo, mCross (CL-position-registered motifs), PEKA (positional k-mer enrichment), RBPamp (affinity), and RNA Bind-n-Seq (RBNS) cross-validation. Use when characterizing RBP sequence specificity, registering motifs to crosslink positions, validating in vivo CLIP motifs against in vitro RBNS Kd, reconciling motif disagreements across tools, or correcting for the uracil crosslinking bias that contaminates raw CLIP motif logos.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides God Committee members through consensus-building for collective decisions. Use for proposals, voting, and disagreement resolution. Triggers on: consensus, voting, proposal, committee decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in negotiation strategy - systematic approaches to reaching agreements that create value. Covers preparation, tactics, objection handling, and closing. Knows when to push, when to concede, and how to expand the pie rather than just divide it. Use when "negotiation, negotiate, deal terms, BATNA, making a deal, closing a deal, contract terms, bargaining, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in the human side of code review. Covers giving feedback that lands, receiving criticism gracefully, navigating disagreements, and building a healthy review culture. Understands that code review is as much about relationships as it is about code quality. Use when "code review, PR feedback, review comments, how to give feedback, harsh review, review culture, constructive criticism, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keeps specification documents and code in agreement. Audit mode finds every divergence when an implementation is claimed complete; sync mode detects spec drift in staged changes and updates the spec after user approval, so each commit is a reconciled snapshot of spec, tests, and code. Use when an implementation is claimed complete against a spec, before committing changes that may drift from the spec, or after approving decisions that must flow back into it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether a paper's EVALUATION DESIGN actually measures what it claims and whether its reporting is complete — the validity layer family D (experiment-forensics) cannot reach. Three patterns: train/test leakage means the reported score may not measure generalization (HP-EVAL-LEAKAGE — adopts the Kapoor & Narayanan 8-type / 3-category leakage taxonomy; the illegitimate-proxy / sampling-bias / pretraining-contamination subtypes hand off as needs_external_check, naming but NEVER running Oren-2023 exchangeability / Shi-2023 Min-K% / Golchin-2023 Time-Travel / BIG-bench canary); a load-bearing LLM judge is conflicted (same model/family as a compared system) or unvalidated (no human-agreement, no bias control) (HP-JUDGE-VALIDITY); a declared condition/metric is dropped or switched to favor the method, or 'best' is chosen with no held-out set (HP-SELECTIVE-REPORTING). Verdict-bearing at L0/L1 from the DESCRIBED protocol — NOT repo-gated like experiment-forensics; L2 only CONFIRMS against split/preprocessing/result files. A fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per pass) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Leakage and under-reporting are usually HONEST methodological errors — every finding describes a discrepancy to CHECK, never an accusation. An LLM generating GROUND-TRUTH labels is HP-FAKE-GT (experiment-forensics) — routed there, not here. Emits eval-design-forensics.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "eval design audit", "evaluation validity", "train/test leakage", "data leakage", "is the score measuring generalization", "LLM judge bias", "is the judge validated", "selective reporting", "cherry-picked results", "评估设计审计", "评测有效性", "数据泄漏", "训练测试集泄漏", "裁判模型有没有验证", "选择性报告".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before making any completion/success claims. Covers three practices - receiving feedback with technical rigor over performative agreement, requesting reviews via code-reviewer subagent, and verification gates requiring evidence before any status claims. Essential for subagent-driven development, pull requests, and preventing false completion claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-affiliated marketing deliberation that applies documented public frameworks through clearly labeled simulated advisors, surfaces disagreements, and synthesizes a decision. Use when the user wants multiple expert lenses on one bounded marketing question. NOT FOR: factual claims about a living person's private views, primary research (use suede-customer-research), or executing the selected tactic (route to the relevant public Suede skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede AI MCP release QA, scoped to this pack's own server (mcp/suede-skills-mcp.mjs) and its catalog, install, and docs surface. Runs the full JSON-RPC lifecycle against a live server (initialize, notifications/initialized, ping, tools/list, tools/call, resources/list, resources/read, prompts/list, prompts/get), plus protocol negotiation, closed input and output schemas, tool annotations, structuredContent with text fallbacks, malformed-input probes, clean stdio, catalog-to-folder agreement, and install-path language. Use when the MCP server, mcp/catalog.json, a tool, resource, or prompt definition, or the MCP install docs change, or before publishing an MCP release. A check that did not run against the live server is a FAIL, not a skip. NOT FOR: a generic third-party MCP server, which this skill's hardcoded surface does not describe; fixing or testing the public install path itself (use suede-launch-packaging).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits whether scores, benchmarks, LLM judges, or surveys measure what we think. Use when a benchmark is saturated, a score unreliable, or judge agreement untrustworthy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build students' capacity to compare accounts across multiple historical sources — identifying agreements, contradictions, and gaps. Use when students treat individual documents as complete answers rather than partial perspectives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs contract-driven compliance review of insurance certificates and endorsements against CRE/site-access and vendor agreement requirements. Produces pass/fail/conditional determinations, deficit lists, and broker-ready remediation instructions. Use when reviewing COI packets, ACORD 25 forms, or endorsements for additional insured, primary and non-contributory, waiver of subrogation, completed operations, umbrella alignment, limits adequacy, or insurer rating compliance. Trigger terms: COI, ACORD, additional insured, certificate holder, cancellation notice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces requirement-by-requirement CRE insurance certificate compliance reviews by analyzing ACORD 25 certificates and endorsements against Access Agreement terms. Use when the user mentions COI review, insurance compliance, ACORD 25 analysis, Additional Insured verification, primary/non-contributory status, waiver of subrogation, vendor insurance audit, CGL compliance, umbrella follow-form, broker-ready deficiency instructions, certificate holder vs. additional insured, AI endorsements (CG 20 10, CG 20 37), or carrier rating checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews CRE insurance certificates (ACORD 25) and endorsements against Access Agreement insurance requirements, producing a pass/fail compliance determination with broker-ready deficiency instructions. Verifies coverage limits, Additional Insured status, primary/non-contributory language, waiver of subrogation, umbrella alignment, and carrier qualifications. Use when reviewing COIs, ACORD forms, vendor or contractor insurance, site access insurance, or Additional Insured endorsements in commercial real estate transactions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a compliant Commercial Invoice for Export satisfying customs, banking (L/C), logistics, and insurance requirements. Enforces Incoterms 2020, HS tariff classification, country-of-origin determination, export control referencing, and certification language. Use when preparing export invoices for customs authorities, freight forwarders, banks, or insurance underwriters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。