743 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Extraia dados estruturados de respostas de LLM com validação Pydantic, tente novamente automaticamente extrações que falharem, analise JSON complexo com segurança de tipo e transmita resultados parciais com Instructor - biblioteca de saída estruturada testada em batalha
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Core technical, safety, and maintainability rules for codebase edits. Trigger when: - Writing code, refactoring, modifying files, or creating unit tests. - Proposing commits, reviewing git history, or auditing code quality. - Modifying files in any programming language (e.g. *.go, *.rs, *.py, *.ts, *.js, *.c, *.cpp). - Prompt contains keywords: refactor, build, compile, lint, test, git, commit, rule priority, type safety, error handling, defensive programming.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configure Azure API Management (APIM) as AI Gateway to secure, observe, control AI models, MCP servers, agents. Helps with rate limiting, semantic caching, content safety, load balancing. USE FOR: AI Gateway, APIM, setup gateway, configure gateway, add gateway, model gateway, MCP server, r...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepares a DRAFT management-of-change intake record from a change description (email, meeting note, marked-up drawing or request form): what changes from what to what and where, the identifiers named, the candidate affected documents matched against the register, the disciplines to consult with the reason for each, and the numbered questions reviewers must answer, with UNKNOWN wherever the description is silent. Prepares the record only: never approves, classifies the change, decides replacement in kind or makes any hazard or safety judgement. Use when the user asks to "raise an MoC for this", "prepare the change request intake", "which documents does this change touch", "who needs to review this change" or "draft the MoC form from this email". Do not use for tracking who owes information to whom across disciplines, use interface-register-builder instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Senior engineer CLI expertise for AI agents — workflows, safety guardrails, gotchas, and anti-patterns across cloud, IaC, containers, databases, dev tools, and platforms
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and interpret TypeSafe Jev decision requests in NV oOS — typed choice/score/noul questions, batching, confidence thresholds, composite scoring, and guardrails. Use when classifying, routing, scoring, or safety-screening content with the typesafe_decide or typesafe_guardrail tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
スキーマ/データ移行の安全性を framework 非依存で審査する。破壊的スキーマ変更・ロック誘発・backfill・ロールバック可逆性・expand-contract の段階適用を、prisma / typeorm / Rails / Django / Alembic / 生 SQL などに横断適用する。
Creates and reviews agent skills safely by enforcing deletion-prevention harness rules: no fixed absolute temp paths, no cwd-dependent cleanup, no wildcard deletes, no workspace-external file operations, no silent cleanup failures, and mandatory temp-root validation before any destructive command. Use when creating a new skill, updating an existing SKILL.md, or reviewing prompts/runbooks that include temp files, extraction, cleanup, PowerShell, bash, rm, del, Remove-Item, or archive expansion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract structured data from LLM responses with Pydantic validation, retry failed extractions automatically, parse complex JSON with type safety, and stream partial results with Instructor - battle-tested structured output library
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Predicts ADMET properties using ADMETlab 3.0 (119 endpoints with uncertainty), ADMET-AI, DeepChem MolNet, and chemprop D-MPNN with explicit handling of OECD QSAR principles, applicability domain assessment, calibration, hERG/CYP/AMES gold-standard endpoints, and PAINS / Lipinski / Ro5 / Veber / BBB druglikeness filters. Use when filtering compounds for drug-likeness, prioritizing leads by predicted safety, or building an in-house ADMET QSAR model.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Predicts ADMET properties using ADMETlab 3.0 (119 endpoints with uncertainty), ADMET-AI, DeepChem MolNet, and chemprop D-MPNN with explicit handling of OECD QSAR principles, applicability domain assessment, calibration, hERG/CYP/AMES gold-standard endpoints, and PAINS / Lipinski / Ro5 / Veber / BBB druglikeness filters. Use when filtering compounds for drug-likeness, prioritizing leads by predicted safety, or building an in-house ADMET QSAR model.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Predicts ADMET properties using ADMETlab 3.0 (119 endpoints with uncertainty), ADMET-AI, DeepChem MolNet, and chemprop D-MPNN with explicit handling of OECD QSAR principles, applicability domain assessment, calibration, hERG/CYP/AMES gold-standard endpoints, and PAINS / Lipinski / Ro5 / Veber / BBB druglikeness filters. Use when filtering compounds for drug-likeness, prioritizing leads by predicted safety, or building an in-house ADMET QSAR model.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for when to use and when not to use return validators in Convex functions. Use this skill whenever the user is writing Convex queries, mutations, or actions and needs guidance on return value validation. Also trigger when the user asks about Convex type safety, runtime validation, AI-generated Convex code, Convex AI rules, Convex security best practices, or when they're debugging return type issues in Convex functions. Trigger this skill when users mention "validators", "returns", "return type", or "exact types" in the context of Convex development. Also trigger when writing or reviewing Convex AI rules or prompts that instruct LLMs how to write Convex code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build content moderation applications using the Azure AI Content Safety SDK for Java.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Azure AI Content Safety SDK for Python. Use for detecting harmful content in text and images with multi-severity classification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design spec with 98 rules for building CLI tools that AI agents can safely use. Covers structured JSON output, error handling, input contracts, safety guardrails, exit codes, and agent self-description.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract structured data from LLM responses with Pydantic validation, retry failed extractions automatically, parse complex JSON with type safety, and stream partial results with Instructor - battle-tested structured output library
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Architecture and systems design for agents that retain bounded state across sessions. Covers durable event history, owned state, derived memory, retrieval indexes, framework evaluation, recovery, deletion, and rebuild behavior. Uses constructed implementation examples and workload calibration rather than universal vendor, latency, similarity, retention, or cost claims. Activate on: "always-on agent", "persistent agent architecture", "episodic memory system", "agent memory design", "long-running agent", "stateful agent", "agent that remembers", "MemGPT architecture", "Letta deployment", "/always-on-agent-architecture". NOT for: choosing what data to feed the agent (use always-on-agent-inputs), brainstorming applications (use always-on-agent-applications), safety and privacy concerns (use always-on-agent-safety), general agentic patterns (use agentic-patterns).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How to design contextual inputs for an always-on AI agent with episodic memory. Covers what data to feed the agent, how to structure observations and triggers, ambient context capture (screen, audio, calendar), context window budgeting, and retrieval strategies that keep the agent grounded in what's actually happening. Activate on: "what should the agent observe", "context inputs for agent", "ambient context capture", "agent triggers", "agent input design", "screenpipe integration", "context window budget", "what data to feed my agent", "/always-on-agent-inputs". NOT for: memory architecture and storage (use always-on-agent-architecture), application ideas (use always-on-agent-applications), safety concerns (use always-on-agent-safety).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design RL simulation sandboxes, trajectory datasets, QLoRA/LoRA adaptation plans, eval harnesses, and rollback unhooks for agents learning specific coding behaviors beyond the base model. Use when building or reviewing tool-use training loops, offline trajectories, reward functions, self-improvement harnesses, or Port Daddy agent behavior curricula. NOT for generic ML tutorials, full model training operations, or production deployment without eval gates and safety unhooks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
複数店舗の販売データや商品の特性をもとに、需要予測、安全在庫、発注量を検討するスキル。販促後の需要減少や季節商品の値下げ時期まで計画を支援します。
C++コードの実装・レビュー・改修で、型の扱い、メモリ管理、例外処理、並行処理を点検するスキル。標準的な指針に沿って安全性と書き方の一貫性を整えます。
Azure AI Content Safety SDK for Python. Use for detecting harmful content in text and images with multi-severity classification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build content moderation applications using the Azure AI Content Safety SDK for Java.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。