1,999 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when strengthening ACM CCS reproducibility evidence, including the artifact-availability posture, threat-model-to-evidence mapping, attack reproduction steps, defense overhead measurement, measurement-dataset provenance, environment and version pinning, and honest justification when artifacts cannot be shared.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
当你在为《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 稿件准备代码与数据可用性材料、判断本刊是否设有独立制品评审(artifact evaluation)徽章制度时调用。讲清本刊现状(以同行评议为主、无独立徽章制度的现况为待核实)、如何主动提供匿名可复现的代码/数据以增强说服力、控制仿真与实物实验制品的组织，帮助控制/自动化/模式识别方向的中文稿在 Acta Automatica Sinica 外审中用可用制品提升可信度。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when strengthening the reproducibility of an ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) paper or preparing for the ACM MM Reproducibility track and ACM artifact badging — capturing environments, media/data access, seeds, and multimodal pipelines so an independent reviewer can rebuild results and reach Artifacts Evaluated or Results Reproduced badges.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when packaging code, models, datasets, or media as ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) artifacts — building the anonymous review package versus the public release, and choosing between the Open Source Software Competition, the Dataset track, the Reproducibility track, and main-track supplementary evidence, each with its own blinding and expectations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when packaging code, datasets, prompts, model outputs, or annotation materials for an ACL submission under ACL Rolling Review, covering anonymized supplement archives, scientific-artifact items of the Responsible NLP checklist, licensing and intended-use documentation, data statements, and post-acceptance public release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when packaging AAMAS multiagent code, environments, opponent and population sets, random seeds, game definitions, and logs as anonymous supplementary evidence or a public post-acceptance release, even without a separate artifact badge, so that game-theory and MARL reviewers can inspect and re-run the interaction claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Corrects the gene-independent copy-number artifact in CRISPR-Cas9 screens (Aguirre 2016 / Munoz 2016 Cancer Discov) where amplified loci appear essential from DNA-damage burden of simultaneous cuts. Covers the gene-independent DNA-damage / G2-arrest mechanism, CRISPRcleanR (Iorio 2018) unsupervised pre-hoc correction, CERES (Meyers 2017) joint CN + gene-effect model, Chronos (Dempster 2021) DepMap-standard population-dynamics + CN model with lowest residual bias, the decision tree by data availability, the Spearman LFC-vs-CN diagnostic, focal-amplification examples (ERBB2 in HER2+, MYC in colorectal, FGFR1 in head and neck), and CRISPRi/a alternatives that bypass the artifact. Use when screening cancer cell lines, diagnosing essentiality at amplified loci, choosing CRISPRcleanR / CERES / Chronos, deciding whether CN correction is needed before MAGeCK / BAGEL2 / drugZ, or switching from Cas9 to CRISPRi.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Spatially-aware quality control (QC) software for both spot-level and artifact-level QC in spot-based spatial transcripomics, such as 10x Visium. These methods calculate local (nearest-neighbors) mean and variance of standard QC metrics (library size, unique genes, and mitochondrial percentage) to identify outliers spot and large technical artifacts. Scales linearly with the number of spots and is designed to be used with 'SpatialExperiment' objects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Client for the gypsum REST API (https://gypsum.artifactdb.com), a cloud-based file store in the ArtifactDB ecosystem. This package provides functions for uploads, downloads, and various adminstrative and management tasks. Check out the docu
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert knowledge for Azure Repos development including troubleshooting, best practices, decision making, architecture & design patterns, limits & quotas, security, configuration, and integrations & coding patterns. Use when managing Git/TFVC repos, branch policies, PR checks/status, CodeQL/security scans, or Azure DevOps integrations, and other Azure Repos related development tasks. Not for Azure DevOps (use azure-devops), Azure Pipelines (use azure-pipelines), Azure Boards (use azure-boards), Azure Artifacts (use azure-artifacts).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns a brief, script, scene breakdown, treatment, or story idea into ONE connected director's shotlist for Seedance 2.0 — a single editable HTML artifact with a global Style Prefix, an @-asset glossary, and named per-scene prompts (1a, 1b, 2a…) each in Style → Characters → Scene → CUT 1..N form. Use whenever the user says 'make a shotlist', 'break this script into prompts', 'generate Seedance prompts for this ad/film', 'turn this brief into a shot list', 'director's shotlist', or wants many connected scene prompts rather than one. Also use to revise an existing shotlist (edit-once-propagates: 'change the style prefix everywhere', 'rewrite scene 4', 'split prompt 6'). Each prompt targets 15s; longer scenes split across 1a/1b/1c under one scene number.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
MCP threat-model artifact for a scaffolded harness. Reports allowed/denied tools, dangerous permissions count, secrets reachability, network/shell/file-write grants, default-deny posture. Verdict: clean (exit 0) / medium (exit 1) / high (exit 2). The 'enterprise gold' artifact for PR + compliance review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit one research Workspace for declared Unit outputs and Pipeline target Artifacts, writing `output/CONTRACT_REPORT.md`; use for mid-Run coverage snapshots or final delivery completeness, not deep provenance integrity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Removes unwanted visual elements from videos using AI-powered inpainting via Volcengine LAS. Video watermark removal, subtitle removal, logo removal, and text overlay removal — erases and cleans up watermarks, hardcoded subtitles, logos, text, and other fixed-region artifacts and obstructions from video footage. Video inpainting, video repair, video restoration, and video cleanup. Supports specifying exact bounding boxes for targeted removal and erasure. Handles videos up to 4 hours and 30GB. Use this skill when the user wants to remove watermarks from videos, erase hardcoded subtitles/captions, delete logo or text overlays, clean up video footage by removing unwanted objects, repair or restore videos by removing obstructions, do video inpainting on fixed regions, or remove visual artifacts from video content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Upload video/audio media to BytePlus VOD (Video on Demand) storage, returning the Vid and playback references; supports both local file upload (ApplyUploadInfo + TOS + CommitUploadInfo) and URL pull upload (UploadMediaByUrl); also supports AI-based comprehensive quality restoration on already-uploaded videos (removing compression artifacts, noise, scratches, improving clarity, and configuring Pro-tier color depth). Trigger keywords: upload video, upload media, upload to VOD, URL upload, pull upload, local upload, file upload, UploadMediaByUrl, ApplyUploadInfo, media ingestion, quality restoration, quality enhancement, comprehensive restoration, video denoising, denoise, compression artifact removal, color depth, bit depth, 10-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to write or improve integration tests for Quarkus — including @QuarkusTest, Dev Services for automatic container provisioning, Testcontainers via QuarkusTestResourceLifecycleManager, WireMock for external HTTP stubs, @QuarkusIntegrationTest for black-box testing against packaged artifacts, REST Assured, data isolation strategies (@TestTransaction vs @BeforeEach cleanup), and Maven Surefire/Failsafe three-tier split (*Test, *IT, *AT). This should trigger for requests such as Add or improve integration tests in a Quarkus project; Configure Testcontainers or Dev Services for Quarkus tests; Add WireMock stubs for external HTTP dependencies in Quarkus integration tests; Set up @QuarkusIntegrationTest for packaged artifact or native binary testing; Fix test data isolation or configure Maven Surefire/Failsafe split. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating or refining a structured Java implementation plan from trusted issue summaries, approved designs, ADRs, OpenSpec changes, existing plans, or a valid combination. The plan records its source artifacts and derivation direction and can remain the execution artifact without requiring OpenSpec. This should trigger for requests such as Create a plan from an issue; Create a plan from OpenSpec; Design an implementation plan; Refine an existing plan. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need GitHub CLI (`gh`) installation/authentication guidance and an operator-only GitHub issue inventory workflow. The agent does not ingest GitHub issue, milestone, body, comment, title, label, or summary text; requirements analysis must use repository-owned planning artifacts, with issue numbers only for traceability. This should trigger for requests such as GitHub issue inventory workflow; GitHub CLI setup for issues; Prepare issue traceability lists; Analyze repository planning artifacts linked to GitHub issues. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Lifecycle SOP for **per-model prompt artifacts** — the compiled prompts, instructions, few-shot demos, edit-format pins, and embedding-bound indices that change behavior when the underlying LM, dataset, or framework version changes. Activate when adopting compiled prompts (DSPy, GEPA, BootstrapFewShot output), when supporting multiple LMs in production, when a provider deprecates a model snapshot, or when a framework deprecates a config surface (LlamaIndex `ServiceContext` → `Settings`, Aider edit-format defaults). Do NOT activate for one-off raw prompt edits or for truly model-agnostic system prompts that have been swap-tested. Search keywords: prompt portability, model swap, recompile prompt, model deprecation, prompt per model, prompt breaks on new model, version compiled prompts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Update an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Never edits code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Capture and retrieve durable YYLO Ledger artifact Records with intentional profiles, payload modes, provenance, retention, and secret-safe immutable evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate how a concept, code path, application, network flow, system, incident, document, or local artifact actually works, then deliver a two-depth visual HTML explainer with a dead-simple big-picture first layer and source-backed technical depth behind it. Use when the user invokes $xray, asks how something works under the hood, wants a module or app behavior traced across boundaries, requests web, code, network, or safe static artifact research before explanation, or asks for an evidence-backed explainer. Do not use for answer-only definitions, general web design, full codebase audits, or invasive binary reverse engineering without explicit authorization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Researches an open-ended question — options, possible solutions, prior art, trade-offs, or how something works — and produces a durable, evidence-backed, adversarially-validated report that recommends an option without committing the team to any artifact. Use when you want to research approaches, weigh options, survey prior art or the state of the art, or understand how something works before committing to a direction. Does not diagnose a bug, failure, or root cause — use investigate. Does not specify a feature — use plan-a-feature. Does not create or update a coding standard — use coding-standard. Does not compare two concrete artifacts for gaps — use gap-analysis. Does not assess an existing module's architecture — use architectural-analysis. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。