「check」の検索結果

Validate plugin content quality before release. Run skill-validator across plugins, verify marketplace.json completeness, check plugin.json version consistency, and detect broken documentation cross-references. Use when preparing a release, before running release.sh, or when user mentions "release check", "pre-release", "plugin-release-checker", or "release validation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

认知-工作对齐健康检查（第四维）。验证五个工作域的核心产出是否可追溯到元思维体系（L1.5原则 or L1文档），识别「漂浮」的工作任务，输出对齐报告。与现有三维健康检查互补：skill-system-health-check（内部一致性）/ cognitive-consistency-check（认知自洽）/ skill-domain-health-check（传播完备性）+ 本Skill（认知根对齐）= 四维完整体系。触发词：「检查工作任务与认知的对齐」「第四维健康检查」「检查工作任务是否有认知根」「认知体系和工作任务是否自洽」「认知对齐检查」。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-production security checklist for Agentforce deployments: agent run-as permission scope, grounding-source data classification, action write-scope, audit trail. NOT for the full go-live readiness gate covering cost telemetry, rate limits, rollout and rollback — use agentforce/agentforce-production-readiness-checklist. NOT for a general org security review — use security/security-health-check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Canonical go-live checklist for Agentforce deployments with rehearsed rollback and stakeholder sign-off records. NOT for the technical pre-prod verification behind those sign-off rows — cost telemetry, rate limits, canary rollout, latency benchmarks — use agentforce/agentforce-production-readiness-checklist. NOT for general Salesforce release management — use devops/release-management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dependent picklists in Salesforce: controlling field (picklist or checkbox), dependent picklist, valueSettings matrix in metadata, API behavior via SOAP/REST, LWC lightning-combobox with dependency. NOT for creating picklist fields or Global Value Sets and replacing retired values - use admin/picklist-and-value-sets. NOT for filtering picklist values per record type or layout - use admin/record-types-and-page-layouts. Keywords: controllingField, valueSettings, controllingFieldValue, valueName, checked/unchecked checkbox controller, RecordTypePicklistValue, isDependentPicklist, getController, validFor, controllerValues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when authoring, reviewing, or maintaining Salesforce DevOps operational documents — runbooks, environment matrices, deployment guides, and post-deploy validation checklists. Triggers: 'runbook', 'environment matrix', 'deployment guide', 'pre-deploy checklist', 'post-deploy validation', 'how do I document a deployment', 'rollback procedure template'. NOT for what actually belongs on the pre-deploy gate — use devops/pre-deployment-checklist. NOT for release calendar, versioning, or go/no-go governance — use devops/release-management. Also covers: the devops-process YAML artefact (environment ladder, change-request state machine, deploy contract, deploy order, RACI), the deployOptions the runbook must record (checkOnly, testLevel, rollbackOnError, ignoreWarnings, purgeOnDelete, singlePackage, runTests), destructiveChangesPre/Post ordering, and the change-request emergency path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Record a finding about the configured engine MCP server into .unikit/MCP-RECHECK-NOTES.md — the project's log of what has to be re-checked here. Use right after a call reported success while changing nothing, ate an argument, or validated a broken state, e.g. "write this down", "record this MCP finding", "the server lied — note it", "add a recheck note", "trap this". Takes three forms of input: the finding in one line, a path to a plan file (harvests the "## MCP Findings" table of that plan and nothing else), or nothing at all — then it takes findings already in the session first, and offers to scan the tables of plans touched since the last audit. The table only, never the plan body. Writes in the one allowed genre — a check to perform; never a lifted gate, never a named workaround, never a claim about what the server can or cannot do. Makes zero MCP calls and needs no editor. To replay, retire, or upstream existing notes use /unikit-mcp-audit instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check for and apply Spec Kit CLI updates via `specify self`. USE FOR: checking whether a newer specify-cli release is available, previewing an upgrade with --dry-run, upgrading the CLI in place (optionally to a pinned tag). DO NOT USE FOR: checking project tools/integrations (use speckit-check) or managing extensions/presets/integrations/workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unified verification: build→lint→test→type-check→coverage. Use for 'is everything green', 'run all checks', 'verify build'. Auto-called by mk:cook. NOT for lint/format only (see mk:lint-and-validate); NOT for test-to-requirement coverage mapping (see mk:nyquist).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects fabricated content, false citations, and unverifiable claims in agent outputs. Uses source verification and consistency checking. Activate on 'detect hallucination', 'fact check', 'verify claims', 'check accuracy', 'find fabrications'. NOT for validation (use dag-output-validator) or confidence scoring (use dag-confidence-scorer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the Tamanu release-branch CUTOFF checks when preparing to cut a new release/X.YY branch: confirm the previous release's hotfixes are merged to main, reconcile the commits since the previous release against the "Merged to main" card list from Linear, and scan for data/reporting/schema changes. Use when the user is cutting a Tamanu release and wants to verify the codebase is ready, wants to check main against the previous release branch, or wants to reconcile commits with a Linear "Merged to main" column (they should paste the card list). Handles Tamanu's train-release model (release/X.YY branches vs vX.YY.Z patch tags) and the cherry-pick model where the same logical fix has different SHAs on different branches. Purely git-based — no live database or Canopy access needed. Not for verifying an existing release branch's hotfix integrity (see pre-release-checks) or for deciding which tests to run (see scope-tamanu-release-tests).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Tamanu pre-release verification checks: verify that hotfixes on the current release branch are merged forward to main, and that hotfixes from prior release branches are included in the current release. Use when the user wants to run "pre-release checks", verify hotfix integrity before cutting or shipping a Tamanu release, confirm a release/X.YY branch is safe to release, or check that no hotfix has been orphaned (left on neither main nor the current release). Handles Tamanu's train-release model (release/X.YY branches vs vX.YY.Z patch tags) and the cherry-pick model where the same logical fix has different SHAs on different branches. Purely git-based — no live database or Canopy access needed. Not for deciding which tests to run (see scope-tamanu-release-tests).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proposes tag and number structures for the new lines and instruments in a P&ID draft according to the project's numbering procedures, checks every tag extracted from the PFD against the quoted procedure format, and lists cross-section identifier mismatches and the registry checks a human must run. Never invents a numbering convention, never alters a PFD tag and never assigns a sequence number the procedure reserves for the registry. Use when the user asks to "run the tagging and numbering section", "check the tags against the numbering procedure", "propose the tag structure for the new lines and instruments" or "list the registry checks before validation" after the process safety flags. Do not use for validating the four sections, use validation-and-review-package instead; do not use for instrument content, use instrumentation-and-control-enrichment. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operational guide for WordPress.org submission readiness of NV oOS standalone plugins (nvoos-docs-hub live at 0.5.3; nvoos-content-graph live at 1.0.10 in the re-submission loop; nvoos-design-system next in the pipeline — issue #6811). Covers the 18 wp.org guidelines, the Plugin Check (PCP) gate in CI and Docker, PCP finding triage, the reviewer-reply loop (findings taxonomy from the real 0.4.3 review, related-issue sweep checklist, reply-email template), packaging exclusion tri-sync, readme.txt standards, .wordpress-org listing assets, and the NV oOS Complete checkout-flow disclosure discipline (docs-hub 0.5.3, content-graph). Use when preparing a wp.org submission, responding to a reviewer email, fixing the plugin-check CI job, triaging PCP findings, or capturing listing screenshots.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a comprehensive health check on a single Estuary task by combining catalog status, data flow stats, recent errors, and publication history. Use when diagnosing a task that seems broken, slow, or stuck. Use when user says "is my task healthy", "something seems wrong", "check my capture", "check my materialization", "why is data not flowing", "task health check", "diagnose my task", or "what's wrong with my pipeline".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run flowctl catalog status to check the control-plane state of an Estuary resource, or list catalog specs to see which connectors exist and which are active. Use when checking whether a task is running, disabled, or failing, interpreting status output, or enumerating connectors. Use when user says "check task status", "is my capture running", "catalog status", "flowctl catalog status", "what's wrong with my capture", "task failing", "check catalog status", "collection status", "derivation status", "why is my task disabled", "list my connectors", "show me my connectors", "list captures", "list materializations", "what connectors do I have", or "show me all my active connectors".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Checkov — checkov infrastructure-as-code security scanning. Covers Terraform, CloudFormation, Kubernetes, and Dockerfile scanning, policy management, custom checks, compliance frameworks, and suppression management. Use when scanning IaC for security misconfigurations, evaluating compliance, managing custom policies, or reviewing scan results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

iOS プロジェクトのエラー・警告を XcodeBuildMCP 経由で診断する。「check」「errors」「warnings」「diagnostics」「issues」「compile check」「lint」「エラーチェック」「コンパイルチェック」「警告チェック」などのキーワードで自動適用。

Check the latest Claude (Anthropic), OpenAI Codex, and Google Gemini model releases from official primary sources, update model selections in this dotfiles repo, and update the Claude Code, Codex, and Gemini CLIs through their configured managers. Every run checks both the model settings and CLI for the selected provider, then scans the invoking repository for hardcoded model IDs. Use when the user asks to "モデル更新", "モデルを最新に", "最新モデル確認", "Codex/Claude Code/Gemini CLI本体の更新", "model bump", "update models", or "update agent CLIs". Do NOT use for one-off model selection in a single conversation, general model questions, or unrelated package updates.

Soc2 Compliance Checker - Auto-activating skill for Security Advanced. Triggers on: soc2 compliance checker, soc2 compliance checker Part of the Security Advanced skill category.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

親イシュー配下のサブイシュー（孫以下の全子孫を含む）を依存順を保ちつつ worktree で並列に自動実装・push 前 review・PR 作成・CI 監視・マージ可能状態化まで一括自動化。 「イシューツリーを並列実装」「配下のサブイシューをまとめて実装」「ツリー全体を並列で実装して」「イシュー階層を自動開発」で使用。 per-issue 計画立案（Plan: セッション継承モデル）→実装（Implement: sonnet）の分業。push 前 review（Review 通過後にのみ push・PR 作成して CI を 1 回だけ起動）。 外部チェック構成は args の externalChecks で明示（{"app", "context"} の組で宣言。[] で「なし」を確定して不要待機なし・未指定なら自動マージ停止・slug のみの旧形式は自動マージ fail-closed）。 自動 squash merge は autoMerge: true + externalChecks 明示（全 App の信頼済み context 宣言込み）の opt-in で実行（merge-exec の自己取得再検証 + サーバー側 branch protection 実測が前提。既定 false はマージ可能状態で停止し人間がマージ。サーバー側 workflow サンプル（upstream の docs/implement-issue-tree/auto-merge-sample.yml 参照）+ branch protection への委譲も可）。並列度（parallel）と依存（dependsOn）で実行順を制御。 Phase 単位で厳密に直列化したい場合は phaseGate: true（opt-in。ルート直下の子〔Phase 親〕を sub-issues リスト順に直列化し、前 Phase の全子孫が merged/closed になるまで次 Phase 配下に着手しない。既定 false は現行の post-order 優先度のみ）。 着手できる件数・blocked になる件数を事前に知りたい場合は dryRun: true（何も書かずに見積りだけ返す）。 単一イシューの実装は implement-issue、PR レビューは implement-review-pr を参照。

Check the terms of a specific side-work assignment offered as gyomu-itaku or freelance work in Japan, item by item: what the client has actually put in writing about the deliverable, the fee, the payment due date, what counts as out of scope, how many revisions are included, who bears expenses, who owns the result, confidentiality, and how either side can end it. Convert the fee into an effective hourly figure over the hours the work will really take including meetings, revisions and unpaid preparation, and count the days from delivery to the payment due date. Use when someone is offered or is discussing a paid side job, a freelance assignment, spot consulting, or paid trial work and wants to know what is still unwritten before starting; do not use to judge whether the fee is fair or the terms lawful, to decide whether to accept, to draft or sign the contract for the user, or to check whether their employer's rules permit side work, which is sidework-rules-check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code review checklist for SwiftUI and Swift PRs. Use when reviewing pull requests, checking code quality, verifying Swift/SwiftUI implementations, or conducting PR reviews. Provides prioritized checklist covering state management, performance, component design, data flow, async handling, UI/UX, accessibility, security, and testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find the right skill for a capability. Load when a user or skill needs to check if a skill exists for a given task, when process-decomposer assigns skills to steps, or when agent-builder checks skill availability. Triggers on "what skill does this need", "find a skill for", "is there a skill that", "which skill handles", "does a skill exist for", "skill lookup", "check skill library". Prevents skill sprawl by always checking existing skills before creating new ones. The gatekeeper for all skill creation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。