「chi」の検索結果

Review software architecture for coupling, cohesion, SOLID principles, API design, scalability, and technical debt. Covers system-level evaluation, architecture decision record review, and improvement recommendations. Use when evaluating a proposed architecture before implementation, assessing an existing system for scalability or security, reviewing ADRs, performing a technical debt assessment, or evaluating readiness for significant scale-up.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Data fetching, caching, and revalidation patterns in Next.js App Router. Covers native fetch caching, ISR/SSG/SSR per-route choice, generateStaticParams, unstable_cache, revalidatePath/revalidateTag, Route Handlers, dynamic vs static rendering. Use this skill to: - Pick the right rendering mode (SSG / ISR / SSR / streaming) per route. - Use native fetch caching options correctly. - Build Route Handlers that match REST conventions. - Invalidate cached data after mutations. - Use generateStaticParams for dynamic SSG. Do NOT use this skill for: - RSC vs Client boundaries (see server-component-patterns). - Routing primitives (see nextjs-routing). - General conventions (see nextjs-conventions).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Archive completed plans and roadmap milestones. Moves finished plans to the archive directory and optionally trims closed milestones from ROADMAP.md. Use when user says "archive plans", "clean up plans", "archive completed", or "trim roadmap".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Archive completed plans and roadmap milestones. Moves finished plans to the archive directory and optionally trims closed milestones from ROADMAP.md. Use when user says "archive plans", "clean up plans", "archive completed", or "trim roadmap".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TanStack Query (React Query) v5 best practices for data fetching, caching, mutations, and server state management. Use when building data-driven React applications, setting up query configurations, implementing mutations/optimistic updates, configuring caching strategies, integrating with SSR, or fixing v4→v5 migration errors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design the technical architecture for a NowStack Mobile app from .agents/plan/PRD.md, mapping the product onto the FIXED boilerplate stack (Convex schema + functions, Expo Router screens, Better Auth, Apple IAP/Stripe, R2), then save .agents/plan/ARCHITECTURE.md. Use for "design the architecture", "ns architecture", "plan the schema and screens", or as the second planning step after ns-prd and before ns-tasks. Not a blank-slate stack design — the stack is set; this maps features onto it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Implement Gale-Shapley stable matching algorithm for two-sided matching problems. Use this skill when the user needs to match candidates to positions, assign students to schools, or solve any two-sided preference matching — even if they say 'optimal job matching', 'stable assignment', or 'candidate-position pairing'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunts for pre-exfiltration data staging and archiving by detecting archive-tool execution (rar, 7z, zip, tar), large compressed files written to staging directories, and collection into a single location before transfer. Activates for requests to hunt data staging, detect pre-exfil archiving, or find collection and compression before exfiltration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Opt-in DI architecture using Reflex for Unity 6+. Covers container setup, scoping, injection, command pattern, update management, and class taxonomy. Use when ProjectConfig.yaml -> architecture_pattern is "di-first", or when the user asks about dependency injection, inversion of control, service architecture, or testable game code. Triggers on "set up DI", "add dependency injection", "create a service", "wire up dependencies", "make this testable", "decouple these systems", "add a command pattern", "cross-feature communication", or architecture discussions involving testability, decoupling, and service layers. Only activates when ProjectConfig.yaml -> architecture_pattern is "di-first". For simpler projects, use uw-scriptable-object-arch instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unity state and behavior system architecture. FSM, Hierarchical FSM, Behavior Trees, stack-based state machines, Animator-vs-code decisions, state machine testing. DECISION format: WHEN/DECISION/SCAFFOLD/GOTCHA. Based on Unity 6.3 LTS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze system architecture, module structure, API contracts, data models, and code patterns. Use when designing systems, reviewing module boundaries, evaluating API designs, analyzing data models, checking pattern conformance, tracing decisions, or reviewing frontend architecture. Triggers: "architecture", "module design", "API design", "data model", "boundaries", "patterns", "decisions", "frontend architecture".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Archive a completed OpenSpec change in the experimental workflow. Use when the user wants to finalize and archive a change after implementation is complete. Also use when the user says "openspec archive" or "opsx archive".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Language-specific guidelines for producing high-quality Traditional Chinese (zh-TW) content: script, full-width punctuation, spacing, forms of address, grammar constraints, and Taiwan terminology. Includes the no-calque rule against literal translations of English phrasal verbs such as 折入 for fold in. Use when writing any kind of Chinese content. Including blog posts, notes, technical articles, technical writing, chitchat, social media posts, etc., even when you are just sending a text message. Also use when reviewing or editing existing Chinese content for language and terminology compliance. Always apply `writing-style-guideline` alongside this skill for structure, tone, rhetorical constraints, and banned phrases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to select the right Salesforce integration pattern — from point-to-point to event-driven to hub-and-spoke — by applying the official Salesforce two-axis decision framework (integration type × timing) to a business integration scenario. Trigger keywords: integration pattern decision, choose integration approach, Salesforce integration architecture, when to use platform events vs API, integration type selection. NOT for implementation of any specific integration pattern (use domain-specific integration skills), MuleSoft architecture (use architect/mulesoft-anypoint-architecture), or middleware vendor selection. More triggers: integration decision record, Bulk API vs REST for a nightly load, external Id upsert, Named Credential vs Remote Site Setting, platform event vs CDC, who calls whom.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing, reviewing, or troubleshooting Salesforce duplicate prevention, matching rules, duplicate rules, and merge governance. Covers cleaning up duplicates that already exist at ordinary volume: merge sequencing, survivorship, stewardship ownership. Also covers the deployable MatchingRule / DuplicateRule metadata, the Alert-vs-Block action pair, DuplicateRecordSet reporting, and the Apex DMLOptions.DuplicateRuleHeader.allowSave bypass. Triggers: 'duplicate rule', 'matching rule', 'merge strategy', 'dedupe', 'survivorship', 'D&B', 'same contact twice', 'clean up duplicate records', 'clean up duplicate accounts', 'DUPLICATES_DETECTED', 'allowSave', 'FindDuplicates'. NOT for cleanup at volume — hundreds of thousands of records, batch merge jobs, DemandTools/Cloudingo — use data/large-scale-deduplication. NOT for which field values and child records the platform keeps in a merge - use data/record-merge-implications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when scoring a list of business or solution requirements against the *actual* capabilities of a specific Salesforce org so each row can be classified Standard / Configuration / Low-Code / Custom / Unfit, given an effort tier (S/M/L/XL), a risk tag, and an AppExchange suggestion when applicable. Trigger keywords: fit gap salesforce requirements, score requirements against salesforce capabilities, salesforce capability matrix, classify requirement as standard config custom, fit-gap effort tier, AppExchange alternative for requirement. NOT for requirements elicitation (use admin/requirements-gathering-for-sf). NOT for architecture decisions on the GAP rows (use architect/solution-design-patterns and standards/decision-trees/). NOT for license or edition selection (use architect/license-optimization-strategy and architect/org-edition-and-feature-licensing). NOT for OmniStudio-specific fit-gap (use architect/omnistudio-vs-standard-decision).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when admins are governing the Chatter group lifecycle — creation policy, public/private/unlisted visibility decisions, group ownership transfer when owners leave, archived vs inactive vs deleted state changes, auto-archive behavior, naming conventions, group templates (Information Templates), and orphan-group cleanup after user terminations. Triggers: 'we have 800 dead chatter groups', 'group owner left the company who owns it now', 'should this group be public private or unlisted', 'when does a chatter group auto-archive', 'how do I delete vs archive a chatter group', 'we need a chatter group naming convention'. NOT for Chatter notification / digest / feed-noise tuning (use admin/chatter-notification-tuning), NOT for Chatter REST API integration patterns (use apex/apex-connect-api-chatter), NOT for Custom Notifications API (use apex/apex-custom-notifications-from-apex), NOT for Experience Cloud / Customer Community group access (different sharing model).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement proven backend architecture patterns including Clean Architecture, Hexagonal Architecture, and Domain-Driven Design. Use when architecting complex backend systems or refactoring existing applications for better maintainability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when surfacing architectural friction and proposing deepening refactors (shallow modules → deep modules) for testability and AI-navigability. Triggers on "improve architecture", "find deepening opportunities", "where is this codebase shallow", "architecture review". Emits structured candidates + precise patches; delegates ALL rendering to mk:preview. NOT for diagram/HTML rendering (see mk:preview); NOT for trade-off deliberation (see mk:party); NOT for plan critique (see mk:plan-ceo-review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CI/CD caching optimizer for dependency caching, Docker layer caching, and build speed improvements. Activate on: CI cache, build speed, dependency caching, Docker layer cache, turbo remote cache, GitHub Actions cache, pnpm store cache. NOT for: CI/CD pipeline creation (use github-actions-pipeline-builder), deployment strategy (use blue-green-deployment-orchestrator), Docker image building (use docker-multi-stage-optimizer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify direct miRNA-target interactions from AGO HITS-CLIP, AGO-CLEAR-CLIP (chimeric reads), HEAP (Halo-Ago2 mouse), chimeric eCLIP / miR-eCLIP (deep miRNA-target profiling), or CLASH using chimeric-read processing pipelines, seed-pairing analysis, and 3' auxiliary pairing rules. Use when distinguishing direct miRNA targets from indirect, integrating CLIP-derived target maps with TargetScan / miRDB / DIANA predictions, applying canonical 7mer-8mer seed matching with 3' UTR context, or recovering miRNA-mRNA chimeras at scale.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calls ChIP-seq peaks with MACS3, MACS2, HOMER, or SPP across narrow (TF) and broad (histone) modes. Handles input control matching, fragment-size modeling vs --nomodel, effective genome size, ENCODE-style IDR vs naive overlap, hyper-ChIPable artifacts, and aligner-specific shifts. Use when calling peaks from ChIP-seq alignments, choosing between narrow vs broad mode for a histone mark, deciding model vs nomodel for low-depth data, applying ENCODE pseudoreplicate IDR, or reconciling MACS vs HOMER vs SPP results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement proven backend architecture patterns including Clean Architecture, Hexagonal Architecture, and Domain-Driven Design. Use when architecting complex backend systems or refactoring existing applications for better maintainability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Workflow] Use when activating the Architecture Audit workflow to review the whole project's architecture, run an architecture health check, or check production readiness/scalability in one pass — read-only, produces one consolidated Architecture Health Report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。