「confidence」の検索結果

Invoke when the user asks to review, check, audit, or look over Qt6 C++ code — or suggest before committing. Runs deterministic linting (60+ rules) then six parallel deep- analysis agents covering model contracts, ownership, threading, API correctness, error handling, and performance. Reports only high-confidence issues (>80/100) with structured mitigations. Read-only — never modifies code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a high-confidence, CONCISE implementation / architecture / strategy PLAN that follows the OMC plan system end to end. It first runs OMC's real requirements interview (auto-chains the `omc-plan` skill: one question at a time, explore-first, Analyst consult) to produce an initial plan in `.omc/plans/`, then DEEPENS that plan with a 3-round ITERATIVE fusion loop — each round an Opus 4.8 panelist (Agent subagent) and a GPT-5.5 panelist (via codex) critique/improve it IN PARALLEL and BLIND, then Opus 4.8 (the orchestrator) judges and synthesizes one tighter plan that seeds the next round, stopping early on convergence. Writes the final dense plan back to the same `.omc/plans/<slug>.md`, then offers the OMC handoff (`/omc-plan --review` → `/team` or `/ralph`). Use for high-stakes planning, architecture decisions, strategy calls, and hard debugging — especially when the user runs /plan or asks how to approach a non-trivial build. Reuses the `fusion` skill's run_codex.sh + judge rubric. NOT for trivial tasks (single pass is enough).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer a hard question by fanning it out to a PANEL of models running in parallel — each answering independently with web search and bash, none seeing the others' work — then having Opus 4.8 judge every response into a structured analysis (consensus, contradictions, partial coverage, unique insights, blind spots) and write a final answer grounded in it. The panel is two independent Opus 4.8 runs (slug opus4.8-4.8), Opus 4.8 + GPT-5.5 via codex (opus4.8-gpt5.5), Opus 4.8 + Gemini 3.1 Pro via agy (opus4.8-gemini3.1pro), or all three (opus4.8-gpt5.5-gemini3.1pro). Opus always judges and writes the final answer — the pipeline can't be reversed. Runs on local CLI subscriptions (no metered API), and saves a timestamped provenance .md per run. Use this whenever the user asks to "run it through Fusion", says /fusion, wants a multi-model / panel / ensemble answer, wants a question cross-checked across models, or wants a higher-confidence answer with consensus and blind spots surfaced — even if they don't say "fusion". General-purpose: any topic (research, law, strategy, technical, personal). Best for high-stakes research, design calls, and debugging where being confidently wrong is expensive.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use with every WinDbg plugin investigation to apply evidence-first reasoning, confidence calibration, contrarian review, structured reporting, and deterministic validation. Not a bug-family-specific triage skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes heterogeneous queries to the appropriate index, tool, or answering engine before retrieval. Use when one endpoint serves multiple handlers, such as summary, vector retrieval, text-to-SQL, or tools, and query types require different paths. Covers LLM, semantic, and rule-based routers, confidence thresholds, fallbacks, and framework mappings. Do not use when one handler serves all queries or branching is fixed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a pile of ideas, requests and goals into a confidence-scored roadmap plus a goals/OKR set the team can actually follow. Use when someone says 'prioritize', 'what should we build next', 'roadmap', 'now next later', 'ICE or RICE', 'write our OKRs', 'quarterly planning', 'too many priorities' or 'sales keeps changing the plan'. Draws on 133 Lenny's Podcast guests including Itamar Gilad, Christina Wodtke and Janna Bastow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think before typing. Root cause first, two candidate fixes, pick one, ask if still unclear, then change only the files the request needs. Edit the confidence bar and scope rules to fit the project. Use when a bug report comes in, when a previous fix did not work, or when the request is vague.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diffusion-based molecular docking. Predict protein-ligand binding poses from PDB/SMILES, confidence scores, virtual screening, for structure-based drug design. Not for affinity prediction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master end-to-end testing with Playwright and Cypress to build reliable test suites that catch bugs, improve confidence, and enable fast deployment. Use when implementing E2E tests, debugging flaky tests, or establishing testing standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Access AlphaFold's 200M+ AI-predicted protein structures. Retrieve structures by UniProt ID, download PDB/mmCIF files, analyze confidence metrics (pLDDT, PAE), for drug discovery and structural biology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagrams and checkable docs from a codebase. Draws ERDs, C4 context/container/component views, API endpoint catalogues, lifecycle/state machines, and service-to-service call maps as a validated JSON spec plus a standalone HTML viewer, with Mermaid export. Imports OpenAPI, GraphQL SDL and Prisma; otherwise reads the code (NestJS, TypeORM, Express) and writes the spec. Use for: database diagram, ERD, data model, table relationships, C4 or architecture diagram, system context, API map, endpoint list, "show me the endpoints", status flow, state machine, allowed transitions, "what happens after X is approved", how services call each other, microservice map, Mermaid diagram. Also writes documentation as a fact graph: each statement carries its source and a computed confidence, and a drift check fails CI when the code moves. Use to document a system, write architecture or onboarding docs, or explain how a system works.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automated scRNA-seq cell type annotation via pre-trained logistic regression. 45+ models: immune, gut, lung, brain, fetal, cancer microenvironments. Input normalized AnnData; outputs per-cell labels, majority-vote cluster labels, confidence scores. Use for fast, reference-backed annotation without manual marker inspection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cell type annotation strategy for scRNA-seq: name clusters manually from canonical markers, transfer labels from a reference (CellTypist, popV), or do both and validate one against the other. Covers matching tissue and developmental stage, marker evidence, annotation confidence, doublets, unresolved clusters. Use when planning or troubleshooting how to annotate cells.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diffusion-based docking that predicts protein-ligand poses without a predefined site. Use for blind docking, when traditional docking fails, or exploring multiple binding modes. Pipeline: prep protein (PDB) and ligand (SMILES/SDF), run inference, analyze confidence-ranked poses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find consequential behavior that a passing test suite does not establish, using focused exploratory checks. Use when the user asks what green tests miss or wants confidence in test coverage for a specific change. Not a general code review, routine test run, or debugging workflow for an already failing test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Wire a System One model (Jev, or an open reproduction like Von) into a product feature — routing, guardrails, scoring, classification. Use when replacing an LLM call that returns a label rather than prose, when adding a typed decision to an agent loop, or when deciding between the hosted Jev API and a local open model. Covers question design, the eval-set-first workflow, threshold calibration, confidence gates, and the traps measured on real data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Take any claim and design + execute a complete research protocol to test it. Apply scientific method automatically: design study, gather data, run analysis, provide verdict with confidence level.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze matchups, injuries, weather, Vegas lines. Recommend sit/start decisions with confidence levels for NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, soccer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

March Madness, playoff brackets, tournament picks. Upset potential, chalk vs contrarian strategies, historical trends, confidence levels.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes Alibi users to the right explanation, confidence, prototype, or optional-backend workflow and points them to the bundled helpers needed to run it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate project-specific AGENTS.md and companion rules by analyzing a codebase. Supports full, minimal, update, and dry-run modes with package-manager detection, monorepos, backups, managed blocks, confidence scoring, and command validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage failed Agent QA runs with MCP evidence, artifacts, logs, fixed failure categories, confidence, and actionable next steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects PII in unstructured data including emails, documents, images, and logs using NER-based detection with spaCy and Microsoft Presidio, regex patterns, OCR integration, and confidence scoring. Keywords: PII detection, unstructured data, NER, spaCy, Presidio, OCR, regex, email scanning, document scanning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build automated PII detection and redaction pipelines using spaCy NER, Microsoft Presidio, and AWS Macie integration. Includes confidence scoring, custom entity type definitions, batch processing workflows, and multi-format document scanning for structured and unstructured data sources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。