「conflicts」の検索結果

Inspect one bounded Proto UI Issue queue slice and route ready governed work toward claim and implementation. Use for intake health, readiness, ownership, claim conflicts, stale state, or a candidate task search. This evidence leaf is read-only; authorized claim and implementation continue in their registered leaves.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect one bounded Proto UI pull-request slice, produce canonical review input, and route each eligible exact head toward review and integration. Use for review queues, linked work, evidence gaps, merge conflicts, stale revisions, or portfolio health. This evidence leaf is read-only; authorized review and integration continue in their registered leaves.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build React animations with Motion (Framer Motion) - gestures (drag, hover, tap), scroll effects, spring physics, layout animations, SVG. Bundle: 2.3 KB (mini) to 34 KB (full). Use when: drag-and-drop, scroll animations, modals, carousels, parallax. Troubleshoot: AnimatePresence exit, list performance, Tailwind conflicts, Next.js "use client".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when diagnosing NPU + PyTorch or LLM Serving Host CPU affinity, NUMA locality, cgroup/cpuset constraints, CPU range conflicts, PyTorch/runtime threading, DataLoader, tokenizer, scheduler, vLLM-Ascend, SGLang, TTFT, TPOT, tokens/s, QPS, or multi-rank/multi-worker CPU binding issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit Convex performance for hot reads, write contention, subscriptions, function limits, OCC conflicts, latency, read amplification, and expensive reactive queries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The complete Go development skill. REQUIRED for ALL Go work — writing, refactoring, reviewing, generating, scaffolding, or discussing Go code, including any change to .go files. Use whenever the user mentions Go, Golang, go.mod, a Go package, or asks to build a Go backend service, CLI, library, script, MCP server (Model Context Protocol), or AI/LLM agent with tool calling or ReAct-style reasoning. Routes by project type to the right architecture, conventions, and review checklist. Highly opinionated; overrides generic Go style and lint guidance on conflicts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to resolve an in-progress git merge/rebase conflict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pull the latest remote base branch into the current local branch and resolve merge conflicts (aka update-branch). Use when the agent needs to sync a feature branch with origin, perform a merge-based update (not rebase), and guide conflict resolution best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pull latest origin/main into the current local branch and resolve merge conflicts (aka update-branch). Use when Codex needs to sync a feature branch with origin, perform a merge-based update (not rebase), and guide conflict resolution best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Land a PR by monitoring conflicts, resolving them, waiting for checks, and squash-merging when green; use when asked to land, merge, or shepherd a PR to completion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to resolve an in-progress git merge/rebase conflict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pull latest origin/main into the current local branch and resolve merge conflicts (aka update-branch). Use when Codex needs to sync a feature branch with origin, perform a merge-based update (not rebase), and guide conflict resolution best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Land a PR by monitoring conflicts, resolving them, waiting for checks, and squash-merging when green; use when asked to land, merge, or shepherd a PR to completion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Agency Theory (Jensen and Meckling, 1976) to diagnose principal-agent problems — moral hazard, adverse selection — and design governance mechanisms to align interests. Use this skill when the user needs to analyze conflicts of interest between owners and managers, design incentive or monitoring structures, evaluate corporate governance effectiveness, or when they ask 'how do we ensure managers act in shareholders interest', 'why is this incentive plan failing', or 'what governance mechanisms reduce agency costs'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze project dependencies, build dependency trees, detect conflicts, and check compatibility

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Safely merge GitHub pull requests using comprehensive pre-merge validation. Use this skill when the user asks to merge a PR, complete a PR workflow, or check if a PR is ready to merge. Validates CI/CD status, reviews, and conflicts before merging with the appropriate strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits whether a machine-readable regelrecht law model is faithful to the LETTER of the wettekst — and strictly separates the wettekst (leading) from the toelichting (Nota/Memorie van Toelichting; explanatory, not a norm). Runs in critical passes per article/lid and detects four deviation classes: toelichting-bleed (a modeled criterion that the letter only states as an open norm, or not at all), missing verbatim elements (a word/condition such as a "tenzij" or a qualifier dropped from the model), wrong legal_basis anchoring (an endpoint hung on a "kapstok"-article while the operative norm lives elsewhere), and verbatim-drift in text: (an ingetrokken/older redaction). Also detects positief-lid vs uitsluitings-lid conflicts and checks the chapeau for an explicit derogation rule ("zo nodig in afwijking van het eerste lid") before judging precedence. Classifies every finding as modelfout (fix), wettekst-gevolg (report, do not fix), or letter-vs-toelichting-question (jurist decides what is leading + revision signal). Use when the user wants to know if a model is "dicht bij de letter", mentions letter vs toelichting/bedoeling, fidelity, "natuurgetrouw", or before trusting feature outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review what Prisma Next migrations will run on merge or deploy, render the migration graph, resolve concurrent / diamond-convergence conflicts, and configure environment refs for CI. Use for "what migrations are going to run", "what runs on deploy", merge conflict, diamond convergence, concurrent migrations, migration status, ref management, staging, production, MIGRATION.DIVERGED, MIGRATION.NO_MARKER, MIGRATION.MARKER_NOT_IN_HISTORY, prisma migrate status, prisma migrate diff, prisma migrate resolve.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run this skill for Phase 3 of the evidence verification pipeline — the adversarial audit step. Use when you need to check the evidence data lake for bad data before ingestion: dead links, wrong URL formats (tree/ vs blob/), subjective wording ("elite", "high-quality"), stale migration notes, benchmark catalog misuse/vendor-claim leakage, or skills whose star evidence conflicts with classified evidence level. Triggers on phrases like: "audit the data lake", "adversarial check", "ev-adversarial-audit", "check for noise in evidence", "flag bad evidence", "run the audit phase", "quality check the by-type files", or any reference to Phase 3 of the pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pull latest origin/main into the current local branch and resolve merge conflicts (aka update-branch). Use when Codex needs to sync a feature branch with origin, perform a merge-based update (not rebase), and guide conflict resolution best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Land a PR by monitoring conflicts, resolving them, waiting for checks, and squash-merging when green; use when asked to land, merge, or shepherd a PR to completion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Holistic cross-GDD consistency and game design review. Reads all system GDDs simultaneously and checks for contradictions between them, stale references, ownership conflicts, formula incompatibilities, and game design theory violations (dominant strategies, economic imbalance, cognitive overload, pillar drift). Run after all MVP GDDs are written, before architecture begins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates completeness and consistency of the project architecture against all GDDs. Builds a traceability matrix mapping every GDD technical requirement to ADRs, identifies coverage gaps, detects cross-ADR conflicts, verifies engine compatibility consistency across all decisions, and produces a PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL verdict. The architecture equivalent of /design-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning, implementing, or reviewing frontend dependency upgrades, package migrations, lockfile changes, major framework version bumps, CVE remediation, peer dependency conflicts, ESM/CJS shifts, build-tool compatibility, or CI verification matrices; Chinese triggers include dependency upgrades, version upgrades, lockfile, peer dependency, CVE fixes, major version migrations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。