「does」の検索結果

"Apply cultivation theory (Gerbner) to analyze how long-term media exposure shapes worldviews. Use this skill when the user needs to study cumulative media effects on audience beliefs, evaluate mainstreaming and resonance phenomena, or assess how media consumption patterns correlate with perceptions of social reality — even if they say 'does watching news make people more fearful', 'how does media shape worldview', or 'mean world syndrome'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Affordance Theory (Gibson, 1979; Norman, 1988) to analyze the action possibilities that an artifact provides to an actor. Use this skill when the user needs to evaluate technology design from an affordance perspective, identify why users struggle with an interface, analyze IT-enabled organizational change through affordance actualization, or when they ask 'what does this technology afford', 'why can't users figure out this feature', or 'how does technology enable new practices'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Consumer Culture Theory to analyze consumption as a cultural practice shaped by identity, marketplace cultures, and ideology. Use this skill when the user needs to interpret consumer behavior through cultural lenses, analyze brand communities or subcultures of consumption, decode marketplace ideologies, or when they ask 'why do consumers behave this way culturally', 'what does this consumption mean', or 'how does identity shape buying'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/PRD asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Focused single-target audit of one Gaia skill, named skill, or real-skill catalog item. Use this skill when: auditing a specific skill by ID or name, a skill looks overpromoted, evidence feels thin or dead, a contributor's skill seems outdated or superseded, the rank doesn't match the source quality, evidence is mapped to the wrong Evidence Type, a skill at 3★+ is missing a working GitHub link, someone asks "does this skill deserve its stars?", or you want the smallest possible correction with validation — not a bulk sweep. This is NOT for bulk curation passes (use /gaia-curate for that) or meta-level registry sweeps (use /gaia-meta-audit). It is specifically for "fix this one skill, get it right."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pulp in the browser — the WAM v2 and WebCLAP adapters, the wasm runtime, the Skia/WebGL2 browser window host, and the WebGPU (emdawnwebgpu) GPU-audio lane. Covers what does and does not compile to wasm, the worklet-thread constraints (no std::thread, no fetch, no navigator.gpu), the non-realtime tick, memory growth, how to PROVE a GPU lane actually ran rather than silently falling back to CPU, and the silent-failure traps that make a wasm build "work" while producing no audio or no pixels.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug or validate Pulp animations / transitions / scroll behavior using in-process motion fixtures and offline visual analysis. TRIGGER on phrases like "animation is wrong", "transition timing off", "fade too late", "card slides too far", "scroll jumps on restore", "scroll offset wrong on restore", "frame jump in the timeline", "easing looks wonky", "imported Figma motion doesn't match source", "settle time / overshoot / drift / monotonic", "what value does the knob reach at frame N", "record this animation so I can replay it", "this animation is expensive — which one and why", "reduced-motion broken", "scrub a captured fixture". Captures fixtures (.motion.jsonl), and ships assertion helpers (is_monotonic / settling_time_seconds / overshoot / start_delay_seconds / final_value / local_step_outlier_ratio) and the `scroll_geometry` trace for `ScrollView` content-offset / visible-rect / content-size observability. Off by default in prod.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Building and shipping a Forge app (Modular, Instrument, MIDI, FX, and the sequencer work to come) as a signed installer somebody else can actually use. Covers the seam between the Forge and Pulp repos, what a green signal does and does not prove, shipping the runtime rather than only the binary, and the wiring gaps that make a finished feature behave like a missing one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explains DSP math concepts to developers who need the theory behind an algorithm. Use whenever the user asks how a signal-processing concept works, wants intuition behind a formula, or hits a math-shaped bug. Trigger on phrases like "how does a Fourier transform work", "explain z-transforms", "what is convolution", "why does my biquad ring", "what is windowing for", "what causes aliasing", or "how do I convert gain to dB". Also trigger when the user pastes DSP code and asks why it behaves a certain way.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Traces and documents signal paths, bus/aux architecture, and sidechain connections in audio systems. Surfaces hidden coupling between audio components. Use when the user asks to trace a signal chain, explain audio routing, understand an audio graph, locate sidechain sources, or describe how audio flows through a plugin or engine. Trigger on phrases like "trace this signal chain", "explain this audio routing", "what calls what in this audio graph", "where does the sidechain come from", "how does audio flow through this plugin".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to transact on any Volcengine commercial product — purchase/provision it, ask what it costs, or unsubscribe from it. Covers three actions: buy (purchase, subscribe, provision, open, place an order; Chinese "开通 / 购买 / 下单 / 买 / 售卖 / 订购"), price (how much does it cost, quote, billing rules, estimated spend; Chinese "多少钱 / 价格 / 报价 / 费用 / 怎么收费 / 如何计费 / 预估费用"), and unsubscribe (cancel a subscription, refund a prepaid instance; Chinese "退订 / 退款 / 取消订阅"). Trigger even when the user does not mention "sale" but expresses a clear purchase, pricing, or cancellation intent toward a Volcengine product. Only handles these three transaction actions; anything outside them is out of scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Document a machine learning model in a structured, transparent format for stakeholders, reviewers, and future maintainers. Use when the user says "document this model", "write a model card", "model documentation", "how should I document my ML model", "bias and fairness report", "model transparency", "what does this model do", "model handoff", "production model documentation", or needs to communicate what a model does, how it was built, where it works, and where it fails.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze and interpret financial statements to surface performance signals, quality concerns, and red flags. Use when an accountant says "review these financials", "analyze the income statement", "look at the balance sheet", "what does the cash flow statement tell us", "check the financial health", "ratio analysis", "are the earnings real", "working capital review", "does this company have liquidity issues", or needs to interpret any of the three core financial statements - even if they don't explicitly say "financial statement review". Also trigger when someone shares P&L, balance sheet, or cash flow data and asks what it means.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find every LLM workflow in the current repository and label it, so Caveman Cloud groups spend by what the code actually does (support-reply, nightly-digest) instead of one anonymous bucket. Use when the user pastes the Caveman discovery prompt, says "discover workflows", or asks to break LLM spend down by workflow. The repo should already route through the Caveman gateway (the caveman-setup skill does that part).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Entry point for the SfSkills Salesforce library: 1,040 skill packages across 11 domains (admin, agentforce, apex, architect, data, devops, flow, integration, lwc, omnistudio, security), 70 run-time agents and 92 slash commands. Use for any Salesforce, Force.com or Lightning Platform question — Apex, SOQL, SOSL, triggers, Flow, LWC, sObject, custom field, permission set, profile, sharing rule, validation rule, deployment, sandbox, Agentforce, OmniStudio, org setup. This skill does not answer Salesforce questions itself; it routes to the specific skill package that does, then hands off to a domain router.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Understand what SKMTC is, how its engine works, and the architectural invariants — for agents building or extending infrastructure *around* SKMTC rather than authoring generators or running the CLI. Covers the three-phase pipeline, the host/Worker boundary, cross-generator coordination, the manifest, the attribution / gen-maps (provenance) subsystem, the package graph, the dependency substrate, and the design decisions that make SKMTC behave unlike a typical codegen tool. Use this skill when the user asks "what is SKMTC", "how does the SKMTC engine work", "explain the SKMTC architecture", or is building platform infrastructure around SKMTC — a hosted generate API, a schema or generator registry, tracing or provenance tooling, a web app or SaaS that wraps the engine, or platform-level CI integration. This skill is the system mental model. It does NOT cover authoring generators (→ skmtc-generator), running CLI commands (→ skmtc-cli), or diagnosing broken runs (→ skmtc-debug).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ask Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini a question and capture the full trace behind the answer (the search queries each engine ran, the pages it retrieved, and the sources it cited, span by span). Use when asked to "trace an AI answer", "see what AI engines cite", "check AI citations", "which sources does ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini use", "why does the AI recommend X", or for any GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) measurement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when answering factual or explanatory questions about the current project — codebase, architecture, conventions, workflows, constraints — with minimal cited evidence. Triggers on "how does X work here", "what does X mean", "why is X structured this way", "is this claim true in the repo", "explain X with sources". NOT for brainstorming or comparing approaches (mk:brainstorming), trade-off decisions (mk:party), debugging/root cause (mk:investigate), code review (mk:review), plans (mk:plan-creator), security audits (mk:cso), visual explanations/diagrams (mk:preview --explain), test-coverage gaps (mk:nyquist), library docs (mk:docs-finder), or workflow navigation (mk:help).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when copy-catting, replicating, or adapting features from external systems, repos, apps, or ideas into the current project. Triggers on 'copy this from', 'replicate', 'clone this feature', 'how does X do Y', 'chom', 'like how X does it', 'port from', 'build like', '1:1 copy'. NOT for packing the current project (see mk:pack); NOT for one-shot URL-to-markdown fetches (see mk:web-to-markdown).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Confirms patient understands that continuous glucose monitoring complements but does not replace self-monitoring of blood glucose. Triggers include: 'Clarify CGM role alongside fingersticks', 'Ensure patient knows CGM does not eliminate need for SMBG'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/PRD asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read a Reddit thread or single tweet the host cannot fetch — 'what does this Reddit thread say', 'top comment on this post', 'what does this tweet say' — when reddit.com is refused or x.com 402s.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。