本文へ移動
cccskills

「drafts」の検索結果

666 件 ・ 関連度順

概要と使いどころ

Use when responding to an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) proposal decision or full-review referee letter — framework/attitude asks, coverage gaps, balance complaints, and accessibility. Drafts the response letter and revision plan; it does not run the portal preflight (amann-submission) or redesign the framework from scratch (amann-organizing-framework).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2502026年9月27日 更新

Use when drafting the revision and response letter after an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) revise-and-resubmit — structuring point-by-point responses to the action editor and reviewers across a multi-round developmental process. Drafts the response after revisions; it does not interpret the decision letter (amj-review-process).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2502026年9月27日 更新

Handles disqualified and near-miss inbound leads gracefully. Drafts polite rejection emails, referral requests (right company wrong person), and nurture routing (future fit). Ensures no inbound lead gets ignored and every disqualification preserves the relationship. Tool-agnostic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2472026年10月13日 更新

End-to-end news-triggered signal composite. Takes any piece of news — an article, LinkedIn post, tweet, announcement, event, trend, regulation, product launch, acquisition, layoff, expansion, or any other public event — and evaluates whether the companies or people mentioned are ICP fits. If yes, identifies the connection between the news and your product, finds the right people to contact, and drafts personalized outreach using the news as the hook. Tool-agnostic. Accepts both company-level and person-level news triggers. AUTO-TRIGGER: Load this composite whenever a user shares a URL (LinkedIn post, article, tweet, blog post) or mentions a company/person they "came across", "saw", or "found" from any external source and asks about relevance, fit, ICP match, or whether to reach out. The user does NOT need to explicitly say "outreach" — any signal evaluation request from an external source triggers this.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2472026年10月13日 更新

End-to-end leadership change signal composite. Takes any set of companies, detects recent leadership changes (new VP+, C-suite hires and promotions), evaluates relevance to your product, and drafts personalized outreach. Uses Apollo People Search (free) for fast detection + Apollo Enrichment (1 credit/person) for employment history, start dates, LinkedIn URLs, and verified emails.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2472026年10月13日 更新

End-to-end champion/buyer/user job change signal composite. Takes a set of known people (past buyers, champions, power users), detects when they move to a new company, researches the new company for ICP fit, and drafts personalized outreach leveraging the existing relationship. Tool-agnostic — works with any people source, detection method, and outreach platform.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2472026年10月13日 更新

End-to-end hiring signal composite. Takes any set of companies, detects job postings that your product augments or replaces, finds relevant people (the hiring manager, buyers, champions, users), and drafts personalized outreach using the job role as the hook. Tool-agnostic — works with any company source, job board, contact finder, and outreach platform.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2472026年10月13日 更新

End-to-end funding signal composite. Takes any set of companies, detects recent funding events, qualifies against your company context, finds relevant people (buyers, champions, users), and drafts personalized outreach. Tool-agnostic — works with any company source, contact finder, and outreach platform.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2472026年10月13日 更新

End-to-end skill that turns a single reference image into a published Gooseworks style — analyzes the image, drafts the slim style spec, renders a hero example plus 2-3 additional formats via Playwright, writes the `gooseworks-style.json` manifest, and publishes via `npx gooseworks styles publish` so other agents can discover it. Mirrors goose-graphics-create-format but for styles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,2472026年10月13日 更新

Generates draft requirements from Simulink models. Use when drafting or updating requirement artifacts from a model. Prefers Requirements Toolbox (.slreqx) when available; falls back to structured YAML.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

matlab/simulink-agentic-toolkit1,2202026年10月8日 更新

Find evidence-backed potential first customers, beta users, or design partners from public demand signals. Use for product-specific prospect research, qualified shortlists, source-grounded outreach drafts, and follow-up searches refined by the user's feedback and local prospect history. Does not send outreach automatically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Kappaemme-git/codex-first-customer-finder-skill1,0872026年9月19日 更新

Social media management and community building automation. Creates content calendars, drafts posts, manages engagement, and builds audience across X/Twitter, LinkedIn, Reddit, Product Hunt, and other platforms. Use when the user needs social media strategy, content scheduling, community building, or says 'social media', 'tweet', 'LinkedIn post', 'Reddit', 'Product Hunt launch', or 'build audience'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

iamzifei/show-me-the-money1,0832026年9月1日 更新

Polish mathematical modeling paper drafts for grammar, clarity, formula consistency, hedging calibration, overclaim detection, and contest formatting compliance. Use after paper-section-writer has drafted sections.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1,0562026年9月24日 更新

Reduce defensive writing in drafts and revisions by removing unnecessary caveats, disclaimers, hedges, apology-like framing, negative self-limiting statements, and over-explanations while preserving necessary scope, accuracy, safety, legal, ethical, and methodological limits. Use when drafting or revising academic writing, papers, essays, abstracts, introductions, contribution statements, discussions, conclusions, technical explanations, grant writing, product writing, policy writing, professional reports, or any text the user wants to be clearer, stronger, more direct, more concise, more confident, less verbose, less caveated, less apologetic, or less defensive.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Kiterlin/anti-defensive-writing1,0142026年10月1日 更新

Help the user turn their Retentioneering ideas, friction reports, bug findings, or feature needs into high-quality upstream contributions: from capturing and validating the idea, through minimal reproductions and issue drafts, to preparing, testing, and submitting a pull request that follows this repository's conventions. Use when the user says they found a bug, wants a feature, wrote a workaround worth upstreaming, or asks how to contribute, open an issue, or make a PR to retentioneering-tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

retentioneering/retentioneering-tools9322026年10月13日 更新

Systematic copy editing through focused passes (the Seven Sweeps Framework) covering clarity, voice, proof, specificity, and friction removal. Use when editing marketing copy, reviewing drafts, polishing content, or proofreading.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

borghei/Claude-Skills9052026年10月7日 更新

Create, inspect, and safely update project-scoped ReachAI Agents; edit and publish Supervisor config drafts; discover published bindable Skills; and attach or detach exact Skill versions through the Agent AI Coding REST API. Use when an AI coding tool is asked to add an Agent, configure its model or prompt, bind a Skill, remove a Skill binding, or attach a published Workflow as a Tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

w8123/EnterpriseAgentFramework8982026年10月7日 更新

Edit, validate, debug, publish, and inspect ReachAI Workflow drafts through the Workflow AI Coding REST API. Use when asked to create or modify a workflow graph, add/update/delete nodes or edges, validate GraphSpec, dry-run or debug-run a workflow, inspect trace/run output, check release readiness, publish a validated draft, or work on PAGE_ASSISTANT workflows from Cursor/Codex.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

w8123/EnterpriseAgentFramework8982026年10月7日 更新

Lock one primary goal per brand and judge ideas or drafts against it. "does this fit our goal"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro8812026年10月12日 更新

Repurpose one content piece into 10+ channel formats with drafts and a calendar. "repurpose this blog post"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro8812026年10月12日 更新

Drafts a customized Customer Agreement starting from the Y Combinator standard form SaaS template. Tailors the agreement through structured intake questions covering fee structure, data handling, ML rights, implementation services, and more. Applies 18 always-on defaults that transform the raw YC form into a professional starting point (renamed to "Customer Agreement", data privacy section added, warranty restructured, consolidated SLA/support exhibit, etc.). Produces a clean .docx and a lawyer-facing memo explaining every change from the YC standard. Use when user says "draft a SaaS agreement", "YC SaaS", "startup SaaS contract", "customer agreement", "SaaS subscription agreement", or "I need a SaaS agreement starting from the YC form". Also trigger when the user is a startup founder discussing SaaS contracting, even if they don't mention YC specifically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills8642026年10月3日 更新

Writes a settlement letter on the right footing — and warns you when marking it 'without prejudice' won't actually keep it out of court. A genuine settlement letter is normally protected (the judge can't see it), but only if the substance is a real attempt to settle, and even then there are exceptions. The skill picks the correct footing — without prejudice (WP), without prejudice save as to costs (WPSATC / Calderbank), or open — drafts the finished letter, and surfaces the Unilever v Procter & Gamble exceptions that get WP material admitted despite the label, which a plain template won't flag. Built for juniors and in-house counsel drafting a settlement or Calderbank offer who need the footing right the first time. Use when the user asks to draft a WP letter, a Calderbank, a settlement letter, or wants to know whether material is likely protected from disclosure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills8642026年10月3日 更新

No Inference / Source-Locked Verification. Forces Claude to answer ONLY from user-provided materials and/or online sources actually accessed — no inference, no assumptions, no gap-filling. Every factual, legal, numerical, or procedural claim must be anchored to a cited source. Use whenever Claude reviews documents, summarises evidence, checks accuracy, drafts submissions, creates timelines, extracts facts, checks citations, analyses rules, prepares legal arguments, compares documents, verifies claims, produces chronologies, works from uploaded materials, performs legal research, checks case status, or does anything where evidential fidelity matters. Also trigger on: 'source-locked', 'no inference', 'only from the materials', 'don't assume', 'stick to the evidence', 'verify this', 'check this is right', 'work from the documents'. Overrides Claude's default tendency to fill gaps. If evidential accuracy matters, use this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills8642026年10月3日 更新

Prepare a lawyer for an adversarial proceeding the way Neal Katyal's "Harvey" prepared him for the SCOTUS tariffs argument: profile the tribunal from their prior opinions and questions, predict the specific questions you will face, map narrow "escape routes" each judge can walk through without abandoning prior commitments, and spar adversarially until only the strongest answers survive. The model is the sparring partner. The human still wins the case. Use when: preparing for oral argument, appellate argument, motion hearing, evidentiary hearing, deposition (taking or defending), arbitration, mediation, or any proceeding where a known decision-maker will fire questions at you in real time. Also useful for stress-testing a brief before filing. Proactively suggest when: the user mentions an upcoming hearing/argument with named judges or arbitrators, drafts a brief and wants it pressure-tested, asks "what will Justice X / Judge Y ask me," or talks about preparing for a specific bench.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills8642026年10月3日 更新