「edge」の検索結果

Test Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems for data poisoning, prompt injection via retrieved documents, and data exfiltration through manipulated context windows. Use this skill when assessing RAG-based chatbots, knowledge bases, enterprise AI assistants, or any system that augments LLM responses with external document retrieval. Covers document injection, embedding manipulation, knowledge base poisoning, and cross-document inference attacks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn raw Lumen release content (a dump of the LedgerHQ/lumen GitHub Releases page) into one minimalist Slack announcement, drafted to #lumen-releases. Use whenever the user pastes one or more `@ledgerhq/lumen-*` package releases, a chunk of the Releases page, or asks to "announce", "format", "post", or "write release notes / a Slack message" for new Lumen versions. Trigger it even when the user just drops the raw release text with no instructions, or says things like "new Lumen release", "format these lumen versions for Slack", or "lumen changelog for the channel".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Study unfamiliar codebases and produce evidence-backed knowledge artifacts. Use for repository orientation, architecture mapping, subsystem tracing, onboarding, or codebase documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and maintain the shared knowledge/ context files that every other marketing skill reads - brand voice, ICP personas, positioning, KPIs, and the learnings log. Run this once per company or client before using any other marketing skill. Use when the user says "set up brand context", "onboard my brand", "set up the marketing knowledge base", "the skills don't know my brand", "update our positioning", "our voice has changed", "add a new persona", or when any marketing skill reports that a knowledge/ file is missing. Also use when output sounds generic or off-brand. For writing a positioning statement as a standalone document, see positioning-doc. For deep persona research from raw sources, see customer-research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Searches, retrieves, and synthesizes official Google developer documentation across Google Cloud, AI/Gemini, Android, Chrome, Web, Flutter, Go, Firebase, and other Google developer platforms. Integrates with the Developer Knowledge MCP server (search_documents, get_documents, answer_query) or the Developer Knowledge REST API fallback. Use when searching for gcloud CLI commands, API syntax, IAM permissions, official documentation, architectural comparisons, or product choice overviews. Don't use for local filesystem lookups or non-Google documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discovers requirements and designs an end-to-end governed agentic analytics solution using Knowledge Catalog and Managed Service for Apache Spark (Lightning Engine). Use when designing data science and analytics workflows across structured and unstructured distributed data (including in S3, Azure Blob, AlloyDB, and Iceberg), establishing metadata governance with Knowledge Catalog aspect types, or grounding agentic IDEs (VS Code, Antigravity) by using the Google Cloud Data Agent Kit. Don't use for provisioning borderless data lakehouse infrastructure (use google-cloud-solution-agentic-ai-borderless-data-lakehouse instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when designing the UX and content strategy for a Salesforce-powered self-service portal or help center — pre-deflection article surfacing, Help Center search UX, friction-calibrated case submission forms, community peer support layers, and deflection measurement. Trigger keywords: design self-service portal, case deflection strategy, help center UX design, reduce support volume with self-service, knowledge base search experience. NOT for picking which contact reasons to deflect and through which channel — use architect/case-deflection-strategy. NOT for building the Experience Cloud site itself — use admin/experience-cloud-site-setup. More trigger keywords: article visibility matrix IsVisibleInCsp IsVisibleInPkb, which articles show in the customer portal, case visibility for portal users, CaseComment IsPublished customer visible comment, self-registration profile and account for a portal, Help Center template does not support login, deflection metrics SOQL KnowledgeArticleViewStat, self-service journey map, moderation policy for a support community.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning, sequencing, or troubleshooting an org-wide migration from Salesforce Classic to Lightning Experience. Covers the LEX Transition Assistant Readiness Check, asset triage matrix (Visualforce, JavaScript buttons, page layouts, Knowledge, email templates, list views, AppExchange), pilot/wave rollout sequencing, end-user adoption telemetry, and cutover criteria. Triggers: 'lightning experience transition', 'classic to lightning migration plan', 'LEX readiness check', 'why are some users still on Classic', 'turning on Lightning for everyone'. NOT for individual asset migrations like a single VF page (use lwc/visualforce-to-lwc-migration), a single JavaScript button (use admin/custom-button-to-action-migration), or Knowledge article migration (use admin/knowledge-classic-to-lightning) — this skill orchestrates the program. NOT for Lightning App Builder page design (use admin/lightning-app-builder-advanced).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when recording, tallying, or triaging stochastic review findings — the append-only JSONL ledger where Tier 2 (advisory, unevidenced) reviewer output goes instead of blocking language. Triggers on "log this finding", "ledger add", "tally the findings", "triage findings", "is this finding recurring", "retire this noise", or whenever a reviewer produces an unevidenced concern that should be measured for recurrence rather than chased. For the review itself see code-review-and-quality or skill-library-review; for verifying formal claims with deterministic evidence see adversarial-claims-reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture and organize knowledge in Notion—research findings, best practices, reference materials. Build searchable knowledge base for your team and future self.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search, read, create, edit, and maintain knowledge in a Memex KB via the `mx` CLI. Use when the user asks to search the KB, find documentation, check project or organizational docs, add or update knowledge-base entries, audit KB quality, or when reusable knowledge should be captured for future agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Render a wiki into ONE self-contained HTML snapshot (pages + provenance) that opens offline — no CDN, no remote assets, page content HTML-escaped. Use to share or review accumulated wiki knowledge as a static page. NOT for capturing/approving knowledge (see mk:wiki); NOT for generic code/diagram visuals (see mk:preview).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitor reviewed Grafana telemetry and freshness evidence for IoT devices and edge fleets. Use for smart devices, home automation sensors, remote equipment, wind turbines, space hardware, device-fleet freshness, missing telemetry, and bounded edge-health comparisons.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep analysis of knowledge distillation techniques for compressing large models into smaller efficient ones

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design deployment-focused distillation systems that balance model size, accuracy, calibration, and cascade escalation under real resource limits. Best for teacher-student compression, threshold design, and failure-aware deployment. Activate on "model compression", "teacher- student", "distillation score", "cascade model", "edge deployment", or "model calibration". NOT for generic deep-learning overviews, prompt optimization, or training work without a concrete distillation objective.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cloudflare Workers, KV, Durable Objects, and edge computing development. Use for serverless APIs, caching, rate limiting, real-time features. Activate on "Workers", "KV", "Durable Objects", "wrangler", "edge function", "Cloudflare". NOT for Cloudflare Pages configuration (use deployment docs), DNS management, or general CDN settings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cloudflare Pages CI/CD with preview environments, edge functions, and Wrangler automation. Activate on: Cloudflare Pages, Wrangler deploy, preview environment, edge function, Pages project, Cloudflare Workers integration, custom domain on Pages. NOT for: Worker-specific development (use cloudflare-worker-dev), DNS management (use devops-automator), full-stack app frameworks (use vercel-deployment).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive Archon integration for knowledge base and project management via REST API. On first use, asks for Archon host URL. Use when searching documentation, managing projects/tasks, or querying indexed knowledge. Provides RAG-powered semantic search, website crawling, document upload, hierarchical project/task management, and document versioning. Always try Archon first for external documentation and knowledge retrieval before using other sources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Walk every branching path and boundary condition in content, report only unhandled edge cases. Orthogonal to adversarial review - method-driven not attitude-driven. Use when you need exhaustive edge-case analysis of code, specs, or diffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

VRChat エコシステムツール（ModularAvatar / liltoon / VRCFury / AvatarOptimizer 等）の ナレッジを 4 フェーズで段階的に調査・検証し `knowledge/*.md` に再現可能な形で蓄積する。 ソースコード読解 → inspect 実測まで進めると confidence を `high` に昇格できる。 トリガー: 新しい VRChat コミュニティツールに初めて遭遇した、 既存ナレッジの confidence が low で作業に支障がある、 ユーザーから「このツールについて調べて」と依頼された場合。

Produces a deep, honest peer-review of how someone uses Claude Code by statistically analyzing their local session data (~/.claude/usage-data/ and ~/.claude/projects/). Trigger whenever the user asks to review, analyze, audit, or critique their own Claude Code usage, workflow, habits, or skill level — including phrases like "analyze my cc usage", "review my cc sessions", "peer review my cc workflow", "deeper than /insights", or any ask for an honest audit of their AI workflow. Also covers portfolio/hiring-manager framings (e.g. "portfolio for Anthropic/OpenAI/xAI"), but ALWAYS ask the user in Step 0 which version to build (self / hr / both) before running — never silently produce an HR report, because that version goes to outsiders and needs explicit privacy setup. The HTML report is laid out ledger-first for SELF (opening band, output/team/leak/trend ledgers, then peer review, 9-dim scoring, try-this-week, case study, claim-indexed evidence). The HR variant is a recruiter version v1: identity card, earned badges (threshold-based, earned-only), allowlist-filtered output ledger, one case study, and a methodology & scope disclosure — no scores, no peer-review memo, no charts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

生成スキルに knowledge/ を追加するとき読む。ナレッジ蓄積・検索・フィードバックループの設計を参照するとき読む。

Analyze folders of Markdown/text research notes, Obsidian vaults, paper cards, invention notes, or memory exports as a practical knowledge map. Use when asked to find center topics, noisy or low-signal notes, possible contamination, overgrown topic groups, orphan notes, cleanup actions, or a useful public knowledge-hygiene workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NIST SP 800-37 Revision 2, the Risk Management Framework (RMF) for information systems and organizations. Use for the seven RMF steps (Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, Monitor) and their tasks; the three-tier organization-wide risk model; authorization boundaries; the requirements-to-controls relationship; security categorization (FIPS 199/200 high-water mark) and control selection/tailoring (SP 800-53/53B baselines); assessment, the authorization decision and risk acceptance, continuous monitoring and ongoing authorization; the security/privacy distinction; and supply chain risk management. This is the security-and-privacy-risk-governance edge of systems engineering — it governs how much protection and whether to accept residual risk, complementing the disciplines that decide how protection is built. Does NOT reproduce the SP 800-53 control catalog or its baselines, the FIPS impact tables, or the ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 process text; it names and routes to them rather than restating them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。