1,245 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Generates guidance for reliability, resilience, availability, redundancy, fault-tolerance, and disaster recovery (DR) for Google Cloud workloads based on the design principles and recommendations in the Google Cloud Well-Architected Framework. Use when the user asks to evaluate, design, or improve the reliability, resilience, availability, or disaster recovery capabilities of Google Cloud workloads.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Leverages BigQuery's built-in machine learning and GenAI capabilities for advanced data analytics. Use when you need to write SQL queries that perform time-series forecasting, predict values, detect outliers or anomalies, find key drivers, perform semantic search or vector search, classify text, calculate similarity, summarize content, translate language, evaluate models, filter by semantic conditions, measure the causal effect of an intervention, compute correlations between columns, detect change points or structural breaks, extract trend or seasonality components, or leverage generative AI capabilities in BigQuery. Do not use for general BigQuery dataset, table, or job management requests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find, evaluate, and download common purchasable CAD parts from step.parts, including named off-the-shelf actuators, servos, motors, electronics boards, connectors, screws, bolts, nuts, washers, bearings, standoffs, and other catalog components. Use when Codex needs to search the hosted step.parts catalog before creating simplified placeholder geometry, resolve fuzzy part names, standards, aliases, or dimensions, choose a matching part, fetch a canonical .step file, verify checksums, or use the step.parts API/OpenAPI/catalog endpoints for standard part discovery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assertion-first AI eval framework aligned to Anthropic's 'Demystifying evals for AI agents' — typed deterministic asserts + a forced-structured LLM judge over an input→assert case schema, pass^k/pass@k, capability vs regression suites, subscription-billed. USE WHEN eval, evaluate, benchmark, regression test, assertion, assert, llm-rubric, judge, pass@k, pass^k, grade output, compare prompts/models, test agent. NOT FOR scientific-method framing (use Science), property/mutation testing of code (use Hardening), or live UI verification (use Interceptor).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits any AI instruction set for over-prompting using the core test — would a smarter model make this rule unnecessary? Applies Five Questions to every rule (Claude already does this? Contradiction? Redundant? One-off fix? Vague?) then classifies as CUT/RESOLVE/MERGE/EVALUATE/SHARPEN/MOVE/KEEP. Workflows: Audit (full system, token savings), QuickCheck (single file). Principle: less scaffolding = better output. USE WHEN BPE, bitter pill, audit setup, over-prompting, trim instructions, dead weight, simplify setup, clean up CLAUDE.md. NOT FOR attacking logical flaws in ideas (use RedTeam).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate page content for usefulness, E-E-A-T, readability, thinness, and AI citation readiness, plus last-mile draft cleanup (AI-typical phrasing and invisible Unicode watermark characters). Use for content-only analysis, not full-page technical checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
DeepEval evaluation workflow for AI agents and LLM applications. TRIGGER when the user wants to evaluate or improve an AI agent, tool-using workflow, multi-turn chatbot, RAG pipeline, or LLM app; add evals; generate datasets or goldens; use deepeval generate; use deepeval test run; send results to Confident AI; monitor production; run online evals; inspect traces; or iterate on prompts, tools, retrieval, or agent behavior from eval failures. AI agents are the primary use case. Covers Python SDK, pytest eval suites, CLI generation, traced evals, Confident AI reporting, and agent-driven improvement loops. DO NOT TRIGGER for unrelated generic pytest, non-AI test setup, or non-DeepEval observability work unless the user asks to compare or migrate to DeepEval; for instrumenting an app with DeepEval tracing, @observe, or framework integrations (use the `deepeval-tracing` skill); or for raw OpenTelemetry / OTLP export without the deepeval package (use the `deepeval-otel` skill).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when experiments complete to judge what claims the results support, what they don't, and what evidence is still missing. A secondary Codex agent evaluates results against intended claims and routes to next action (pivot, supplement, or confirm). Use after experiments finish — before writing the paper or running ablations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess patent novelty and non-obviousness against prior art. Use when user says "专利查新", "patent novelty", "可专利性评估", "patentability check", or wants to evaluate if an invention is patentable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when experiments complete to judge what claims the results support, what they don't, and what evidence is still missing. Codex MCP evaluates results against intended claims and routes to next action (pivot, supplement, or confirm). Use after experiments finish — before writing the paper or running ablations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Installs the CARLA Autonomous Driving Leaderboard (leaderboard.carla.org) at a chosen version — 1.0, 2.0 or 2.1 — together with the exact scenario_runner branch and CARLA build each one requires, then wires the four-root PYTHONPATH and verifies the whole stack imports. Detects which version an existing checkout is by reading its code, not its branch name. Use when the user asks to "install the leaderboard", "set up the CARLA challenge", "evaluate my driving agent", "reproduce my leaderboard score", or names a leaderboard version.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs the CARLA Leaderboard evaluator over a set of routes with your agent — routes/routes-subset/repetitions/track selection, checkpoint and live-results endpoints, resume after a crash, recording, and the debug levels — for leaderboard 1.0, 2.0 or 2.1. Preflights the whole stack (version pairing, maps, ports, agent class, sensor budget) before spending hours, and hands the world back in async mode. Use when the user asks to "run the leaderboard", "evaluate my agent", "run routes_training", "resume an evaluation", or "reproduce my submission locally".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fine-tunes and evaluates OpenVLA-OFT and OpenVLA-OFT+ policies for robot action generation with continuous action heads, LoRA adaptation, and FiLM conditioning on LIBERO simulation and ALOHA real-world setups. Use when reproducing OpenVLA-OFT paper results, training custom VLA action heads (L1 or diffusion), deploying server-client inference for ALOHA, or debugging normalization, LoRA merge, and cross-GPU issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates NVIDIA Cosmos Policy on LIBERO and RoboCasa simulation environments. Use when setting up cosmos-policy for robot manipulation evaluation, running headless GPU evaluations with EGL rendering, or profiling inference latency on cluster or local GPU machines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates code generation models across HumanEval, MBPP, MultiPL-E, and 15+ benchmarks with pass@k metrics. Use when benchmarking code models, comparing coding abilities, testing multi-language support, or measuring code generation quality. Industry standard from BigCode Project used by HuggingFace leaderboards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates LLMs across 60+ academic benchmarks (MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, HellaSwag). Use when benchmarking model quality, comparing models, reporting academic results, or tracking training progress. Industry standard used by EleutherAI, HuggingFace, and major labs. Supports HuggingFace, vLLM, APIs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates LLMs across 100+ benchmarks from 18+ harnesses (MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, safety, VLM) with multi-backend execution. Use when needing scalable evaluation on local Docker, Slurm HPC, or cloud platforms. NVIDIA's enterprise-grade platform with container-first architecture for reproducible benchmarking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes, refactors, and evaluates prompts for LLMs — generating optimized prompt templates, structured output schemas, evaluation rubrics, and test suites. Use when designing prompts for new LLM applications, refactoring existing prompts for better accuracy or token efficiency, implementing chain-of-thought or few-shot learning, creating system prompts with personas and guardrails, building JSON/function-calling schemas, or developing prompt evaluation frameworks to measure and improve model performance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing new high-level system architecture, reviewing existing designs, or making architectural decisions. Invoke to create architecture diagrams, write Architecture Decision Records (ADRs), evaluate technology trade-offs, design component interactions, and plan for scalability. Use for system design, architecture review, microservices structuring, ADR authoring, scalability planning, and infrastructure pattern selection — distinct from code-level design patterns or database-only design tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Content quality and E-E-A-T assessment for AI citability — evaluate experience, expertise, authoritativeness, trustworthiness, and content structure
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and evaluate paid-ad experiments with hypotheses, randomization units, sample-size and duration assumptions, guardrails, platform experiment tools, analysis, and decision rules. Use for A/B test, split test, experiment design, hypothesis, statistical significance, sample size, test duration, or experiment readout.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage a subpoena served on the company — classify it, analyze scope/burden/privilege, cross-check the portfolio, and produce an objections framework, compliance plan, and deadline calendar. Use when the user says "we got a subpoena", "served with a subpoena", or shares a subpoena, CID, or third-party document request to evaluate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage an inbound demand letter — extract fields, cross-check the portfolio, assess merit, present response options with a recommendation, and hand off to matter-intake or demand-intake if escalation is warranted. Use when the user says "we got a demand letter", "triage this demand", or shares an incoming demand to evaluate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate a skill against the Legal Skill Design Framework — thirteen design parameters (including trust-surface, freshness, schema validation, and conflict detection), three legal failure modes, and a three-band verdict (Ready / Some Concern / Material Concerns). Use when deciding whether to trust a community skill before installing it, before deploying a first-party skill to your team, or whenever the user asks "should I trust this?" or "is this skill well-designed?". Runs automatically as part of /legal-builder-hub:skill-installer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。