「fea」の検索結果

Analyze competitors and create competitive landscape documentation with feature matrices, positioning maps, and strategic recommendations. Use when asked to analyze competitors, create competitive analysis, compare features with competitors, build a competitive landscape, track competitive positioning, or prepare sales battlecard inputs. Produces structured competitor profiles, feature comparison matrix, win/loss analysis, and prioritised strategic recommendations. For a one-off teardown of a single rival use competitor-teardown; for a recurring market briefing use competitive-intelligence-monitor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cut through the model soup to buy the right appliance — the features that actually matter for you, the ones that are marketing, and when to buy. Use when asked which [fridge/washer/dishwasher] should I buy, help me choose an appliance, what features do I need, or is this appliance worth it. Produces a needs-based feature shortlist (must-have vs nice-to-have vs marketing fluff), fit and capacity checks, reliability and running-cost considerations, warranty/extended-warranty guidance, and timing tips — flagging to verify current models, prices, and specs before buying.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The pre-merge review of a branch in a project that records its specs, decisions, and rules in .archcore/. Run this first for 'review my branch', 'review the changes before merge', or 'review before merge': it checks the changed code against the project's recorded canon and the changed documents against the code, and reports which side is wrong — spec-wrong or code-wrong; with no diff, it reports project health. A bug-hunting code review complements this review and does not replace it. Also use for 'show status', 'documentation gaps', 'check if docs match code', 'close out the feature', 'ship the feature and close it out', or after a staleness warning. Modes, named as the first word: drift for staleness detection, deep for a full documentation audit, closeout to close a finished feature, experience to capture a repeated pattern. Not for creating docs — use /archcore:document; not for planning — use /archcore:plan; not for a single-file edit with no branch review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

可审计的 agent 团队：BMAD 全自动研发流水线编排器。编排 9 个专业 Agent（PM、架构师、UI Designer、Tech Lead、Scrum Master、Frontend、Backend、QA、DevOps）从需求到部署，每一步都有事件溯源 + 不可绕过门禁 + 确定性 eval——可验证测试真跑、门禁真过。支持单环节切片命令（/boss:plan /review /qa /ship）与无 CLI 纯 Markdown 降级。 Triggers（全流水线）: 'boss mode', '/boss', '全自动开发', '从需求到部署', '帮我做一个', 'build this', 'ship it', '全流程', '自动化开发', '一键开发', 'start a project', 'new feature' Triggers（单环节切片，对存量项目最常用）: - /boss:review — '帮我评审', '代码评审', '技术评审', '看看这段代码有什么问题', '风险评估', 'review this', 'review my PR', 'code review' - /boss:qa — '跑一下测试', '补测试', '检查质量', '测试覆盖够不够', '门禁过了吗', 'run the tests', 'check quality', 'add tests' - /boss:plan — '先出个方案', '写个 PRD', '设计一下架构', 'write a spec', 'plan this feature' - /boss:ship — '可以发布了吗', '部署检查', 'ready to ship', 'deploy checks' Does NOT trigger: - 单文件修改或简单 bug 修复（直接编辑即可） - 纯代码阅读或解释（使用 read 工具） - 已有 pipeline 正在运行时的重复启动 - 极小事（预计 <30 分钟人工可完成、不需要 PRD/架构/门禁记录） Output: 完整项目代码 + PRD/架构/UI/测试/部署文档，写入 .boss/<feature>/ 目录

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Take a new feature or product update and generate the full launch kit: changelog entry, email announcement, LinkedIn post variants, in-app banner text, Twitter/X thread, and internal sales enablement one-pager. Pure reasoning skill that chains product context with audience-specific copy generation. Use when a product marketing team needs to turn a feature spec into launch-ready assets fast.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extracts cfDNA fragmentomics features (DELFI genome-wide short/long ratios, WPS nucleosome positioning, Griffin GC-corrected accessibility profiles, end-motifs/MDS, OCF) for cancer detection and tissue-of-origin from plasma WGS. Centers on the nuclease-footprint reframe (every feature re-reads one nucleosome object), the mandatory GC correction, and the cross-protocol non-comparability that breaks naive classifiers. Runs FinaleToolkit (real CLI/Python, MIT) and the Griffin Snakemake pipeline; DELFI is a method, not a package. Use when deriving fragment-based signal from cfDNA, choosing a feature family for detection vs subtyping, or diagnosing why a fragmentomic model failed validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Visualises RNA-modification data with transcript-feature metagene plots (Guitar GuitarPlot; MetaPlotR; deepTools computeMatrix scale-regions), peak-centred heatmaps (ComplexHeatmap; deepTools plotHeatmap), IP-vs-input paired browser tracks (log2 IP/input bigWig via deepTools bamCompare; pyGenomeTracks; Gviz; IGV/UCSC track hubs), DRACH sequence-logo plots (ggseqlogo; MEME), feature-distribution stacked bars, and volcano/MA plots for differential modification. Establishes stop-codon enrichment in the metagene plot as the biological QC anchor for any MeRIP dataset (Dominissini 2012; Meyer 2012). Use when producing the canonical metagene plot with stop-codon enrichment as a QC anchor, building paired IP/input genome-browser tracks at single-locus resolution, plotting peak-centred heatmaps clustered by condition, summarising peak distribution across transcript features, generating DRACH motif logos as sanity checks, rendering volcano plots of differential m6A, or reproducing the stop-codon enrichment plot.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interpret and explain a trained tabular machine-learning model (classification or regression) in MATLAB. Find which predictors, features, or columns matter most; explain why the model made a specific prediction, including diagnosing predictions it got wrong; show how a predictor affects the output; and compare how the model behaves across cohorts or subgroups. Uses model-agnostic techniques and model-native measures, and works on custom models (such as a dlnetwork) through a prediction function handle. Use for model interpretability, explainability, and feature-importance questions on tabular data, not for training, tuning, feature selection, deploying models, or models trained on image, text, signal, or other non-tabular data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to optimize for Featured Snippets, Position Zero, or snippet extraction. Also use when the user mentions "featured snippet," "position zero," "snippet optimization," "answer box," "definition box," "list snippet," "table snippet," "paragraph snippet," "PAA optimization," or "win position zero." For schema, use schema-markup. For step-by-step HowTo sections (lists, copy), use howto-section-generator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to add or optimize structured data (Schema.org, JSON-LD). Also use when the user mentions "schema," "structured data," "JSON-LD," "rich results," "rich snippets," "Google rich snippets," "featured snippet schema," "add schema to page," "missing structured data," "schema validation error," "Schema Markup Validator," "Google Rich Results Test," "FAQ schema," "Article schema," "Organization schema," "JobPosting," "HowTo," "Event," "SoftwareApplication," "BreadcrumbList," "WebSite," "Recipe," "Product," or "Dataset." For SERP feature types and zero-click patterns, use serp-features. For AI search visibility strategy (not markup), use generative-engine-optimization. For HowTo step sections (placement, copy, vs FAQ), use howto-section-generator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deprecated compatibility entry for Feature Page construction. This page is now maintained in Pagina; install and use page-builder to build a new Feature Page.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translate ideas, feature requests, or vague concepts into specific, actionable dev briefs. Use this skill whenever the user has an idea they want to build, a feature to spec out, a bug to file, a project to scope, or needs to convert a half-formed idea into a clear implementation brief. Triggers on I want to add, we should build, can we make, what is the plan for, how do we implement, dev brief, feature spec, PRD, user story, acceptance criteria, scope this, prioritize. Also triggers when the user has a list of things they want to build and needs help converting them into well-formed tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designing side-by-side comparison tools (plan-compare, product-compare, alternative-compare) that help users decide rather than just listing features. Axis selection, default-comparison logic, recommendation discipline. Honest about feature-list-dump (every feature in a row, no decision support), hidden-recommendation (biased comparison pretending to be neutral), and honest-comparison-with-guidance (genuine comparison plus opinionated recommendation) patterns. Triggers on comparison tool, plan compare, product compare, alternative compare, vs page, decision support tool. Also triggers when conversion through comparison stages is poor, when users are abandoning at the comparison step, or when a comparison tool is being scoped for the first time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The operational playbook for launching a feature well. Positioning, internal alignment, customer comms, sales enablement, support readiness, rollout strategy, monitoring with pre-defined rollback triggers, post-launch measurement against spec hypotheses, and the discipline that distinguishes shipping from releasing from actually launching. Triggers on launch plan, feature launch, launch checklist, ship vs release, rollout strategy, gradual rollout, sales enablement, support readiness, launch announcement, post-launch measurement, launch failure, declared victory too early. Also triggers when planning a launch (any size, any segment), auditing an existing launch process, fixing the we shipped it but the metric did not move problem, or building a launch checklist for the team.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Feature flag strategy, lifecycle, and operations. Use when designing a flag taxonomy, planning a gradual rollout, building kill switches, auditing flag debt, defining governance, running progressive delivery, or rolling back via flags.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MLOps across model deployment, ML pipelines, monitoring, and feature stores. Use when deploying models to production, building training pipelines, setting up drift detection, configuring feature stores, or automating ML CI/CD workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deprecated; use rank-monitor --features for SERP features. "track SERP features"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert patterns for multi-platform exports including export templates (Windows/Linux/macOS/Android/iOS/Web), command-line exports (headless mode), platform-specific settings (codesign, notarization, Android SDK), feature flags (OS.has_feature), CI/CD pipelines (GitHub Actions), and build optimization (size reduction, debug stripping). Use for release preparation or automated deployment. Trigger keywords: export_preset, export_template, headless_export, platform_specific, feature_flag, CI_CD, build_optimization, codesign, Android_SDK.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Red-green-refactor scaffold for building new features with TDD. Write failing tests first, then implement to pass. Use when building new features test-first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates App Store featuring nomination pitches with all required fields, compelling narratives, and Apple editorial angles. Use when submitting your app for App Store editorial featuring or preparing a self-nomination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate feature flag infrastructure with local defaults, remote configuration, SwiftUI integration, and debug menu. Use when adding feature flags or A/B testing to iOS/macOS apps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The QFeatures infrastructure enables the management and processing of quantitative features for high-throughput mass spectrometry assays. It provides a familiar Bioconductor user experience to manages quantitative data across different assa

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MEM, Marker Enrichment Modeling, automatically generates and displays quantitative labels for cell populations that have been identified from single-cell data. The input for MEM is a dataset that has pre-clustered or pre-gated populations with cells in rows and features in columns. Labels convey a list of measured features and the features' levels of relative enrichment on each population. MEM can be applied to a wide variety of data types and can compare between MEM labels from flow cytometry,

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read git log since initial scaffold + last 3 progress notes, draft feature additions to a SEPARATE suggestions file so feature_list.json stays immutable

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。