「find」の検索結果

Search code by AST structure using ast-grep. Find semantic patterns like function calls, imports, class definitions instead of text patterns. Triggers on: find all calls to X, search for pattern, refactor usages, find where function is used, structural search, ast-grep, sg.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Modern find-and-replace using sd (simpler than sed) and batch replacement patterns. Triggers on: sd, find replace, batch replace, sed replacement, string replacement, rename.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translate technical security work into the language of non-security audiences — board, executives, engineering, customer success, customers, legal, procurement, sales. Covers incident communication, post-mortem narrative, audit-findings-for-stakeholders, risk justification, security spend justification, and customer-facing breach disclosure. Use when the user mentions 'security comms,' 'communicate this finding,' 'explain to my boss,' 'board update,' 'executive summary,' 'incident communication,' 'breach notification,' 'customer disclosure,' 'security memo,' 'post-mortem narrative,' 'risk justification,' 'why this matters to the business,' 'translate this finding,' 'stakeholder update,' or has technical security work that needs to land with a non-security audience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Survey the codebase for analogous features, reusable utilities, and existing patterns relevant to a proposed change, reading any source the task names outside this repo. Returns structured findings without writing code. Use when the user asks to "survey patterns", "find existing patterns", "look for analogous features", "check how similar things are done", "find prior art for this change", or needs pattern context before planning a change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AiZynthFinder retrosynthetic route planning (CASP) from AstraZeneca Molecular AI. Monte Carlo tree search guided by a template-based neural expansion policy recursively disconnects a target SMILES until precursors are found in a purchasable stock. Covers config.yml (v4 format), aizynthcli batch screening, the AiZynthFinder/AiZynthExpander Python API, one-step disconnections, custom stocks via smiles2stock, scorers, Retro*/breadth-first/DFPN search alternatives, and reading output.json.gz / trees.json. Use for synthesis route planning, synthesizability screening, and building-block/precursor search. For reaction barriers use neb-irc-activation-energy; for 2D reaction scheme drawing use rdkit-chemdraw-cdxml.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Posts review findings from a JSON file as inline comments on a GitHub Pull Request, attaching each comment to its file and line. Use when you have a list/JSON of review findings (each with a file path, line number, and a message such as summary/failure_scenario) and want them published on a PR as inline review comments. Triggers include "post these review comments on the PR", "associate comments to files in the PR", "publish review findings to PR

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cleans up CRM data from HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Zoho, Close, Attio, or any CRM CSV export. Finds duplicate contacts and companies with fuzzy matching (not just exact email), normalizes emails, phones to E.164, names, domains, states, and countries, flags stale, invalid, role, and test records, finds broken contact-company associations, and produces a reviewable merge plan plus import-ready files without touching the live CRM. Use this skill whenever the user wants to dedupe, find or merge duplicate contacts, merge companies or accounts, clean up a CRM, prep a CRM migration or re-import, or says the CRM export is a mess. Also use it when they mention only one symptom, like "the same person is in here three times", "half our leads are junk", or "our company records don't match".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a deep code review of files, modules, a diff, or a branch - finding security vulnerabilities (mapped to OWASP Top 10:2025), correctness bugs, performance problems, and maintainability issues - and returns severity-ranked findings with evidence and concrete fixes. Use when the user asks to review, audit, or sanity-check code, asks "is this safe", "what's wrong with this", "find bugs", or wants a security or performance pass before shipping. For posting line comments on a GitHub pull request, use git-pr-reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finding validation gate - 7-Question triage adapted for FIND schema. Run before moving any FIND from Research to Completed. One NO = keep in Research. All YES = move to Completed, then run /evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides internal privacy audit program design and execution including risk-based audit planning, scope definition, fieldwork procedures, finding classification, evidence gathering, remediation tracking, and management reporting. Covers audit universe definition, annual audit plan, working papers, and closure verification. Keywords: internal audit, privacy audit, fieldwork, remediation, findings, audit plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides privacy audit report writing including executive summary drafting, findings classification (critical, high, medium, low), evidence referencing, root cause analysis documentation, recommendation formulation, management response tracking, and report distribution protocols. Covers report structure from scope definition through appendices and sign-off. Keywords: audit report, findings documentation, executive summary, recommendations, report structure, privacy audit deliverables.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

全面代码库审计 — 自适应并行深度分析（前后端契约、数据完整性、异常处理/安全、架构/技术债、配置/缓存），结构化 findings + 对抗验证 + 基线对比，输出按严重程度排序的统一报告和修复路线图。支持 quick 快速体检模式。Use when user asks to audit, analyze, or review an entire codebase for design issues, find hidden bugs, check architecture health, or asks '全面审查', '代码库审计', '分析设计问题', 'audit codebase', 'health check', '有哪些问题', '快速体检'. Also trigger when user asks to find silent degradation, data flow breakpoints, type mismatches between frontend and backend, or wants to understand technical debt across a project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Anymail Finder integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Anymail Finder data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Affinda integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Affinda data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AddressFinder Australia integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with AddressFinder Australia data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies boundaries between modules or components in software systems through static code analysis and dependency detection. Use when Claude needs to analyze software architecture, identify module boundaries, detect boundary violations, find circular dependencies, or assess component coupling. Supports Python (packages and imports) and Java (packages and dependencies). Trigger when users ask to "identify boundaries", "find component boundaries", "detect boundary violations", "analyze module structure", "check architecture", or "find circular dependencies".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill orchestrates autonomous discovery of brand materials across enterprise platforms (Notion, Confluence, Google Drive, Box, SharePoint, Figma, Gong, Granola, Slack). It should be used when the user asks to "discover brand materials", "find brand documents", "search for brand guidelines", "audit brand content", "what brand materials do we have", "find our style guide", "where are our brand docs", "do we have a style guide", "discover brand voice", "brand content audit", or "find brand assets".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find web pages and content similar to a given URL using Exa's neural similarity search. Ideal for competitor discovery, alternative source finding, related content research, and expanding research beyond known sources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues in local branch changes. Use when asked to review changes, find bugs, security review, or audit code on the current branch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find academic papers across up to 8 sources (OpenAlex / Semantic Scholar / CrossRef / PubMed / arXiv for English, OpenReview for AI venues, plus native-Chinese retrieval via NSSD 国家哲社文献中心 + yiigle 中华医学期刊) with adjustable depth — Quick scan (5 min) to Audit prep (3 hr). Use when the user wants to find papers, run a literature search, gather references, scope a research topic, search Chinese-language / 中文原生 literature (中文文献/中文核心/CSSCI/C刊/国内研究/国内文献/中华××期刊/心理学报/经济研究), or filter results by journal tier (中科院分区/一区/几区, Q1, JCR/SJR quartile, 影响因子/impact factor, 期刊分区, 顶刊/top journal, '按分区筛'), or export paste-ready professional search strategies / 检索式 for external databases (PubMed / WOS / Scopus / Embase / 知网 CNKI / 万方 / SinoMed — '写检索式', '导出检索式', 'WOS 检索式', '知网专业检索', 'search strategy', 'boolean search strategy'). Triggers on search verbs ('find papers', 'literature search', 'papers about X'), review types ('scoping review', 'systematic review', 'SR prep', 'literature review', 'lit review', 'help me write a lit review'), Chinese ('找文献', '找论文', '论文搜索', '学术检索', '文献检索', '文献综述', '综述前期', '求文献', '中文文献', '中文核心', 'CSSCI', 'C刊', '国内研究', '找中文的'). Outputs Shadcn HTML report + BibTeX/RIS/CSV + PRISMA-S log. Do NOT use for: concept explanations ('what is X' / 'X 是什么', e.g. '影响因子怎么算'), writing ('帮我写' / 'help me write a paragraph'), single-paper interpretation or PDF download with metadata (use paper-downloader-portable), or when the user already has a literature set (use literature-set-review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in designing and implementing intelligent game AI systems including behavior trees, finite state machines, GOAP, utility AI, pathfinding, steering behaviors, and perception systems. Specializes in creating believable, performant NPC behaviors that enhance player experience. Use when "game AI, NPC behavior, behavior tree, state machine for game, enemy AI, pathfinding, A* algorithm, navmesh, steering behavior, GOAP, utility AI, AI perception, combat AI, companion AI, boss AI, crowd simulation, flocking, game-ai, behavior-trees, pathfinding, npc, state-machines, goap, utility-ai, steering, perception" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit experiment integrity against the evidence ledger. At L2 (repo + result files present) a fresh cross-model reviewer reads the eval code line-by-line for fake/derived ground truth, score self-normalization, phantom results (a paper number with no backing file/key), dead/uncalled metric code, verified-scope inflation, method-described ≠ method-evaluated drift, synthesized-looking results, placeholder/fake data still wired into a released result, code-output ≠ reported-number mismatch, and missing reproducibility artifacts (an empirical/agent/LLM paper shipping neither code nor the prompts/configs its results need) — every finding span-anchored to a ledger claim_id. At L0/L1 (PDF / source only) the same patterns are surfaced as info-level 'could-not-verify' signals where the ledger gives an anchor (observability_level_required:2) — NEVER a fraud verdict from a PDF. The reviewer PROPOSES findings; tools/adjudicate_findings.py computes the verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "experiment forensics", "audit the results", "check the eval code", "实验诚实度".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether a paper's baseline comparisons are COMPLETE, FAIR, and SIGNIFICANT: a required recent SOTA baseline is missing while 'best/SOTA' is claimed (HP-MISSING-BASELINE); a baseline is undertuned / given less compute-tuning-data, run at a mismatched config, or the equal-budget ablation-as-baseline is absent (HP-WEAK-BASELINE); 'outperforms' is asserted over overlapping error bars or with no variance/seeds (HP-SIG-OVERLAP); and a cross-row 'improves over baseline by X%' is arithmetically wrong (HP-DELTA-ERROR, cross-row form only). A versioned per-domain baseline profile + a live leaderboard/recency search are assembled by the EXECUTOR as structured facts; a fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per dimension) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Works at L0 (stated comparisons) and deepens at L2 (configs/result files). A completeness question it cannot settle internally becomes needs_external_check, never a guessed missing baseline. Emits baseline-comparison-audit.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "baseline audit", "missing baselines", "is the comparison fair", "weak baseline", "baseline 误报", "SOTA earned?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end substantive-integrity forensic sweep of a research paper (especially autoresearch / AI-Scientist-style output). Orchestrates the whole pipeline: ingest (arxiv-id | pdf | dir → working dir + pdftotext for L0) → /evidence-ledger (artifact manifest + observability level L0/L1/L2 + span-anchored claims.json) → fan out the integrity auditor skills (consistency, citation, baseline, experiment, presentation, proof-derivation, eval-design — each reads the ledger, emits span-anchored findings) + the zero-verdict-weight AIS writing-style track → advisory memos (/adversarial-case-builder + /novelty-duplication-advisory, no verdict weight) → deterministic tools/adjudicate_findings.py (--ledger REQUIRED) → reviewer-ready Integrity Forensics Report. Cross-model (fresh codex per dimension) and reviewer≠adjudicator: the model proposes findings, the deterministic adjudicator decides the verdict. Observability-aware, detect-only, never an opaque AI-text classifier (a separate zero-weight AIS section lists AI writing-style impressions, never moving the verdict). Triggers: "anti-autoresearch", "integrity audit this paper", "forensic review", "audit a submission", "审一篇投稿的诚信".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。