993 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Review a finished epic folder in the ticket tree against the evidence it left behind — the epic file, each ticket plan, diffs, commits — and produce a retrospective with sourced findings, action items, and an acceptance decision. Use when the user says "run a retrospective" or "lets retro the epic [epic]". Supports -H/--headless
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compiles current scholarly evidence for a scientific manuscript or research brief when the user explicitly asks to gather literature, references, background evidence, competing findings, or a manuscript research packet. Uses Parallel Search by default, Parallel Extract for source retrieval, Parallel Research for explicitly deep/exhaustive work, optional explicit Parallel Chat, and optional Perplexity only when requested or allowed as a failure fallback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Converts neuroscience acquisition data to Neurodata Without Borders files with NeuroConv and PyNWB, preserves metadata and timebases, checks evidence-based clock alignment, and produces schema validation, NWB Inspector findings and round-trip checks. Use for NWB conversion and synchronization of planar single-channel two-photon TIFF imaging plus timestamped behavioral position CSV; this skill does not perform spike sorting or claim tested support for arbitrary acquisition formats.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Formulates evidence-bounded scientific questions, candidate hypotheses, rival explanations, causal or associational claims, discriminating predictions, measurements, and preregistration-ready analysis plans. Used when turning observations or preliminary findings into transparent, testable research plans without treating hypotheses as facts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working on, reviewing, or extending GitNexus's CFG/taint/PDG subsystem (the `--pdg` layers), or when reasoning about source→sink data-flow findings. Examples: "How does taint analysis work here?", "Why didn't explain find this flow?", "Add a new sink/source", "Review the interprocedural taint code".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematically explore and test a web application to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to "dogfood", "QA", "exploratory test", "find issues", "bug hunt", "test this app/site/platform", or review the quality of a web application. Produces a structured report with full reproduction evidence -- step-by-step screenshots, repro videos, and detailed repro steps for every issue -- so findings can be handed directly to the responsible teams.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform an Azure Well-Architected Framework review of the current workload IaC and architecture, generating findings and GitHub issues for improvements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read artifacts from the shared bench — the workspace where desks leave findings, verdicts, and work products for each other and the operator.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform an AWS Well-Architected Framework review of the current workload IaC and architecture, generating findings and GitHub issues for improvements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate an open question and return grounded, sourced findings
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compile one or more OpenViking knowledge bases or document collections into topic-organized, evidence-grounded high-level knowledge, including cross-source findings, trends, changes, drivers, comparisons, implications, and uncertainties. Use with ov compile when the user asks to distill or synthesize a knowledge base, compare multiple collections, or derive higher-order insights such as changes across financial reports; do not use for document-by-document summaries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft a structured investment committee memo for PE deal approval. Synthesizes due diligence findings, financial analysis, and deal terms into a professional IC-ready document. Use when preparing for investment committee, writing up a deal, or creating a formal recommendation. Triggers on "write IC memo", "investment committee memo", "deal write-up", "prepare IC materials", or "recommendation memo".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use before opening a PR, or whenever asked to self-review a diffusers contribution. Applies the same rubric as the `@claude` CI (checks the diff against references/review-rules.md, traces call paths for dead code). Reports findings grouped by severity, flagging what to fix before submitting (blocking issues + dead code) vs what to leave for the actual review. Report-only — does not edit files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detecting data exfiltration attempts from AWS S3 buckets by analyzing CloudTrail S3 data events, VPC Flow Logs, GuardDuty findings, Amazon Macie alerts, and S3 access patterns to identify unauthorized bulk downloads and cross-account data transfers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill teaches security teams how to detect and respond to unauthorized cryptocurrency mining operations in cloud environments. It covers identifying cryptomining indicators through compute usage anomalies, network traffic patterns to mining pools, GuardDuty CryptoCurrency findings, and runtime process monitoring on EC2, ECS, EKS, and Azure Automation workloads.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deploy and operationalize Amazon GuardDuty, covering protection plans for S3, EKS, EC2 runtime monitoring, and Lambda, interpreting finding severity, and building automated response with EventBridge and Lambda. Use when establishing threat detection for AWS accounts, investigating findings on compromised instances or credential abuse, or building automated incident-response playbooks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a systematic threat-hunt workflow that turns threat intelligence and ATT&CK gap analysis into testable hypotheses, then executes and validates them via EDR/SIEM queries (CrowdStrike, Defender, Splunk, Elastic, Sysmon, Velociraptor, Sigma) and documents findings in a standardized hunt report. Use when planning or running a proactive threat hunt or scoping compromise from an intel- or anomaly-driven lead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deploy DefectDojo as a centralized vulnerability management dashboard that ingests findings from 200+ security scanners, deduplicates results, tracks remediation metrics, and integrates with CI/CD, Jira ticketing, and Slack notifications via its REST API. Use when consolidating scanner output into one dashboard or automating vulnerability ticketing and executive reporting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill outlines methodologies for performing authorized penetration testing against AWS, Azure, and GCP cloud environments. It covers understanding the shared responsibility model for testing scope, leveraging cloud-specific attack tools like Pacu and ScoutSuite, exploiting IAM misconfigurations, testing for SSRF to cloud metadata services, and reporting findings aligned to MITRE ATT&CK Cloud matrix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configure a GitLab CI/CD pipeline that embeds SAST (Semgrep, SpotBugs, Gosec, Bandit, NodeJsScan), DAST, container scanning, dependency scanning, and secret detection via GitLab's managed security templates. Use when building a shift-left DevSecOps pipeline in GitLab, adding automated vulnerability scanning stages to .gitlab-ci.yml, or triaging scanner findings with GitLab Duo AI before deployment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scan Linux systems for persistence mechanisms including crontab/systemd entries, LD_PRELOAD injection, shell profile modifications (.bashrc, .profile), and SSH authorized_keys backdoors, then correlate findings with auditd logs into an installation timeline. Use during incident response or threat hunting to detect or confirm how an adversary maintained access to a compromised Linux host.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Installs and runs the kube-bench tool against a Kubernetes cluster as a Job, DaemonSet, or standalone binary, selecting the correct benchmark version and targets (control plane, etcd, kubelet, worker nodes) and emitting JSON or JUnit output for pipelines. Use when setting kube-bench up for the first time, choosing which benchmark version and node targets to run, wiring it into CI, or troubleshooting skipped or misdetected checks. Keywords: kube-bench, DaemonSet, --benchmark, --targets, JSON output, JUnit, CI integration. Do not use for interpreting the findings or producing an audit report - use performing-kubernetes-cis-benchmark-with-kube-bench.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a doc, guide, README, or block of prose against the good-docs-writing style guide and report violations. Use when the user asks to review, critique, lint, or check the voice and tone of documentation or text. Produces a structured findings report (file:line, rule violated, offending text, suggested rewrite) and does NOT edit files unless explicitly asked.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesize user research from interviews, surveys, and feedback into structured insights. Use when you have a pile of interview notes, survey responses, or support tickets to make sense of, need to extract themes and rank findings by frequency and impact, or want to turn raw feedback into roadmap recommendations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。