「fix」の検索結果

Matter budgeting and ongoing WIP/variance monitoring. Build phase-based fee estimates at matter setup, run bottom-up budgets by jurisdiction or workstream, calculate contingency, and structure AFA arrangements (fixed fee, capped fee, phased fixed fees). Ongoing monitoring: WIP tracking against budget, proportionality assessment (spend vs progress), variance commentary with root cause analysis, forecast-to-complete, realisation monitoring, write-off analysis. Trigger on: 'build a budget', 'fee estimate', 'what will this cost', 'WIP review', 'budget vs actual', 'how are we tracking against budget', 'we're over budget', 'realisation is poor', 'what's our ETC', 'budget for the German workstream', 'model the financial impact of this scope change', 'draft a fee adjustment', 'write-off analysis', 'how much contingency', 'AFA structure', 'fixed fee estimate', 'budget update', 'forecast to complete'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix a GitHub issue by number. Use when asked to fix GitHub issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert knowledge for Azure Internet Peering development including troubleshooting. Use when validating Peering Service prefixes, checking prefix registration, verifying routing, or fixing reachability issues, and other Azure Internet Peering related development tasks. Not for Azure ExpressRoute (use azure-expressroute), Azure Virtual Network (use azure-virtual-network), Azure Virtual WAN (use azure-virtual-wan), Azure VPN Gateway (use azure-vpn-gateway).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a brief, script, scene breakdown, treatment, or story idea into ONE connected director's shotlist for Seedance 2.0 — a single editable HTML artifact with a global Style Prefix, an @-asset glossary, and named per-scene prompts (1a, 1b, 2a…) each in Style → Characters → Scene → CUT 1..N form. Use whenever the user says 'make a shotlist', 'break this script into prompts', 'generate Seedance prompts for this ad/film', 'turn this brief into a shot list', 'director's shotlist', or wants many connected scene prompts rather than one. Also use to revise an existing shotlist (edit-once-propagates: 'change the style prefix everywhere', 'rewrite scene 4', 'split prompt 6'). Each prompt targets 15s; longer scenes split across 1a/1b/1c under one scene number.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and reorganize a Claude Code / Codex skill library — enforce a naming convention (prefix each skill by which backend or product it touches), rename skills consistently, fix the symlinks and cross-references a rename breaks, and report broken symlinks and stale name references. Use when the user says "organize my skills", "rename these skills", "clean up the skill library", "enforce a skill naming convention", or "fix broken skill symlinks".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep bug analysis to break the fix-forget-repeat cycle. Analyzes root cause category, why fixes failed, prevention mechanisms, and captures knowledge into specs. Use after fixing a bug to prevent the same class of bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run tests and systematically fix all failing tests using smart error grouping. Use when user asks to fix failing tests, mentions test failures, runs test suite and failures occur, or requests to make tests pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bug fix workflow: root cause analysis → user review → regression test + fix via TDD

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs root-cause analysis of a bug — from a GitHub issue, an issue URL, or a free-text description — before any reproduction or fix is written. TRIGGER when: triaging or diagnosing a bug, investigating why something misbehaves, an issue number/URL handed over for analysis, needing the root cause before touching code. DO NOT TRIGGER when: a failing reproduction test already exists and you are ready to fix → opsmill-dev-fixing-bugs; writing that reproduction test → opsmill-dev-test-driving-bugs; capturing a new bug as a ticket → opsmill-dev-creating-issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically fix broken OpenCLI adapters when commands fail. Load this skill when an opencli command fails — it guides you through collecting a trace artifact, patching the adapter, retrying, and filing an upstream GitHub issue after a verified fix. Works with any AI agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enable nullable reference types in a C# project and systematically resolve all warnings. USE FOR: adopting NRTs in existing codebases, file-by-file or project-wide migration, fixing CS8602/CS8618/CS86xx warnings, annotating APIs for nullability, cleaning up null-forgiving operators, upgrading dependencies with new nullable annotations. DO NOT USE FOR: projects already fully migrated with zero warnings (unless auditing suppressions), fixing a handful of nullable warnings in code that already has NRTs enabled, suppressing warnings without fixing them, C# 7.3 or earlier projects. INVOKES: Get-NullableReadiness.ps1 scanner script.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision protocol for wiring a verify-then-fix loop around a code-editing LLM agent. The agent edits → runs lint/test → reads the output → fixes → re-runs, bounded by an iteration cap and an escalation rule. Activates whenever a coder agent has a verifiable success criterion (exit code, type-checker output, failing assertion) and the user wants the agent to converge to "green" on its own. Framework-agnostic — wraps Aider's `--auto-lint`/`--auto-test`, an OpenHands SWE-Bench loop, a manual LangGraph cycle, or Claude Code's bash tool just the same.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pull request lifecycle: commit, codex review, sync, review, fix, status, cleanup, and PR mining. Use when user wants to commit changes, get a second-opinion code review from Codex, push changes, create a PR, check PR status, fix review comments, clean up branches after merge, or mine tribal knowledge from PR reviews. Use for "commit my changes", "codex review", "push my changes", "create a PR", "pr status", "fix PR comments", "clean up branches", "mine PRs", or "address feedback".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger for: FFP IGCE, firm-fixed-price estimate, FFP cost model, proposed FFP rate validation, wrap-rate analysis, Agency BPA rate comparison, price-reasonableness memo, or fair-and-reasonable analysis. Build auditable Firm-Fixed-Price federal estimates using BLS OEWS wages, layered fringe/overhead/G&A/profit, GSA CALC+ positioning, and GSA Per Diem travel. Use for FFP-by-period, FFP-by-deliverable, SOW/PWS decomposition, implied-multiplier analysis, and fixed-price scenario comparisons. Do NOT use for Labor Hour, T&M, or cost-reimbursement IGCEs (use IGCE Builder LH/T&M or IGCE Builder CR). Do NOT use for grant budgets. Requires the bls-oews, gsa-calc, and gsa-perdiem MCP servers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate, fix, answer, and reply to GitHub pull request review comments and conversation comments. Handles both change requests (fix or skip) and reviewer questions (explain using the rationale recalled from past Codex session history). Use when the user asks to "resolve PR comments", "fix review comments", "address PR feedback", "handle review comments", "address review feedback", "respond to PR comments", "answer review questions", or "address code review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate, fix, answer, and reply to GitHub pull request review comments and conversation comments. Handles both change requests (fix or skip) and reviewer questions (explain using the rationale recalled from past Claude Code transcripts). Use when the user asks to "resolve PR comments", "fix review comments", "address PR feedback", "handle review comments", "address review feedback", "respond to PR comments", "answer review questions", or "address code review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Address PR reviewer feedback by evaluating comments, proposing fixes, and executing after user approval. Use when the user wants to handle review comments on an existing PR, address PR feedback, fix PR comments, respond to reviewer suggestions, or process code review feedback. Triggers on "address PR feedback", "handle review comments", "fix PR comments", "respond to PR review", "process reviewer feedback", or when given a PR number/URL with intent to address its comments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end open source contribution workflow: from scanning issues to submitting PRs. Use this skill whenever the user wants to contribute to an open source project, find issues to fix, submit a pull request, fork a repo to contribute, fix a GitHub issue, or mentions 'open source contribution'. Also trigger when they provide a GitHub repo URL and ask about contributing, say things like 'help me submit a PR', 'find good first issues', 'I want to contribute to X', or mention fixing bugs in someone else's project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies bug-introducing commits using SZZ-style analysis based on bug-fixing commits, commit history, and code blame information. Use this skill when you need to trace bugs back to their origin, identify which commits introduced bugs, analyze bug-fix commits to find root causes, perform software repository mining for bug analysis, or conduct empirical studies on software defects. Triggers when users ask to find bug-introducing commits, identify when a bug was introduced, trace bug origins, perform SZZ analysis, or analyze bug-fixing commits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically repair buggy code and generate comprehensive tests for Python, Java, and C++ programs. Use when users need to fix logic errors or runtime errors in functions, modules, or repositories. Accepts specifications via natural language descriptions, existing test cases, or input/output examples. Generates corrected code, creates or updates tests to verify correctness and prevent regressions, and produces a detailed report explaining the bug, fix, and testing strategy. Triggers on requests like "fix this bug", "repair this code", "debug this function", or "this code is broken".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PR の CI 失敗を修正し、全 CI がパスするまでプッシュ→待機→修正を繰り返す。「/ci-fix-and-verify [PR番号]」「CI直して」「CIが落ちてる」「CI修正」などの依頼時に使用。

Flaky test fixes: detect nondeterministic tests empirically (repeat/shuffle/parallel runs), diagnose the root cause, fix it — never retry/skip/sleep — and verify across many randomized runs. Triggers on "absolute deflake", "fix flaky tests", "CI is flaky", "this test fails randomly/intermittently".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate, reproduce, and safely fix a bug with regression protection. Composes context, diagnosis, architecture, code quality, and testing guardrails into a reproduce-first repair workflow. Use when the user says 'fix this bug', 'debug this', 'investigate this failure', 'patch this regression', 'repair this issue', or 'why is this broken'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the konsistent CLI, review all reported violations, and fix them in the codebase. Use when the user wants to "fix konsistent violations", "resolve konsistent errors", "clean up konsistent diagnostics", "make konsistent pass", "address structural convention violations", or asks to run konsistent and act on the results. The skill is interactive: it requires explicit user decisions when many violations stem from the same rule (rule vs. code question), explicit user confirmation before modifying any code, and a triage step for non-trivial violations. For editing `konsistent.json`, this skill defers to the `konsistent-config` skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。