「gap」の検索結果

Use when a Research Pilot project needs read-only gap detection or Evidence Need extraction from the Project Understanding Graph.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a weighted sales forecast with best/likely/worst scenarios, commit vs. upside breakdown, and gap analysis. Use when preparing a quarterly forecast call, assessing gap-to-quota from a pipeline CSV, deciding which deals to commit vs. call upside, or checking pipeline coverage against your number.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research competitors and generate a positioning and messaging comparison with content gaps, opportunities, and threats. Use when building sales battlecards, when finding positioning gaps and messaging angles competitors haven't claimed, or when a competitor makes a move and you need to assess the impact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare policies, procedures, onboarding files, or operating evidence against a named compliance framework such as AML/KYC, privacy, internal controls, or audit readiness. Use when a team needs a gap matrix, control checklist, remediation priorities, or evidence request list. Do not use when no target framework is specified or when formal legal or regulatory sign-off is required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when setting up or troubleshooting Waydroid on Linux - installation and initialization, waydroid CLI, GPU and networking setup, GApps and Play certification, ADB integration, file sharing, or desktop environment integration

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Consult this skill BEFORE proposing a fix to any CLI gap or schema gap that touches evidence, trust magnitude, evidence types, evidence grades, the TM formula, or star-level promotion gates. Also read it whenever an issue mentions citations, stars, commits, contributors, views, reviewers, percentile, arxiv, github-stars-own, repo-own, social-signal, benchmark-result, peer-review, self-attestation, fusion-recipe, verifier-attestation, or proxy-containment — those are the 10 canonical evidence types and the raw inputs that feed their formulas. Also read it when asked whether a skill qualifies for a given star level (0★–6★): the Star Bar and promotion gates live in `META.md`, not in the TM methodology page. Reading both prevents proposing a calibration that satisfies the TM grade threshold but violates a Star Bar installability or link requirement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates detection coverage by mapping Atomic Red Team tests to ATT&CK techniques, checking which of your detections cover each tested technique, and reporting coverage gaps. Activates for requests to validate detections with atomic tests, map Atomic Red Team to coverage, or find detection gaps against tested techniques.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesize project documentation and codebase into comprehensive roadmap status, gaps analysis, and blockers. Use when assessing project health, identifying blockers, tracking progress, comparing plan vs reality, documenting risks, or planning next milestones. Triggers: "roadmap", "project status", "blockers", "risks", "progress", "next milestone", "gaps", "what's done".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Authentication & Authorisation control plane for Yuzu — the canonical entry point for any work on RBAC, OIDC SSO, SAML, SCIM, MFA/TOTP, AD/Entra integration, API tokens, session lifecycle, enrollment, and the audit/evidence chain. Use when the user says "/auth-and-authz", "/auth", "/iam", asks to plan or implement an enterprise A&A feature, asks "what's our auth gap to enterprise readiness", asks to audit current auth state against SOC 2 CC6.x / Workstream B, or starts work that touches `auth_*`, `rbac_*`, `oidc_*`, `api_token_*`, `enrollment_*`, or `cert_store.*`. The skill bundles current-state inventory, required-features inventory, gap matrix, the canonical workflow for adding a new A&A feature, and the load order for the routed reference docs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when mapping care coordination process requirements for Health Cloud: designing care team workflows, transition of care handoffs, social determinants of health (SDOH) barrier tracking, and care gap identification. NOT for building care plan templates, problems, and goals — use admin/care-plan-configuration. NOT for referral routing and provider networks — use admin/referral-management-health.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Consult the Eldar — audit a project's moflo + Claude Code setup for portable, high-leverage gaps and guide remediation. Default mode is read-only audit with severity-ranked findings; --fix presents an interactive triage menu and walks the user through each chosen fix (healer, missing CLAUDE.md, sparse guidance, hook/MCP wiring, empty memory namespaces, stack→guidance gaps). Use when starting in a new project, when Claude feels lost or inefficient, when guidance/CLAUDE.md is sparse, or as a periodic health check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research current job markets and hiring requirements, analyze recent job descriptions (JDs), compare them with a user's resume, projects, skills, and constraints, and turn evidence gaps into prioritized career actions. Use when students, job seekers, or career changers ask about current role or industry outlook (including “现在行情怎么样”), whether a role or JD fits them (including “这个JD适合我吗”), cross-platform JD sampling, resume evidence gaps or truthful tailoring, what career skill to learn next, target-role course or certificate decisions, application readiness, or a capacity-bounded 30/60/90-day job-search plan. Do not use for unrelated personal or education advice, simple factual lookups, automatic job applications, or unsupported resume rewriting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-powered SEO operations: keyword intelligence, competitor gap analysis, Google Search Console optimization, and trend detection. Use when asked to research keywords, analyze competitor content gaps, audit GSC performance, or detect trending topics. For growth experiments see growth-engine; for content optimization see autoresearch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scientific research engine for hypothesis testing, literature gap analysis, experimental validation, and data-driven discovery. Enforces adversarial review (Reviewer 2), 32 quality gates, tree search over hypotheses, confounder harness for quantitative claims, and serendipity detection. TRIGGER when: user asks to analyze scientific data, test hypotheses, validate findings, search for research gaps, design experiments, or investigate results. DO NOT TRIGGER when: pure code review, documentation writing, devops tasks, general conversation, or non-scientific data transformation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research process for comparing frontier harnesses (Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw, autoresearch, Prime Agent) with the original/upstream implementation and performing GAP analysis before feature implementation. Triggered by "research" ("리서치"), "gap", "frontier", "harness", "case study" ("사례 조사"), "pattern exploration" ("패턴 탐색"), "comparative analysis" ("비교 분석") keywords.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI compliance analysis for EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, GDPR, OECD, financial services regulations (SEC, FCA, FINRA, DORA, MiFID II), and other frameworks. Use when asked to generate a compliance checklist for an AI tool or use case, determine if a risk assessment is required, score an AI tool's risk level, identify where an AI tool or use case could run afoul of regulatory requirements, perform a gap analysis, recommend remediation steps, assess a vendor, draft an acceptable use policy, map training requirements, or review jurisdiction-specific AI rules. Triggers on phrases like "compliance checklist", "risk assessment", "risk score", "does this comply", "EU AI Act", "ISO 42001", "NIST AI RMF", "AI governance", "gap analysis", "vendor assessment", "acceptable use policy", "MNPI", "AI training requirements", or any request to evaluate an AI tool or use case for regulatory compliance or risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test-to-requirement coverage mapping. Reads plan acceptance criteria and test files, produces a coverage gap report showing which requirements have no tests. Use during Phase 2 (Test) or Phase 4 (Review) to verify test completeness. Named after the Nyquist sampling theorem — sufficient test coverage prevents aliased (missed) requirements. NOT for running tests (see mk:testing); NOT for structural code review (see mk:review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep spec analysis on a Confluence page. Reads page (+ children) via the confluence-as wrapper, produces a structured Spec Research Report with requirements, acceptance criteria, gaps, ambiguities, and suggested user stories for human review. Read-only — does NOT create Jira tickets. Triggers: 'analyze spec for PAGE-ID', 'extract requirements from confluence page', 'spec research on URL'. NOT for raw page CRUD (mk:confluence-page); NOT for ticket complexity scoring (mk:planning-engine).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies missing information required to complete qualification, segmentation, or outreach preparation. Use when the user provides records and a goal and wants prioritized research gaps with sources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Central entry point of the afonsoft agent harness. Use when starting a new project, resuming an existing one, planning features/Epics/releases, or running any multi-step agent-driven work. Validates and reconciles SPECs (SDD), audits the codebase and harness for gaps (security, architecture, performance, hygiene), proposes improvements, fragments work into GitHub Issues, delegates implementation/QA/review to specialized skills, and re-validates everything until delivery. Also use to review unapproved SPECs, reconcile open GitHub Issues with code, or run a final gap check before closing a release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

First-principles strategy — strip away conventional assumptions and find the theoretical maximum for your business. Three modes. Diagnostic mode runs a full session (45+ min) to define your theoretical maximum, map the gap honestly, classify constraints, invert for failure modes, set strategic intent, and work backwards to your first intervention. Review mode (15-20 min) checks whether your theoretical maximum has shifted, whether the gap has changed, and whether you're still climbing the right peak. Alert mode defines constraint-shift, peak-shift, and local-peak triggers that tell you when to reassess. Use when someone is stuck optimising incrementally, when conventional wisdom is driving strategy, when a new technology or regulation changes what's physically possible, or when you suspect the business is climbing a local peak. Integrates with company-context.md. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze advanced persistent threat (APT) group techniques using MITRE ATT&CK Navigator to create layered heatmaps of adversary TTPs for detection gap analysis and threat-informed defense.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PCI DSS 4.0.1 compliance audit support skill. Provides expert guidance for Cardholder Data Environment (CDE) scoping, gap analysis, audit preparation, SAQ completion support, and remediation planning. Includes SOC 2 mapping for combined audit efficiency. Use when preparing for PCI DSS audits, conducting gap analysis, creating remediation plans, or answering SAQ questionnaires for payment card compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Professional business analysis skill aligned with BABOK® Guide v3 standards. Use this skill when you need to elicit and document requirements, analyze business processes, conduct stakeholder analysis, develop business cases, perform gap analysis, or create business requirements documents (BRD). Ideal for requirements gathering, process mapping (BPMN), financial analysis (ROI, NPV), stakeholder engagement, and solution evaluation. Triggers: "gather requirements", "create business case", "analyze process", "stakeholder analysis", "gap analysis", "BRD", "functional requirements", or requests involving business analysis tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。