When the user wants to host a tech event, meetup, workshop, or community gathering — especially using Luma. Also use when the user mentions "host an event", "meetup", "workshop", "Luma event", or "community event".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
359 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
When the user wants to host a tech event, meetup, workshop, or community gathering — especially using Luma. Also use when the user mentions "host an event", "meetup", "workshop", "Luma event", or "community event".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scans HN, Lobsters, Reddit, and tech blogs for community experience reports. Use when gathering practitioner opinions on a technology or approach.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze Reddit threads for sentiment, consensus opinions, top arguments, and discussion patterns. Use this when users want to understand Reddit community opinions, analyze discussions, or gather insights from subreddit conversations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Take any claim and design + execute a complete research protocol to test it. Apply scientific method automatically: design study, gather data, run analysis, provide verdict with confidence level.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Collect and research materials for X (Twitter) content creation using multi-round web search strategy. Use when user wants to gather trending topics, research subjects for X posts, or mentions "collect materials", "research topic", "find content for X", "x-collect". Performs 4-round deep research mimicking human research workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides internal privacy audit program design and execution including risk-based audit planning, scope definition, fieldwork procedures, finding classification, evidence gathering, remediation tracking, and management reporting. Covers audit universe definition, annual audit plan, working papers, and closure verification. Keywords: internal audit, privacy audit, fieldwork, remediation, findings, audit plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
User research methods, customer insight gathering, and problem validation for product discovery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master requirements gathering, user story writing, acceptance criteria definition, and scope management. Transform insights into clear, actionable specifications.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct deep web research using the openbrowser-ai agent: decompose a query, investigate sub-questions across multiple sources, and produce a cited markdown report plus structured JSON under local_docs/research/. Trigger when the user asks to: research a topic, do a deep dive, investigate, gather evidence, compare options, write a literature review, build a briefing, or produce a cited report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract structured data from websites, scrape page content, and collect information across multiple pages. Trigger when the user asks to: extract data from a website, scrape a page, collect information from URLs, pull content from web pages, gather data across multiple pages, or download page content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interview-based strategic planning for complex software tasks. Conducts structured requirements gathering, gap analysis, and generates detailed work plans before implementation begins.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One-time setup that gathers design context for your project and saves it to your AI config file. Run once to establish persistent design guidelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Any live-web task via the Firecrawl CLI — including ordinary web research: searching the web, reading or extracting pages, gathering sources, discovering site URLs, bulk extraction, downloading a site, change alerts, or pages needing clicks/login — web only; local files route to firecrawl-parse. For US legal or regulatory questions use gov; for papers use firecrawl-research-index; for library, API, error, or bug questions use firecrawl-developer-index.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adaptive interview-driven spec generation. Use when converting rough plans into comprehensive specifications, needing structured requirements gathering, or transforming ideas into implementation-ready documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run an honest market-fit and viability audit of any project or idea and produce a decision doc, not code. Use when someone asks "is this viable as a business", "audit the market fit", "make the case and compare to competitors", "should I apply to YC or bootstrap", or wants to validate a project, product, or market before investing more time. Gathers verifiable traction data first, researches the competitive field, gets an independent cold read, writes a doc with pre-committed pass/middle/kill criteria and a concrete week-1 assignment, then hardens it with an adversarial review loop.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Qualitative stock analysis, management operating plan MOP assessment, key performance indicator KPI identification, catalyst identification and classification, earnings call transcript analysis, qualitative evidence gathering for investment thesis
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search tweets, analyze trends, monitor users, and gather social intelligence from Twitter/X through SandBase. Use when asked for Twitter research, social listening, trend analysis, influencer monitoring, sentiment tracking, or competitor social intelligence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search academic papers, scholarly articles, and research publications through SandBase. Use when asked for literature review, academic citations, scholarly research, paper discovery, or scientific evidence gathering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find the most valuable commercial insight and the monetization point closest to lawful revenue for a project, product, service, website, community, content account, open-source tool, or business idea. Use when a user asks how to monetize, who pays, why people do not buy, what to charge, whether to keep building, what to stop, what to do next, or asks to continue or deepen an earlier business analysis. Answer the user's actual question before asking for more information and carry the analysis forward without repeating it. When the buyer, purchased result, or delivery ability is unknown, do not select them from industry stereotypes; use explicit conditional candidates and an evidence-gathering next step. Not for investment advice, income forecasts, get-rich-quick schemes, or guaranteed results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find academic papers across up to 8 sources (OpenAlex / Semantic Scholar / CrossRef / PubMed / arXiv for English, OpenReview for AI venues, plus native-Chinese retrieval via NSSD 国家哲社文献中心 + yiigle 中华医学期刊) with adjustable depth — Quick scan (5 min) to Audit prep (3 hr). Use when the user wants to find papers, run a literature search, gather references, scope a research topic, search Chinese-language / 中文原生 literature (中文文献/中文核心/CSSCI/C刊/国内研究/国内文献/中华××期刊/心理学报/经济研究), or filter results by journal tier (中科院分区/一区/几区, Q1, JCR/SJR quartile, 影响因子/impact factor, 期刊分区, 顶刊/top journal, '按分区筛'), or export paste-ready professional search strategies / 检索式 for external databases (PubMed / WOS / Scopus / Embase / 知网 CNKI / 万方 / SinoMed — '写检索式', '导出检索式', 'WOS 检索式', '知网专业检索', 'search strategy', 'boolean search strategy'). Triggers on search verbs ('find papers', 'literature search', 'papers about X'), review types ('scoping review', 'systematic review', 'SR prep', 'literature review', 'lit review', 'help me write a lit review'), Chinese ('找文献', '找论文', '论文搜索', '学术检索', '文献检索', '文献综述', '综述前期', '求文献', '中文文献', '中文核心', 'CSSCI', 'C刊', '国内研究', '找中文的'). Outputs Shadcn HTML report + BibTeX/RIS/CSV + PRISMA-S log. Do NOT use for: concept explanations ('what is X' / 'X 是什么', e.g. '影响因子怎么算'), writing ('帮我写' / 'help me write a paragraph'), single-paper interpretation or PDF download with metadata (use paper-downloader-portable), or when the user already has a literature set (use literature-set-review).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up or resume THIS session's retalk user — from your existing users (global ~/.agent-talk or project-local ./.agent-talk) or a new one. Use for first-time setup, to pick which identity this session acts as, or when a command fails with "no identity". agent-talk has no default user; pick one with AskUserQuestion (distinct per parallel session). All human input (relay, passphrase, peers, receive source, delivery mode — auto-receive recommended) is gathered here so send/receive run autonomously afterward.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up, check, stop, or delete a retalk relay server (retalk-server). Use when the user needs their OWN relay rather than an existing URL. Invoke as `relay setup`, `relay ping`, `relay stop`, or `relay delete`. Uses AskUserQuestion to pick the host (Local / Local+Cloudflare / Hugging Face / GCP) and gather settings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate a question against high-trust primary sources and capture the findings as a Markdown file in the repo. Use when the user wants a topic researched, docs or API facts gathered, or reading legwork delegated to a background agent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematically harvest short testimonials from customers via NPS, milestones, post-purchase, and email during PRD v1.0 Market Adoption. Triggers on requests to collect testimonials, set up social proof harvest, gather customer quotes, or when user asks "how do we get testimonials?", "social proof harvest", "NPS responses", "testimonial wall", "customer quotes", "post-purchase survey", "milestone follow-up". Outputs CFD-TST-* testimonial entries and GTM-TST-* placement assets.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。