「interview」の検索結果

Structure and run a post-interview candidate debrief. Use when the user says "run the debrief", "how do we decide on this candidate", "let's calibrate", "we need to make a hire/no-hire call", "prep the debrief meeting", or wants to structure the decision-making process after interviews are complete - even if they don't explicitly say "debrief". Also use when a recruiter wants to prevent groupthink or HiPPO effect (highest paid person's opinion) from dominating the decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Facilitate structured requirements gathering. Use when the user says "gather requirements", "elicitation session", "stakeholder interview", "requirements workshop", "what do the users need", "discover requirements", "trawl for requirements", "understand the business need", "conduct interviews", or needs to systematically extract requirements from stakeholders - even if they don't explicitly say "elicitation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scheduled Paths in record-triggered Flow: delayed execution, time-offset from field, batch size tuning, monitoring Paused Flow Interviews, async limits. NOT for picking between Scheduled Path, Wait and Scheduled Flow, or migrating time-based workflow rules — use flow/flow-time-based-patterns. NOT for a flow that runs on a recurring schedule — use flow/scheduled-flows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Eliciting, documenting and structuring requirements for a Salesforce implementation: stakeholder discovery interviews, As-Is and To-Be process mapping, and gap analysis against standard Salesforce capability. Trigger keywords: requirements gathering, user story, As-Is To-Be, gap analysis, stakeholder interview, process mapping, business requirements, fit gap. NOT for authoring the user stories themselves - use admin/user-story-writing-for-salesforce. NOT for scoring requirements against a specific org - use admin/fit-gap-analysis-against-org. NOT for technical design decisions - use architect/solution-design-patterns. Also covers the requirements catalogue itself (one row per requirement, MoSCoW priority, source stakeholder, downstream target) and Salesforce non-functional requirements: record volume, sharing layer, integration pattern, reporting joins, mobile/offline, and licence implication.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strategic planning consultant that produces decision-complete work plans through Socratic interview, codebase exploration, Metis gap analysis, and optional Momus high-accuracy review. MUST USE when the task has 5+ steps, scope is ambiguous, multiple modules are involved, or the user asks for a plan. Triggers: plan this, create a work plan, interview me, start planning, prometheustic, plan mode, help me plan this, break this down.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reporting workflow for a working journalist, using web research and Apify's X scraper (social signals). Onboards the journalist, monitors their beat and builds digests, evaluates story pitches, finds and vets sources, and prepares interviews. Use for any newsroom task, such as "what's new on my beat", "is this pitch any good", "who should I talk to about X", "prep me for this interview", or "turn these notes into a draft".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automate Async Interview tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a raw idea into ONE honest recommendation: interview one question at a time until the problem, requirements, goals, non-goals, and constraints are CONFIRMED, then deliver a single verdict — do, don't, cheaper alternatives, trade-offs, ordered checklist, success metrics. Required: the user wants exactly ONE recommendation — not options, not a debate — and their framing is open to challenge (advise may answer a different question than the one asked). Triggers on "what should I do about X", "advise me on X", "am I approaching this right", "is this the right move". Do NOT use to be interrogated with no recommendation (→ mk:grill) — advise also interviews one question at a time, but only to reach a verdict. Do NOT use when the framing is settled and only the options are open (→ mk:brainstorming). Do NOT use to decide whether something is worth building (→ mk:office-hours). Do NOT use when you want several perspectives to argue it out (→ mk:party).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Develop and extend the RulCode technical interview preparation platform built with React, Vite, TypeScript, and Supabase. Use when adding new algorithm problems, building visualization components, implementing DSA topic pages, updating the problem editor, or modifying the interview preparation UI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares for hiring manager rounds at Staff+ (L6+) level — scope of impact, influence without authority, ambiguity navigation, mentorship, strategic thinking. Use when practicing HM rounds or calibrating story depth for target level. Activate on "hiring manager round", "HM screen", "staff level", "scope of impact". NOT for coding interviews, system design, behavioral/values rounds, or resume writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured interview and observation techniques for extracting tacit knowledge from domain experts

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-powered career biographer that conducts empathetic interviews, extracts structured career narratives, and transforms professional stories into portfolios, CVs, and personal brand assets. This skill should be used when users want to document their career journey, create professional portfolios, generate CVs, or craft compelling career narratives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automate Async Interview tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When running discovery interviews — question-bank build, bias audit, insight extraction. Triggers on 'audit my guide', 'extract insights from transcript', 'is my hypothesis falsifiable'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interviewing the owner to a shared understanding before any work starts. Use when a plan, a decision or an idea needs stress-testing, or when the owner asks to be grilled, interviewed or questioned about one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview me about this card to develop the acceptance criteria

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explicit-only interview loop for stress-testing a plan, decision, or idea. Use only when the user asks to grill, interrogate, interview, or stress-test their thinking before action.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Relentless one-question-at-a-time interview (tappable options with a recommended answer) that sharpens a requirement, business plan, project plan, proposal, or raw idea through conversation, then writes it up as a brief with a glossary and decision log. Use whenever the user wants their thinking stress-tested or pinned down before acting — trigger phrases include "grill me", "grill this", "詰めて", "詰めたい", "壁打ち", "要件を固めたい", "企画を練りたい", "計画を整理したい", "アイデアをぶつけたい", "突っ込んで", "clarify", "質問して", "何が決まってないか教えて", or when the user describes a plan/idea vaguely and asks what to do next. Do NOT use for reviewing a finished document (use a document-review skill) or when the user just wants an answer, not questions.

Author a completed-spec fixture — a seeded intent graph plus a believable four-phase interview transcript — for a brunch feature, so it can feed any downstream tooling that consumes a completed spec or dogfood the UI. Use when you need a real completed specification in .brunch/brunch.db for testing or demo: pick a feature from memory/SPEC.md (or a free description), choose a stress profile (coverage|clean), and produce a registered scenario seed + an interview-questions doc that match exactly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Мотивационное интервью (МИ) по Миллеру и Роллнику: техники OARS, высказывания в пользу изменений, стимулирование готовности к переменам.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ミラーとロールニックに基づく動機づけ面接（MI）：OARS手法、チェンジトーク、変容への準備性の促進。

基于 Miller 与 Rollnick 的动机访谈（MI）：OARS 技术、改变言语以及促进改变准备度。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Entrevista Motivacional (EM) según Miller y Rollnick: técnicas OARS, discurso de cambio y fomento de la preparación para el cambio.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares a DRAFT internal audit pack from the audit plan: scope as stated, criteria with clauses quoted from the documents provided, document requests per auditee with due dates, open interview questions per process and role, previous findings to follow up and a readiness checklist. Never pre-judges conformity, writes findings or selects the sample; the lead auditor decides. Use when the user asks to "prepare the internal audit", "build the audit pack from this plan", "draft the document requests and interview questions" or "get us ready for the supplier audit". Do not use for evidence requests built from a control list, use control-evidence-request-pack instead; to chase actions from earlier audits, use corrective-action-tracker. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。