「lens」の検索結果

Python code quality review lens. SOLID principles, dead code, exception handling, resource leaks, thread safety, performance. Triggered by "quality" ("품질"), "SOLID", "dead code" ("데드코드"), "exception", "resource leak", "thread safety" keywords.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select complementary review lenses for a requested multi-perspective review or a high-risk GEODE change. Covers design, agent constraints, gateway operations, and CLI/tool behavior; not a mandatory four-agent gate for ordinary edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

6-lens diagnostic slop audit — unused imports, dead private fns, duplicate signatures, abandoned TODOs, lint bypass markers, stale refs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured second-pass reasoning after a review or plan verdict: pre-mortem, inversion, red team, Socratic lens, etc. NOT for initial review (mk:review) or new plans (mk:plan-creator).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured second-pass reasoning after code review or plan evaluation. Offers named reasoning methods (pre-mortem, inversion, red team, Socratic, etc.) to re-examine findings through a specific lens. Use after /mk:review verdict or any time deeper analysis is needed on an existing output. NOT for initial review (see mk:review); NOT for creating implementation plans (see mk:plan-creator).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Relentlessly interview the user about THEIR plan or design — one question at a time — resolving each branch of a decision tree until shared understanding. Claude is the interviewer; the user is the interviewee. Triggers on "grill me", "stress-test this plan", "get grilled on my design", "interrogate my plan". Checkpoints every answer to docs/knowledge/<slug>.md so progress survives a context-window reset. Flags knowledge the user cannot answer as a gap to chase. Do NOT use to PROPOSE solutions or compare approaches (→ mk:brainstorming). Do NOT use to validate "is this worth building?" (→ mk:office-hours). Do NOT use when Claude should ANSWER questions about the repo (→ mk:ask-me). Do NOT use for a one-shot review of an existing plan (→ mk:plan-ceo-review). Do NOT use to apply named reasoning lenses to findings (→ mk:elicit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Judge board subskill for simmer. Dispatches a panel of judges with different lenses, runs one deliberation round where they challenge each other's scores, then synthesizes consensus scores + single ASI. Drop-in replacement for simmer-judge that produces identical output format. Do not invoke directly — dispatched by the simmer orchestrator when JUDGE_MODE is board.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build bilingual, evidence-backed, SIEGER v2 customer intelligence reports for foreign-trade leads. Use when OpenClaw or a sales operator needs claim-level citations, decision gates, an industry-specific analysis lens, a non-fabricated verdict card, and sales angles that require approval before downstream outreach drafting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in Jungian analytical psychology, depth psychology, shadow work, archetypal analysis, dream interpretation, active imagination, addiction/recovery through Jungian lens, and the individuation process - grounded in primary sources and clinical frameworks. Activate on 'Jung', 'Jungian', 'shadow work', 'archetypes', 'dream interpretation', 'active imagination', 'individuation', 'anima', 'animus', 'collective unconscious', 'addiction', 'recovery', 'spiritus contra spiritum'. NOT for therapy or diagnosis (only licensed analysts diagnose), active psychosis, severe dissociation, or replacing the relational container of actual Jungian analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level dark matter physics covering observational evidence, candidate particles, detection methods, structure formation, and alternative gravity theories.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level general relativity knowledge. Use when working with curved spacetime, Einstein field equations, geodesics, black holes, gravitational waves, cosmology, Schwarzschild metric, or tensor calculus. Also use when the user mentions 'Einstein field equations', 'curved spacetime', 'geodesic', 'black hole', 'event horizon', 'Schwarzschild', 'gravitational waves', 'spacetime curvature', 'Riemann tensor', 'metric tensor', 'cosmological constant', or 'gravitational lensing'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level optics knowledge. Use when working with geometric optics, wave optics, interference, diffraction, polarization, lasers, fiber optics, optical instruments, or photonics. Also use when the user mentions 'reflection', 'refraction', 'Snell law', 'lens', 'mirror', 'interference', 'diffraction', 'polarization', 'laser', 'fiber optic', 'holography', 'aberration', or 'optical instrument'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a written plan or design doc through a designer's lens before implementation - seven passes over information architecture, interaction states, emotional arc, AI-slop risk, design-system alignment, responsive and accessibility coverage, and unresolved decisions. Each dimension is rated 0-10 with an explicit statement of what would make it a 10, then the plan is edited to get there. Use when a plan has a UI surface and you want the design gaps closed before code is written. Not for auditing a live site.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a dual-lens critical review of the specification and plan from both product strategy and engineering risk perspectives before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Domain-Driven Design system for software development. Use when designing new systems with DDD principles, refactoring existing codebases toward DDD, generating code scaffolding (entities, aggregates, repositories, domain events), facilitating Event Storming sessions, creating bounded context maps, or performing code reviews with a DDD lens. Covers both strategic design (bounded contexts, subdomains, context maps, ubiquitous language) and tactical design (entities, value objects, aggregates, domain services, repositories). Supports all major architecture patterns (Hexagonal/Ports & Adapters, CQRS, Event Sourcing, Clean Architecture) with language-agnostic guidance and concrete examples in Python and TypeScript.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a live-action beat becomes the 11-block cinematic prompt — lens, lighting, negatives. Triggers 'cinematic prompt', 'film-grade scene'. Animated → pixar-storyteller; 12-block → scene-expander.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when stakeholders pull a decision in different directions — frames each lens, builds a trade-off matrix, surfaces the cost of every choice — even if the user just says 'PO and ops disagree'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a diff builds more than the task needs — code that should not exist, a dependency the platform already covers, or a clever form where a flat one reads better. Deletion-hunting, not quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a diff may break system boundaries, dependency direction, or cross-service contracts — fifth judge dispatched by /review-changes alongside the four standard judges.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fornece orientação para treinar e analisar Autoencodificadores Esparsos (SAEs) usando SAELens para decompor ativações de redes neurais em features interpretáveis. Use ao descobrir features interpretáveis, analisar superposição ou estudar representações monossemânticas em modelos de linguagem.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a Mixture of Experts (MoE) audit on any topic, plan, codebase, evidence archive, or process. Dynamically spawns specialized subagents with different critical lenses to cross-reference findings and detect flaws, overlap, retention issues, or drift. Use when designing architectures, analyzing complex code, verifying multi-step plans, classifying evidence artifacts, or looking for duplicated intent in a repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SOP for formal mathematical domain modeling. Trigger when: - Creating new formal models or applying mathematical lenses to analyze existing specifications. - Navigating phases: Identify, Select, Construct, Validate, Record, Connect. - Prompt contains: /form, form workflow, categorical, coalgebraic, linear logic, information-theoretic, validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review someone else's PR through an architectural/strategic lens — does it shift design, raise complexity, or quietly change precedent? Drives a brief reflective discussion with the user, then posts a concise review comment via `gh`. Defers line-level and bug-hunting concerns to AI review bots and the PR author.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn any hypothesis, however fringe, into an argument map rather than a verdict: five independent lenses (consensus, skeptic, frontier, historian, experimental design), then a synthesis of for and against, evidence quality, a confidence tier and the cheapest decisive experiment. Triggers: "/research-swarm <hypothesis>", "map the arguments on X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。