2,869 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Amazon FBA and FBM shipping cost calculator and fulfillment optimization. Dimensional weight analysis, storage fee calculation, removal cost estimation, and fulfillment method comparison. Use when the user asks about Amazon shipping costs, FBA fees, fulfillment costs, storage fees, or shipping calculations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SEO·AEO·GEO·LLMO·NEO(네이버) 다섯 레인을 진단하고 직접 구현하며, 인용되는 콘텐츠를 계속 생산하는 서브 블로그·콘텐츠 운영 파이프라인까지 세팅하는 스킬. 사이트를 검색엔진·답변엔진·생성 AI·네이버 AI 브리핑이 인용하는 1차 소스로 만든다. "SEO 해줘", "AI에 인용되게 해줘", "네이버 노출 늘려줘", "llms.txt 만들어줘", "블로그 만들어줘/글 써줘", "콘텐츠 백로그·캘린더 잡아줘", "낡은 글 갱신해줘" 류 요청에 사용. Use for "audit my site's SEO", "get my site cited by ChatGPT/Perplexity/AI Overviews", "improve search visibility", "create llms.txt", "answer engine / generative engine optimization", "set up a blog that gets cited", "content backlog / calendar / refresh", and any AI-search-visibility request.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and maintain a Karpathy-style LLM knowledge base — a self-compiling Obsidian markdown wiki where an Agent ingests raw sources, compiles cross-linked concept/entity/summary pages, answers queries against the corpus, lints the graph for health, and audits in-context human feedback filed from Obsidian or the local web viewer. Use when (1) scaffolding a new knowledge base for any research topic, (2) ingesting articles/papers/PDFs/web pages into raw/, (3) compiling or restructuring wiki articles from existing raw material, (4) answering questions against the wiki and filing durable answers back, (5) running lint passes for dead links / orphan pages / coverage gaps / audit shape, (6) processing human feedback from the audit/ directory and applying corrections. Not for general note-taking, daily journals, or non-wiki Obsidian use.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025) audit checklist for AI applications, agent tools, RAG pipelines, and prompt construction. Use when performing any security review touching LLM client code, prompt templates, agent tools, or vector stores.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate LLM systems using automated metrics, LLM-as-judge, and benchmarks. Use when testing prompt quality, validating RAG pipelines, measuring safety (hallucinations, bias), or comparing models for production deployment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Split a multi-call LM workflow by cognitive load, not by accuracy: let one strong model make the few reasoning decisions and a cheap model do the many mechanical executions (Aider architect+editor, DSPy optimizer-LM vs task-LM, vLLM speculative draft+target, LangGraph supervisor+worker are the same shape). Use when designing or cost-optimizing a pipeline that calls an LM many times, when deciding which steps need a strong reasoner vs a cheap executor, or when adding an escalation valve for when the cheap tier degrades. Search keywords: reduce LLM cost, cheaper model, lower token cost, model cascade, route to cheap model, strong model plus cheap model, LLM cost optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds an eval plan for an AI feature - error analysis on real traces, failure-mode ranking, code checks and binary LLM judges validated against human labels, CI tests, production monitoring, and a launch bar. Use when you ask how do we eval this, how do I test an AI feature, our LLM outputs are inconsistent, are the evals good enough, LLM-as-judge, hallucinations, or what accuracy is good enough to launch. Draws on 41 Lenny's Podcast guests incl. Hamel Husain, Shreya Shankar and Sander Schulhoff.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications using automated metrics, human feedback, and benchmarking. Use when testing LLM performance, measuring AI application quality, or establishing evaluation frameworks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operational skill hub for LLM system architecture, evaluation, deployment, and optimization (modern production standards). Links to specialized skills for prompts, RAG, agents, and safety. Integrates recent advances: PEFT/LoRA fine-tuning, hybrid RAG handoff (see dedicated skill), vLLM 24x throughput, multi-layered security (90%+ bypass for single-layer), automated drift detection (18-second response), and CI/CD-aligned evaluation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing or auditing how an LLM or multimodal LLM is evaluated on a clinical task (report generation, VQA, text extraction). Covers reference standard, clinical-efficacy metrics beyond BLEU/ROUGE, hallucination, contamination and prompt sensitivity. Imaging models are /model-assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
LLM / AI application attack hunting - prompt injection (direct + indirect), excessive agency, insecure output handling, system-prompt + data leakage. OWASP LLM Top 10. Wiki-first, FIND schema output.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reference for the Claude API / Anthropic SDK — model ids, pricing, params, streaming, tool use, MCP, agents, caching, token counting, model migration. TRIGGER — read BEFORE opening the target file; don't skip because it "looks like a one-liner" — whenever: the prompt names Claude/Anthropic in any form (Claude, Anthropic, Fable, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku, `anthropic`, `@anthropic-ai`, `claude-*`, `us.anthropic.*`, `[1m]`); the user asks about an LLM (pricing/model choice/limits/caching) — never answer from memory; OR the task is LLM-shaped with provider unstated (agent/MCP/tool-definition/multi-agent/RAG/LLM-judge/computer-use; generate/summarize/extract/classify/rewrite/converse over NL; debugging refusals/cutoffs/streaming/tool-calls/tokens). SKIP only when another provider is being worked on (overrides all triggers): OpenAI/GPT/Gemini/Llama/Mistral/Cohere/Ollama named in the query; OR `grep -rE 'openai|langchain_openai|google.generativeai|genai|mistralai|cohere|ollama'` over the project hits (run this grep FIRST if no provider named — don't Read the file).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assessing privacy risks in large language model outputs including training data memorisation, PII leakage in generated text, prompt injection leading to data extraction, and hallucinated personal data. Covers output filtering, guardrails, and monitoring. Keywords: LLM privacy, output risk, memorisation, PII leakage, prompt injection, hallucinated PII.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses lawful basis for AI training data processing per EDPB April 2025 report on LLMs and general-purpose AI. Covers legitimate interest balancing tests, consent challenges for ML training, public dataset assessment, and web scraping lawfulness. Keywords: AI training data, lawful basis, EDPB LLM, legitimate interest, consent, web scraping.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Thesis report synthesis — turn a thesis's markdown artifacts into its letter-size thesis-report.html, then OPTIMIZE it against real page renders. Four-step loop — pack (deterministic Python bundle of all sources + report/metrics.json), author (the LLM writes report/content.html — narrative, KPI tiles, badges, timeline, tables and citations are LLM judgment), assemble (deterministic validation, template injection, Q50 pins, Q47 overflow gate), render + optimize (Chrome headless per-page PNGs — the LLM reads them and iterates until every page is visually clean). Spec 046 Q46–Q50.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Machine Learning Engineer. Use when a task calls for Machine Learning Engineer judgment. Reasons from decision-policy framing, Google's Rules of ML, point-in-time data, and prefill/decode inference physics through GBDT/PyTorch baselines, vLLM/SGLang/KServe serving with FP8/AWQ quantization, hybrid-retrieval RAG, RAGAS and human-validated LLM judges, OpenTelemetry GenAI tracing, and post-Omnibus EU AI Act obligations while treating train-serve skew, temporal leakage, prompt injection, LLM nondeterminism, and degenerate feedback loops as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build production-ready LLM applications, RAG systems, and intelligent agents. Use when implementing AI features, chatbots, vector search, or agent orchestration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enterprise BPMN 2.0 diagram generator — converts natural language process descriptions into OMG-compliant BPMN 2.0 XML files and SVG previews via a 4-phase pipeline: Intent Extraction (LLM → JSON Logic-Core) → Validation (deadlock detection, structural soundness) → ElkJS Auto-Layout → BPMN XML + SVG output. Supports: multi-pool collaborations, message flows, boundary events (timer/error/signal), loop/multi-instance markers, data objects, all gateway types with correct gatewayDirection, and all BPMN 2.0 task types. Use this skill whenever the user wants to create, generate, or model a BPMN diagram, process flow, or workflow — even if they say "draw a process", "model this workflow", "make a BPMN for...", "create a Prozessmodell", "visualize this process", or describe a business process in natural language. Also use for editing or extending existing BPMN Logic-Core JSON.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build production-ready AI agents with PydanticAI — type-safe tool use, structured outputs, dependency injection, and multi-model support.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The only memory skill that watches on its own. No database. No vectors. No manual saves. Just an LLM observer that compresses your conversations into prioritised notes, consolidates when they grow, and recovers anything missed. Five layers of redundancy, zero maintenance. ~$0.00/month (using free-tier models). While other memory skills ask you to remember to remember, this one just pays attention.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build production-ready LLM applications, advanced RAG systems, and intelligent agents. Implements vector search, multimodal AI, agent orchestration, and enterprise AI integrations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Patterns and techniques for evaluating and improving AI agent outputs. Use this skill when: - Implementing self-critique and reflection loops - Building evaluator-optimizer pipelines for quality-critical generation - Creating test-driven code refinement workflows - Designing rubric-based or LLM-as-judge evaluation systems - Adding iterative improvement to agent outputs (code, reports, analysis) - Measuring and improving agent response quality
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up the Graphsignal Profiler for inference workloads — vLLM, SGLang, PyTorch, and dstack services. Use when the user wants GPU profiling, tracing, or monitoring for inference, asks about `graphsignal-run` or `graphsignal.watch()`, or asks about CUPTI / Prometheus / OTLP setup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。