3,169 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Evaluates water rights valuation with seniority analysis, regulatory framework assessment, and allocation risk for resource investments. Use when analyzing water rights, evaluating water allocation, or assessing water risk.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates corporate vulnerability to shareholder activism with governance assessment, valuation gaps, and operational improvement opportunities. Use when assessing activist risk, identifying vulnerabilities, or preparing defensive analyses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates completed agent pipelines across 5 scoring dimensions and produces a composite verdict with actionable recommendations
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates and scores Claude prompts and system prompts using a six-dimension Scorecard with anchored 1-5 rubrics. Trigger on: "review my prompt," "score this prompt," "rate my prompt," "evaluate this prompt," "improve my prompt," "what's wrong with my prompt." Also trigger on: "why isn't my prompt working," "my prompt produces bad output," "help me fix this prompt," "is this prompt any good." Scorecard covers Objective Clarity, Context Specificity, Reasoning Fit, Output Precision, Behavioral Calibration, and Architectural Efficiency, plus a five-question Output Evaluation Rubric for assessing actual output. Also use when the user pastes a system prompt and asks for feedback. Activate whenever structured quality assessment of a single prompt is the primary need. Do NOT use for project-level audits involving Custom Instructions architecture, knowledge file organization, or multi-file Project structure (use rootnode-project-audit if available).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Specialized agentic and context engineering prompt methodology for Claude. Use when designing AI agents — system prompts, tool definitions, context window architectures, failure mode planning, multi-agent coordination, agent evaluation. Trigger on: "design an agent," "build a system prompt for an agent," "architect an agent's context," "design tool definitions," "agent system prompt," "context window architecture," "tool interface design," "evaluate agent behavior," "multi-agent coordination," "context engineering for agents," "ACI design." Provides 12 tested approaches for agent architecture (designing agents, not using them). Do NOT use for evaluating or scoring individual non-agent prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available). Do NOT use for general software architecture that hosts agents (use standard technical reasoning for that).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review user experience and interface design using Nielsen's heuristics, WCAG 2.1 accessibility guidelines, keyboard and screen reader audit, user flow analysis, cognitive load assessment, and form usability evaluation. Use when conducting a usability review before release, assessing WCAG 2.1 accessibility compliance, evaluating user flows for efficiency, reviewing form design, or performing a heuristic evaluation of an existing interface.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review software architecture for coupling, cohesion, SOLID principles, API design, scalability, and technical debt. Covers system-level evaluation, architecture decision record review, and improvement recommendations. Use when evaluating a proposed architecture before implementation, assessing an existing system for scalability or security, reviewing ADRs, performing a technical debt assessment, or evaluating readiness for significant scale-up.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
从游戏客户端（安装包/APK/IPA/EXE 或 dump.cs、lua、usmap、抓包等）反推服务端协议并复现可部署服务端。含阅读路径分派、原理层(primer：三要素/数据包协议/协议表/热更源码)、四阶段路线图(workflow-roadmap：静态分析→建工具+登录链→重定向→补包循环→清单迭代)、11 种反推方法选择器（含内联服务端路线）、接口清单提取器（tools/）、协议规格模板(protocol.spec.yaml)、wire 级定点改写（不等 schema 齐就能跑）、客户端地址来源清查、三轴状态与验收体系、发布运维清单、进度清单(TRACKER.md)、登录链条与功能清单模板。覆盖：账号登录注册、房间匹配、战斗、掉落物资、抽卡、充值与邮件、部署(本地/服务器/Termux/Windows)、客户端对接、闭环验证；并支持 Unity(IL2CPP/Mono/Lua)、Unreal(UE4/UE5)、Cocos2d-x/Cocos Creator(JS/Lua 热更)、C#、AS3、Java、JS 等客户端；含进服后的 Live 运营手册；并含「内联服务端」路线（客户端进程内合成响应、运行时对象合成与字段发现、平台 SDK 登录态复用与目录服/区服两段准入）。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate msmodelslim evaluation YAML configuration (service_oriented + aisbench + vllm-ascend). Use when user asks for evaluation config generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate AI model performance with metrics, benchmarks, and comparison. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-model-evaluator related tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create evaluation frameworks for AI outputs with rubrics and scoring. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-evaluation-framework related tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate AI copilot performance. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-copilot-evaluation related tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate AI agent performance and reliability. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-agent-evaluation related tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide 409A valuation processes. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with 409a-valuation-guide related tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate third-party logistics providers. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with 3pl-evaluation related tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs financial ratio analysis, DCF valuation, budget variance analysis, and rolling forecast construction for strategic decision-making. Use when analyzing financial statements, building valuation models, assessing budget variances, or constructing financial projections and forecasts. Also applicable when users mention financial modeling, cash flow analysis, company valuation, financial projections, or spreadsheet analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs discounted cash flow (DCF) valuation analysis to estimate intrinsic value per share. Triggers when user asks for fair value, intrinsic value, DCF, valuation, "what is X worth", price target, undervalued/overvalued analysis, or wants to compare current price to fundamental value.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Apply the TPACK framework to evaluate and design technology-integrated instruction at the intersection of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge. Use this skill when the user needs to assess teacher readiness for technology integration, design professional development for ed-tech, or evaluate whether technology use is pedagogically grounded — even if they say 'how to integrate technology in teaching', 'ed-tech evaluation', or 'teacher technology competency'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Build Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) valuation models to estimate intrinsic value. Use this skill when the user needs to value a company, evaluate an investment, estimate fair share price, or build financial projections — even if they say 'what is this company worth', 'should we acquire them', or 'build me a valuation model'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Author and run offline evals for Agentforce agents: fixture format, scoring rubrics, hallucination checks, regression baselines, CI integration, prompt-change safety. Trigger keywords: agent eval, hallucination, doesn't hallucinate, agentforce offline evals, rubric for agent response. NOT for deciding which layers of testing the agent needs — use agentforce/agentforce-testing-strategy. NOT for Testing Center, AiEvaluationDefinition or sf agent test runs — use agentforce/agent-testing-and-evaluation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate an incoming workflow upgrade — a skill, MCP server, subagent, library, external service, prompt, or pattern — through one disciplined pipeline before adopting it. Security is a blocking gate. Records every verdict so the same thing is never evaluated twice. Use when considering a new tool from a post, repo, or recommendation. Triggers — "vet this", "should we adopt", "is this safe to install", "evaluate this skill/MCP", "what do you think of this tool".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Experimental behavioral evaluator. Drives a running artifact via browser/curl/CLI and records rubric evidence; the runner is not yet a fully implemented automated evaluation system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate Jira ticket complexity and inconsistencies via jira-evaluator agent, read-only. NOT estimation (mk:jira-estimator) or full RCA (mk:jira-analyst).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。