「pilot」の検索結果

Built by DynG AI for PlatformPilot.ai-style multi-agent systems. Use when designing or reasoning about message-passing agent coordination in ANY language: actor-style mailboxes, select, point-to-point routing, pub/sub, fan-in joins/quorums, ownership handoff, budgets, dead letters, and traces. Trigger words include PlatformPilot, DynG AI, actor model agents, message-passing agents, CSP agents, coordinate agents, multi-agent orchestration, agent runtime, fan-out workers, pub/sub agents, agent barrier, or join.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, run, and review fair performance, token, and cost comparisons across GitHub Copilot CLI, Codex CLI, and direct model APIs. Use for AI CLI benchmark, Copilot vs Codex, prompt-cache diagnosis, cache read/write analysis, fresh-process latency measurement, token-cost comparison, or when a benchmark must separate provider caching from local CLI caches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze historical VS Code GitHub Copilot Chat sessions by model, reasoning effort, AIU, time, reliability, workflow behavior, and external quality evidence, or safely prune workspace-scoped local chat history by age. Use for session analysis, repeated-task retrospectives, model evaluation, cost/performance analysis, and old session cleanup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reflect reusable learnings into the current workspace / repository design and automation assets (.github/**, AGENTS.md, repo scripts/tasks). Not for ~/.copilot personal assets, VS Code User Data assets, or a private skills repository. Use when running a workspace/repo retro from CLI or Scout. Detects whether a project folder exists and, if not, asks before creating one. Triggers on "retro workspace", "repo retro", "workspace cleanup", "ワークスペース知見反映".

Prepare video URLs or local video files for GitHub Copilot analysis by extracting captions, sampled frames, contact sheets, and a prompt packet. Use when the user asks Copilot to watch, inspect, summarize, or diagnose a video, screen recording, demo, webinar, YouTube/Loom/TikTok/X/Vimeo URL, or .mp4/.mov/.mkv/.webm file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Research Pilot project needs an experiment proposal from a weak or bounded project claim.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Research Pilot project needs a read-only recommendation for the next workflow action.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to add source identity from PDF, URL, arXiv, DOI, note, experiment result, manual reference, or Zotero item into a Research Pilot project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Research Pilot project needs read-only gap detection or Evidence Need extraction from the Project Understanding Graph.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Research Pilot project graph change must be previewed, registered, accepted, rejected, parked, or revised through human-gated D* deltas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review and resolve PR review comments on the current branch's PR in this Flutter repository, from both AI reviewers (CodeRabbit, CodiumAI, CodePilot, Copilot, etc.) and human reviewers. Fetches comments via `gh`, splits them into AI and human groups, verifies each comment against the actual Flutter code, triages them, proposes fixes, and optionally applies fixes, replies to comments, and pushes. Use when the user asks to review PR comments, resolve PR feedback, review AI comments, review human review comments, or handle code review feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose whether an LLM classifier's validation-gate failure is GOLD-BOUND before spending on prompt revision or model changes. Use when: (1) a scoring pipeline over-predicts a label (precision low, recall high) and a prompt clarification is proposed to tighten it, (2) a pilot/validation gate fails and the fix candidates are prompt edits, (3) inter-rater agreement on the weak label was already low (κ < ~0.6). Core check: if gold POSITIVES share the exact feature the revision would exclude, no prompt can pass a gold-scored gate — recall craters while precision barely moves. Also documents the verified surgical-pilot design (single-section diff, tune/holdout split, pre-registered gate, perturbation check on untouched sections).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full-funnel paid advertising operations for B2B SaaS. Use this skill for PPC strategy, Google Ads optimization, LinkedIn Ads, social media advertising, programmatic buying, creative strategy, attribution modeling, budget allocation, budget pacing and planned-vs-delivered reconciliation, audience overlap and campaign self-competition audits, suppression lists, ROAS improvement, media spend optimization, and the media no auction sells — newsletter and podcast sponsorships, community and industry-publication placements, paid review-site listings on G2 and Capterra, and pay-per-lead content syndication. It also covers buying on the AI answer surface — ads inside Google AI Overviews and AI Mode that existing Search, Shopping and Performance Max campaigns already serve into with no opt-out, no placement targeting and no segmented reporting, and ChatGPT Ads and Microsoft Copilot as separate opt-in platforms with their own plan-tier reach limits, no negative keywords, and a landing-page crawler gate. It also owns the conversion signal the bidding algorithms learn from — CRM pipeline stages (SQL, opportunity, closed-won) sent back to Google Ads, LinkedIn, Meta and Microsoft Ads through offline conversion import, enhanced conversions for leads, the Google Data Manager API and the LinkedIn Conversions API, with click-ID capture, stage values, dedupe, EEA consent signals and retractions. It also gates connected TV (CTV) and streaming video for B2B — whether a reach medium belongs in the plan, how a vendor ties a TV household to a target account (member data, IP-to-account graph or contextual), the server-side ad insertion (SSAI) fraud questions, Programmatic Guaranteed deals, and a holdout lift test because CTV has no click. It also runs person-led paid social — LinkedIn Thought Leader Ads and Meta partnership ads that put spend behind an employee's or creator's post — on a paid-usage term, an in-post disclosure check and an end-date register, because the platform approval carries no term. Also triggers on: CTV, connected TV, OTT, streaming TV ads, should we run CTV, LinkedIn CTV, B2B CTV, account-based CTV, SSAI fraud, thought leader ads, boost an employee's post, sponsor a creator's post, partnership ads, whitelisting, creator usage rights, PPC, Google Ads, LinkedIn Ads, social ads, programmatic, ad creative, attribution, media budget, paid campaigns, ROAS, CPA, ad spend, newsletter sponsorship, podcast sponsorship, community sponsorship, sponsor a newsletter, content syndication, pay-per-lead, cost per lead vendor, media kit, rate card, insertion order, direct buy, publisher partnership, make-good, G2 paid listing, Capterra ads, review site advertising, sponsorship ROI, budget pacing, we underspent our budget, are our campaigns competing with each other, audience overlap, self-competition, campaign cannibalization, suppression list, exclusion list, ad frequency across channels, how many ad accounts do we have, ads in AI Overviews, AI Mode ads, ChatGPT Ads, OpenAI Ads Manager, Copilot ads, conversational ads, should we advertise on ChatGPT, can we buy our way into the AI answer, our ads are showing in AI Overviews and we cannot report on it, context hints, OAI-AdsBot, our ad landing page fails review, robots.txt is blocking our ads, our paid leads are junk, Google Ads is optimizing for the wrong leads, offline conversion import, OCI, enhanced conversions for leads, send CRM stages back to Google Ads, upload SQLs to LinkedIn, LinkedIn Conversions API, LinkedIn CAPI, Meta conversion leads, CRM to ad platform, gclid, li_fat_id, msclkid, value-based bidding, optimize for pipeline not form fills, low match rate, conversion lag.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sales enablement, technical presales and deal acceleration for B2B SaaS revenue teams. Use this skill when planning outbound campaigns, running discovery calls, building deal strategy, creating battle cards, writing proposals, responding to RFPs, preparing a product demo, scoping a proof of concept or pilot, answering a security questionnaire or the AI annex buyers now attach to it, executing sales sequences, coaching qualification, or deciding what the website's AI chat agent is allowed to say. Also triggers on: outbound, cold outreach, reply handling, reply classification, out-of-office replies, auto-replies counted as replies, our reply rate is inflated, prospect replied remove me, opt-out by reply, is this list ready to send, launch readiness, CRM segment outbound, we emailed a current customer, outbound hit an open opportunity, ownerless leads, prospects engaging our competitors, competitor connections, displacement list, is this personalization creepy, can we mention they visited our site, signal freshness, deal strategy, pipeline, battle card, objection handling, common objections, why do we keep hearing this objection, mine call transcripts for objections, objection register, proposal, RFP, discovery call, MEDDPICC, sales sequence, qualification, sales engineer, solutions engineer, presales, demo plan, demo script, POC, proof of concept, pilot success criteria, technical evaluation, technical win, security questionnaire, vendor security review, SOC 2 questionnaire, AI security questionnaire, AI annex, AI vendor due diligence, the buyer is asking if we train on their data, do you train on customer data, which model do you use, model provider sub-processor, AI subprocessor disclosure, where does inference run, can the customer turn the AI feature off, AI-CAIQ, CSA AI Controls Matrix, ISO 42001, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act Article 50, are we a provider or a deployer, AI feature disclosure, our model vendor changed and nobody told the buyer, technical objection, mutual action plan, MAP, close plan, mutual close plan, buyer enablement, the deal is stalled, deal stalled after the demo, how do I get this deal to close, close date keeps slipping, JOLT, buyer indecision, no-decision loss, website chatbot, chat widget, AI chat agent, AI SDR, inbound AI SDR, conversational marketing, live chat, what should our chatbot be allowed to say, our chatbot quoted the wrong price, the bot promised a discount, do we have to disclose it is AI, EU AI Act chatbot disclosure, chatbot handoff to sales, chat transcript review, prompt injection on our chatbot, Drift, Qualified, Intercom.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a commercial pilot — computing density-altitude-adjusted takeoff/landing distance against runway available, checking weight-and-balance CG against the envelope (not just gross weight), deciding an IFR/VFR go/no-go against personal minimums instead of legal minimums, interpreting a METAR/TAF (TEMPO/PROB groups, 1-2-3 alternate rule) for a go decision, or setting divert/turn-back triggers before a flight departs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track brand mentions, URL citations, and share-of-voice across the 2026 AI search surface — ChatGPT (with browsing), Perplexity, Claude (with search), Google Gemini, Google AI Overviews, Bing Copilot, You.com, Phind, and Microsoft Copilot..

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate user research interview scripts using Mom Test principles. Use this skill when: - You are preparing for user interviews or pilot observation sessions - You need a question bank organized by behavior, context, pain points, and workflow - You want interview guides that avoid leading questions and hypotheticals - You need per-persona interview guides - You are preparing for field visits or pilot debriefs

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Update user personas from new feedback, pilot data, or research. Use this skill when: - New pilot data or feedback reveals changed user behaviors or pain points - Annual persona review is due (1-2x per year) - New user segments are discovered that need persona documentation - Existing personas need validation against recent data

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SciPilot Skills 家族成员，负责科研数据可视化——但定位不是"画图工具"， 而是"可视化顾问"。先做数据剖析（列类型/样本量/分布/异常值/分组结构/相关性）， 再结合用户的论证目标推荐图型，主动拦截科研画图的经典错误（小样本画均值柱掩盖 分布、双 Y 轴、饼图、Y 轴不当截断、rainbow 色图、把分类点连成折线等），最后 产出 Nature / Science / IEEE / Elsevier / PNAS / 中文核心期刊级别的成图。 覆盖纯数据图：折线、柱状、散点、箱线 / 小提琴、热力图、误差棒、分布图（直方 图 / KDE）、相关性矩阵 / 散点矩阵、多面板组合。技术栈 matplotlib + seaborn + SciencePlots（静态）+ plotly（交互）。中英文双语，中文模式自动配置 Noto Sans CJK / Source Han Sans / SimHei 并修复负号方框，支持中文期刊"宋体正文 + Times New Roman 数字"混排。默认色盲安全配色 + 冗余编码 + 灰度预览。出图后做 "视觉自检闭环"：渲染 PNG 预览→程序自检缺字/文字裁切/刻度重叠→AI 读图复核遮盖 与子图对齐→回改重渲，直到通过。 当用户的任务涉及以下任何情况时主动触发：论文配图、科研画图、数据可视化、 不知道用什么图、怎么展示数据、用什么图好、期刊投稿图、figure、出版级图表、 matplotlib、seaborn、plotly、误差棒、显著性标注、色盲安全配色、矢量图导出、 中文论文图表、多面板。**即使用户只是给一批数据问"这个怎么画"或"用什么图 好"，也应使用本技能——本技能首要能力是"判断该用什么图"，其次才是绘制。** 不做示意图、流程图、架构图。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages core GKE cluster provisioning, credentials, Autopilot vs Standard selection, and workload deployment. Use when creating GKE clusters, fetching kubectl credentials, configuring Workload Identity, or deciding between Autopilot and Standard modes. Don't use for specialized GKE networking (use gke-networking), advanced security hardening (use gke-platform-security or gke-workload-security), or cluster upgrades (use gke-upgrades).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, create, and configure production-ready Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) clusters using the golden path Autopilot configuration. Covers Day-0 checklist, Autopilot vs Standard, networking (private clusters, VPC-native, Gateway API), security (Workload Identity, Secret Manager, RBAC hardening), observability, scaling, cost optimization, and AI/ML inference. WHEN: create GKE cluster, provision GKE environment, design GKE networking, secure GKE, optimize GKE cost, GKE autoscaling, GKE inference, GKE upgrade, GKE observability, GKE multi-tenancy, GKE batch, GKE HPC, GKE compute class.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate unattended resolution of open GitHub issues - triage by complexity, dispatch parallel worker agents into isolated worktrees, review their diffs, open PRs, and monitor CI and CodeRabbit until green. Use when asked to work through open issues autonomously or put Claude on auto-pilot.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Estimates the minimum biological replicates (or cells/events) for a target power at a target FDR in genomics experiments using ssizeRNA, PROPER, powsimR for scRNA-seq, and pilot-data dispersion estimation from DESeq2/edgeR. Covers the biological-versus-technical replication distinction (technical replicates do not add degrees of freedom for biological inference), replicate-number-versus-sequencing-depth budgeting, scRNA-seq sample-versus-cell allocation under a pseudobulk model, and the critique that "n=3" is a publication convention rather than a power calculation. Use when budgeting a sequencing experiment, writing the sample-size justification in a grant, estimating replicates from pilot data, allocating a fixed budget between samples and depth, or planning scRNA-seq cohort size. For clinical-trial sample size see clinical-biostatistics/power-and-sample-size; for the power-given-n direction see experimental-design/power-analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fri→Fri community signals routine across CopilotKit + AG-UI. Orchestrator that supervises subagents — Discord pull, GitHub pull, deep-read, reporter enrichment, Reddit Pulse — and synthesizes a Notion report under the Community Signals parent page. Triggers on "go", "weekly report", "community signals", "run routine".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。