「product question」の検索結果

Build custom AI agents in Claude Code from a user's problem statement. This skill analyzes the user's use case, asks smart clarifying questions, researches the internet for similar agents (GitHub repos, blogs, Claude Code community patterns), and then architects and builds production-ready Claude Code agents — including subagents, skills, hooks, slash commands, MCP integrations, and CLAUDE.md configuration. Use this skill whenever the user wants to create an agent, build an automation workflow, set up a Claude Code subagent, design a multi-agent system, or says things like 'build me an agent for...', 'automate this with Claude Code', 'I want a subagent that...', 'help me create a workflow', 'set up an agent pipeline', or any variation of wanting Claude Code to do something specialized. Also trigger when the user mentions agent architecture, agent SDK, agentic workflows, or task delegation in Claude Code — even if they don't use the word 'agent' explicitly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft a professional customer-facing response tailored to the situation and relationship. Use when answering a product question, responding to an escalation or outage, delivering bad news like a delay or won't-fix, declining a feature request, or replying to a billing issue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete B2B SaaS marketing agency powered by 90 AI agents across 17 specialties. This is the entry point for ALL marketing requests. Routes to the right specialist team: content marketing, SEO, paid media, social media, email marketing, design, sales enablement (including technical presales — demos, proofs of concept, security questionnaires), product marketing, account-based marketing (ABM), partnerships and channel programs (co-marketing, marketplace GTM, channel conflict and deal registration, partner economics), growth, analytics, project management, or client operations. Use this skill when the request spans multiple disciplines or when unsure which specialist to invoke. Also triggers on: marketing help, marketing team, marketing agency, what can you do, marketing capabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Bioinformatics Scientist — designing a differential-expression or GWAS analysis with correct multiple-testing correction, calling and triaging variants from NGS data using genotype-likelihood confidence rather than raw allele counts, interpreting a BLAST/DIAMOND homology search, choosing or building a genomics pipeline (aligner, caller, normalization method) for a specific data-generating process, or judging whether a computational-biology analysis's statistical design actually supports the biological claim being made. Distinct from a bioinformatics-technician (executes and QC-gates an established pipeline someone else designed) and a data-scientist (general product/experimentation judgment, not genomics-specific statistics) — this role owns which method and statistical model a genomics question requires, and why.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Personal financial planner for Thailand-based users. Use this skill when the user asks for help with budgeting, tax planning involving Thai-specific products (SSF, RMF, Thai ESG, Thai ESGX, Easy E-Receipt), debt strategy at Thai bank rates, retirement planning involving ประกันสังคม (มาตรา 33/39/40), กบข., PVD (provident fund), or any personal-money question framed in baht and Thai life events. Strong activation phrases include "ช่วยวางแผนการเงิน", "วางแผนภาษี", "ปลดหนี้บัตรเครดิต", "ลดหย่อน RMF", "Help me with my Thai finances", "How much should I save in Thailand", "ม.33 vs ม.39", "เกษียณต้องเก็บเงินเท่าไหร่". Do NOT use for non-Thai financial contexts (US 401(k), Canadian RRSP, UK ISA, etc.) — different skills exist for those.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

方案拷问 / 压力测试：当用户有一个产品方案、架构设计、计划或决策，想被连续追问、反方挑战、 压测取舍和失败模式时使用。可用中文唤起：“拷问我的方案”“压力测试这个设计”“帮我问 hard questions” “这个方案哪里会翻车”“grill me”。目标是一问一答把决策树走清楚，不是直接替用户写最终方案。 跨 Skill 运行时只输出 Challenge/Critic Handoff，并把一个 gap 返回最小责任节点；不重写完整方案。 如果用户还不知道真正问题是什么，先用 ai-collaboration-calibration；如果用户要标准 PRD 交付准备度评审， 用 prd-review。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify that a requested bug fix changes observable behavior with a failing-before, passing-after reproduction and honest execution evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Meta-skill that orchestrates the discourse skill suite: routes between steel-man-argument, socratic-questioning, toulmin-argument-analysis, logical-fallacy-detector, bad-faith-rhetoric-detector, discourse-elision-analyzer, forensic-speech-structure, and productive-discourse-facilitator. Use when analyzing conversations, facilitating discourse, or operating as a dialogue copilot. Maintains mode (silent analysis, coaching overlay, active facilitator) and decides which skills to invoke based on conversation dynamics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer questions about the Paseo product and app, including setup, configuration, connectivity, providers, workspaces, updates, logs, and troubleshooting. Use when a user inside Paseo asks how Paseo works, how to configure it, or why something is broken; use the paseo skill instead to operate agents and workspaces through MCP or the CLI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks how to build with OpenAI products or APIs, asks about Codex itself or choosing Codex surfaces, needs up-to-date official documentation with citations, help choosing the latest model for a use case, or model upgrade and prompt-upgrade guidance; use OpenAI docs MCP tools for non-Codex docs questions, use the Codex manual helper first for broad Codex self-knowledge, and restrict fallback browsing to official OpenAI domains.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when creating bug/defect reports during system testing. Use this skill when you discover a bug, need to document test failures, or want to create comprehensive bug tickets with proper reproduction steps, severity assessment, and environment details. Guides users through interactive questioning to gather all necessary information and generates professional bug ticket documents in Markdown format. Supports Japanese (default) and English.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Time-boxed throwaway investigation to answer one hard question. Use when facing technical uncertainty before committing to a frontier item or scoped slice — the output is knowledge, not production code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the GAO Agile Assessment Guide (GAO-24-105506, 2023). Use for assessing and managing Agile software development in federal programs: the Agile Manifesto and framework family (Scrum, Kanban, XP, SAFe, DA, DSDM, Lean, DevOps); the three adoption perspectives (team dynamics, program operations, organization environment); requirements decomposition (epics, features, user stories, INVEST, MoSCoW, definition of done); Agile-aware federal contracting (FAR, modular contracting, SOO/PWS/SOW, product owner vs. COR); program monitoring and control (WBS, cost, schedule, EVM at the feature level); Agile metrics (velocity, lead/cycle time, CFD, burn charts); and the auditor's key-question bank. Oversight- and acquisition-oriented: it tells you how to *assess and govern* Agile programs, not how to code. Thin on hands-on engineering practice, deep cost/schedule checklists (see gao-cost, gao-schedule), and any non-US-federal context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds one DRAFT message house for a product, service, programme or initiative from the source material the user provides: an umbrella statement, two to four pillars and graded proof points under each, with every proof point that lacks a source flagged, a claim sensitivity table, an audience coverage check and open questions. Use when the user asks to "build a message house", "write our messaging framework", "what are the key messages for this launch", "turn this research into messaging pillars" or "test our current messaging against the evidence". Do not use for a campaign one-pager, use campaign-brief-builder instead; to check whether a written document's claims are substantiated, use claims-evidence-map. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesises exit interview notes or leaver survey responses into a DRAFT themed report: coded themes with record counts and shares, anonymised verbatim evidence, breakdowns by broad group only for groups that meet a minimum group size, referred items and open questions for the people team, without naming or identifying any individual. Use when the user asks to analyse, summarise, code, theme or report on exit interviews, leaver feedback, attrition interviews or departure surveys, or says "what are our leavers telling us", "theme these exit interviews" or "summarise the leaver survey". Do not use for customer or product feedback, use customer-feedback-theme-synthesis instead; for redacting one document with no theming, use document-deidentification-pass. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Customer Advocate archetype, the seat for paying customers not in the room, and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings that cite the exact passage, customer-side risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a customer advocate review", "do a voice-of-the-customer pressure-test", "what would our customers say about this" or "what does this plan really ask of paying customers". Do not use for the product evidence or roadmap case, use cpo-reviewer instead; for revenue or pricing strategy, use cro-reviewer; for the staff who operate the change, use frontline-skeptic-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or rollout plan in character as a Frontline Sceptic archetype, the experienced staff member who will live with the change, and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings that cite the exact passage, adoption risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a frontline review", "give me the shop-floor view of this rollout", "pressure-test adoption of this plan" or "what will the team actually say about this". Do not use for employee consultation, monitoring or works council preparation, use works-council-reviewer instead; for people strategy or restructuring, use chro-reviewer; for product evidence, use cpo-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query PostHog product analytics via REST API — event analytics, HogQL SQL queries, feature flags, experiments, session recordings, insights, persons, cohorts. Use when the user wants to answer an analytics question, toggle/inspect a flag, or pull event data programmatically without opening the PostHog UI or installing the PostHog MCP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete B2B SaaS marketing agency powered by 79 AI agents across 17 specialties. This is the entry point for ALL marketing requests. Routes to the right specialist team: content marketing, SEO, paid media, social media, email marketing, design, sales enablement (including technical presales — demos, proofs of concept, security questionnaires), product marketing, account-based marketing (ABM), growth, analytics, project management, or client operations. Use this skill when the request spans multiple disciplines or when unsure which specialist to invoke. Also triggers on: marketing help, marketing team, marketing agency, what can you do, marketing capabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-phase dialectical stress-test for HIGH-STAKES decisions only (architecture choices, irreversible product calls, strategic bets). Heavy-cost skill — do NOT use for routine questions, brainstorming, or simple tradeoffs. User must explicitly invoke or describe a decision they call "high-stakes", "irreversible", or "needs stress-testing". Triggers: "stress test this decision", "dialectic on", "challenge this thesis", "should I really".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stop and check this skill before finishing any reply to a question about how to use Claude or a Claude product — it recommends matching courses, tutorials, and use cases from Claude Academy (academy

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks how to build with OpenAI products or APIs, asks about Codex itself or choosing Codex surfaces, needs up-to-date official documentation with citations, help choosing the latest model for a use case, latest/current/default-model prompting guidance, or model upgrade and prompt-upgrade guidance; use OpenAI docs MCP tools for non-Codex docs questions, use the Codex manual helper first for broad Codex self-knowledge, and restrict fallback browsing to official OpenAI domains.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activate this skill when BenchmarkDotNet (BDN) is involved in the task — creating, running, configuring, or reviewing BDN benchmarks. Also activate when microbenchmarking .NET code would be useful and BenchmarkDotNet is the likely tool. Consider activating when answering a .NET performance question requires measurement and BenchmarkDotNet may be needed. Covers microbenchmark design, BDN configuration and project setup, how to run BDN microbenchmarks efficiently and effectively, and using BDN for side-by-side performance comparisons. Do NOT use for profiling/tracing .NET code (dotnet-trace, PerfView), production telemetry, or load/stress testing (Crank, k6).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when someone asks to write, rewrite, review, or improve text that appears inside a product or interface. Examples: "review the UX copy", "is there a better way to phrase this", "rewrite this error message", "write copy for this screen/flow/page", reviewing button labels, improving CLI output messages, writing onboarding copy, settings descriptions, or confirmation dialogs. Trigger whenever the request involves wording shown to end users inside software — apps, web, CLI, email notifications, modals, tooltips, empty states, or alerts. Also trigger for vague requests like "review the UX" where interface copy review is implied. Do NOT trigger for content marketing, blog posts, app store listings, API docs, brand guides, cover letters, or interview questions — this is a technical writing skill for interface language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。