dontbesilent 好问题生成器。把模糊问题改写成 Agent 可推理、可批评、可验证的问题说明书,并判断它能被自动化解决到什么程度。 触发方式:/dbs-good-question、/好问题、/问题说明书、/Agent可解性、「这个问题能不能自动化解决」「帮我把问题说清楚」 Turn fuzzy problems into agent-solvable problem briefs and evaluate automation readiness. Trigger: /dbs-good-question, "clarify this problem", "can an agent solve this"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pluviobyte/rnskill☆ 1,6422026年9月21日 更新
Use when a meta-agent request is too ambiguous to safely generate, package, publish, or adapt without one to five targeted questions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
agentlas-ai/Agentlas-OS☆ 1,5802026年10月11日 更新
Start and control Minutes Coach, the separate real-time copilot HUD, with an explicit meeting goal. Use only for explicit Coach or HUD lifecycle requests such as "start Minutes Coach", "open the Coach HUD", "pause Minutes Coach", "resume Minutes Coach", "Minutes Coach status", or "stop Minutes Coach". Do not use for requests that explicitly ask the current terminal agent to watch or strategize; those belong to minutes-live-sidekick. An ambiguous request such as "coach me live" requires one short surface clarification and must not automatically start Coach.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
silverstein/minutes☆ 1,5462026年10月13日 更新
Build traceable internal-review proposal, RFI, RFP, tender, bid, and questionnaire responses from supplied questions and approved sources. Use to analyze questions, contribute business or product evidence, or draft qualified responses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
microsoft/hve-core☆ 1,5232026年10月13日 更新
PR code review that surfaces decay risks, design smells, and maintainability issues with concrete Symptom → Source → Consequence → Remedy findings, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to review code, check a PR, shares a diff or pastes code asking "does this look right?" / "any issues here?" / "ready to merge?", or asks for feedback on a function, class, or file. Also triggers when user mentions: code smells / refactoring / clean architecture / DDD / SOLID principles / Hyrum's Law / deep modules / tactical programming / conceptual integrity / Brooks's Law / Mythical Man-Month / second system effect. Do NOT trigger for: questions about how to write code from scratch, language syntax questions, or framework/tool questions where no existing code is shared.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
hyhmrright/brooks-lint☆ 1,5192026年10月12日 更新
Generate a tailored code review checklist for any pull request based on the language, type of change, and risk level. Use when asked to review code, check a PR, review a pull request, or generate a code review checklist. Produces a focused checklist with language-specific checks, risk-level-appropriate depth, and a clear approve/request-changes recommendation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills☆ 1,4502026年10月13日 更新
Practise the structured interview (结构化面试) for Chinese civil service and public institution posts (公务员面试 / 事业单位面试): the common question types, a clear answer structure for each, timed mock rounds and feedback on content, structure and delivery. Use when asked 公务员面试怎么准备, 结构化面试题, 帮我模拟面试, 综合分析题怎么答, 应急应变题, or practise the civil service interview. Produces a question-type guide, answer frameworks with worked examples, a timed mock interview asked one question at a time, scored feedback, and a practice plan up to the interview date.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills☆ 1,4502026年10月13日 更新
Interview the user with sharp, one-at-a-time questions to turn a vague request into a tight, complete brief any other skill can run on. Use when a request is fuzzy, under-specified, or 'help me think this through', or before running a skill that needs inputs the user hasn't given. Produces a structured brief (goal, audience, constraints, success criteria) and hands off to the right skill — by interrogating, not guessing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills☆ 1,4502026年10月13日 更新
Use when choosing or sharpening a research question for an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript — testing whether the question genuinely concerns the social, organizational, behavioral or institutional life of accounting, and picking the intellectual tradition the question demands. Screens fit; it does not build the theory (aos-theory-development).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills☆ 1,2522026年9月27日 更新
Design and build a high-converting questionnaire-style onboarding flow for your app, modelled on proven conversion patterns from top subscription apps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
adamlyttleapps/claude-skill-app-onboarding-questionnaire☆ 1,2162026年4月6日 更新
Implement computer vision features including text recognition (OCR), face detection, barcode scanning, image segmentation, object tracking, and document scanning in iOS apps. Covers both the modern Swift-native Vision API (iOS 18+) and legacy VNRequest patterns, VisionKit DataScannerViewController for live camera scanning, and CoreMLRequest/VNCoreMLRequest for custom model inference. Use when adding OCR, barcode scanning, face detection, or custom Core ML model inference with Vision.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
dpearson2699/swift-ios-skills☆ 1,1952026年8月1日 更新
Viking Search tuning for specified policy directions. Use this when the user provides specific queries, a type of query, or a business policy direction, and asks to boost, suppress, or fix a class of search results through request-parameter passthrough. You must only perform read-only baseline evaluation and request-level candidate testing; do not modify search scenes, app config, dictionaries, recommend scenes, or primary recall parameters.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
volcengine/SearchCLI☆ 1,1882026年10月10日 更新
Answer a question from a second-brain vault by reading its own pages, citing the pages used, and saying plainly when the vault does not contain the answer. Use this skill whenever the user asks what they know about a topic, what they have read on something, what connects two ideas, what they have changed their mind about, or asks any question that should be answered from their own notes rather than general knowledge. Do NOT use for ingesting new material, for general questions the vault has nothing to do with, or when the user explicitly wants an answer from the open web.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
undefined-ui/second-brain-os☆ 1,0592026年10月10日 更新
Expert UK Cyber Essentials and Cyber Essentials Plus advisor — the NCSC-owned, IASME-delivered baseline certification. Covers the current Danzell question set (Requirements for IT Infrastructure v3.3, mandatory for assessment accounts from April 27, 2026) and the Willow transition, the five control themes (firewalls, secure configuration, security update management, user access control, malware protection), scoping rules for cloud services, BYOD and home working, the 14-day critical-update rule, mandatory MFA for cloud services and the new auto-fail questions, CE Plus technical audits, pricing, annual renewal, the included cyber liability insurance, and procurement mandates (PPN 014, MoD Defence Cyber Certification, NHS). Use this skill whenever a user mentions Cyber Essentials, CE Plus, IASME, the UK government cyber certification, Danzell or Willow question sets, UK public-sector or MoD supply-chain security requirements, or wants a readiness gap assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance☆ 9562026年10月10日 更新
Expert GDPR compliance assistant covering all four core workflows: (1) auditing code and systems for GDPR violations, (2) drafting GDPR-compliant documents such as privacy policies, Data Processing Agreements (DPAs), and consent notices, (3) answering GDPR compliance questions with authoritative article citations, and (4) reviewing data flows and PII handling practices. Use this skill whenever the user mentions GDPR, data protection, privacy compliance, lawful basis, data subject rights, DPA, privacy notices, consent management, data breaches, DPIAs, controller/ processor relationships, cross-border data transfers, or any EU/UK data privacy topic. Also trigger for questions like "is this GDPR compliant?", "how do I handle personal data?", "what does a privacy policy need?", or any request involving PII, personal data, or data retention in a regulatory context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance☆ 9562026年10月10日 更新
Ricerca giuridica su fonti italiane e UE: normativa, prassi e giurisprudenza in ogni materia (civile, penale, amministrativo, lavoro, tributario e specialistiche). Usare quando l'utente chiede di trovare, inquadrare o citare una norma ("cosa dice l'articolo...", "quale legge disciplina...", "è ancora in vigore...", "che estremi ha..."), cercare sentenze, massime o orientamenti, verificare la vigenza di una disposizione, verificare una citazione o l'esistenza di una pronuncia ("questa sentenza esiste?", "controlla le citazioni di questo atto"), cercare precedenti a favore e contro una tesi ("conformi e difformi", "sentenze pro e contro"), trovare un CCNL o le decisioni di ABF, ACF, AGCM o del Garante, creare un documento fondato su fonti (atti, pareri, clausole, contratti, memorie, diffide), o impostare una strategia processuale ("come imposto la causa", "come gestiresti questo caso", "conviene agire o transigere"), anche quando la fonte non è nominata. Non usare per domande non giuridiche.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills☆ 8642026年10月3日 更新
Prepare a lawyer for an adversarial proceeding the way Neal Katyal's "Harvey" prepared him for the SCOTUS tariffs argument: profile the tribunal from their prior opinions and questions, predict the specific questions you will face, map narrow "escape routes" each judge can walk through without abandoning prior commitments, and spar adversarially until only the strongest answers survive. The model is the sparring partner. The human still wins the case. Use when: preparing for oral argument, appellate argument, motion hearing, evidentiary hearing, deposition (taking or defending), arbitration, mediation, or any proceeding where a known decision-maker will fire questions at you in real time. Also useful for stress-testing a brief before filing. Proactively suggest when: the user mentions an upcoming hearing/argument with named judges or arbitrators, drafts a brief and wants it pressure-tested, asks "what will Justice X / Judge Y ask me," or talks about preparing for a specific bench.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills☆ 8642026年10月3日 更新
Searches the domestic courts of 122 jurisdictions — 153 databases, 49 automated — for extradition and arrest-warrant surrender decisions, each in its own language and vocabulary. Answers the question no commercial database does: how are OTHER executing states treating this requesting state, or this ground? Searching by requesting state localises its name per jurisdiction (AE becomes 'Emiratele Arabe Unite' in Romania, 'Emirati Arabi Uniti' in Italy), so the sweep finds what those courts actually wrote. Every hit passes a relevance gate; every search leaves a dated report, so the research is reconstructable months later. Use when asked what foreign courts have said about surrender to a given state, whether any European court has refused extradition on prison conditions, assurances or Article 3, for comparative extradition research, or to build a foreign-authority section of an extradition argument. Not for domestic case law of the user's own jurisdiction, and never a substitute for reading the judgment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills☆ 8642026年10月3日 更新
Expert GDPR compliance assistant covering all four core workflows: (1) auditing code and systems for GDPR violations, (2) drafting GDPR-compliant documents such as privacy policies, Data Processing Agreements (DPAs), and consent notices, (3) answering GDPR compliance questions with authoritative article citations, and (4) reviewing data flows and PII handling practices. Use this skill whenever the user mentions GDPR, data protection, privacy compliance, lawful basis, data subject rights, DPA, privacy notices, consent management, data breaches, DPIAs, controller/ processor relationships, cross-border data transfers, or any EU/UK data privacy topic. Also trigger for questions like "is this GDPR compliant?", "how do I handle personal data?", "what does a privacy policy need?", or any request involving PII, personal data, or data retention in a regulatory context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills☆ 8642026年10月3日 更新
Generate templated responses for common legal inquiries and identify when situations require individualized attention. Use when responding to routine legal questions — data subject requests, vendor inquiries, NDA requests, discovery holds — or when managing response templates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills☆ 8642026年10月3日 更新
Complete prep for all three scored components of the California Bar Exam: the five written ESSAYS (13 subjects — Business Associations, Civil Procedure, Community Property, Constitutional Law, Contracts, Criminal Law & Procedure, Evidence, Professional Responsibility, Real Property, Remedies, Torts, Trusts, Wills & Succession), the PERFORMANCE TEST, and the multiple-choice MBE (7 subjects). Trigger whenever someone is studying for the California bar (or the MBE) and says things like: "give me the rule for [issue]", "big issues in [subject]", "drill/quiz me on [topic]", "MBE questions on [subject]", "teach me [doctrine]", "build an attack outline", "grade my essay", "memorizable paragraph for [issue]", "performance test approach", or "make a study plan" — or names any tested essay/MBE subject in a study, memorization, drilling, or practice-question context. Also trigger when a student uploads a practice essay, PT, or question set to be graded or turned into rule blocks. When in doubt during bar prep, trigger.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills☆ 8642026年10月3日 更新
When you have a decision to make and want a structured workflow that picks the load-bearing questions, walks through them, reaches a call (or "wait"), and archives the rationale for future reference. Based on the 37signals Guide to Making Decisions (38 questions) plus house additions like Q39 opportunity cost ("what does saying yes displace?"). Triages to 6–8 relevant questions per decision instead of forcing the full set. Archives every decision to ~/.config/makerskills/decide/archive/ with a revisit date so you can check later whether the call was right. Triggers on "/decide," "help me decide," "should I [X]," "I need to make a decision about," "stuck on a decision," "deciding between," "go/no-go on," "what should I do about." This is both the decision-making workflow AND the decision log — making the decision is the act of logging it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
coreyhaines31/makerskills☆ 8562026年10月9日 更新
Design a diagnostic hinge question that reveals whether students understand enough to move on. Use when planning key checkpoints mid-lesson during explicit or direct instruction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GarethManning/education-agent-skills☆ 8532026年8月29日 更新
Generate a Socratic questioning sequence that develops conceptual understanding through guided inquiry. Use when facilitating philosophical discussions, concept exploration, or critical examination.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GarethManning/education-agent-skills☆ 8532026年8月29日 更新