「recall」の検索結果

Store memories in tier-aware hierarchical memory — working / short-term / long-term — and recall with tier filters. Use for working-set context that should fade, vs facts that should persist, vs patterns that should be searchable forever.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a Montessori three-period lesson for introducing concepts through concrete materials and naming. Use when teaching vocabulary, classifications, or concepts through hands-on materials.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before any explanation or answer, require the learner to produce a free-recall attempt and confidence rating. Use when a student wants help understanding or reviewing a topic — this skill ensures the AI works from what the learner already knows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Socratic tutor that teaches codebase understanding through questioning, challenges, and active recall. Invoke with /learn-codebase when onboarding to a new codebase or deepening understanding of existing code. Maintains a learning journal that tracks mastery and schedules reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Methods for assessing what people actually eat — 24-hour recall, food frequency questionnaires, diet diaries, biomarkers, duplicate-plate studies, and controlled feeding. Covers the relative strengths and biases of each instrument, how to choose among them for a given question, and how to interpret results in the presence of measurement error. Use when a user wants to estimate population-level intake, individual-level intake, or evaluate the plausibility of a dietary claim that depends on how intake was measured.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run this appropriateness check the moment you are about to integrate a retrieved long-term memory — a Grove content-addressed hit, a chroma/pgvector neighbour, a memory-consolidation digest, or a MEMORY.md line — into a response, especially anything touching private origins, Fox Companies IP, credentials, or Center Camp / consent-governed content. It answers a question intent-router never asks: not WHAT to fetch or HOW, but WHETHER a correctly-retrieved item should reach output. Relevance is not appropriateness — a perfect similarity match can still be a boundary violation. Default is FAIL-CLOSED: if in-context authorization is uncertain, the memory may inform behaviour but must not be surfaced. Backed by RBI-Eval (arxiv 2606.06055v1). Triggers on surfacing recalled sensitive memory into a response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research a specific technology, library, system, protocol, or tool to answer a concrete technical question with source-traceable evidence. Use when current implementation details, version behavior, configuration, compatibility, or authoritative technical facts must be verified rather than recalled. Also use when explicitly asked to incorporate verified findings into an existing skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verifies claims in backlog items, skill documentation, or plugin content against primary sources using web lookups. Spawns parallel verification agents that must use WebFetch/WebSearch/gh — training data recall is explicitly rejected as evidence. Produces VERIFIED/REFUTED/INCONCLUSIVE verdicts with citations. Use when items are marked UNVERIFIED or when verifying tool API claims, CLI flags, or documented software behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Look up prior Claude Code sessions when context is lost or forgotten. Use when asked what was done before, what happened in the last session, or any request to recall past conversation history, prior decisions, experiments, or outcomes. Indexes and searches raw JSONL transcripts from ~/.claude/projects/ via DuckDB. Returns verbatim user messages, summarizes AI actions and sub-agent outcomes, detects tool errors and user frustration signals, and reports tool usage statistics. Summaries cached at ~/.claude/kaizen/session-summaries/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Self-evolution workflow for the agent. Before substantive work, recall past outcomes from evolution memory; while editing, detect improvement signals; at task end, record the outcome; when reusable, distill or search the EvoMap network for proven genes/capsules. Use when the user starts non-trivial work (a feature, a fix, a refactor) or asks the agent to "evolve", "learn from this", or "remember how this went".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user asks to save, remember, recall, or organize memories. Triggers on: 'remember this', 'save this', 'note this', 'what did we discuss about...', 'check your notes', 'clean up memories'. Also use proactively when discovering valuable findings worth preserving.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

模型评估全流程。覆盖分类/回归/排序/生成/RAG/LLM 评估、A/B 测试、 在线监控、数据漂移检测、评估集构建、基准测试。 触发关键词：评估、指标、Precision、Recall、F1、AUC、BLEU、ROUGE、 A/B 测试、基准测试、数据漂移、模型监控、RAGAS、LLM-as-Judge。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sync high-value dev knowledge (skills, decisions, lessons) into Google NotebookLM for cloud recall, podcasts, and flashcards. Pairs with Dockit/deep-search. Use for NotebookLM, nlm, knowledge base, skill sync, or cross-machine AI memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use EnterpriseRAG-Bench to evaluate an enterprise RAG or knowledge-agent system against a realistic synthetic company corpus with answer, recall, and comparative scoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maps a startup's competitive landscape, scores moat strength across 6+ dimensions, and writes an investor-ready competition narrative with a positioning map. Use when the user asks for a competitive landscape, moat analysis, or positioning review and gives enough to work from: a deck, a list of competitors, or a clearly named startup. A full run takes about 30–40 minutes and searches the web, so for a passing question such as 'who are my competitors?' or 'is that a real moat?', answer briefly in chat and offer the analysis instead of starting it. When it runs, the competitor set and moat scores are checked adversarially, never recalled from memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Semantic search over global agent memory. Use to retrieve previously learned patterns, decisions, gotchas, and workarounds. Prevents stale-context errors across long sessions and multi-agent pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to auto-log all tool interactions into a self-organizing vector DB with instant recall. Intercepts interactions, extracts key information, generates embeddings, stores in LanceDB, auto-categorizes, and builds a retrieval index. Inspired by OpenClaw SQLite LCM + summary DAG pattern.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need semantic retrieval from perpetual memory at query time. Parses query intent, searches vector store, ranks by relevance and recency, and injects context. Complements memory-search.cjs with the perpetual_memory LanceDB table.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the four paper-quality autoraters from PaperOrchestra (arXiv:2604.05018, App. F.3) — Citation F1 (P0/P1 partition + Precision/Recall/F1), Literature Review Quality (6-axis 0-100 with anti-inflation rules), SxS Overall Paper Quality (side-by-side), and SxS Literature Review Quality (side-by-side). TRIGGER when the user asks to "score this paper draft", "evaluate against the benchmark", "compare two papers", or "run the autoraters".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI systematic knowledge acquisition from unfamiliar territory — deliberate model-building with feedback loops. Maps spaced repetition principles to AI reasoning: survey the territory, hypothesize structure, explore with probes, integrate findings, verify understanding, and consolidate for future retrieval. Use when encountering an unfamiliar codebase or domain, when a user asks about a topic requiring genuine investigation rather than recall, when multiple conflicting sources require building a coherent model, or when preparing to teach a topic and deep understanding is required first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze pre-trained generative diffusion models (Stable Diffusion, DALL-E, Flux) by computing quality metrics (FID, IS, CLIP score, precision/recall), inspecting noise schedules, extracting and visualizing attention maps, and probing latent spaces. Use when evaluating a pre-trained generative diffusion model's output quality, comparing noise schedule variants, analyzing cross-attention patterns for text-conditioned generation, interpolating between latent codes, or detecting out-of-distribution inputs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a concept needs practising: the user asks for an exercise, quiz, recall, or gap probe. Not for explanations: use explain-concept.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user requests the reasoning behind one matched session by query or handle. Not for peer transfer: use history-sync. Not for store registration: use history-source-registry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user asks to audit what recall fed agents. Not for source or remote-system changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。