「recovery」の検索結果

Multi-cloud orchestration for ML workloads with automatic cost optimization. Use when you need to run training or batch jobs across multiple clouds, leverage spot instances with auto-recovery, or optimize GPU costs across providers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate Claude Ads contracts, scoring inputs, run bundles, capabilities, source freshness, safety, installation, uninstall, or release readiness. Use for ads validate, ads status, ads next, stale claims with missing tool access, maturity checks, ownership-manifest uninstall, preserving unrelated ads-* skills, checksum verification, preflight, QA, or release audits. Missing access must demote stale evidence for the run and block dependent release-current claims before recovery guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adaptive polling pattern with exponential backoff on failure, automatic recovery on success, and visibility-aware scheduling

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate complex tasks to shell_agent when direct tool execution fails, leveraging autonomous error recovery and library selection

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Leverage shell_agent for autonomous file creation and modification with automatic tool selection and error recovery

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recover from execute_code_sandbox failures by writing code to file and executing via run_shell

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Four-step recovery workflow for code execution failures when inline Python fails

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate spreadsheets, diagrams, and PDF reports in a phased workflow with explicit iteration budgets and error recovery

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic approach to diagnose and recover from pandoc PDF conversion unknown errors

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate spreadsheets, diagrams, and PDF reports with iteration budgeting and error recovery

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Handle cascading data retrieval tool failures by falling back to embedded knowledge generation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger: RDD, receipt-driven development, review authority, receipt/lineage, correction/recovery, delivery gate/kill switch, bounded review defects. Guide work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Incident response workup for a lead in hand — an alert, an IOC, or a /dnr-hunt finding. Scopes the lead across the logs, verdicts whether the attack succeeded, quantifies blast radius, confirms root cause in source with a local PoC, and writes a proposed (never executed) containment/remediation/recovery plan. Use when asked to "respond to this alert", "work this incident", "how bad is this", or "run dnr-respond". /dnr-hunt is the no-alert entry to the same track.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when analyzing dated public-equity event paths, probabilities, payoffs, and expected returns. Do not use for generic catalyst lists, risk sizing, hedges, capital structure, covenants, or credit recovery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Boltz job status and result recovery. Use when listing jobs, checking progress, resuming downloads, recovering results, or downloading an existing job ID. Not for starting new jobs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you are a sitting agent near your context threshold (~85%) and a PLANNED seat transition is due — retire deliberately and hand your seat to a fresh successor primed from a packet, rather than let compaction degrade you. Covers the handover packet, the append-only lineage ledger (one row per tenure), physical-seat continuity, the do-not-over-inherit framing, the optional warm-handoff window, and wake-v0 (consulting a retired predecessor). NOT for unplanned compaction/crash recovery (session-compaction-and-restore / claude-compaction-restore) and NOT the seat-binding primitive mechanics (seat-continuity-and-handover).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have just been primed into an EXISTING seat through a planned handover — a different agent retired and handed you the seat plus its earned context — and you need a world model of what just happened to you. Covers how a handover differs from compaction and from a fresh launch, the inherit-the-seat-not-the-identity rule, treating the handover packet as testimony you verify (and refusing stale ghost prompts, and verifying your OWN identity surfaces), why a seat is a COMPOUNDING LINEAGE (inherit the state, acquire the predecessor's epistemology, then improve and re-deposit so the next generation is better), how to query your predecessor, your duty to stream feedback and re-deposit your earned wisdom, and how to route to role-specific onboarding. NOT the driver-side handover mechanic (retiring-and-inheriting-a-seat) and NOT unplanned compaction/crash recovery (claude-compaction-restore / session-compaction-and-restore).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a person in their own Claude Code or Codex session mentions OpenRig, rigs or the rig command, or wants a team of coding agents (Claude Code, Codex) on their project. That includes installing, setting up, starting or updating OpenRig, seeing, getting back to or re-attaching to their OpenRig agents (including bringing a stopped team back), TUI or operator, starting or sharing a team, and joining this session to one. Operating a running rig from inside it (fleet recovery, seat handover, watchdog wakes, in-rig upgrades) is the openrig-skills skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reasoning about the rig lifecycle operations family (create / start / stop / resume / restore / snapshot / release / unclaim / destroy), reading or trusting `rig ps` / lifecycle projections after recovery, or designing proof for a lifecycle scenario. Covers the 4 failure modes (auto-restore creates partial rig; projections report healthier than reality; provider auth treated as impl work; resume succeeds for one runtime fails another) plus the restore-honesty rule (failed resume is FAILED loudly — no auto fresh fallback).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an agent running inside OpenRig needs the right skill or context for fleet recovery, seat handover, new-seat orientation, a watchdog wake, cross-host reach to an agent on another machine, rig packaging, an OpenRig upgrade, systematic debugging, queue triage, or implementation planning; also when the agent doesn't know what applies or nothing is projected on cold boot. Installing, starting or updating OpenRig, getting back to a team or bringing a stopped one back from a person's own session is the rigs skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before any projectflow call or Team Leader workflow involving Project state, Project lifecycle, DAG planning, Loop planning, ready node checks, pause/resume/complete, project recovery, heartbeat project checks, or project-level result aggregation. Always use team-coordination first when the question is how to organize the work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a team", "spawn agents", "assign tasks", "coordinate multiple agents", "check team status", "view kanban board", "send messages between agents", "manage team tasks", "monitor team progress", or mentions "clawteam", legacy "oh", "multi-agent coordination", "team collaboration", "agent inbox", "task board", "spawn worker". This skill should also be triggered when the current task is complex enough to benefit from splitting into subtasks and delegating to multiple agents — for example when the user asks to "build a full-stack app", "refactor the entire codebase", "implement multiple features in parallel", or when the agent determines that the work scope exceeds what a single agent can efficiently handle alone. Provides comprehensive guidance for using the ClawTeam CLI to orchestrate multi-agent teams with task management, messaging, monitoring, runtime profiles, git context, and recovery tooling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and resume interrupted Copilot CLI sessions using session_store queries

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt MFA / 2FA bypass — 7 distinct patterns. (1) MFA not enforced on sensitive endpoints (password change, email change accept without MFA challenge), (2) MFA-step skip via direct navigation to post-login URL, (3) MFA-token replay (same code accepted twice), (4) brute-force the 6-digit OTP without rate limit (10^6 attempts at server speed), (5) race condition on OTP validation, (6) recovery-code dump via /api/me, (7) backup factor downgrade (SMS factor with no rate limit). Plus the chain: cookie theft + password oracle + no step-up = ATO without MFA challenge. Detection: trace auth flow in Burp, find every state transition, check if MFA is middleware-gated vs per-endpoint, check OTP entropy and rate limit on OTP-validate. Validate: attacker session reaching post-MFA state. Use when hunting auth bypass, MFA flows, chaining primitives toward ATO.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。