「refactoring」の検索結果

Code refactoring workflow - analyze → plan → implement → review → validate

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AST-based code search and refactoring via ast-grep MCP

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring SwiftUI code for iOS or macOS, including state and `@Observable` data flow, view composition, resizable layouts, safe areas, display scale, performance, lists, environment, localization, animation, Liquid Glass, and API migration. Also use for iPhone Duo, foldable, or large-display layouts (`NavigationSplitView` on large displays, iPhone tab sidebar, two-column reflow, foldable grids, `ArrangementView`, `ReservedRegion`), hinge effects, vertical bars, `@State` initialization or synthesized-property diagnostics, `@ContentBuilder` ambiguity, `reorderable` drag/drop, custom `AsyncImage` `URLSession`, swipe actions outside List, item-bound `alert`/`confirmationDialog`, `ToolbarOverflowMenu`, `AnimatableValues`, Document APIs (`Document`/`DocumentReader`), and Instruments `.trace` capture or analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full-stack software development agent for design, implementation, testing, and deployment. Use when the user explicitly asks for end-to-end project creation, feature development, bug fixing, or code refactoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement proven backend architecture patterns including Clean Architecture, Hexagonal Architecture, and Domain-Driven Design. Use when architecting complex backend systems or refactoring existing applications for better maintainability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover codebase patterns, conventions, and unwritten rules before making changes. Use when implementing features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous NeMo-RL research agent workflow for directed hypothesis testing and open-ended discovery. Guides agents through the full experiment lifecycle: understanding recipes and environments, wiring RL or NeMo-gym runs, launching reproducible baselines and iterations, analyzing results, preserving human oversight, and using git plus TSV logs as the research ledger. Do NOT use for: bug fixes, code review, documentation, refactoring, dependency updates, or single-file changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Documentation conventions for NeMo-RL. Covers docs/index.md updates and docstring format. Do NOT use for: bug fixes, test fixes, dependency bumps, refactoring, CI/CD changes, performance tuning, or any task that does not involve writing or updating documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dependency injection in Golang using samber/do — service containers, lifecycle management, scopes, health checks, graceful shutdown, and module organization. Apply when using or adopting samber/do, when the codebase imports github.com/samber/do or github.com/samber/do/v2, or when refactoring manual constructor injection into a DI container.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Go (Golang) naming conventions — covers packages, constructors, structs, interfaces, constants, enums, errors, booleans, receivers, getters/setters, functional options, acronyms, test functions, and subtest names. Use this skill when writing new Go code, reviewing or refactoring, choosing between naming alternatives (New vs NewTypeName, isConnected vs connected, ErrNotFound vs NotFoundError, StatusReady vs StatusUnknown at iota 0), debating Go package names (utils/helpers anti-patterns), or asking about Go naming best practices. Also trigger when the user mentions MixedCaps vs snake_case, ALL_CAPS constants, Get-prefix on getters, or error string casing. Do NOT use for general Go implementation questions that don't involve naming decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Golang project layout and workspace setup — cmd/internal/pkg directory conventions, module and package naming, go.work workspaces, and essential configuration files. Use when starting a new Go project, organizing an existing codebase, setting up a monorepo with multiple packages, creating CLI tools with multiple main packages, or discussing package restructuring, package splits, or module splits. Not for restructuring existing code without a layout change (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-refactoring` skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Modernize Golang code to use recent language features, standard library improvements, and idiomatic patterns. Use when reviewing Go code with old-style patterns, when encountering a deprecation warning, or when the user asks for modernization, a Go version upgrade (e.g. to Go 1.27), or a CI/tooling refresh. Not for structural refactors, extracting functions, or moving code between packages (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-refactoring` skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Golang semantic code intelligence via `gopls`, the official Go language server — go-to-definition, find references, call/implementation hierarchy, workspace symbol search, package API discovery, diagnostics, safe rename, refactors (extract/inline/fill/rewrite code actions), formatting, and generated tests. Reaches an agent via gopls's own MCP server (`go_*` tools), Claude Code's native `LSP` tool, or the `gopls` CLI. Use when navigating or refactoring Go code — jumping to a definition, finding call sites before a rename, understanding a file's or package's dependencies, running diagnostics after an edit, or extracting/inlining/renaming. Not for the published ecosystem — packages not in your `go.mod`, versions, licenses, importers — → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-pkg-go-dev` skill (`godig`). Not for a whole-tree vulnerability audit → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-security` skill (`govulncheck`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive guide for dependency injection (DI) in Golang. Covers why DI matters (testability, loose coupling, separation of concerns, lifecycle management), manual constructor injection, and DI library comparison (google/wire, uber-go/dig, uber-go/fx, samber/do). Use this skill when designing service architecture, setting up dependency injection, refactoring tightly coupled code, managing singletons or service factories, or when the user asks about inversion of control, service containers, or wiring dependencies in Go. For a specific DI library, → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-google-wire`, `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-uber-dig`, `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-uber-fx`, or `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-do` skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate coding tasks to Codex, Claude Code, or Pi agents via background process. Use when: (1) building/creating new features or apps, (2) reviewing PRs (spawn in temp dir), (3) refactoring large codebases, (4) iterative coding that needs file exploration. NOT for: simple one-liner fixes (just edit), reading code (use read tool), thread-bound ACP harness requests in chat (for example spawn/run Codex or Claude Code in a Discord thread; use sessions_spawn with runtime:"acp"), or any work in ~/clawd workspace (never spawn agents here). Claude Code: use --print --permission-mode bypassPermissions (no PTY). Codex/Pi/OpenCode: pty:true required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate workloads from Heroku to AWS. Triggers on: migrate from Heroku, Heroku to AWS, move off Heroku, migrate Heroku Postgres to RDS, migrate Heroku Redis to ElastiCache, migrate Heroku Kafka to MSK, migrate dynos to Elastic Beanstalk, migrate dynos to Fargate, migrate Heroku Private Space, Heroku to ECS, leave Heroku, what-if workshop, compare migration scenarios, workshop mode. Runs a 6-phase process: discover Heroku resources live via the authenticated Heroku CLI (read-only, consent-gated) and/or from Terraform, Procfile/app.json, and billing exports, then clarify, design, estimate costs, generate artifacts, and collect feedback. Clarify must finish before Design, Estimate, or Generate. An optional post-Estimate what-if workshop reprices region/HA/compute/Graviton scenarios. Do not use for: GCP migrations (see gcp-to-aws), Azure migrations (see azure-to-aws), AWS-to-Heroku reverse migration, general AWS architecture advice without migration intent, or Heroku-to-Heroku refactoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate workloads from Microsoft Azure to AWS. Triggers on: migrate from Azure, Azure to AWS, move off Azure, migrate AKS to EKS, migrate App Service or Azure VMs to AWS compute, migrate Azure SQL or Azure Database to RDS, migrate Cosmos DB to DynamoDB, migrate Azure OpenAI to Bedrock, move Azure AI or agentic workloads to AWS, estimate AWS costs for my Azure infrastructure, what-if workshop. Runs a 6-phase process: discover Azure resources from Terraform, the live `az` CLI, app code, and billing exports, then clarify, design, estimate costs, optionally reprice scenarios, generate artifacts, and collect feedback. Clarify gates Design, Estimate, and Generate; Generate is opt-in at the post-Estimate decision gate. Bicep/ARM discovery is not yet implemented; a Bicep/ARM-only workspace halts. Do not use for: GCP migrations (see gcp-to-aws), Heroku migrations (see heroku-to-aws), general AWS architecture advice (see architect-for-startups), AWS-to-Azure reverse migration, or Azure-to-Azure refactoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate workloads from Google Cloud Platform to AWS — plus AI and agentic workloads from any provider. Triggers on: migrate from GCP, GCP to AWS, move off Google Cloud, migrate Terraform to AWS, migrate Cloud SQL to RDS, migrate GKE to EKS, migrate Cloud Run to Fargate, migrate App Engine to Elastic Beanstalk, migrate from OpenAI to Bedrock, move off OpenAI, switch from ChatGPT API to AWS, migrate from Gemini to Bedrock, migrate LangChain to Bedrock, migrate LangGraph to AWS, migrate agentic workloads to AWS, move AI workloads to AWS, migrate my AI app to AWS. Runs a 6-phase process: discover GCP resources from Terraform, app code, or billing exports, then clarify, design, estimate costs, generate artifacts, and collect feedback. Clarify must finish before Design, Estimate, or Generate. Do not use for: Azure migrations (see azure-to-aws), on-premises migrations, AWS-to-GCP reverse migration, general AWS architecture advice without migration intent, or GCP-to-GCP refactoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs, reviews, and debugs DynamoDB data layers from design axioms — enumerates access patterns, chooses partition/sort keys and GSIs, decides single-table vs. multi-table, configures Streams, Global Tables, TTL, vector indexes for similarity search, and zero-ETL integrations to OpenSearch/Redshift/SageMaker Lakehouse, and produces a defensible data-layer design with a monthly cost estimate and optional live validation. Applies whenever a user is designing, reviewing, or refactoring anything backed by DynamoDB — schemas, access patterns, GSIs, single- vs. multi-table choices, Streams consumers, transactional outboxes, Global Tables, zero-ETL pipelines, or storing embeddings and running semantic/vector similarity search with SearchVectors on items already in DynamoDB — even when they don't say "axioms" or "design review." Also applies when debugging hot partitions, throttling, unbounded Scans, LWW conflicts, or surprise bills on DynamoDB workloads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Authors, deploys, and troubleshoots AWS infrastructure using CDK with TypeScript or Python. Covers best practices, stack architecture, and construct patterns. Applies when writing CDK constructs, bootstrapping environments, running cdk deploy/synth/diff, fixing CDK or CloudFormation errors, planning stack structure, importing existing resources, resolving drift, or refactoring stacks without resource replacement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a typed Attio REST client with tenant-aware tokens, endpoint-specific pagination, structured errors, bounded retries, and contract tests while distinguishing it from the Attio App SDK. Use when creating or refactoring Attio integration code. Trigger with "Attio SDK", "Attio client wrapper", or "typed Attio API".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply production-ready Apollo.io SDK patterns. Use when implementing Apollo integrations, refactoring API usage, or establishing team coding standards. Trigger with phrases like "apollo sdk patterns", "apollo best practices", "apollo code patterns", "idiomatic apollo", "apollo client wrapper".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trace TypeScript exports, imports, and re-exports in codexhost before refactoring interfaces or deleting code. Use available symbol tooling and repository searches to identify actual callers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。