228 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use for 'why does X work this way', 'why we picked Y', design rationale, regressions, postmortems, or data-backed thresholds. Discovers available MCPs and queries each evidence category (source control, issue tracker, long-form docs, real-time chat, infrastructure observability, error tracking, product analytics warehouse) in parallel, then returns a cited read on decisions and tradeoffs. Use how for runtime behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnoses and prevents mobile performance regressions on every stack — Flutter, native Android, native iOS, React Native and Kotlin Multiplatform. Covers startup time, rendering and jank, memory, battery and background work, app size, the profiler and benchmark to use on each platform, and regression detection in CI. Use when an app is slow, janky, heavy or draining the battery, when setting performance budgets, or when a release must not regress.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build AI-focused SRE incident response practices for LLM outages, degraded quality, runaway cost events, and safety regressions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Parallel read-only multi-agent review of a current git diff or explicit file scope to find behavioral regressions, security or privacy risks, performance or reliability issues, and contract or test coverage gaps. Use when the user asks for a review swarm, parallel review, diff review, regression review, security review, or wants high-signal issues plus a prioritized fix path without editing files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Parallel read-only multi-agent root-cause investigation for bugs, regressions, crashes, flaky behavior, or unexplained failures. Use when the user asks to investigate a bug, find the root cause, trace a regression, understand why something broke, or wants a ranked diagnosis with the fastest proof path without making code edits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verifies bug fixes are correct and complete by tracing callers, checking imports/exports, validating path resolution, and confirming no regressions. Does the code work? Use when reviewing code changes for functional correctness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Disciplined diagnosis workflow for hard, intermittent, or multi-component bugs and performance regressions: inspect logs and existing evidence, build a feedback loop, test falsifiable hypotheses, instrument gaps, and verify the outcome. Use when the root cause is unclear, reproduction is unreliable, several causes or components are plausible, or performance has regressed. Do NOT use for obvious single-cause errors, straightforward configuration or syntax fixes, planned feature work, or broad architecture review. Diagnosis-only requests stop after reporting the root cause and evidence; apply a fix only when the user requested one.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Focused Signals scout for PostHog projects using error tracking. Watches `$exception` bursts, stuck loops, multi-fingerprint clusters, status regressions, and stack-trace activity-name patterns. Emits findings only when they clear the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet — no dependencies on other skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Focused Signals scout for PostHog projects collecting Content Security Policy (CSP) violation reports. Watches `$csp_violation` events for fresh blocked-URL clusters, per-directive bursts, page-scoped regressions after deploys, and suspicious third-party domains that may indicate a compromised script. Emits aggregated findings only when a cluster clears the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet — no dependencies on other skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Focused Signals scout for PostHog projects using revenue analytics. Watches the derived revenue product for upstream failures (Stripe sync stalls, capture regressions), config drift (missing subscription property, currency mix surprises, broken Stripe↔person joins, deferred-revenue gaps), and goal-miss escalations. Emits findings only when they clear the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet — no dependencies on other skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Focused Signals scout for PostHog projects running surveys. Watches active surveys for score regressions (NPS / CSAT / rating drops), response-volume drops, abandonment spikes, and targeting drift, AND aggregates open-text responses into recurring themes the team should know about (clusters of complaints, praise, feature requests). Emits findings only when a theme or anomaly clears the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet — no dependencies on other skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Focused Signals scout for PostHog projects with web traffic. Watches the acquisition and site-health layer the web analytics product reports on: per-channel session volume diverging from the site's own rhythm (an acquisition source silently collapsing or surging), attribution breakage (paid/campaign traffic reclassifying into Direct or Unknown when tagging breaks), landing pages that break (bounce-rate steps, 404 spikes, entry-path cliffs), and page-performance regressions (web vitals p75 steps). Emits findings only when they clear the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate LLM spend in PostHog — total cost over time, cost by model, provider, user, trace, or custom dimension, token and cache-hit economics, and cost regressions. Use when the user asks "how much are we spending on LLMs?", "which model / user / feature is most expensive?", "why did cost spike?", wants to build a cost dashboard or alert, or pastes a trace URL and asks about its cost.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recall ChatCrystal memories for debugging tasks involving failing tests, compiler errors, runtime exceptions, dependency issues, environment breakage, or performance regressions. Use when historical root causes, fixes, or pitfalls may accelerate diagnosis before proposing a fix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits security and supply-chain risk between two git refs with Codex cross-validation. 预发布安全审计（含 Codex 交叉验证）。Use when performing pre-release security audits, supply-chain reviews, or comparing two git refs for security regressions. Triggers on “预发布审计”, “security audit”, “release audit”, “安全预审”.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use after the Lean model changed and before touching backend code — regenerates Kotlin from Lean, lists changed generated symbols, the hand-written files and contract tests that reference them, and golden regressions, so the blast radius is known before implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ensure code changes keep logs/metrics/traces useful for debugging failures and regressions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Gate a build on browser fingerprint regressions with liarjs - save a baseline scan as JSON, diff later runs against it, and fail the job when the consistency score falls below a floor. Use when asked to add a fingerprint or headless-detection check to GitHub Actions, GitLab CI or another pipeline, to catch a regression in a Chromium build or scraping harness before it ships, or to track how a fingerprint score changes across commits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iteratively detects and auto-fixes technical debt in a codebase using three quality criteria from debt-analysis references: conditional branch simplification, encapsulation, and separation of concerns. Applies fixes directly to code, runs existing tests to verify no regressions, re-analyzes, and loops until all high-severity issues are resolved or max iterations (5) reached. Use this skill when you want to automatically improve code quality with real code changes, reduce technical debt systematically, or clean up code to meet quality standards. Trigger on phrases like "fix technical debt", "clean up code quality", "refactor and fix issues", "improve code quality automatically", "apply debt fixes", "fix code problems", "eliminate debt".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find root cause of errors, crashes, regressions, failing tests before any fix. Not for code review or new features.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write comprehensive end-to-end tests that verify complete user workflows, integration between components, and system behavior from user perspective using Playwright, Cypress, or similar frameworks. Use when testing user flows, verifying feature integration, testing across real browsers, ensuring UI interactions work correctly, validating form submissions end-to-end, testing authentication flows, catching regressions, automating QA processes, testing API integrations, or building confidence in production deployments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement test-driven development (TDD) workflow using the red-green-refactor cycle. Use when writing new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring existing code. Always write the failing test first, then implement minimal code to pass, then refactor. Essential for ensuring code reliability, preventing regressions, improving design through testability requirements, documenting expected behavior through tests, enabling confident refactoring, and maintaining high code quality standards throughout the development process.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。