「resolving」の検索結果

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Chef or Head Cook — costing and re-engineering a menu, diagnosing a food-cost or prime-cost overrun, building a kitchen labor schedule against sales volume, vetting or renegotiating a vendor, or resolving a health-code/HACCP compliance gap.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Bridge and Lock Tender — deciding whether to open a movable span for a vessel signal during a restricted-hours window, sequencing a lock chamber's fill/empty and valve staging, verifying an interlock/gate cycle before commanding span movement, resolving a marine-traffic-vs-vehicle-traffic conflict, or coordinating a vessel passage over VHF.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Bookkeeping, Accounting, and Auditing Clerk — reconciling a bank or credit card account, resolving an AP three-way-match discrepancy before payment, coding an expense to the correct account and department, tracing a general ledger discrepancy to root cause, or running a month-end close checklist.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Bellhop or Baggage Porter — loading and routing a luggage cart, triaging a group check-in or motorcoach arrival that outpaces current staffing, resolving a bag-count or damage dispute against the claim-ticket trail, or deciding solo-lift vs. two-person-lift vs. hand-truck for an oversized or awkward piece.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an air traffic controller — sequencing and spacing arrivals/departures, resolving a projected loss of separation, applying wake-turbulence separation between mismatched aircraft categories, deciding when to query a read-back, or working a facility through a saturation/traffic-management event.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an archivist — appraising whether a donated or transferred collection has enduring value, deciding a processing level for a backlog, writing a finding aid, triaging preservation under budget constraints, or resolving a records-restriction question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a licensed Architect — programming a building's spatial/functional requirements against a budget, developing a design concept against a zoning/code envelope, evaluating a fee proposal or scope-creep request, resolving a code-compliance conflict between disciplines, or working through a construction-phase change order's cost and schedule impact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an airline pilot — checking whether an ETOPS diversion-time rating still holds against a current MEL downgrade, deciding whether to accept or query a dispatch release, applying sterile-cockpit discipline and Pilot Flying/Pilot Monitoring role separation on a two-pilot flight deck, resolving a captain-dispatcher operational-control disagreement, or checking Part 117 flight-duty-period legality against an irregular-operations delay.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an accountant/financial controller — closing the books on a fixed calendar, resolving a bank or account reconciliation variance, evaluating a revenue-recognition or substance-over-form question, designing or testing an internal control, or triaging a discrepancy in financial records before it reaches the auditors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent review resolution with trust-but-verify methodology. Accepts a PR number/URL or a local code-review report file. Extracts review comments, verifies each with parallel agents using confidence scoring (0-100), filters false positives, presents a triage report for approval, then applies fixes and replies. Use when user runs /resolve-review, mentions "resolve PR comments", "address review feedback", "fix PR suggestions", "handle review comments", or "resolve review findings".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rebases a feature branch onto its latest base, resolving conflicts while preserving the intent of local changes, optionally force-pushing and watching CI afterward. TRIGGER when: the user wants to rebase a feature branch, update a branch against its base, or replay local work on top of the latest upstream. DO NOT TRIGGER when: merging a release branch into dev → merging-branches; only watching CI on an already-open PR → monitoring-pull-requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage Spec Kit presets via `specify preset`. USE FOR: listing installed presets as text or JSON, installing/removing presets, searching the preset catalog, showing preset info, resolving which template a preset name maps to, enabling/disabling presets, setting resolution priority, or managing preset catalogs. DO NOT USE FOR: full artifact composition stacks (use speckit-artifact), extensions (use speckit-extension), bundles (use speckit-bundle), or workflows (use speckit-workflow).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end workflow for resolving one GitHub issue in dynamic-neural-field-composer - branch, TDD, build, review, docs, PR. Use when asked to fix, implement, or close a specific issue number.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinates release preparation for your monorepo — maintaining CHANGELOG and the release assessment document, resolving merge conflicts on release branches, and communicating status, risk, and asks to the broader team. Use when the user mentions release manager, release train, cut a release, release branch, CHANGELOG, release assessment, monorepo release, merge conflicts during release, versioning, or coordinating a version bump with engineering and stakeholders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures git workflow practices. Use when making any code change. Use when committing, branching, resolving conflicts, or when you need to organize work across multiple parallel streams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and address all unresolved GitHub PR review comments on the current branch's pull request. Use when the user asks to resolve, address, respond to, or reply to PR review feedback — whether from humans, CodeRabbit, Copilot, Claude Code reviewer, or any other source. Triggers on "/rr", "resolve review comments", "address PR feedback", "reply to review threads", "deal with CodeRabbit", etc.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides the agent through TRID tolerance compliance under 12 CFR § 1026.19(e)(3), comparing Closing Disclosure fees to Loan Estimate fees across zero, 10% cumulative, and unlimited tolerance categories. Use when reviewing a CD for tolerance variances, determining whether a revised LE is permitted, calculating cure amounts, or resolving post-closing tolerance violations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages end-to-end workflow for multi-organization amicus coalition briefs in appellate courts. Covers single-pen drafting governance, position alignment, conflict resolution, documented sign-offs, FRAP 29/Rule 37.6 disclosures, FRAP 26.1 corporate disclosures, cover formatting for multiple amici, and compliant filing. Use when coordinating coalition amicus briefs, managing sign-offs, drafting joint friend-of-court briefs, handling multi-amici filing, or resolving inter-organization conflicts. Triggers on phrases like "coalition brief," "12 orgs joining this amicus," or "coordinate the amicus."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resolves an in-progress git merge/rebase conflict: reads conflict state, recovers each side's intent, resolves hunks, runs checks. NOT for the ship pipeline (mk:ship); NOT for bug debugging (mk:fix).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GitHub project management via gh CLI: issues, Projects v2 boards, labels, milestones, handoff summaries. NOT for code review (mk:review-pr), PR creation, or git ops (mk:resolving-merge-conflicts).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resolve an in-progress git merge or rebase conflict end to end: read the conflict state, recover each side's original intent, resolve every hunk, run the project's checks, and prepare the merge/rebase for an explicitly approved finish. Use when asked to "resolve merge conflicts", "fix this rebase", "finish the merge", or when `git status` shows conflicted (unmerged) paths. NOT for the full ship pipeline that merges the base branch first (see mk:ship); NOT for debugging a runtime bug or test failure unrelated to a conflict (see mk:investigate / mk:fix).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Relentlessly interview the user about THEIR plan or design — one question at a time — resolving each branch of a decision tree until shared understanding. Claude is the interviewer; the user is the interviewee. Triggers on "grill me", "stress-test this plan", "get grilled on my design", "interrogate my plan". Checkpoints every answer to docs/knowledge/<slug>.md so progress survives a context-window reset. Flags knowledge the user cannot answer as a gap to chase. Do NOT use to PROPOSE solutions or compare approaches (→ mk:brainstorming). Do NOT use to validate "is this worth building?" (→ mk:office-hours). Do NOT use when Claude should ANSWER questions about the repo (→ mk:ask-me). Do NOT use for a one-shot review of an existing plan (→ mk:plan-ceo-review). Do NOT use to apply named reasoning lenses to findings (→ mk:elicit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。