255 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when 高教社杯/CUMCM/电工杯 mathematical modeling abstracts, keywords, highlights, first-page claims, or high-density summaries need drafting, revision, audit, or style diagnosis, especially when feedback mentions too many numbers, weak focus, process-listing, empty official prose, buzzwords, missing structure, weak keywords, unsupported values, or first-page claim verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured review process for Remotion video implementations. Analyzes spec compliance, detects common timing/easing issues, validates asset quality, and provides prioritized revision lists. Use when reviewing Remotion code against design specs or performing quality assurance on video compositions. Trigger phrases "review video code", "check spec compliance", "audit Remotion implementation".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Lints Protocol Buffer definitions using the Buf CLI ruleset and validates gRPC service contracts. Detects breaking changes between proto revisions using buf breaking with git integration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write operator-facing and public documentation plans for AI-Controlled Party mixer/Soundcraft Ui24R scene arming. Use for runbooks, rehearsal checklists, show-day checklists, EN/PT docs updates, demo scripts, safety wording, and follow-up documentation revisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply whenever writing or updating a project-facing document — root CLAUDE.md, `.hedgehog/core-design.md`, specs, READMEs, or similar. Ensures the file reads as a clean, current, as-is snapshot rather than a log of edits or decisions. Applies on first generation and on every later revision, including "update," "rewrite," or "clean up" requests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds credible TAM/SAM/SOM analysis with external validation and sensitivity testing for startup fundraising: top-down, bottom-up, or both. Use when the user asks to size a market or check market claims and gives something to size: a product or service description, a market segment, or a deck with TAM/SAM/SOM claims. A full run takes about 15–20 minutes and searches the web, 30 or more with a large data room or a revision round, so for a passing question about market size, answer briefly in chat and offer the analysis instead of starting it. When it runs, every figure is externally sourced and stress-tested, never estimated from memory.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sequential thinking and structured problem solving. Break down complex problems into steps with revision and branching capabilities. Use for multi-step analysis, planning, and hypothesis verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Step 5 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). Iteratively refine drafts/paper.tex by simulating peer review and applying targeted revisions, with strict accept/revert halt rules. Maintains a worklog and snapshots each iteration so revert is real, not symbolic. TRIGGER when the orchestrator delegates Step 5 or when the user asks to "refine the draft", "iterate on the paper", or "run peer review on this paper".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Si attiva quando l'utente chiede di scrivere, redigere, tradurre o revisionare testi italiani per uso pubblico, editoriale, blog, social, newsletter, marketing, narrativa, saggistica o divulgazione. Si attiva anche quando l'utente chiede di umanizzare testi italiani, eliminare pattern AI, correggere lessico da chatbot, catturare o calibrare la voce di un autore su un corpus di suoi testi, rispondere a un rilevatore automatico che ha segnalato come generato un testo scritto da una persona, o quando rivede testi italiani generati da modelli linguistici.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a GxP training programme covering training needs analysis by role, curriculum design (regulatory awareness, system-specific, data integrity), competency assessment criteria, training record retention, and retraining triggers for SOP revisions and incidents. Use when a new validated system requires user training before go-live, an audit finding cites inadequate training, organisational changes introduce new roles, a periodic programme review is due, or inspection preparation requires demonstrating training adequacy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coordinate safely with a peer interactive session sharing the same git worktree — check first whether a separate worktree removes the problem, then declare path and branch scope before the first edit, survive a contended index lock, and review the whole branch before opening a PR. Activate when starting work in a repository that may already be occupied, when a git command fails with `index.lock: File exists`, when `guard:snapshot` refuses because a snapshot already exists, or when a commit turns out to contain a file this session never edited. When one session leads and the other supports, divide the labour by shape and re-derive every reported number against a named revision before citing it. Distinct from subagent concurrency: a peer session cannot be bracketed, because no baseline exists from before its edits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Inspect one bounded Proto UI pull-request slice, produce canonical review input, and route each eligible exact head toward review and integration. Use for review queues, linked work, evidence gaps, merge conflicts, stale revisions, or portfolio health. This evidence leaf is read-only; authorized review and integration continue in their registered leaves.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose one bounded Proto UI Actions or CI failure from an exact workflow run and revision, then route the exact repair, validation, or recheck transition. Use to locate the owning failure and distinguish infrastructure from change failures. This leaf remains read-only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
On-demand journal peer review simulation expert — supports 7 research paradigms (experimental/computational/empirical_survey/interpretive/mixed_methods/systematic_review/interdisciplinary) with 6-step review workflow, outputting targeted revision suggestions based on journal-specific review standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan high-quality PowerPoint presentations before file creation or editing. Use when designing slide structure, storyline, section flow, executive summaries, local PowerPoint production briefs, Copilot prompts, or slide-review/revision prompts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits whether a machine-readable regelrecht law model is faithful to the LETTER of the wettekst — and strictly separates the wettekst (leading) from the toelichting (Nota/Memorie van Toelichting; explanatory, not a norm). Runs in critical passes per article/lid and detects four deviation classes: toelichting-bleed (a modeled criterion that the letter only states as an open norm, or not at all), missing verbatim elements (a word/condition such as a "tenzij" or a qualifier dropped from the model), wrong legal_basis anchoring (an endpoint hung on a "kapstok"-article while the operative norm lives elsewhere), and verbatim-drift in text: (an ingetrokken/older redaction). Also detects positief-lid vs uitsluitings-lid conflicts and checks the chapeau for an explicit derogation rule ("zo nodig in afwijking van het eerste lid") before judging precedence. Classifies every finding as modelfout (fix), wettekst-gevolg (report, do not fix), or letter-vs-toelichting-question (jurist decides what is leading + revision signal). Use when the user wants to know if a model is "dicht bij de letter", mentions letter vs toelichting/bedoeling, fidelity, "natuurgetrouw", or before trusting feature outcomes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft or restructure research-paper sections, refine local prose, and audit manuscript-wide consistency. Use for evidence-grounded academic writing and revision, not independent acceptance-risk review or official rebuttal management.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply source-aware mechanical-engineering judgment to research, analysis, coding, writing, teaching, research identity, and release work. Use for thermal-fluid systems, heat transfer, fluid mechanics, thermodynamics, HVAC, energy systems, turbomachinery, piping, multiphase flow, experiments, correlations, CFD, reduced-order models, AI/ML, uncertainty, engineering datasets, literature reviews, citations, manuscripts, reviewer revisions, Overleaf packages, figures, proposals, research software, reproducibility, public releases, engineering teaching materials, or a research-project logo and visual identity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Character/Motion Animator — triaging which shots in a batch get full 12-principles polish versus blocking-only under a tight schedule, choosing pose-to-pose vs. straight-ahead for a shot, writing a rig-limitation workaround memo, or reading a director's revision note as a pose fix vs. a timing fix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Architectural and Civil Drafter — setting up a CAD sheet at the correct scale and viewport scale factor, applying NCS/AIA layer and sheet-numbering standards, dimensioning a wall assembly or site plan per governing convention, managing xrefs and revision clouds across a sheet set, or QC-checking a drawing set before issuance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transform reference photographs and visually dense images into sparse, recognizable, high-saturation flat-vector-style illustrations through semantic compression rather than literal tracing. Use when the user asks for photo-to-flat illustration, photo-to-vector-style redraw, 照片转扁平插画, 无渐变高饱和插画, iconification, visual simplification, composition-preserving abstraction, a consistent minimal illustration set, or revisions that remove gradients, glow, texture, blur, clutter, text, logos, numbers, or UI. Default to human-perceived semantic complexity 6 out of 10 or lower, fixed-HSB solid fills, crisp boundaries, and no gradients or light-halo effects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Firmware development for the Guition JC4880P443C_I_W (JC4880P443, JC4880P443C, often mistyped JC4880P433) — a 4.3" 480x800 IPS touch display board on the JC-ESP32P4-M3 module (ESP32-P4NRW32, 32 MB PSRAM, 16 MB flash, ESP32-C6 Wi-Fi co-processor on SDIO) — its ST7701S MIPI-DSI panel, GT911 touch, backlight, ES8311 codec with speaker amp and mic, microSD, RS485, battery charger, 2x13 header, and the PlatformIO + ESP-IDF (pioarduino) setup around them. Use when working on this board: project setup, platformio.ini and sdkconfig.defaults, the P4 silicon revision and an "Illegal instruction" boot, a black DSI screen, ST7701 init sequence and timings, GT911 init errors, backlight PWM, choosing a free GPIO, Wi-Fi through esp_hosted and esp_wifi_remote, SD card, audio, flashing over USB-C, or debugging why something on the board does not work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Firmware development for the Guition JC-ESP32P4-M3-DEV board (JC-ESP32P4-M3 module — ESP32-P4NRW32 with 32 MB in-package PSRAM, 16 MB flash, and an ESP32-C6 radio co-processor on SDIO) — its MIPI-DSI panel and MIPI-CSI camera connectors, IP101 Ethernet, ES8311 codec with speaker amplifier and microphone, microSD on SDMMC, RS485, three USB-C sockets, the 26-pin JP1 header, and the PlatformIO + ESP-IDF (pioarduino) setup around them. Use when working on this board or any ESP32-P4 devkit: project setup, platformio.ini and sdkconfig.defaults, the silicon revision split between rev v1.3 and rev v3.x, why the bootloader dies with "Illegal instruction", the pin map and which header pins are traps, Wi-Fi through esp_hosted and esp_wifi_remote, mounting the TF card and its on-chip LDO, bringing up a DSI panel, the shared I2C bus, audio direction and the amplifier enable, Ethernet RMII pins, choosing a free GPIO, flashing over any of the three USB-C ports, or debugging why something on the board does not work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, audit, harden, review, or upgrade MCP servers and MCP Apps with revision-aware protocol profiles, explicit HTTP/deployment boundaries, capability-centered validation, bilingual reporting, and reproducible evidence. Use for MCP server architecture, JSON-RPC or Streamable HTTP bugs, security hardening, protocol-version migration, MCP Apps widget boundaries, review reconciliation, test planning, and public engineering evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。