351 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Structures credit committee packages with borrower analysis, risk assessment, structuring proposal, and recommendation documentation. Use when preparing credit committee materials, presenting loan opportunities, or documenting credit decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates MBS structures with prepayment modeling (CPR/CDR), collateral analysis, and tranche-level credit risk assessment. Use when analyzing MBS, modeling prepayment scenarios, or evaluating residential mortgage pools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates regulated utility rate-setting with RAB methodology, allowed return analysis, and regulatory reset risk assessment. Use when analyzing regulatory frameworks, modeling rate cases, or evaluating allowed return mechanics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structures TAM/SAM/SOM analysis with bottom-up and top-down methodology and market timing assessment. Use when sizing markets, validating market opportunity, or assessing timing risk.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates corporate vulnerability to shareholder activism with governance assessment, valuation gaps, and operational improvement opportunities. Use when assessing activist risk, identifying vulnerabilities, or preparing defensive analyses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Qualify a vendor or supplier of GxP-relevant software or services. Covers vendor risk classification, assessment questionnaire design, desk and on-site audit approaches, quality agreement evaluation, SLA review, and ongoing monitoring cadence definition. Use when selecting a new vendor for a GxP-critical system, onboarding a cloud provider for regulated data, performing a periodic re-qualification, when a vendor audit finding requires re-assessment, or when EU Annex 11 or ICH Q10 requires supplier qualification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess an open-source agent framework for investment readiness by evaluating community health, supersession risk, architecture alignment, and governance sustainability. Produces a four-tier classification (INVEST / EVALUATE-FURTHER / CONTRIBUTE-CAUTIOUSLY / AVOID) to guide resource allocation decisions before committing engineering effort.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to answer "which attacker techniques do our controls actually stop, and how well?", "what controls should I have for this threat?", or "what telemetry should I collect to detect it?" — joining a customer's or your own security control baseline to ATT&CK techniques using a public, versioned evidence base of 9,545 control-to-technique mappings from six sources. Produces four ranked lists (addressed strongly, addressed weakly, real gaps, and techniques no control anywhere addresses). Use for control gap analysis, security programme prioritisation, board reporting on coverage, or the Resistance Strength side of a FAIR risk assessment. Invoke after /threat-actor-profiling or /lookup-liberty91 has produced a technique list.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit risk simulation and decision support systems for Monte Carlo modeling quality, wargaming analysis, threat assessment, mission planning support, and course-of-action decision analysis..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, implement, or audit a Change Advisory Board (CAB) process for Salesforce deployments: change classification (standard, normal, emergency), required approvals, deployment gate sequencing, and integration with external ITSM tooling. NOT for scoring how risky one release is - use admin/deployment-risk-assessment. NOT for executing or troubleshooting the deployment itself - use admin/change-management-and-deployment. Also covers: the CAB charter (membership, quorum, decision rights), the CAB decision record artefact and its linter, the change classification matrix, the deployOptions a CAB decision pins (checkOnly, testLevel, rollbackOnError, ignoreWarnings, runTests), the 10-day quick-deploy validity window, the deploy-window vs freeze-register check, and the emergency (ECAB) path with its mandatory retrospective.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify, score, and prioritize Salesforce AI use cases before any implementation begins — opportunity identification, Impact-Effort matrix scoring, feasibility evaluation across Technical/Operational/Data/Risk dimensions, and ROI framing. NOT for the license checks and enablement steps once a use case is approved — use agentforce/agentforce-service-ai-setup or agentforce/agentforce-sales-ai-setup. NOT for making the data model AI-ready — use architect/ai-ready-data-architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when planning, reviewing, or troubleshooting Salesforce metadata releases and admin deployment processes. Triggers: 'change set', 'deployment plan', 'rollback', 'DevOps Center', 'SFDX deploy', 'release checklist', 'production deployment', 'validation only deploy', 'quick deploy', 'test level', 'rollbackOnError', 'destructive changes', 'package.xml for an admin release', 'deployment status'. NOT for change set upload mechanics — use devops/change-set-deployment. NOT for scoring release risk up front — use admin/deployment-risk-assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coordinates release preparation for your monorepo — maintaining CHANGELOG and the release assessment document, resolving merge conflicts on release branches, and communicating status, risk, and asks to the broader team. Use when the user mentions release manager, release train, cut a release, release branch, CHANGELOG, release assessment, monorepo release, merge conflicts during release, versioning, or coordinating a version bump with engineering and stakeholders.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts privilege-protective, board-ready executive summary memoranda of internal antitrust investigation findings for US federal law. Covers monopolization, vertical restraints, acquisitions, FTC Act Section 5, tech-platform conduct, risk assessment, and remediation. Use when drafting antitrust investigation summaries, board memos on competition risk, or internal compliance investigation reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recommends early delivery based on individualized risk assessment rather than expectant management for pregnant patients with preexisting diabetes mellitus (PDM). Consider when evaluating delivery timing in the presence of diabetes‑related complications, suboptimal glycemia, abnormal fetal growth, or maternal comorbidities that may increase perinatal risk beyond 38 weeks gestation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct a Marty-Cagan-style opportunity assessment interview and produce a ~2-page Opportunity Brief in Confluence. Covers business objective, customer, problem, success metric, current alternatives, assumptions/risks, and what we don't know yet. Triggers on "opportunity brief", "opportunity assessment", "discovery brief", "who is this for", "why are we building this", "validate this idea", "product discovery", or any request to frame a feature before implementation. One question at a time. Records accepted research gaps as structured Confluence Decision pages with bidirectional links.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the SD-22 DMSMS Guidebook (DSPO, FY24 working draft). Use for managing Diminished Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) and obsolescence across a long-lived system's life cycle: the five-step process (Prepare, Identify, Assess, Analyze, Implement) plus the Strategize overlay; standing up a DMSMS Management Team (DMT) and Management Plan (DMP); risk-based monitoring and surveillance (the risk cube, predictive tools, vendor surveys, GIDEP/DLA PDNs, critical-materials analysis); health assessments and resolution timing; costing and selecting resolutions (life-of-need buys, substitutes, redesign, technology refreshment) by AoA/BCA; and budgeting/executing resolutions through modification funding and the ECP process. Defense-sustainment / DoD-acquisition framing throughout. Does NOT teach general systems engineering, parts-management standards, or contracting law in depth, and does not reproduce DoD policy text or the source's tables and figures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from NASA-STD-8719.14C (Process for Limiting Orbital Debris). Use for orbital-debris assessment planning, mission-related debris limits, explosion/passivation and collision risk, postmission disposal options, reentry casualty risk, and ODAR/EOMP governance. Covers STD-8719.14C (Approved 2021-11-05) synthesized notes only; does not replace NPR 8715.6 delivery timing, NASA-HDBK-8719.14 environment/modeling depth, or program-specific OSMA waivers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from NASA-STD-7009B (Standard for Models and Simulations) with implementation depth from NASA-HDBK-7009B. Use for M&S criticality and programmatics, development evidence and capability assessment, verification/validation domains, uncertainty and sensitivity, use-phase results assessment, risk-informed decision reporting, and handbook life-cycle products. Covers STD-7009B (2024-03-05) + HDBK-7009B (2026-02-03) synthesized notes only; does not replace program-specific TA direction, NPR 7150.2 software requirements detail, or full PRA methodology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from MIL-STD-882E (DoD System Safety). Use for the system safety process, hazard analysis tasks (PHA/SSHA/SHA/O&SHA), the risk assessment matrix (severity x probability), software safety criticality, and risk acceptance. US-gov public domain.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the GAO Technology Readiness Assessment Guide (GAO-20-48G, 2020). Use for evaluating technology maturity in acquisition programs and projects: Technology Readiness Levels (TRL 1–9) and related scales (MRL, IRL), identifying Critical Technology Elements (CTEs), the five-step process for a high-quality TRA, the four characteristics of a reliable TRA (comprehensive, well-documented, credible, defensible), Technology Maturation Plans (TMPs), and using TRA results in knowledge-based, milestone decisions. Assessment/maturity oriented: it measures readiness and frames risk — it is not a full SE process model, cost-estimating, or schedule guide (see sibling packs for those).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert en audit interne (risk assessment, controls, compliance, recommendations, DZ context)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI-powered global compliance checker, document generator, and risk assessor for GDPR, CCPA, SOC2, ISO27001, HIPAA and more
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Meme coin and token security audit — rug pull detection (honeypot, hidden mint, fee manipulation, LP lock bypass), Solana SPL token analysis (freeze authority, mint authority, metadata mutability), Token-2022 extension risks (transfer hooks, permanent delegate), DEX liquidity pool attacks (sandwich amplification, LP drain, bonding curve exploits), pump.fun/Raydium/Jupiter integration risks, and real exploit examples from 2024-2025. Use for any token audit, rug pull assessment, meme coin security review, or pre-investment due diligence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。