「sel」の検索結果

Deprecated compatibility entry for Carousel construction. This component is now maintained in Bricks; install and use component-builder to build a new Carousel.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establish a security baseline for a website or web app. Use this skill when configuring HTTPS and TLS, setting security headers, planning secrets management, evaluating CSP policies, doing a basic security audit, or hardening a site before launch. Triggers on security headers, HTTPS, TLS, CSP, content security policy, HSTS, secrets management, vulnerability scan, security audit, harden, OWASP, security baseline. Also triggers when a security review is required for compliance or before going live.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up and run rank tracking using Ahrefs MCP: pick the right keywords to track, segment them by purpose, set baselines, and define alert thresholds. Use this skill when starting a new tracking project, baselining for a campaign, choosing what to monitor, or building a rank reporting cadence. Triggers on rank tracking, keyword tracking, monitor rankings, track positions, what should we track, ranking dashboard, baseline rankings, alert thresholds. Also triggers when a stakeholder wants weekly or monthly ranking visibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 compliance advisor — all 20 control families (AC, AT, AU, CA, CM, CP, IA, IR, MA, MP, PE, PL, PM, PS, PT, RA, SA, SC, SI, SR), Low/Moderate/High baseline selection, FIPS 199/200 system categorization, control tailoring and overlays, privacy controls (PT family), supply chain risk management (SR family), assessment procedures (SP 800-53A), OSCAL, RMF integration (SP 800-37), and mapping to FedRAMP, FISMA, CMMC 2.0, and ISO 27001. Use for any federal system security controls, FISMA compliance, RMF step guidance, control narrative writing, or baseline tailoring question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Patterns for AI agents that learn from their own execution, detect failure modes, and improve autonomously. Use when building agents that get better over time, managing auto- memory, or designing self-correcting feedback loops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to figure out which marketing actually drives conversions and revenue, choose or interpret an attribution model, or reconcile conflicting numbers across tools. Also use when the user mentions "attribution," "attribution model," "first-touch vs last-touch," "multi-touch," "which channel drives revenue," "what's my real CAC," "my dashboards disagree," "Google/Meta says X but GA says Y," "media mix model," "MMM," "incrementality," "geo lift," "holdout test," "how did you hear about us," "self-reported attribution," "dark social," or wants to instrument attribution themselves — "stitch my bookings to their source," "SavvyCal/Calendly attribution," "close the identify gap," "track conversions on a third-party domain," "first-party / self-hosted attribution." For event tracking setup and UTMs, see analytics. For ad-platform pixels/CAPI, see ads. For pipeline and CRM revenue reporting, see revops. For the AI-search attribution blind spot, see ai-seo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces an adversarial attack on a legal argument that survives reply. Runs the opposing-counsel discipline twice: an unrestrained first pass, then the same instrument turned on that pass to cut every point that collapses under challenge - attacks on conceded facts, wrong-forum objections, speculation about documents and motives, gotchas with innocent explanations, overclaims, self-refuting assertions, and padding. The deliverable is one standalone attack containing only what can be defended, capped at five heads, not a discussion of the discarded draft. Use to attack, stress-test, red-team or rebut a submission, brief, motion, witness statement, letter or structured legal reasoning. Triggers on "attack this but only with points that hold", "no cheap shots", "what survives reply", "which points can I actually defend", "give me the version I can file", "double-pass adversarial review". Also use when an earlier adversarial review came back overlong or scattershot. Formal British English.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 compliance advisor — all 20 control families (AC, AT, AU, CA, CM, CP, IA, IR, MA, MP, PE, PL, PM, PS, PT, RA, SA, SC, SI, SR), Low/Moderate/High baseline selection, FIPS 199/200 system categorization, control tailoring and overlays, privacy controls (PT family), supply chain risk management (SR family), assessment procedures (SP 800-53A), OSCAL, RMF integration (SP 800-37), and mapping to FedRAMP, FISMA, CMMC 2.0, and ISO 27001. Use for any federal system security controls, FISMA compliance, RMF step guidance, control narrative writing, or baseline tailoring question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Outside counsel guidelines (OCGs) — drafting, review, gap analysis, and targeted updates for in-house legal teams. Build new OCGs calibrated to maturity level (light, standard, comprehensive), review existing OCGs against 15-component best practice framework, add or update specific sections (AI policy, AFA terms, D&I, rate review), and produce GC briefing notes for internal buy-in. Trigger on: 'draft billing guidelines', 'outside counsel guidelines', 'OCG', 'billing expectations', 'review our guidelines', 'update the AI clause', 'what should our billing guidelines cover', 'we don't have billing guidelines', 'firms aren't following our guidelines', 'rate review terms', 'GC briefing on billing guidelines', 'AFA policy', 'block billing', 'prohibited fees', 'staffing expectations for outside counsel'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a structured goal-setting protocol using SMART or implementation-intention frameworks for students. Use when launching units, projects, or developing student self-direction habits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select evidence-based study strategies matched to material type, learning goal, and student habits. Use when advising students on revision techniques, homework, or independent study approaches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structure a student's self-determined project with mentoring checkpoints, competency alignment, and reflection. Use when guiding student-led projects within a competency-based framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate scaffolds supporting student self-regulation across planning, monitoring, and evaluation phases. Use when students struggle to manage their own learning during extended or independent tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create self-explanation prompts that deepen understanding of worked examples, texts, or diagrams. Use when students read material passively without engaging with underlying principles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SEO drift monitoring: capture baselines of SEO-critical elements, detect changes, and track regressions over time. Git for SEO — baseline, diff, and track changes to your on-page SEO. Use when user says "SEO drift", "baseline", "track changes", "did anything break", "SEO regression", "compare SEO", "before and after", "monitor SEO changes", or "deployment check".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous compute-reselling agent on Surplus Intelligence - resells free or low-cost provider compute across Bankr, AWS Bedrock, and Google Vertex (GCP) as one skill. Reads the live market + your cost + your usage, auto-lists your models per enabled provider, and reactively prices each offer to win routing within a cost floor, cap, and health guardrails.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate and plan Amazon marketplace expansion across countries and regions. Use when a seller asks which Amazon marketplace to enter, how to compare international demand and economics, what tax, product-compliance, logistics, localization, account, or launch workstreams to investigate, or how to build a gated global-selling roadmap. Do not use as legal, tax, customs, or certification advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive product research and opportunity analysis for Amazon sellers. Analyzes demand, competition, profit potential, market entry barriers, and validates product ideas. Covers product sourcing, pricing strategy, and go-to-market planning. Use when the user asks about researching a product to sell, validating product ideas, product opportunity analysis, market research for Amazon, competition analysis, profit potential, should I sell this product, product viability, or any general product research questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and execute marketing strategy for Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) brands — customer acquisition, retention, email flows, social proof, subscription models, and repeat purchase mechanics. Use when the user says "DTC marketing", "direct to consumer", "D2C strategy", "selling directly to customers", "cut out the middleman", "DTC brand", "e-commerce brand marketing", "how do we get direct customers", "DTC growth", "consumer brand marketing", "we sell direct", or is building a brand that sells its products directly without retail or distribution middlemen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design the complete free-to-premium value ladder for affiliate promotions. Triggers on: "value ladder", "customer journey", "upsell path", "ascension model", "free to paid funnel", "tripwire offer", "upsell strategy", "downsell", "product ladder", "price ladder", "customer ascension", "funnel architecture", "map my funnel", "design my funnel stages", "monetization path".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

JTBD workflow classification and routing - ODI two-phase framework, five job types with workflow sequences, baseline type selection, workflow anti-patterns, and common recipes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the WHAT being sold needs work, not the price and not the copy — core promise, value stack, bonuses, guarantee and risk reversal, honest scarcity and urgency, tier packaging, upsell and downsell paths, and high-ticket or productized service structures. Trigger on 'design an offer', 'irresistible offer', 'value stack', 'add a guarantee', 'my offer is not converting', 'people say it is too expensive'. Also use when traffic and copy are fine and nobody is buying anyway. Not for — the number on the price tag, see `17-pricing-strategy-global`; the ad text selling it, see `05-ad-copy-global`; the page it sits on, see `12-landing-page-brief-global`; the launch sequence, see `59-go-to-market-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose MSBuild build performance bottlenecks using binary log analysis. USE FOR: identifying why builds are slow by analyzing binlog performance summaries, detecting ResolveAssemblyReference (RAR) taking >5s, Roslyn analyzers consuming >30% of Csc time, single targets dominating >50% of build time, node utilization below 80%, excessive Copy tasks, NuGet restore running every build. Covers timeline analysis, Target/Task Performance Summary interpretation, and 7 common bottleneck categories. Use after build-perf-baseline has established measurements. DO NOT USE FOR: establishing initial baselines (use build-perf-baseline first), fixing incremental build issues (use incremental-build), parallelism tuning (use build-parallelism), non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establish MSBuild/.NET build performance baselines before optimizing. USE FOR: a .NET build or solution that is slow or has build-performance concerns; cold, warm, incremental, or no-op measurements; before/after comparisons; CI build output caching; static graph build decisions; artifacts output; and dependency graph trimming. Start here before build-perf-diagnostics, incremental-build, or build-parallelism. DO NOT USE for webpack, npm, JavaScript bundlers, or other non-MSBuild build systems. For detailed target/task/analyzer bottleneck analysis after baselining, use build-perf-diagnostics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。