「severity」の検索結果

Deep behavioral audit of a Lattice skill — proposes 3 review personas relevant to the skill, runs independent scenario analysis from each persona's perspective, then merges only the high-confidence, practical findings into a severity-ordered gap report with proposed fixes. Structural validation (conventions, cross-references) is skill-validate's job — this skill finds gaps that would realistically surface when someone actually uses the skill: missing scenario handling, ambiguous instructions, silent failure cases, and behavioral inconsistencies. Filters out theoretical edge cases, low-likelihood speculation, and findings owned by other skills. Use after writing or significantly changing any skill, or when the user says 'review this skill', 'deep review', 'does this skill work', 'find gaps in this skill', 'stress test this skill', 'review from different angles', or 'skill review'. Standalone — does not call other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive autonomous design quality audit across accessibility (WCAG 2.2), performance, theming, responsive/adaptive design, and anti-pattern detection. Produces a prioritized report with severity ratings and fix recommendations. Use when: 'audit design', 'check accessibility', 'a11y audit', 'design review', 'UI quality check', 'WCAG audit', 'design quality'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a vague bug report into a VERIFIED minimal reproduction and then a failing regression test, agent-driven end to end. Covers extracting the implicit repro from a thin report (env, build, steps, data), the reproduce-minimize-isolate-capture loop, git bisect to find the introducing commit, building a deterministic minimal repro (fixed seeds, frozen time, stubbed network), writing the failing regression test BEFORE the fix (red) and confirming the fix flips it green, and writing repro evidence back into the ticket. Distinguishes flaky-not-reproducible from environment-specific. Use when: "reproduce this bug," "minimal reproduction," "repro steps," "find the commit that broke it," "git bisect," "make the repro deterministic," "write a failing test for this bug," "regression test for a defect," "can't reproduce this bug." Not for: Classifying/deduplicating/severity-routing existing failures without reproducing them — that is ai-bug-triage. Generating tests from specs rather than from a defect — that is ai-test-generation. Related: ai-bug-triage, ai-test-generation, test-reliability, systematic-debugging, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove AI-generated patterns from QA reports, bug reports, test summaries, status updates, and quality communications. Detects and rewrites robotic test-result language, template-sounding status updates, inflated severity descriptions, and generic stakeholder reports — without inventing facts. Makes QA writing sound like a real engineer wrote it. Use when: "humanize report," "rewrite QA summary," "fix test report," "make this sound human," "clean up status update." Not for: general prose, blog, or marketing-copy cleanup — use the global humanizer skill. Not for: classifying or routing CI failures — use ai-bug-triage. Related: ai-bug-triage, qa-metrics, qa-dashboard, quality-postmortem.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the working-tree changes (vs main) for correctness, concurrency, architecture, testing, and API/doc issues — following .github/CODE_REVIEW.md — and return a severity-graded report. Scales the machinery to the diff size: a single code-reviewer agent for a small change, or a fan-out-and-verify Workflow for a large/multi-unit one. Produces findings; it does not apply fixes (the caller does).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze application error logs and monitoring platform exports (Sentry, Datadog, Rollbar) to identify error patterns, duplicates, and severity. Use when someone asks to "audit errors", "analyze exceptions", "find noisy alerts", "deduplicate error groups", or "triage production errors". Parses JSON/CSV error exports and produces categorized reports with root cause analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Production incident response - from detection through resolution to post-mortem. Effective communication, systematic investigation, and blameless learning from failuresUse when "incident, outage, production issue, site down, on-call, post-mortem, war room, severity, pages, alerts, rollback, incident, outage, on-call, post-mortem, production, reliability, SRE, communication" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create polished HTML technical reports and multi-page documents for consulting deliverables. Includes a customizable design system with dark cover page, warm cream content pages (8.5x11 portrait), professional typography, and a curated component library (KPI cards, data tables with severity coloring, callout boxes, recommendation cards, priority banners). Trigger on report, audit report, technical document, written report, assessment, or multi-page document. Outputs standalone HTML files exported to PDF via Chrome headless.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure AI Content Safety SDK for Python workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Azure AI Content Safety SDK for Python. Use for detecting harmful content in text and images with multi-severity classification and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure AI Content Safety SDK for Python workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Azure AI Content Safety SDK for Python. Use for detecting harmful content in text and images with multi-severity classification and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GitHub 解封 — 账号封禁/限制/恢复的领域操作系统。覆盖：(a) GitHub 官方政策体系 (TOS / 可接受使用政策 / Trust & Safety 执行模式 / 公开申诉路径 / 受制裁地区解读)；(b) 封号原因诊断学 (spam / abuse / 制裁误标 / 2FA 丢失 / ToS 违规 / 账号劫持误判 / ban evasion 等子类型 + 症状→原因映射 + 自我分诊压测)；(c) 申诉实操 craft (写一封能让 T&S 快速判误伤的英文申诉信 + 升级阶梯 + 法务介入边界 + Don'ts)；(d) 制裁与合规硬边界 (OFAC SDN 名单 / 哪些国家或地区真不可达 / VPN 误判路径 / 中国大陆不是美国制裁地区的反复重申)；(e) 中国大陆开发者特别处境 (sanctioned region 误标 + SMS 验证不支持 +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab 备用迁移 + 私有自托管 Gitea/Forgejo)；(f) 真实案例库 (~30+ 公开案例分类拆解：误伤 / 真违规 / 制裁误标三类各自赔率与申诉成功路径)。伦理锚绝不软化：不教 ban evasion / 不教撒谎式申诉 / 真违规承认改进 / 丢 2FA 无恢复因子则诚实告知 / 中国制裁误标靠申诉不靠换 VPN / 申诉 6 个月窗口必算清 / 约 3% (业内估) 真违规恢复 vs 约 79% (业内估) 误伤申诉成功率分层标。 (GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: false-positive / genuine violation / sanctions mis-flag, each with win-rate and appeal success path). Ethical anchors absolutely not softened: do NOT teach ban evasion (creating new accounts turns a temp ban into a permanent one — the single biggest mistake); do NOT teach social engineering or lying in appeals (misuse + actually confirms violation); genuine violations: admit + improve beats denial; lost 2FA + no recovery factor → do not pretend recovery is possible; China sanctioned-region mis-flag → fix via appeal, not repeated VPN switching; appeal form 6-month window must be counted carefully; historical 约 3% (业内估) genuine-violation recovery vs 约 79% (业内估) false-positive appeal success rate stratification must be honestly labeled. Anti-samples (explicitly describe harm, never endorse): developer permabanned for ban evasion / open-source team org-banned for personal attacks in public issues / cases where repeated VPN switching escalated risk-control severity.) Master OS — automated mastery of GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: fa

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes, triages, flags and rates a piece of text with a probability for every option: which department or queue a ticket goes to, which intent a message expresses, whether a yes/no condition holds (is this tool call grounded, should the agent ask first, is the customer angry), and how severe or urgent it is on a rubric, each with a calibrated confidence. Runs Claude Haiku in the request and response shapes of OpenAI's Decisions API, for when no purpose-built decision model is at hand. Use for "route this ticket", "triage these", "classify with a confidence", "give me a probability that", "rate the severity", "score against this rubric", guardrail checks before a tool call, or "a Decisions API without OpenAI".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect keyword cannibalization across blog posts by extracting primary keywords from titles and headings, clustering semantically similar targets, and flagging posts competing for the same search intent. Supports local-only mode (grep-based) and DataForSEO API mode (Page Intersection endpoint at ~$0.01/call). Outputs severity-scored report with merge or differentiate recommendations. Use when user says "cannibalization", "keyword overlap", "competing pages", "duplicate keywords", "cannibalize".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct a comprehensive accessibility audit against WCAG guidelines with severity ratings and remediation steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede AI eval design and coverage audit: AI-SPEC, failure-mode rubric with severity scoring, concrete pass/fail eval cases, coverage and infrastructure scores, and mechanical acceptance gates. Use when a change ships LLM, RAG, agent, classifier, prompt, or generated-media behavior, or when asked to write evals for an AI feature, design test cases for a model surface, audit existing eval coverage, or judge whether AI behavior is safe to ship. No AI-SPEC means no eval plan, and no eval plan holds the recommended ship verdict. NOT FOR: reviewing or grading the implementation code behind the AI surface (use suede-code); wiring a passing suite into CI as a required check (use suede-ci-gate); UAT of the built feature beyond the eval suite (a private Suede Labs companion, not in this pack).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate operations runbooks and post-mortems for incident response — severity matrix, decision trees, escalation paths, war room setup (Slack/Zoom), status page updates, customer comms templates, and blameless post-mortems with action items.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when deciding the verdict of a security review - severity and confidence scales, when to block, approve with notes, drop or reject as unreviewable, and the exact comment templates

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when any case fails or you reject a criterion - what goes in the review_criterion note, the failed case and the numbered need_revision comment, with severity

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when ordering board tasks - set priority/blocked_by/deploy_depends_on by severity and dependency, split MoSCoW within a feature, and use RICE/ICE only for a genuine "what next" call across several features

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shared review framework that every domain reviewer (pci, oracle, gov, edtech, healthcare, mlops, etc.) MUST follow. Defines the output artifact (TM-{slug}.md), mandatory sections, severity scale, verdict format, the workflow scaffold (when-invoked, Step-0 read-inputs, HANDOFF), and the "domain heuristic vs generic check" boundary. Eliminates duplication across the ~30 reviewer prompts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates a structured bug report from a description, or analyzes code to identify potential bugs. Ensures every bug report has full reproduction steps, severity assessment, and context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read all open bugs in production/qa/bugs/, re-evaluate priority vs. severity, assign to sprints, surface systemic trends, and produce a triage report. Run at sprint start or when the bug count grows enough to need re-prioritization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When something breaks in production: triage the severity, gather evidence, identify root cause, deploy a fix or mitigation, and write a post-mortem. Provides a calm, structured process for high-stress moments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code review knowledge base: quality, security (OWASP Top 10), error-handling, performance, and test-coverage checklists with severity-ranked output format. Use when reviewing code changes, PRs, or before commits. Loaded automatically by the code-reviewer agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。