2,230 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
METAINFORMANT rules for directory examples/singlecell. Use when editing, adding tests, or reviewing code under this path. Read the linked AGENTS.md first; use uv only, write outputs to output/, real implementations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
METAINFORMANT rules for directory docs/singlecell. Use when editing, adding tests, or reviewing code under this path. Read the linked AGENTS.md first; use uv only, write outputs to output/, real implementations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
METAINFORMANT rules for directory config/singlecell. Use when editing, adding tests, or reviewing code under this path. Read the linked AGENTS.md first; use uv only, write outputs to output/, real implementations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews one deal's notes and timeline (CRM opportunity record, activity log, emails, meeting notes, forecast entries) for risk signals such as a single contact thread, no identified budget owner, slipped or missing dates, silence after a proposal, an undefined decision process or a competitor named late, and returns a DRAFT risk register: each signal with the quoted evidence and its date, a severity on a stated scale, and one proposed next action with an owner role for the user to decide on. Use when the user asks to "review the risks on this deal", "why is this opportunity stalling", "is this deal single-threaded", "deal health check before the forecast call" or "what should we do next on <opportunity>". Do not use for a whole-account plan, use account-plan-builder instead; for scoring early leads against a rubric use lead-qualification-scorer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cursorで複雑な問いを、必要な探索・独立したコンテキストでの熟考・統合・十分性確認へ分けて考える。single/panelの方式を使い、親だけで熟考を完了させない。ユーザーが /deepthink と入力したときに使う。
難しい意思決定や論点を、必要な探索・独立したコンテキストでの熟考・統合・十分性確認へ分けて考える。single/panelの方式を使い、親だけで熟考を完了させない。調査はresearch、実装やbug修正はpir2/debugを使う。ユーザーが /deepthink と入力したときに使う。
Designs and reviews the internal architecture of a WordPress plugin — folder layout, PSR-4 one-class-per-file discipline, Schema/Constants placement, composition-root vs singleton decisions, conditional asset enqueueing, script config via wp_add_inline_script, and prefixed custom-hook naming. Use when scaffolding includes/src, reviewing class organization, asset enqueue code, repeated strings, or "should I make this a singleton" decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and review Action Scheduler jobs in WordPress plugins using Action Scheduler 3.9.x public APIs - async, single, recurring, and cron-expression actions; action_scheduler_init load timing; hook/args/group naming; unique and priority parameters; idempotent callbacks; chunked workloads; activation/deactivation cleanup; WooCommerce-bundled or standalone dependency usage; admin and WP-CLI debugging; queue runner limits; and safe operational troubleshooting. Use when a plugin schedules background jobs with as_enqueue_async_action, as_schedule_single_action, as_schedule_recurring_action, as_schedule_cron_action, as_get_scheduled_actions, or integrates with WooCommerce background queues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
6つの専門レビュアーロールを並列実行し、consensusLevel（複数ロールの合意度）と Tech Lead レポート（top3指摘・blindSpots・consensusSummary）で結果を統合する マルチエージェントレビュー entry skill。 Parallel multi-role review with consensus scoring (consensusLevel) and Tech Lead report. Use when a major release needs exhaustive multi-angle review, or when a single-perspective review is not enough and you want confidence that no reviewer angle was missed（重要リリース前の網羅レビュー・多視点の確証が 欲しいとき）。
Optimize a single Jetpack Compose @Composable function. Use when the user wants to improve, polish, animate, or refactor ONE Composable — keywords like "optimize this composable", "make this smoother", "add animation to this", "split this composable", "fix recomposition", "this composable is laggy", "polish this UI", or when user pastes/points to a single @Composable function. Analyzes the target for recomposition issues, missing animations, size/concern splits, and stability problems, then iterates with the user via AskUserQuestion to pick which optimizations to apply, then delegates implementation to the kta-compose-developer agent and summarizes changes. Input MUST be exactly one Composable (file path + function name, or function name alone).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects MSBuild projects with conflicting OutputPath or IntermediateOutputPath. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: builds failing with 'Cannot create a file when that file already exists', 'The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process', intermittent build failures that succeed on retry, missing outputs in multi-project builds, multi-targeting builds where project.assets.json conflicts. Diagnoses when multiple projects or TFMs write to the same bin/obj directories due to shared OutputPath, missing AppendTargetFrameworkToOutputPath, or extra global properties like PublishReadyToRun creating redundant evaluations. DO NOT USE FOR: file access errors unrelated to MSBuild (OS-level locking), single-project single-TFM builds, non-MSBuild build systems. INVOKES: binlog MCP server tools (overview, projects, evaluations, properties, double_writes); falls back to dotnet msbuild binlog replay + grep when the MCP is unavailable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for organizing MSBuild infrastructure with Directory.Build.props, Directory.Build.targets, Directory.Packages.props, and Directory.Build.rsp. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: structuring multi-project repos, centralizing build settings, implementing NuGet Central Package Management (CPM) with ManagePackageVersionsCentrally, consolidating duplicated properties across .csproj files, setting up multi-level Directory.Build hierarchy with GetPathOfFileAbove, understanding evaluation order (Directory.Build.props → SDK .props → .csproj → SDK .targets → Directory.Build.targets). Critical pitfall: $(TargetFramework) conditions in .props silently fail for single-targeting projects — must use .targets. DO NOT USE FOR: non-MSBuild build systems, migrating legacy projects to SDK-style (use msbuild-modernization), single-project solutions with no shared settings. INVOKES: no tools — pure knowledge skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scanpy is a scalable Python toolkit for analyzing single-cell RNA-seq data, built on AnnData. Apply this skill for complete single-cell workflows including quality control, normalization, dimensionality reduction, clustering, marker gene identification, visualization, and trajectory analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Simplified Japanese web artifacts builder skill for creating single-file HTML applications with Japanese UI components, i18n settings, and responsive design. Triggers on requests for Webアーティファクト, 単一HTMLファイル, HTMLツール作成, 日本語Webアプリ.
Transform transcripts, conversations, or raw notes into shareable content — either multiple social posts OR a single long-form article. Learns style from user's published content. Handles transcripts of any length (tested up to 5500+ lines / 90+ min). Use when user: (1) provides transcript/conversation/recording and wants social content, (2) asks to "turn recording/notes into posts", (3) mentions generating content from recordings/notes, (4) needs multiple publishable pieces from single source, (5) asks to write an article from a transcript — e.g. "write an article/long-form", "organize into an article", "write up this session", "turn this talk into a blog post", "deep dive". Social mode outputs 2-15 ready-to-publish pieces. Article mode outputs a structured long-form piece (3000-10000+ chars) written section-by-section.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing, running, or judging an experiment on a Syntropic137 workflow - comparing prompt variants, fan-out vs single agent, adversarial cross-model review, model selection (can Haiku do this job), phase splits, or tool grants. Trigger phrases include "run a workflow experiment", "A/B the workflow", "does fan-out help", "which model for this phase", "is this prompt better", "measure review quality", "why did the workflow do that". Do NOT use for a one-off workflow run that is just doing work, for authoring a workflow that is not being compared against anything, or for debugging a single failed execution (that is ordinary debugging).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Web race condition exploitation — TOCTOU, single-packet attack, limit overrun, parallel race testing
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Vendor (copy-import) a single external Claude Code skill into your own skills repo correctly — with license compliance and full provenance/attribution. Deterministic, idempotent primitive: given an upstream ref (owner/repo/path@sha or a GitHub URL) it fetches the skill, detects and gates on the license, copies the folder, injects a provenance frontmatter block (license + metadata: author/source/upstream_commit/vendored_at/provenance), ships the upstream LICENSE, adds a ## Credits section, and records a CREDITS.md ledger entry. Use when the user asks to "vendor a skill", "import a skill", "clone a skill", "borrow someone's skill", "add an external skill with attribution/credit", or スキルを取り込む / vendoring / 他人のスキルを自分のリポに取り込む. This is the import primitive that a skill-scout/curator orchestrator calls; it does NOT discover or evaluate — it correctly imports ONE skill you already chose.
Brand-narrative single source of truth (Busabase App-in-Skill) built on the TALE discipline — Trace / Architect / Land / Evaluate. The agent drafts positioning, the message house of value pillars, the story bank, evidence-backed proof points, and vocabulary/tone guardrails; the human curates which drafts become the CANONICAL narrative; a drift monitor flags off-brand usage across channels. Use when the user invokes $kelly-brand or /kelly-brand, mentions brand narrative, brand messaging, positioning, message house, value pillars, story bank, proof points, tone/vocabulary guardrails, narrative quality (NQS), brand drift, or wants a single source of truth for what the brand says.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check the latest Claude (Anthropic), OpenAI Codex, and Google Gemini model releases from official primary sources, update model selections in this dotfiles repo, and update the Claude Code, Codex, and Gemini CLIs through their configured managers. Every run checks both the model settings and CLI for the selected provider, then scans the invoking repository for hardcoded model IDs. Use when the user asks to "モデル更新", "モデルを最新に", "最新モデル確認", "Codex/Claude Code/Gemini CLI本体の更新", "model bump", "update models", or "update agent CLIs". Do NOT use for one-off model selection in a single conversation, general model questions, or unrelated package updates.
End-to-end single-cell RNA-seq workflow from 10X Genomics data to annotated cell types. Covers QC, normalization, clustering, marker detection, and cell type annotation. Use when analyzing single-cell RNA-seq data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrates the end-to-end germline short-variant pipeline from FASTQ to a filtered, normalized, benchmarked VCF, chaining QC/trim, BWA-MEM2 alignment, duplicate marking, optional BQSR, calling (bcftools/GATK HaplotypeCaller/DeepVariant/DRAGEN), normalization, site+genotype filtering, annotation, and hap.py/vcfeval benchmarking. Use when deciding the pipeline-wide reference-genome commitment (GRCh38 analysis set vs T2T, ALT/decoy handling), sequencing the steps in the defensible order (normalize BEFORE annotate, filter site- then genotype-level), choosing the calling engine and single-sample vs cohort joint-calling, picking a filtering strategy by cohort size, or benchmarking stratified within GIAB confident regions. Hands off mechanism to the variant-calling and read-alignment component skills; not a re-teach of any single step.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end gene regulatory network inference pipeline from processed single-cell data to regulon discovery and perturbation simulation. Supports RNA-only (pySCENIC) and multiome (SCENIC+) paths. Use when building gene regulatory networks from single-cell transcriptomic or multiome data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drug-combination synergy analysis — quantify whether two drugs together are synergistic, additive, or antagonistic using the standard reference models (Bliss independence, HSA / highest single agent, Loewe additivity, ZIP, and the Chou-Talalay Combination Index). Use when you have measured single-drug and combination effects (inhibition/viability) and need a synergy score. Explains which model to use, what data each one needs, and how to read the score. NOT for looking up pre-computed synergy in a database (use the SYNERGxDB tool / cell-line-profiling skill).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。