「standards」の検索結果

Turn raw PM content into a compliant, publish-ready skill. Use when creating or updating a repo skill without breaking standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review Python code for bugs, missing tests and security issues using the team's shared standards

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate well-formatted git commit messages following conventional commit standards

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits and realigns UI to match design system standards, spacing, tokens, and patterns. Use when the user mentions consistency, design drift, mismatched styles, tokens, or wants to bring a feature back in line with the system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, refine, and optimize high-quality YAML prompts for AI assistants. Use when working with prompt templates, system prompts, agent prompts, or any prompt engineering tasks. Provides structure guidelines, template patterns, and quality standards for YAML-based prompts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to review a diff or pull request, write review comments, audit code quality, establish review standards, or improve how a team performs code review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Microsoft Style Guide + Squad-specific documentation patterns

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform an AI agent into a tasteful, disciplined development partner. Not just a code generator, but a collaborator with professional standards, transparent decision-making, and craftsmanship. Use for any development task: building features, fixing bugs, designing systems, refactoring. The human provides vision and decisions. The agent provides execution with taste and discipline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to review a diff or pull request, write review comments, audit code quality, establish review standards, or improve how a team performs code review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Humanization Quality Verifier - Ensures transformation integrity and quality Validates that humanization preserves meaning, citations, and academic standards Use when: after G6 transformation, before final export, for quality assurance Triggers: verify humanization, check transformation, validate changes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the R code review protocol on R scripts. Checks code quality, reproducibility, domain correctness, and professional standards. Produces a report without editing files. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants their existing R code evaluated or audited — not when they want new analysis written. Triggers include: "review my R script", "check my R code", "is my code replication-ready", "audit this R file", "does this code follow conventions", "will this reproduce", "check my analysis script", "code review", "review-r", or when the user has an existing .R file and wants quality feedback rather than new code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit economic analysis outputs (fiscal briefings, macro briefings, market research, longlists, and other quantitative economic documents) against methodology standards, academic literature, and common errors. Runs structured checks across core categories including counterfactual, additionality, discounting, double counting, distributional analysis, Aqua Book RIGOUR, and Flyvbjerg-style strategic misrepresentation detection. Returns a RAG scorecard with issues ranked by severity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic peer review toolkit. Evaluate methodology, statistics, design, reproducibility, ethics, figure integrity, reporting standards, for manuscript and grant review across disciplines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform an exhaustive, multi-pass proofread and copy-edit of an applied-microeconomics manuscript to top-economics-journal standards (AER, QJE, Econometrica, ReStud), checking prose, equations, table notes, footnotes, and citations for avoidable errors. Use before submitting or circulating an empirical economics paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies Anthropic's official brand colors and typography to any sort of artifact that may benefit from having Anthropic's look-and-feel. Use it when brand colors or style guidelines, visual formatting, or company design standards apply.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing review standards, or mentoring developers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a git diff or explicit file scope for reuse, code quality, efficiency, clarity, and standards issues, then optionally apply safe Codex-driven fixes. Use when the user asks to "simplify code", "review changed code", "check for code reuse", "review code quality", "review efficiency", "simplify changes", "clean up code", "refactor changes", or "run simplify".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or update project governing principles and development guidelines. Use at project start to establish code quality, testing standards, and architectural constraints that guide all development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write research/technical reports with strong structure + figure standards. Supports Markdown/HTML/PDF outputs (Quarto optional), executive summary, methods, results, discussion, and reproducibility appendix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prowler documentation style guide and writing standards. Trigger: When writing documentation for Prowler features, tutorials, or guides.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, update, and apply iOS design specifications using Apple Human Interface Guidelines (HIG) source data. Use when a task asks for iOS UI/UX rules, Apple design standards, component behavior, accessibility constraints, interaction patterns, or feature-level design-spec writing grounded in official HIG pages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies Anthropic's official brand colors and typography to any sort of artifact that may benefit from having Anthropic's look-and-feel. Use it when brand colors or style guidelines, visual formatting, or company design standards apply.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。