「structured」の検索結果

Use when the user asks "which SAT should I use for X?", wants the index of Structured Analytic Techniques, or is choosing between quality-of-information-check, ACH, key-assumptions-check, devils-advocacy, indicators of change, etc. Quality of Information Check is the default first step of any diagnostic run.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when needing 100% type-safe, schema-valid data extraction from LLMs. Keywords: structured output, JSON schema, Pydantic, Zod, type-safe, constrained decoding, validation, tool use.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create reproducible animated infographic GIFs from structured data or measured results, with audience-language labels, explicit timing semantics, representative-frame QA, and a static fallback. Use when asked for GIF生成, animated infographic, 動的インフォグラフィック, 結果が流れる図, animated benchmark, or a blog/SNS animation whose displayed metrics must remain traceable to source data.

Export the current chat session as a structured Markdown work timeline or blog-draft seed. Use when the user asks for a session log, work log, timeline, 作業ログ, ブログネタ, blog draft, article seed, Zenn, Qiita, or はてな. Do not use for verbatim dialogue export or distilled reusable knowledge only.

Assesses a research paper outline (.qmd file) against structured criteria from Kosuke Imai's empirical research guide. Evaluates the abstract and section outline for: research question clarity, stated contributions, hypotheses and testable implications, data description, planned results and inferential approach, and robustness checks. Detects causal papers from the abstract and conditionally assesses identification strategy only when causal framing is present. Produces a structured markdown report with PASS/PARTIAL/FAIL assessments and actionable suggestions. Use when asked to assess, evaluate, review, or check a paper outline, abstract-and-outline, or research plan in a .qmd file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates a structured playtest report template or analyzes existing playtest notes into a structured format. Use this to standardize playtest feedback collection and analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided game concept ideation — from zero idea to a structured game concept document. Uses professional studio ideation techniques, player psychology frameworks, and structured creative exploration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinate structured thinking and multi-agent parallel execution for complex tasks. Use when tackling multi-step projects, planning parallel work, breaking down complex problems, coordinating specialist tasks, facing architectural decisions, or when user mentions "workflow", "orchestration", "multi-step", "coordinate", "parallel execution", "structured thinking", "break this down", "plan this out", "how should I approach", or needs help planning complex implementations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect, validate, and generate Schema.org structured data with Ahrefs traffic prioritization. JSON-LD format preferred. Use when user says "schema", "structured data", "rich results", "JSON-LD", "markup", or "schema priority".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares Go applications to work effectively with AI coding agents. Use when setting up a new Go project or retrofitting an existing one to ensure: structured JSON logging (slog/Zap/ZeroLog/Logrus), machine-readable command output, thorough golangci-lint configuration, non-interactive CLI design with --yes flags, structured error handling with meaningful exit codes, proper context.Context propagation, graceful shutdown, health check endpoints, and a standardized Makefile. Triggers when a user asks to make their Go app "agent-ready," "AI-friendly," wants to improve agent tooling/observability in a Go project, or needs to audit an existing Go project against agent-readiness best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze text data with NLP — preprocessing, embeddings, topic modeling, sentiment, classification, and evaluation. Use when turning unstructured text into structured insight.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run structured product thinking exercises before writing a spec. Use this skill when: - You need to think through a feature idea before writing a PRD - You want to run the 11-star experience exercise for a feature - You need a positioning statement using Geoffrey Moore's framework - You want to define product principles and success vision for a new feature - You have a raw feature idea and need to turn it into a structured brief

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesize pilot observations into structured debrief reports and spec updates. Use this skill when: - A pilot has completed and you have observation notes, tickets, or feedback transcripts - You need to turn messy pilot data into actionable spec changes - You want to generate edge case user stories from field observations - You need negative acceptance criteria from pilot bugs - You want a structured debrief report for stakeholder communication

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run, document, or review a structured month-end close process. Use when an accountant says "help me with month-end close", "close checklist", "end of month tasks", "what do I need to do to close the books", "journal entries for close", "reconciliation checklist", "accruals and prepaids", "intercompany eliminations", "trial balance review", "close sign-off", or anything related to closing a financial period. Also trigger when someone is preparing for a quarterly or year-end close and needs a structured approach - even if they don't say "month-end close" explicitly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

**WORKFLOW SKILL** — Structured context analysis before acting. USE FOR: questioning assumptions, mapping dependencies, identifying blind spots, validating scope of any task or subject. Use to contextualize, question, analyze before implementing, review premises, prevent hallucination, structured assessment. DO NOT USE FOR: simple tasks where task-intent suffices, direct implementation, code review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Obsidian Claw is an ontology-building skill that transforms chaotic notes, raw ideas, voice dumps, and meeting transcripts into a structured, interlinked knowledge base inside Obsidian. Use this skill whenever the user wants to: add new notes to their Obsidian vault and auto-link them to existing ones, build a concept graph or knowledge map, surface forgotten related discussions ("you talked about this with investor X 3 months ago"), extract entities and relationships from unstructured text, or turn scattered thoughts into wiki-style atomic notes. Also trigger when the user mentions "second brain", "Zettelkasten", "PKM", "personal knowledge management", "note graph", "knowledge graph", "link my notes", "organize my vault", "connect ideas", or asks Claude to "remember" something across sessions using Obsidian. If the user is doing anything with Obsidian notes and wants intelligence layered on top, use this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discovers requirements and designs an end-to-end governed agentic analytics solution using Knowledge Catalog and Managed Service for Apache Spark (Lightning Engine). Use when designing data science and analytics workflows across structured and unstructured distributed data (including in S3, Azure Blob, AlloyDB, and Iceberg), establishing metadata governance with Knowledge Catalog aspect types, or grounding agentic IDEs (VS Code, Antigravity) by using the Google Cloud Data Agent Kit. Don't use for provisioning borderless data lakehouse infrastructure (use google-cloud-solution-agentic-ai-borderless-data-lakehouse instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert unstructured documents into LLM-ready structured data. Supports PDF, Word, PPT, and images; extracts paragraphs, formulas, tables, charts, and other elements in one step; generates up to 8 levels of headings; and outputs Markdown organized in reading order. Useful for field extraction, comparison and validation, knowledge retrieval, and intelligent Q&A.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured memory system for OpenClaw agents. Context death resilience (checkpoint/recover), structured storage, Obsidian-compatible markdown, local semantic search, and session transcript repair.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

6-stage structured development cycle with stage-based tool restrictions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Data structures and serialization formats for agent-to-agent communication. Covers message envelopes, structured output schemas, capability declarations, task handoff payloads, error/retry signaling, and context windows as data structures. Deep comparison of A2A protocol, MCP, OpenAI function calling, and LangChain message types. Teaches when to use rigid schemas vs free-form with validation, typed vs untyped, streaming vs batch. Activate on: "agent message format", "agent communication schema", "agent-to-agent protocol", "A2A protocol", "MCP message format", "structured output for agents", "agent interop", "interchange format", "agent serialization", "task handoff format", "capability declaration". NOT for: what agents say to each other (use agent-conversation-protocols), orchestration topology (use multi-agent-coordination), building agent infrastructure (use agentic-infrastructure-2026).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。